Struck and robbed near the Logan Statue in Grant Park

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  2. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  3. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  4. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  5. present: Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named, and Columbia College Chicago addresses its community.
  6. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  7. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  8. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  9. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  10. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are identified as agencies.
  11. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites Chicago Police Department and Campus Security as agencies.
  12. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  13. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  14. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  15. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself, and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  16. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security appear as agencies.
  17. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  18. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named.
  19. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  20. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself, and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  21. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  22. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  23. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  24. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  25. present: The message addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community and names the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree two people striking the victim and taking his belongings name a specific assault and robbery.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, a specific assault and robbery.
  2. present: Two people struck the victim and took his belongings, a specific robbery and assault.
  3. present: Two people struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific robbery and assault.
  4. present: Two people struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific assault and robbery.
  5. present: Two people struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific assault and robbery.
  6. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, a specific assault and robbery.
  7. present: Two people struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific robbery and assault.
  8. present: Two people striking the victim and taking his belongings specify an assault and robbery.
  9. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific robbery and assault.
  10. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific assault and robbery.
  11. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, a specific assault and robbery.
  12. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific robbery and assault.
  13. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific assault and robbery.
  14. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, a specific robbery and assault.
  15. present: Two people striking the victim and taking his belongings names a specific robbery and assault.
  16. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific assault and robbery.
  17. present: Two people struck the victim and took his belongings, a specific assault and robbery.
  18. present: Two people striking the victim and taking his belongings is a specific assault and robbery.
  19. present: Two people striking the victim and taking his belongings specify an assault and robbery.
  20. present: Two individuals struck the victim and took his belongings, which is robbery and assault.
  21. present: Two people struck the victim and took his belongings, which is a specific assault and robbery.
  22. present: Two people striking the victim and taking his belongings name a specific robbery and assault.
  23. present: The alert describes two people striking the victim and taking his belongings, a robbery and assault.
  24. present: Two people striking the victim and taking his belongings is a specific robbery and assault.
  25. present: Offenders striking the victim and taking his belongings specify an assault and robbery.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the scene is northeast of the Logan Statue on Michigan Avenue near 9th Street in Grant Park.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The scene is northeast of the Logan Statue on Michigan Avenue near 9th Street in Grant Park.
  2. present: Location: northeast of the Logan Statue, Michigan Avenue near 9th Street, Grant Park.
  3. present: The incident is placed northeast of the Logan Statue in Grant Park.
  4. present: Michigan Avenue near 9th Street locates the Logan Statue scene.
  5. present: Grant Park and the Logan Statue (Michigan Avenue near 9th Street) are named places.
  6. present: Readers can place the robbery northeast of the Logan Statue.
  7. present: A named monument (Logan Statue) plus Michigan Avenue and 9th Street give a location.
  8. present: The walking path is northeast of the Logan Statue in Grant Park.
  9. present: The advisory names Grant Park and Michigan Avenue near 9th Street.
  10. present: Logan Statue, Michigan Avenue, 9th Street, and Grant Park are all place names.
  11. present: The product locates the victim northeast of the Logan Statue.
  12. present: Street-level place: Michigan Avenue near 9th Street.
  13. present: The Logan Statue is a named landmark in Grant Park.
  14. present: Northeast of the Logan Statue is a directional location in the body.
  15. present: The scene is in Grant Park at the Logan Statue area.
  16. present: Michigan Avenue near 9th Street is a street intersection-level location.
  17. present: The notice pins the event to Grant Park near the Logan Statue.
  18. present: A Grant Park landmark (the Logan Statue) locates the robbery.
  19. present: The body names Michigan Avenue near 9th Street as the statue vicinity.
  20. present: Place language includes Grant Park and the Logan Statue.
  21. present: The victim was walking northeast of the Logan Statue when approached.
  22. present: Location is specific: Logan Statue, Michigan Avenue, 9th Street, Grant Park.
  23. present: The advisory places the approach northeast of the Logan Statue.
  24. present: Named park plus named statue plus nearby streets locate the incident.
  25. present: Grant Park near 9th Street and Michigan Avenue is the stated scene.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  2. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  3. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  4. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  5. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  6. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  7. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security or detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  8. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  9. absent: The only ask is to contact Campus Security and detectives with information, which is a tips request not protective action.
  10. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security or detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  11. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  12. absent: The only ask is to contact Campus Security or detectives with information, which is a tips request not protective action.
  13. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  14. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  15. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  16. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and Chicago Police is a request for tips, not protective guidance.
  17. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security or detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  18. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact police is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  19. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  20. absent: Contacting Campus Security or detectives with additional information is a tips request, not protective action.
  21. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  22. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  23. absent: The only action asked is to contact Campus Security or detectives with tips, which is not protective guidance.
  24. absent: Recipients are only asked to share information with Campus Security and detectives, not given protective actions.
  25. absent: Recipients are only asked to share information with Campus Security and detectives, which is not protective guidance.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the incident is dated October 2, 2025 at approximately 8:00 p.m.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The incident occurred on October 2, 2025, at approximately 8:00 p.m.
  2. present: Date and time: October 2, 2025 at approximately 8:00 p.m.
  3. present: The advisory timestamps the event as October 2, 2025, about 8:00 p.m.
  4. present: A clock time of approximately 8:00 p.m. on October 2, 2025 is given.
  5. present: October 2, 2025 and 8:00 p.m. supply a date and a time of day.
  6. present: The product says the incident occurred on October 2, 2025 at approximately 8:00 p.m.
  7. present: Readers are told the robbery happened on October 2, 2025 around 8:00 p.m.
  8. present: The date October 2, 2025 and the evening time 8:00 p.m. are present.
  9. present: Time element: October 2, 2025, approximately 8:00 p.m.
  10. present: The investigation concerns an October 2, 2025 incident at about 8:00 p.m.
  11. present: A specific evening time (approximately 8:00 p.m.) is named.
  12. present: The Crime Advisory includes the date October 2, 2025.
  13. present: Approximately 8:00 p.m. is a clock time in the body.
  14. present: The event is placed on October 2, 2025 at approximately 8:00 p.m.
  15. present: Date and time of day appear: October 2, 2025, 8:00 p.m.
  16. present: The notice states the incident occurred on October 2, 2025.
  17. present: A p.m. clock time accompanies the October 2, 2025 date.
  18. present: The text dates the incident October 2, 2025 at approximately 8:00 p.m.
  19. present: October 2, 2025 at approximately 8:00 p.m. is the stated occurrence time.
  20. present: The advisory gives both a calendar date and an approximate evening hour.
  21. present: Time is present via October 2, 2025 and approximately 8:00 p.m.
  22. present: The body reports an October 2, 2025, approximately 8:00 p.m. occurrence.
  23. present: A dated evening incident (October 2, 2025, 8:00 p.m.) is described.
  24. present: The Chicago Police Department is investigating an October 2, 2025 8:00 p.m. incident.
  25. present: Occurrence time is October 2, 2025 at approximately 8:00 p.m.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the victim being struck and losing belongings states physical harm and property loss.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss as consequences.
  2. present: The victim being struck and losing belongings states physical harm and property loss.
  3. present: The victim being struck and having belongings taken states physical harm and property loss.
  4. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and property loss.
  5. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss as consequences.
  6. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss as consequences.
  7. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss as consequences.
  8. present: The victim being struck and losing belongings states physical harm and loss as consequences.
  9. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss as consequences.
  10. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss as consequences.
  11. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss.
  12. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss as consequences.
  13. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss as consequences.
  14. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss.
  15. present: Striking the victim states physical harm as a consequence of the robbery.
  16. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and property loss.
  17. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss.
  18. present: Striking the victim and taking his belongings describes physical harm and property loss.
  19. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss.
  20. present: Striking the victim and taking his belongings states physical harm and property loss.
  21. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss.
  22. present: Striking the victim states physical harm rather than only naming a robbery.
  23. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states assault and robbery consequences.
  24. present: The victim was struck and had belongings taken, which states physical harm and loss.
  25. present: Striking the victim states physical harm.