Tools stolen from an unlocked building inside a locked fence

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree source is present. Cornell University Police Department is named as the responding agency and as the voice urging the community, with Public Safety Communications as a contact.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Cornell University Police Department is named as the agency that responded at 11:43 a.m.
  2. present: The Cornell University Police urge the community, identifying the issuing campus police.
  3. present: Public Safety Communications Center is named as the office to contact with information.
  4. present: A named police department, Cornell University Police Department, is the responding authority.
  5. present: Campus police identity is clear from Cornell University Police in both the response line and the closing urge.
  6. present: The phone number is attached to the Cornell University Public Safety Communications Center, a named source.
  7. present: Who issued the notice is Cornell University Police, the department that responded and that advises the community.
  8. present: Named agency language is met: police, Cornell University Police Department, and Public Safety Communications.
  9. present: The first clause names Cornell University Police Department as the responding source.
  10. present: Cornell University is named inside the police department title that issued this notice.
  11. present: The communications center at (607) 255-1111 identifies the campus public safety office behind the alert.
  12. present: The urging line from Cornell University Police functions as a sender identification.
  13. present: Both the police department and Public Safety Communications Center name the authority.
  14. present: The responding unit is Cornell University Police Department, which the source rule counts as a named agency.
  15. present: Cornell University Police Department responded, so the handling authority is identified in the lead.
  16. present: The university’s police and its communications center are both named, satisfying source.
  17. present: The closing, Cornell University Police urge the community, identifies who is speaking.
  18. present: Police as a named agency appears throughout as Cornell University Police Department.
  19. present: Tips go to the Cornell University Public Safety Communications Center, naming the source office.
  20. present: The notice is from campus police: they responded, they investigate, and they urge precautions.
  21. present: Cornell University Police Department in the opening identifies the responding and issuing authority.
  22. present: The branded department name Cornell University Police Department is the sender.
  23. present: A named campus police department and a named communications center together identify the source.
  24. present: Who to contact is spelled out as Cornell University Public Safety Communications Center.
  25. present: The voice of the alert is Cornell University Police, which also names its communications center.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous that a specific threat is named. The text reports a burglary and states that power and hand tools were stolen, not a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The event is a reported burglary in which power and hand tools were stolen, a specific crime.
  2. present: Burglary is named in the lead, not a generic incident or situation.
  3. present: Theft of miscellaneous power and hand tools under a burglary label is a specific hazard.
  4. present: The victim reported a burglary, which specifies the threat type.
  5. present: Reported burglary of tools is a concrete crime rather than an unnamed emergency.
  6. present: What the threat is, specifically, is burglary involving stolen tools.
  7. present: Burglary is named, and the stolen items are specified as power and hand tools.
  8. present: A burglary at Plant Science Building is a specific threat, not a vague situation.
  9. present: Miscellaneous power and hand tools were stolen names the criminal event with specificity.
  10. present: The victim reported a burglary, so the hazard is not left generic.
  11. present: Burglary of tools is a specific crime comparable to robbery in the hazard examples.
  12. present: Reported burglary in the opening sentence is the named threat.
  13. present: The hazard is not emergency; it is burglary of miscellaneous tools.
  14. present: Stolen tools from an unlocked building are still framed as a burglary hazard.
  15. present: A burglary with stolen power and hand tools is a specific named offense.
  16. present: The first paragraph names burglary and lists the stolen tools, a specific threat.
  17. present: Generic words like incident appear only as at the time of the incident, while the threat named is burglary.
  18. present: The victim reported that tools were stolen in a burglary, which is specific.
  19. present: Burglary is the labeled hazard in the first sentence.
  20. present: Power and hand tools stolen from Plant Science Building specify the burglary hazard.
  21. present: A reported burglary is a specific threat, not a nameless emergency.
  22. present: The stolen tools list makes the burglary a concrete, specific hazard.
  23. present: Burglary of miscellaneous power and hand tools is what occurred.
  24. present: The message does not hide behind situation; it says burglary.
  25. present: Tools stolen from an unlocked science building are still a named burglary hazard.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find location present: Plant Science Building, 236 Tower Rd., City of Ithaca.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The site is Plant Science Building, 236 Tower Rd., City of Ithaca.
  2. present: A named academic building on Tower Rd. is given.
  3. present: 236 Tower Rd. is a street address for Plant Science Building.
  4. present: Plant Science Building in the City of Ithaca is a named place.
  5. present: The perimeter fence and the building itself are located at Plant Science Building, 236 Tower Rd.
  6. present: Tower Rd. with building number 236 locates the Plant Science Building.
  7. present: City of Ithaca plus Plant Science Building answer where.
  8. present: 236 Tower Rd. is a precise campus street address.
  9. present: Plant Science Building is a named campus building.
  10. present: The construction fence is described at Plant Science Building, 236 Tower Rd.
  11. present: Ithaca is named along with Tower Rd. and the building name.
  12. present: Plant Science Building, 236 Tower Rd., City of Ithaca, is a full location.
  13. present: A building name and a road number together say where.
  14. present: 236 Tower Rd. is more specific than campus or the area.
  15. present: The Plant Science Building on Tower Rd. is the scene.
  16. present: City of Ithaca is attached to 236 Tower Rd.
  17. present: Plant Science Building is identified by name and by 236 Tower Rd.
  18. present: The construction fence is at Plant Science Building, locating the perimeter.
  19. present: 236 Tower Rd., City of Ithaca, is an address.
  20. present: A named building on Tower Rd. in Ithaca is the location.
  21. present: Plant Science Building at 236 Tower Rd. is where it happened.
  22. present: The building itself was unlocked at Plant Science Building, a named site.
  23. present: Tower Rd. and Plant Science Building give both a road and a building name.
  24. present: 236 Tower Rd., City of Ithaca, locates the Plant Science Building.
  25. present: Plant Science Building, 236 Tower Rd., is the location given.
• Guidancepresent22/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find protective instruction in locking unattended doors and windows and dialing 911. A small minority treats that closing as after the fact prevention or a tip request.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The community is told to close and lock unattended doors and windows and to dial 911.
  2. present: Locking unattended doors and windows is a protective instruction to recipients.
  3. present: Immediately report suspected crime by dialing 911 or using RAVE Guardian is an action instruction.
  4. present: Protect their property by closing and locking unattended doors and windows is directed at readers.
  5. present: Call 911 if you see suspected criminal activity is guidance listed in the rubric examples.
  6. absent: The lock doors line is general prevention after a completed tool theft, not a live avoid or shelter order.
  7. present: Closing and locking unattended doors and windows is an instruction to the community.
  8. present: The last paragraph tells people to lock unattended openings and report crime they see.
  9. present: Dialing 911 is an instructed protective reporting action.
  10. present: RAVE Guardian is offered with 911 as a way to report suspected activity.
  11. present: Lock unattended doors and windows matches the lock doors guidance example.
  12. present: The police instruct the community to close and lock unattended doors and windows.
  13. absent: Anyone with information is asked to call, which is a tip request, not shelter or avoid guidance.
  14. present: Immediately report any suspected criminal activity they see is an instruction to the public.
  15. present: Closing unattended doors and windows is urged as a protective step.
  16. present: Using the RAVE Guardian app is presented as a reporting action for the community.
  17. present: Lock doors and windows plus dial 911 are the two actions urged.
  18. present: The community is told to protect property by locking unattended doors and windows.
  19. present: Dial 911 to report suspected crime is an instruction to recipients.
  20. present: Closing and locking unattended doors and windows is protective guidance.
  21. absent: No evacuate, avoid the area, or stay inside order is given; the closing is standing crime prevention.
  22. present: Report suspected criminal activity by dialing 911 is call 911 guidance.
  23. present: The closing paragraph is an instruction to lock unattended doors and windows.
  24. present: Police urge locking unattended doors and windows and reporting crime via 911 or RAVE Guardian.
  25. present: Recipients are told to close and lock unattended doors and windows.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Broad agreement that December 10, 2024 at 11:43 a.m. and the December 9 to 10 overnight window satisfy time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: December 10, 2024 at approximately 11:43 a.m. timestamps the police response.
  2. present: Tools were taken between 4:24 p.m. on December 9 and 6:45 a.m. December 10, 2024.
  3. present: Clock times 11:43 a.m., 4:24 p.m., and 6:45 a.m. appear with December 2024 dates.
  4. present: On December 10, 2024 at approximately 11:43 a.m. is a full date and time.
  5. present: December 9 at 4:24 p.m. starts the theft window.
  6. present: 6:45 a.m. December 10, 2024 ends the complainant’s time range.
  7. present: Immediately report plus 11:43 a.m. on December 10 convey when and recency.
  8. present: The investigation is continuing, and dated overnight times mark the theft.
  9. present: December 10, 2024 is the date of the 11:43 a.m. response.
  10. present: 4:24 p.m. on December 9 is a clock time in the loss window.
  11. present: At the time of the incident plus overnight December 9 to 10 times convey when.
  12. present: Approximately 11:43 a.m. on December 10, 2024 is the response stamp.
  13. present: December 9 and December 10, 2024 are dates with multiple clock times.
  14. present: 6:45 a.m. on December 10 is when the overnight window closed.
  15. present: The overnight interval from 4:24 p.m. December 9 to 6:45 a.m. December 10 is a time range.
  16. present: On December 10, 2024, at approximately 11:43 a.m. answers when police responded.
  17. present: Immediately in the reporting advice is a recency cue alongside the dated times.
  18. present: 11:43 a.m. is a clock time on December 10, 2024.
  19. present: December 9, 2024 at 4:24 p.m. is when the theft window opened.
  20. present: 6:45 a.m. December 10, 2024 is an explicit end time.
  21. present: Three clock times across December 9 and 10 satisfy the time element.
  22. present: At approximately 11:43 a.m. on December 10, 2024 is when police were called.
  23. present: The theft happened overnight into December 10, with 6:45 a.m. as an end point.
  24. present: December 9 at 4:24 p.m. and December 10 at 6:45 a.m. bound the event.
  25. present: 11:43 a.m., 4:24 p.m., and 6:45 a.m. on dated December days mark when.
• Impactabsent8/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no impact because stolen tools restate the burglary and no severity language appears. A minority treats the named tool loss as stated property harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Miscellaneous power and hand tools were stolen states an explicit property loss from the burglary.
  2. absent: Stolen tools describe the burglary itself and do not add severity language such as dangerous.
  3. absent: An unlocked building with no suspect description does not state consequences or seriousness.
  4. absent: Naming stolen tools restates the property crime and is not a severity or harm to people statement.
  5. present: Stolen from the building is an explicit property consequence of the burglary.
  6. absent: No phrase such as may cause injury or destructive appears.
  7. absent: The unlocked building fact is a security condition, not a statement of impact.
  8. present: Urging the community to protect their property implies tools and other belongings can be lost to this crime.
  9. absent: Stolen restates the burglary and does not say the event was serious or could injure anyone.
  10. absent: A secured fence and unlocked building describe access, not harm or severity.
  11. absent: There is no life threatening or injurious wording attached to the tool theft.
  12. present: Power and hand tools were stolen from the building, which is a stated property consequence.
  13. absent: No suspect description available is investigative, not an impact statement.
  14. absent: The text never says the burglary was dangerous or could cause further harm.
  15. absent: Unlocked does not convey severity; it explains how access was possible.
  16. absent: Impact requires stated consequences beyond the crime name, and stolen tools are the crime name here.
  17. present: Stolen tools are a concrete property harm, not merely a synonym with no object.
  18. absent: There is no claim occupants faced injury; the building was simply unlocked.
  19. absent: The investigation is continuing does not describe what the hazard could do.
  20. present: The alert reports that tools were stolen, which is an explicit property consequence of the crime.
  21. absent: Unlocked access explains opportunity and is not a severity statement.
  22. absent: No wording such as damaging or life threatening is used.
  23. present: Stolen tools are named as the property taken, which some readers treat as stated property harm.
  24. absent: The perimeter fence being secured is a site detail, not a consequence of the hazard.
  25. present: Miscellaneous power and hand tools were stolen is a clear statement of property loss.