Tempe campus personal-mobility-device thefts

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found ASU Police Department (25/25).

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: ASU Police Department is named as the issuing agency.
  2. present: The ASU Police Department has received reports names the sender.
  3. present: ASU Police urge the community, identifying the police department.
  4. present: Source is ASU Police.
  5. present: Arizona State University police are named.
  6. present: The non-emergency number is the ASU Police number.
  7. present: ASU Police Department is the authority in the first sentence.
  8. present: A named campus police unit is source.
  9. present: The timely warning is from ASU PD.
  10. present: ASU Police is repeated as the speaker.
  11. present: The sending agency is ASU Police Department.
  12. present: University police are identified by name.
  13. present: Source: ASU Police.
  14. present: The product attributes the warning to ASU Police.
  15. present: A police department name is present.
  16. present: ASU PD is the named issuer.
  17. present: The first paragraph names ASU Police Department.
  18. present: Campus police are identified.
  19. present: The alert is an ASU Police timely warning.
  20. present: Who sent it: ASU Police Department.
  21. present: Named agency ASU Police satisfies source.
  22. present: The text identifies ASU Police as the contact.
  23. present: University police branding is in the body.
  24. present: ASU Police Department is source.
  25. present: The issuer is campus police at ASU.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found thefts of mobility devices / Motor Vehicle Theft (25/25).

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Thefts of personal mobility devices, including bicycles, e-bikes and e-scooters, are a specific theft hazard.
  2. present: Crime type Motor Vehicle Theft names the threat.
  3. present: Multiple thefts of e-bikes and e-scooters are specified.
  4. present: The hazard is motor vehicle theft of mobility devices.
  5. present: Named crime: Motor Vehicle Theft.
  6. present: Thefts of bicycles and e-scooters are specific.
  7. present: Hazard is theft of personal mobility devices.
  8. present: The offense is motor vehicle theft.
  9. present: A theft series on Tempe campus is the threat.
  10. present: Specific threat: thefts of e-bikes, bicycles, scooters.
  11. present: Crime type line says Motor Vehicle Theft.
  12. present: The warning is about thefts, a named crime.
  13. present: Hazard equals mobility-device theft.
  14. present: The text specifies thefts rather than a generic incident.
  15. present: E-bike and e-scooter thefts are the hazard.
  16. present: Motor Vehicle Theft is the Clery category named.
  17. present: A property-crime theft hazard is stated.
  18. present: The reports are of thefts.
  19. present: Named threat is theft of mobility devices.
  20. present: The crime type is explicit.
  21. present: Thefts throughout Tempe campus name the hazard.
  22. present: Bicycle and scooter theft is specific.
  23. present: Hazard is present as Motor Vehicle Theft.
  24. present: The subject is theft of personal mobility devices.
  25. present: A theft series is the threat content.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found Tempe campus (25/25).

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Tempe campus is a named campus location.
  2. present: Location: Tempe campus is in the field list.
  3. present: Throughout the Tempe campus locates the thefts.
  4. present: Regardless of campus still names campus geography, and Tempe is specified.
  5. present: A named campus, Tempe, is given.
  6. present: Where: Tempe campus.
  7. present: The thefts are on the Tempe campus.
  8. present: Tempe campus answers where.
  9. present: Location field says Tempe campus.
  10. present: A specific ASU campus is named.
  11. present: The place is Tempe campus.
  12. present: Campus location is present.
  13. present: Tempe is a named campus.
  14. present: The warning locates the series on Tempe campus.
  15. present: Location is Tempe campus.
  16. present: A campus name is stated.
  17. present: The geography is Tempe campus.
  18. present: Named place: Tempe campus.
  19. present: The field Location: Tempe campus satisfies L.
  20. present: Thefts throughout the Tempe campus is location.
  21. present: Campus is identified as Tempe.
  22. present: A specific campus is named.
  23. present: Tempe campus is location.
  24. present: Where is Tempe campus.
  25. present: The location line is filled.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found secure-property and U-lock guidance (25/25).

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Take necessary actions to secure personal property is guidance.
  2. present: High-quality U-locks are recommended, an instruction to recipients.
  3. present: Park in designated areas is a protective instruction.
  4. present: The community is urged to secure e-scooters, bicycles and skateboards.
  5. present: Secure personal property is guidance to the audience.
  6. present: U-locks are a recommended protective action.
  7. present: Park mobility devices in designated areas is what to do.
  8. present: ASU Police urge the community to take actions: that is guidance.
  9. present: Recipients are told how to prevent theft.
  10. present: Guidance is secure property and use U-locks.
  11. present: The public is instructed to park in designated areas.
  12. present: Protective actions for owners are listed.
  13. present: Secure personal property such as e-scooters is guidance.
  14. present: Recommended U-locks are an instruction.
  15. present: The warning tells people what to do with their devices.
  16. present: Take necessary actions is audience guidance.
  17. present: Parking in designated areas is a directive.
  18. present: The community is told to secure property.
  19. present: Guidance exists as theft-prevention steps.
  20. present: Owners are instructed to use U-locks.
  21. present: Protective steps are aimed at recipients, not just police work.
  22. present: Secure and park in designated areas are instructions.
  23. present: The urge to take actions is guidance.
  24. present: Prevention steps are listed for the audience.
  25. present: Call police with details is also an instruction to the public.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found the July 2 to Aug. 21, 2026 window or the 08-24-2026 title date (25/25).

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The theft window July 2 to Aug. 21, 2026 is a date range.
  2. present: Dates July 2 and Aug. 21, 2026 are stated.
  3. present: A date span is present.
  4. present: 2026 dates satisfy Time.
  5. present: The title includes 08-24-2026, a date.
  6. present: From July 2 to Aug. 21, 2026 is when.
  7. present: A dated series is described.
  8. present: Time is present as a date range.
  9. present: Aug. 21, 2026 is a date cue.
  10. present: The warning is dated in the title 08-24-2026.
  11. present: Occurrence dates are given.
  12. present: July 2 to Aug. 21 is a time window.
  13. present: Calendar dates are in the first paragraph.
  14. present: The product includes 2026 dates.
  15. present: When is answered by July through August 2026.
  16. present: A date range is a time element.
  17. present: 08-24-2026 in the title is a date.
  18. present: The thefts are dated.
  19. present: Time: July 2 to Aug. 21, 2026.
  20. present: Dates are explicit.
  21. present: The window of thefts is dated.
  22. present: A 2026 date range is present.
  23. present: Aug. 21, 2026 counts as a date.
  24. present: The title date and body dates are time cues.
  25. present: Time is satisfied by the dated theft window.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found no severity or harm language (0/25 present).

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Shots fired names the hazard but does not state consequence or severity.
  2. absent: No deadly, life-threatening, injury, or dangerous wording is present.
  3. absent: Impact requires stated harm; naming shots fired alone does not count.
  4. absent: There is no explicit consequence for people or property.
  5. absent: Severity language is absent.
  6. absent: The text does not say what the hazard could do beyond naming it.
  7. absent: No injury, death, or danger adjective is used.
  8. absent: Impact is not conveyed; only the hazard name appears.
  9. absent: Could be deadly or similar is missing.
  10. absent: Harm is not stated or clearly implied beyond the hazard label.
  11. absent: Stay inside is guidance, not an impact statement.
  12. absent: The product does not describe potential consequences.
  13. absent: No severity marker such as dangerous appears.
  14. absent: Impact fails the explicit-harm test.
  15. absent: Naming gunfire is hazard, not impact, per the rubric.
  16. absent: There is no stated risk of injury.
  17. absent: Consequences are not described.
  18. absent: The alert does not say how serious the harm would be.
  19. absent: No destructive or life-threatening language.
  20. absent: Impact is absent.
  21. absent: People are not told the hazard could injure them in so many words.
  22. absent: Severity is not stated.
  23. absent: The text lacks an impact clause.
  24. absent: Hazard name without harm language is I=0.
  25. absent: No consequence sentence is present.