Timely warning for buzzing-entry burglaries on Claremont and 122nd

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: Clery Crime Alert and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Columbia University Public Safety is identified as the informing authority sending the alert.
  2. present: Columbia University Public Safety is identified as the office informed of the burglaries and issuing the Clery Crime Alert.
  3. present: Columbia University Public Safety issues this Clery Crime Alert and names an investigator to contact.
  4. present: Columbia University Public Safety is named as the informing authority and as the department to contact.
  5. present: Columbia University Public Safety is identified as the informing authority on this Clery Crime Alert.
  6. present: Columbia University Public Safety is identified as the informed issuer of this Clery Crime Alert.
  7. present: Columbia University Public Safety is named as the source, with a Clery Crime Alert heading.
  8. present: The branded "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify who is issuing the warning.
  9. present: Columbia University Public Safety is named as the informing authority on this Clery Crime Alert.
  10. present: Columbia University Public Safety is named as the informing authority on this Clery Crime Alert.
  11. present: Columbia University Public Safety is named as the agency that was informed and should receive reports.
  12. present: Columbia University Public Safety is identified as the source of this Clery Crime Alert.
  13. present: The Clery Crime Alert identifies Columbia University Public Safety as the informing authority.
  14. present: Columbia University Public Safety is identified as the informing authority under a Clery Crime Alert header.
  15. present: Columbia University Public Safety is identified as the source of this Clery Crime Alert.
  16. present: The alert is issued as a Clery Crime Alert and names Columbia University Public Safety as the informing authority.
  17. present: Columbia University Public Safety is named as the informing authority on this Clery Crime Alert.
  18. present: Columbia University Public Safety is named as the source of the Clery Crime Alert.
  19. present: Columbia University Public Safety is identified as the authority that was informed and is taking reports.
  20. present: Columbia University Public Safety is identified as the source of this Clery Crime Alert.
  21. present: Clery Crime Alert and Columbia University Public Safety identify who is issuing the warning.
  22. present: The header Clery Crime Alert and the name Columbia University Public Safety identify who is issuing the warning.
  23. present: The Clery Crime Alert names Columbia University Public Safety as the authority informed of the burglaries.
  24. present: Columbia University Public Safety is the named authority under the Clery Crime Alert header.
  25. present: Columbia University Public Safety is named as the source on this Clery Crime Alert, with a named investigator to contact.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present because the text names burglaries as the specific crime threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alert names multiple burglaries as the specific crime threat.
  2. present: The message names multiple burglaries, a specific crime, and describes unauthorized entry by buzzing apartments.
  3. present: It specifically names burglaries as the threat, not a generic incident.
  4. present: The alert names burglaries as the specific crime and describes entry after buzzing apartments.
  5. present: The alert names burglaries as the specific crime threat.
  6. present: The message names multiple burglaries as the threat, including how the suspect gained entry by buzzing apartments.
  7. present: The alert names burglaries as the specific crime and threat.
  8. present: The text names "burglaries" as the specific crime threat.
  9. present: The heading and body name multiple burglaries as the specific crime, not a generic incident.
  10. present: It names multiple burglaries by a suspect who entered after buzzing apartments until granted access.
  11. present: The header and body name burglaries as the specific crime, including entry by buzzing apartments.
  12. present: The alert names multiple burglaries as the specific crime threat.
  13. present: Multiple burglaries are named as the specific crime threat.
  14. present: The threat is named as multiple burglaries by a suspect who buzzed into buildings.
  15. present: The hazard is named as burglaries by a suspect who gained entry by buzzing apartments.
  16. present: It names multiple burglaries, including a suspect buzzing apartments until granted access.
  17. present: The message specifically names burglaries committed by the same suspect.
  18. present: The threat is named as burglaries, with a suspect buzzing in and entering the buildings.
  19. present: The message names burglaries as the specific crime threat.
  20. present: The text names burglaries as the specific crime, including entry by buzzing apartments.
  21. present: The title and body name multiple burglaries as the specific crime threat.
  22. present: It specifically names multiple burglaries as the crime threat, not a generic incident.
  23. present: The hazard is named as multiple burglaries by a suspect who buzzed apartments until granted access.
  24. present: The alert names burglaries as the specific crime and threat.
  25. present: The alert names burglaries as the specific crime, including entry after buzzing apartments.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  2. present: It gives two addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  3. present: The burglaries occurred at 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  4. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave. and 520 West 122nd St.
  5. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  6. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  7. present: It gives addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  8. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave. and 520 West 122nd St.
  9. present: It gives street addresses for both events: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  10. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  11. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  12. present: It gives addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  13. present: Locations are given as 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  14. present: Locations are given as 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  15. present: Locations are specific addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  16. present: It gives street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  17. present: It lists 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St as the incident addresses.
  18. present: It gives specific addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  19. present: It gives 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St as the incident addresses.
  20. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  21. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  22. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  23. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave. and 520 West 122nd St.
  24. present: It gives addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
  25. present: It gives two street addresses: 150 Claremont Ave and 520 West 122nd St.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present: do not buzz unknown people into the building, use delivery lockers, and retrieve packages in a timely manner.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use package pickup services.
  2. present: It instructs Do NOT buzz unknown people into your building and to use package lockers and retrieve deliveries promptly.
  3. present: It instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use delivery lockers and report to Public Safety.
  4. present: It instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to send packages to lockers or pickup sites.
  5. present: It tells recipients not to buzz unknown people into the building and to report incidents to Public Safety.
  6. present: Protective instructions include do not buzz unknown people into the building, use package lockers, and report information to Public Safety.
  7. present: Harm reduction instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to report incidents to Public Safety.
  8. present: It instructs recipients not to buzz unknown people into the building, to use package lockers, and to report to Public Safety.
  9. present: It instructs recipients not to buzz unknown people into the building and to report incidents to Public Safety.
  10. present: It instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use package lockers or pickup locations.
  11. present: It instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to report incidents to Public Safety.
  12. present: It instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use package lockers or pickup locations.
  13. present: Residents are told not to buzz unknown people into the building and to report incidents to Public Safety.
  14. present: Protective instructions include not buzzing unknown people into the building and using package lockers or pickup locations.
  15. present: It tells residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use package lockers or pickup sites.
  16. present: It tells residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to report incidents to Public Safety.
  17. present: It instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use lockers or pickup points for packages.
  18. present: It tells residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to report incidents to Public Safety.
  19. present: It instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use package lockers or pickup services.
  20. present: It instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use package pickup options.
  21. present: It tells residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use lockers or pickup points for packages.
  22. present: Harm reduction instructs residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to report incidents to Public Safety.
  23. present: Harm reduction instructs recipients not to buzz unknown people into the building, to use package lockers, and to report to Public Safety.
  24. present: Harm reduction instructs people not to buzz unknown persons into the building and to report incidents to Public Safety.
  25. present: It tells residents not to buzz unknown people into the building and to use parcel lockers or pickup locations.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time present: the evening of April 3, 2026 at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM, plus recently informed.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Both burglaries are timed on the evening of April 3, 2026 at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  2. present: Events are timed to the evening of April 3, 2026 at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  3. present: It dates the evening of April 3, 2026 and gives 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  4. present: It dates the burglaries to the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  5. present: It dates the burglaries to the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  6. present: Both burglaries are placed on the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  7. present: It dates the burglaries to the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  8. present: It places the crimes on the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  9. present: The burglaries are placed on the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  10. present: It times the incidents on the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  11. present: It dates the burglaries to the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  12. present: Both burglaries are dated the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  13. present: The burglaries occurred on the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  14. present: The burglaries occurred on the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  15. present: Both burglaries occurred the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  16. present: It times the burglaries to the evening of April 3, 2026 at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  17. present: Both burglaries are timed on the evening of April 3, 2026 at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  18. present: It times the crimes to the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  19. present: It times the burglaries to the evening of April 3, 2026 at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  20. present: It states the evening of April 3, 2026, with times of 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  21. present: It dates the burglaries to the evening of April 3, 2026 at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  22. present: The burglaries are timed to the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  23. present: The burglaries occurred on the evening of April 3, 2026, at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  24. present: It states the evening of April 3, 2026, with clock times 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
  25. present: It dates the burglaries to the evening of April 3, 2026 at 10:01 PM and 10:09 PM.
• Impactabsent1/25

  Final assessment

  24 of 25 reads find Impact absent. Buzzing entry and missing packages describe the crime. The Clery serious or continuous threat line is legal boilerplate, not a stated consequence.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Entry by buzzing is described, but the text never states harm, property loss, danger, or other consequences.
  2. absent: Nothing states injury, damage, danger, or other consequences beyond naming the burglaries.
  3. absent: Nothing states what the burglaries did to people or property, such as loss, injury, or a dangerous outcome.
  4. absent: Nothing states what the burglaries could do to people or property, such as theft loss, injury, or danger.
  5. absent: Burglary is named and the entry method is described, but no injury, loss, danger, or other consequence is stated.
  6. absent: Nothing states what the burglaries did or could do, such as stolen property, injury, or danger to residents.
  7. absent: It does not describe what the burglaries could do to people or property, such as loss, injury, or danger.
  8. absent: Naming burglaries and offering package tips does not state consequences or severity, such as injury or loss.
  9. absent: Naming burglaries and how the suspect entered does not state any harm, injury, or severity of consequences.
  10. absent: It does not state what the burglaries did or could do, such as property loss, injury, or other harm.
  11. absent: It does not describe stolen property, injury, or other harm these burglaries could cause.
  12. absent: Nothing states what the burglaries did or could do, such as loss, injury, or danger to residents.
  13. absent: Naming burglaries does not state what harm, loss, or severity those crimes caused or could cause.
  14. absent: Burglary is named, but the text does not say what harm it could cause, such as theft loss, injury, or danger.
  15. absent: The text never says what was taken, whether anyone was harmed, or how severe the burglaries were.
  16. absent: Burglary is named and access method is described, but no consequence or severity such as loss, injury, or danger is stated.
  17. absent: Burglary is named and a method is described, but no loss, injury, or other consequence or severity is stated.
  18. absent: Naming burglaries does not convey injury, property loss, or other consequences or severity of the threat.
  19. absent: It does not say what the burglaries could do to people or property, such as loss, injury, or a dangerous suspect.
  20. absent: Nothing states what the burglaries could do to people or property, such as loss, injury, or danger.
  21. absent: Burglary is named without any statement of injury, loss severity, or other harm the crime could cause.
  22. absent: Burglaries are named but the text never says what harm they could do or how severe they are.
  23. absent: Nothing states burglary consequences or severity, such as injury, danger, or likely property loss.
  24. absent: Nothing states consequences or severity of the burglaries, such as loss, injury, or danger to residents.
  25. present: The Clery disclaimer states these alerts cover crimes that represent a serious or continuous threat to the community.