Reports of gunfire traced to a robotics competition; lockdown lifted in about 30 minutes

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourceabsent6/25

  Final assessment

  Majority finds no sender or branded tag; the message cites only a law enforcement presence, though a minority counted the naming of FAMU.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No sender, branded tag, or named agency appears; only "law enforcement presence."
  2. absent: No sender, agency, or branded signature identifies who issued the message.
  3. absent: References "FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium" as a location but no sender or agency is named.
  4. present: Names "FAMU" and "law enforcement", identifying the institution and responders.
  5. absent: No sender signature, university name, or named agency appears in the text.
  6. present: "FAMU" and "law enforcement presence" identify the university and responding authority.
  7. absent: No branded signature, university name, or named agency identifies the sender.
  8. absent: No branded signature, university self-naming, or named agency appears; only generic "law enforcement".
  9. present: Names "FAMU" and "law enforcement", identifying institution and responders.
  10. absent: Names "FAMU" as a place but no branded sender or issuing authority.
  11. absent: No sender or authority is identified, only references to "law enforcement" being present, no issuer named.
  12. absent: Names FAMU places but no branded tag or named issuing authority.
  13. present: Names "FAMU" and references "law enforcement presence", identifying sender and authority.
  14. absent: No sender tag, university name, or agency identifies who issued this alert.
  15. absent: No sender signature, agency, or institution is named in the text.
  16. absent: No agency, university name, or branded sender tag appears in the text.
  17. absent: No sender tag or named issuing authority appears in the text.
  18. absent: No sender, institution, or agency is named; "FAMU" appears only as a place reference.
  19. absent: No sender, agency, or branded signature is identified, only "law enforcement".
  20. present: References "FAMU" and "law enforcement presence", identifying the institution and authority.
  21. absent: No sender, branded signature, or issuing authority is identified in the text.
  22. absent: Mentions "FAMU" as a place but names no sender, agency, or branded signature.
  23. absent: No sender, branded signature, or agency name appears; "FAMU" is only the location.
  24. present: Names "FAMU" and "law enforcement presence", identifying the sender context.
  25. absent: No sender, branded signature, or authority is named, only generic "law enforcement".
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous that no specific threat is named; the message says only police activity.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Says "Police activity" but names no specific threat.
  2. absent: Says only "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" without naming a specific threat.
  3. absent: Says "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" but names no specific hazard.
  4. absent: Only "Police activity" is cited; no specific hazard such as shooter or gunfire is named.
  5. absent: Says only "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence", naming no specific hazard.
  6. absent: It cites "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" but names no specific hazard.
  7. absent: Cites only "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" without a specific hazard.
  8. absent: It cites "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" but names no specific hazard.
  9. absent: Cites "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" but names no specific hazard.
  10. absent: Says "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" but names no specific hazard.
  11. absent: No specific hazard named, only "Police activity" which does not state the threat.
  12. absent: Cites "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" but names no hazard.
  13. absent: Says only "Police activity" with no specific threat named.
  14. absent: It reports only "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" without naming the hazard.
  15. absent: Says "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" without naming a specific threat.
  16. absent: Says "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" but names no specific threat.
  17. absent: Says "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" but names no specific threat.
  18. absent: Says only "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" without naming the threat.
  19. absent: Only "Police activity" appears; no specific hazard is named.
  20. absent: No specific hazard is named, "Police activity" alone does not state the threat.
  21. absent: It cites only "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" without naming the hazard.
  22. absent: Says only "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" without naming a specific hazard.
  23. absent: Reports "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" without naming a specific threat.
  24. absent: Says "Police activity" and "law enforcement presence" but names no specific hazard.
  25. absent: Describes "Police activity" and a "law enforcement presence" but never names the threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All reads agree the location is near FAMU Villages and Bragg Stadium.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Gives location "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium."
  2. present: Locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
  3. present: Locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", a specific place.
  4. present: Gives the location, "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
  5. present: States it is "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", specific places.
  6. present: It locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", specific places.
  7. present: Locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", specific places.
  8. present: It locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", a place.
  9. present: Locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", specific places.
  10. present: Specifies "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
  11. present: Specifies "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
  12. present: Locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
  13. present: Says it is "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", specific places.
  14. present: It locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium."
  15. present: Locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", a specific place.
  16. present: Locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
  17. present: Specifies "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
  18. present: Specifies "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", a location.
  19. present: Says "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", a named place.
  20. present: States the location, "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
  21. present: It locates activity "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", specific places.
  22. present: Says it is "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", a specific location.
  23. present: Specifies "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
  24. present: Says "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium", specific places.
  25. present: Locates it "near FAMU Villages & Bragg Stadium".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous that recipients are told to avoid the area and shelter in place.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Instructs recipients: "Please avoid area... Shelter in place."
  2. present: Instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place".
  3. present: Instructs "Please avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  4. present: Instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  5. present: Instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place."
  6. present: It instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  7. present: Instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place".
  8. present: It instructs "Please avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  9. present: Instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  10. present: Instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place".
  11. present: Instructs recipients to "Please avoid area" and "Shelter in place."
  12. present: Instructs "avoid area" and "Shelter in place".
  13. present: Instructs "Please avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  14. present: It instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place."
  15. present: Instructs, "Please avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  16. present: Instructs to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place".
  17. present: Instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place".
  18. present: Directs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  19. present: Instructs, "Please avoid area" and "Shelter in place".
  20. present: Instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  21. present: It instructs "Please avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  22. present: Instructs recipients to "Please avoid area" and "Shelter in place."
  23. present: Instructs recipients: "Please avoid area" and "Shelter in place".
  24. present: Instructs "avoid area" and "Shelter in place", protective actions.
  25. present: Instructs recipients to "avoid area" and "Shelter in place".
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous that no clock time, date, or recency word is conveyed.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Conveys no clock time, date, or recency word.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" appears.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as "now" or "immediately" appears.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the message.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" appears.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue is given in the text.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue is present in the text.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word appears in the text.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word appears.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent unanimously, 25 to 0: it reports police activity and directs people to avoid the area and shelter but states no explicit harm or danger.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It reports police activity and says avoid the area and shelter but states no explicit harm or danger.
  2. absent: This reports police activity with avoid-area and shelter guidance but states no explicit harm or danger to people.
  3. absent: Reports police activity with avoid-area and shelter guidance but states no explicit harm or severity.
  4. absent: It reports police activity and directs avoidance and shelter but states no harm or explicit danger.
  5. absent: Reports police activity and to avoid the area and shelter but states no harm or consequence.
  6. absent: This reports police activity and tells people to avoid the area and shelter but states no explicit harm or consequence.
  7. absent: Reports police activity and to avoid the area and shelter but states no specific harm or danger.
  8. absent: Reports police activity with avoid and shelter guidance but states no hazard, harm, or severity.
  9. absent: Reports police activity and avoid the area with shelter guidance but states no harm or explicit danger.
  10. absent: It reports police activity and tells people to avoid the area and shelter but states no specific danger or harm.
  11. absent: Reports police activity and directs avoidance and shelter but states no explicit harm or danger.
  12. absent: It reports police activity and says avoid the area and shelter in place but states no danger or consequence.
  13. absent: Police activity with avoid area and shelter in place names no hazard and states no harm or severity.
  14. absent: Reports police activity with avoid-area and shelter guidance but states no harm or what the situation could do.
  15. absent: Reports police activity with avoid and shelter guidance but states no explicit harm or danger.
  16. absent: Reports police activity and to avoid the area and shelter but states no specific danger or harm.
  17. absent: Reports police activity and to avoid the area and shelter in place but states no harm or danger.
  18. absent: Reports police activity and to avoid area and shelter in place with no stated harm or danger.
  19. absent: Reports police activity and says avoid area shelter in place but states no harm or danger.
  20. absent: Reports police activity and directs avoid and shelter but states no harm or specific hazard.
  21. absent: Police activity and avoid the area and shelter in place but no stated danger or consequence.
  22. absent: Reports police activity and to avoid the area and shelter but states no explicit harm or danger.
  23. absent: Reports police activity with avoid and shelter guidance but states no hazard or potential harm.
  24. absent: Reports police activity with avoid and shelter guidance but states no harm or danger.
  25. absent: It reports police activity and to avoid the area and shelter but does not state any harm or severity.