Twelve vehicle break-ins in Lot B and on 8th Street

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Source present. The Department of Public Safety is the named sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "Augsburg University" names the institution issuing the crime advisory.
  2. present: Present: "Augsburg University" identifies the sender.
  3. present: On this reading, the named office is the "Department of Public Safety (DPS)."
  4. present: Quoting the span, "the University is issuing," the message identifies who is sending the advisory.
  5. present: I find the named Department of Public Safety as the source.
  6. present: Read as written, the University says it is issuing the crime advisory after its Department of Public Safety received the reports.
  7. present: The message names the Department of Public Safety and says Augsburg University is issuing the crime advisory.
  8. present: In the body, the University says it is issuing the crime advisory and names the Department of Public Safety.
  9. present: From these sentences, Augsburg University and its Department of Public Safety are named as the issuer of the advisory.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it says the University is issuing the crime advisory and names the Department of Public Safety.
  11. present: A direct reading shows the Department of Public Safety and Augsburg University are issuing the crime advisory.
  12. present: The notice names the Department of Public Safety and states that the University is issuing the crime advisory.
  13. present: As printed, the Department of Public Safety is named and the University is issuing the advisory.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, the Department of Public Safety is named and the University is said to be issuing the crime advisory.
  15. present: The alert says the Department of Public Safety received the reports and that Augsburg University is issuing the crime advisory.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, the University is named as issuing the advisory and Augsburg University is identified in the notice.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the opening names the Department of Public Safety as receiving the reports and says the University is issuing the advisory, and later sentences name Augsburg DPS and Augsburg University.
  18. present: This text says the University is issuing the advisory and names the Department of Public Safety.
  19. present: On the page, Augsburg University says "the University is issuing a crime advisory," and the Department of Public Safety is named as the campus office handling the reports.
  20. present: The posted words name Augsburg University and its Department of Public Safety as the office that received the reports and is issuing the advisory.
  21. present: Within the message, the Department of Public Safety is named and the University says it is issuing the advisory.
  22. present: A plain reading shows the Department of Public Safety is identified and the University states that it is issuing the crime advisory.
  23. present: The lines give the Department of Public Safety as the receiving agency and state that the University is issuing the crime advisory.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, "the University is issuing a crime advisory," and Augsburg University and its Department of Public Safety are named on the issuing side.
  25. present: Only the given words say that the University is issuing this crime advisory after the Department of Public Safety received the reports.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Hazard present. The notice names motor vehicle break-ins and tampering.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "Motor Vehicle Tampering Incidents" names a specific crime, not a generic emergency.
  2. present: Present: "Motor Vehicle Tampering Incidents" names the specific hazard.
  3. present: On this reading, the specific offense is "Motor Vehicle Tampering Incidents."
  4. present: Quoting the span, "Motor Vehicle Tampering," the message names the specific hazard.
  5. present: I find motor vehicle tampering and vehicles broken into as a specific crime.
  6. present: Read as written, the threat is motor vehicle tampering in which vehicles were broken into and, in two cases, items were stolen.
  7. present: The message identifies motor vehicle break-ins and tampering as the reported offense.
  8. present: In the body, the reported offense is named as motor vehicle tampering in which vehicles were broken into.
  9. present: From these sentences, the specific hazard is motor vehicle tampering, with vehicles broken into.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it names motor vehicle tampering and reports that vehicles were broken into.
  11. present: A direct reading names motor vehicle tampering and vehicles broken into as the specific hazard.
  12. present: The notice names motor vehicle tampering and states that vehicles were broken into.
  13. present: As printed, the offense is motor vehicle tampering, with vehicles broken into.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, the reported offense is motor vehicle tampering, with vehicles broken into.
  15. present: The alert says the reported offense is motor vehicle tampering and that vehicles were broken into.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, the specific hazard is motor vehicle tampering, with vehicles broken into and items stolen.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the opening states that motor vehicles were broken into and that items were stolen in two cases, and the offense line names motor vehicle tampering incidents.
  18. present: This text reports vehicles broken into, motor vehicle tampering, and theft from vehicles.
  19. present: On the page, the offense is identified as "Motor Vehicle Tampering Incidents" and as motor vehicles that were "broken into."
  20. present: The posted words report motor vehicle tampering in which vehicles were broken into.
  21. present: Within the message, the specific offenses are vehicles broken into, motor vehicle tampering, and items stolen from vehicles.
  22. present: A plain reading shows the offense is motor vehicle tampering in which vehicles were broken into.
  23. present: The lines give motor vehicle tampering and vehicle break-ins as the reported offenses.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, the hazard is specified as motor vehicles "broken into" and as "Motor Vehicle Tampering Incidents."
  25. present: Only the given words name motor vehicle tampering and vehicles that were broken into.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Location present. Lot B and 8th Street are places.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "Lot B" and "8th Street" names the places where vehicles were entered.
  2. present: Present: "Lot B" names a place.
  3. present: On this reading, the break-ins are "in Lot B" and "on 8th Street."
  4. present: Quoting the span, "in Lot B," the message names a place of the break ins.
  5. present: I find Lot B and 8th Street named as places.
  6. present: Read as written, ten vehicles were broken into in Lot B and two were broken into on 8th Street.
  7. present: The message places the incidents in Lot B and on 8th Street.
  8. present: In the body, the vehicles are placed in Lot B and on 8th Street.
  9. present: From these sentences, the break-ins are placed in Lot B and on 8th Street.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it places those break-ins in Lot B and on 8th Street.
  11. present: A direct reading places the break-ins in Lot B and on 8th Street.
  12. present: The notice places ten of the incidents in Lot B and two of the incidents on 8th Street.
  13. present: As printed, the places are Lot B and 8th Street.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, the break-ins are placed in Lot B and on 8th Street.
  15. present: The alert says ten vehicles were broken into in Lot B and two were broken into on 8th Street.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, the places named are Lot B and 8th Street.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the report places ten vehicles broken into in Lot B and two broken into on 8th Street, which are specific places.
  18. present: This text places those incidents in Lot B and on 8th Street.
  19. present: On the page, ten vehicles were broken into in "Lot B" and two were broken into "on 8th Street."
  20. present: The posted words place ten break-ins in Lot B and two break-ins on 8th Street.
  21. present: Within the message, the vehicles were in Lot B and on 8th Street.
  22. present: A plain reading shows the vehicles were in Lot B and on 8th Street.
  23. present: The lines give Lot B and 8th Street as the places where the vehicles were broken into.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, the break-ins are placed in "Lot B" and "on 8th Street."
  25. present: Only the given words place ten of those vehicles in Lot B and two of them on 8th Street.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Guidance present. Lock your vehicle doors is a protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "Lock your vehicle doors" tells recipients a protective action.
  2. present: Present: "Lock your vehicle doors" is a protective instruction.
  3. present: On this reading, recipients are instructed to "Lock your vehicle doors."
  4. present: Quoting the span, "Lock your vehicle doors," the message gives a protective instruction.
  5. present: I find instructions to lock vehicle doors and to call DPS or the police.
  6. present: Read as written, readers are urged to contact Minneapolis Police or Augsburg DPS, report concerns, lock vehicle doors, and keep valuables out of sight.
  7. present: The message instructs people to lock vehicle doors, keep valuables out of sight, and contact DPS or police about suspicious activity.
  8. present: In the body, readers are told to lock vehicle doors, keep items out of sight, report concerns, and call police about suspicious activity.
  9. present: From these sentences, readers are urged to contact police or DPS, report concerns, lock vehicle doors, and keep valuables out of sight.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it tells people to contact police or DPS, lock vehicle doors, keep valuables out of sight, and report suspicious activity.
  11. present: A direct reading gives protective instructions to lock vehicle doors, keep valuables out of sight, and call if suspicious activity is seen.
  12. present: The notice tells people to lock vehicle doors, keep items out of sight, report suspicious activity, and contact DPS or the Minneapolis Police Department.
  13. present: As printed, readers are told to contact DPS or police, lock vehicle doors, and not leave valuables in sight.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, readers are urged to contact police or DPS, to report concerns, to lock vehicle doors, to keep items out of sight, and to call about suspicious activity.
  15. present: The alert says to lock vehicle doors, keep valuables out of sight, report suspicious activity, and contact DPS or police.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, readers are instructed to lock vehicle doors, keep valuables out of sight, report concerns, and call DPS or the police.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the status section urges people with information to contact police or Augsburg DPS, the reporting section tells the community to report concerns, and the tips say to lock doors, keep valuables out of sight, and call if activity looks suspicious.
  18. present: This text tells readers to lock vehicle doors, keep valuables out of sight, and report suspicious activity.
  19. present: On the page, readers are urged to contact Minneapolis Police or Augsburg DPS, to report concerns, to lock vehicle doors, and to keep items out of sight.
  20. present: The posted words urge people to contact police or DPS, lock vehicle doors, keep valuables out of sight, and report suspicious activity.
  21. present: Within the message, readers are urged to contact police or DPS, lock vehicle doors, keep items out of sight, and report suspicious activity.
  22. present: A plain reading shows readers are told to lock vehicle doors, keep items out of sight, and report suspicious activity to DPS or police.
  23. present: The lines give instructions to contact Minneapolis Police or Augsburg DPS, report concerns, lock vehicle doors, keep valuables out of sight, and call if activity looks suspicious.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, readers are told to lock vehicle doors, keep valuables out of vehicles and out of sight, and call DPS or MPD about suspicious activity.
  25. present: Only the given words tell people to lock vehicle doors, keep items out of sight, report concerns, and call if they see suspicious activity.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Time present. September 22, 2026 and approximately 5:20 a.m. are a date and a clock time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "September 22, 2026" and "5:20 a.m." gives a date and clock time.
  2. present: Present: "September 22, 2026" is a date in the alert.
  3. present: On this reading, the notice is timed to "approximately 5:20 a.m." on September 22, 2026.
  4. present: Quoting the span, "5:20 a.m.," the message includes a clock time.
  5. present: I find the printed date September 22, 2026 and the clock time 5:20 a.m.
  6. present: Read as written, the events are dated September 22, 2026, and DPS was notified at approximately 5:20 a.m.
  7. present: The message dates the incidents to September 22, 2026 at about 5:20 a.m. and says DPS is currently investigating.
  8. present: In the body, the events are dated September 22, 2026, at approximately 5:20 in the morning, and DPS is described as currently investigating.
  9. present: From these sentences, the events are dated September 22, 2026, at approximately 5:20 a.m., and DPS is currently investigating.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it dates the reports September 22, 2026, at approximately 5:20 a.m., and says the investigation is current.
  11. present: A direct reading states Tuesday, September 22, 2026, at approximately 5:20 a.m.
  12. present: The notice dates the reports September 22, 2026 and states that DPS was notified at approximately 5:20 a.m.
  13. present: As printed, the date is September 22, 2026, at approximately 5:20 a.m.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, the date is September 22, 2026, and the notice time is approximately 5:20 a.m.
  15. present: The alert says the incidents were reported on September 22, 2026 at approximately 5:20 a.m.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, the events are dated September 22, 2026 at approximately 5:20 a.m. and the investigation is called current.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the opening dates the reports to September 22, 2026, and the next narrative sentence says Tuesday, September 22, at approximately 5:20 a.m.
  18. present: This text states that DPS was notified on Tuesday, September 22, at approximately 5:20 a.m.
  19. present: On the page, the reports are tied to "September 22, 2026" and to "approximately 5:20 a.m."
  20. present: The posted words date the reports September 22, 2026 and give the notice time as approximately 5:20 a.m.
  21. present: Within the message, the date is September 22, 2026, and the stated clock time is approximately 5:20 a.m.
  22. present: A plain reading shows the events are placed on September 22, 2026, at approximately 5:20 a.m.
  23. present: The lines give September 22, 2026 and approximately 5:20 a.m. as the time DPS was notified.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, the reports are dated September 22, 2026, and one notice time is approximately 5:20 a.m.
  25. present: Only the given words state that the reports were received on September 22, 2026 and that notice came at approximately 5:20 a.m.
• Impactpresent22/25

  Final assessment

  22 of 25 passes found Impact present and 3 found it absent. The majority reads items stolen as property loss beyond the tampering name. The absent passes treat stolen items as the offense itself and crime advisory as a label, not a stated threat level.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "items stolen" states property loss beyond the tampering label.
  2. present: Present: "items were stolen" states harm beyond the hazard name.
  3. present: On this reading, "having items stolen" is harm beyond the "Motor Vehicle Tampering" name.
  4. present: Quoting the span, "items stolen," the message states property harm beyond the tampering label.
  5. present: I find theft of property where items were stolen from vehicles.
  6. absent: Read as written, stolen items are part of the named offense, and the message states no injury, weapon, continuing danger, or other severity beyond that.
  7. present: The message states that items were stolen from two of the vehicles.
  8. present: In the body, items stolen from two vehicles are a stated consequence beyond the tampering label itself.
  9. present: From these sentences, items were stolen from two vehicles, which is harm beyond the name tampering.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it states that items were stolen from two of the vehicles.
  11. present: A direct reading states that vehicles were broken into and that items were stolen from two of them.
  12. present: The notice states that items were stolen from two of the vehicles.
  13. present: As printed, items were stolen from two of the vehicles.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, items were stolen from two of the vehicles.
  15. present: The alert says items were stolen from two of the vehicles.
  16. absent: Looking at the lines, no severity is stated, and crime advisory is only the label of the notice rather than a stated threat level.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the opening states that items were stolen in two cases, and the narrative repeats that the owners of two vehicles stated that items were stolen.
  18. present: This text states that items were stolen from two of the vehicles.
  19. present: On the page, the alert states that items were stolen from two of the vehicles, which records a completed property loss.
  20. present: The posted words state that items were stolen from two of the vehicles that were broken into.
  21. absent: Within the message, calling the notice a crime advisory does not state how serious the threat is, and no injury or threat level is given.
  22. present: A plain reading shows items were stolen from two of the vehicles, which is a stated property loss.
  23. present: The lines give twelve vehicles broken into and items stolen from two of those vehicles as consequences already reported.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, harm is stated as items stolen from two of the vehicles.
  25. present: Only the given words state that items were stolen from two of the vehicles.