Campus safety notice for sexual battery in east-campus residence hall

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 agree (1): The notice cites "FSUPD" and the "Title IX office" as campus authorities handling the case.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The notice cites "FSUPD" and the "Title IX office" as campus authorities handling the case.
  2. present: Because the notice names FSUPD as the tip contact and states that the Title IX office is following up.
  3. present: Checklist confirms a Campus Safety Notice voice with FSUPD named as the contact channel for tips.
  4. present: The notice points people to FSUPD and the Title IX office as the campus authorities handling the case.
  5. present: FSUPD is designated as the contact authority, with Title IX noted as conducting follow-up.
  6. present: Campus officials flag a reported sexual battery with date and east-side residence-hall setting for community awareness.
  7. present: src: Campus Safety Notice frame; FSUPD tip line; Title IX office following up.
  8. present: FSUPD is named as the contact agency and the Title IX office is stated as following up on the Campus Safety Notice.
  9. present: "Campus Safety Notice" and "FSUPD" identify the notice form and campus police as the contact authority.
  10. present: Second glance still treats this as a campus safety notice pointing readers to FSUPD and Title IX follow-up.
  11. present: Peer review finds adequate source control: FSUPD is the tip channel and Title IX is named as following the case under a Campus Safety Notice.
  12. present: This notice identifies FSUPD and the Title IX office as the campus authorities following up and taking tips.
  13. present: The notice expressly references FSUPD and the Title IX office as the competent institutional authorities connected with this disclosure.
  14. present: FSUPD tip line and Title IX follow-up named on Campus Safety Notice.
  15. present: The notice appears attributable to campus authorities, citing FSUPD contact details, Title IX follow-up, and a formal case reference.
  16. present: They name FSUPD and the Title IX office, so you know which campus units are handling this.
  17. present: The text names FSUPD and the Title IX office as following and contact authorities, so a source is present.
  18. present: Present because FSUPD and the Title IX office are named on this campus safety notice and follow-up.
  19. present: Source: FSUPD is named for tips and the Title IX office is named as following up on this Campus Safety Notice.
  20. present: FSUPD and the Title IX office are named as contacts and follow-up so a source is present whereas without those bodies the notice would be unattributed.
  21. present: Names FSUPD and the Title IX office as handling authorities.
  22. present: FSUPD is listed as the tip contact, and follow-up by the Title IX office is stated.
  23. present: The alert names FSUPD as the tip contact and the Title IX office as following up on the incident.
  24. present: Recipients can see this Campus Safety Notice names FSUPD at (850) 644-1234 and Title IX follow-up as the institutional sources.
  25. present: The notice identifies a reported sexual battery and states campus safety context under federal disclosure rules.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 agree (1): The alert names a reported "sexual battery" as the specific crime hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alert names a reported "sexual battery" as the specific crime hazard.
  2. present: Since a sexual battery is explicitly identified as the reported offense.
  3. present: Hazard is identified as sexual battery in a residence hall setting.
  4. present: It clearly names sexual battery as the crime that was reported.
  5. present: The notice identifies sexual battery as the specific offense under report.
  6. present: The notice names sexual battery as the reported offense.
  7. present: hazard named: sexual battery, reported offense type clear.
  8. present: FSUPD reports a sexual battery as the specific campus crime hazard.
  9. present: "sexual battery" names a specific crime hazard.
  10. present: Look again and the named hazard remains a reported sexual battery, not a vague unspecified threat.
  11. present: Hazard is clearly specified as sexual battery, which is a concrete Clery offense rather than a generic incident label.
  12. present: The message specifically names sexual battery as the offense reported to campus safety.
  13. present: The text specifically identifies the offense as sexual battery rather than a nonspecific emergency or incident.
  14. present: Sexual battery is the named offense.
  15. present: The text appears to identify a specific hazard as a reported sexual battery on campus.
  16. present: It straight up says a sexual battery was reported, so the crime type is clear.
  17. present: The text specifically names sexual battery as the offense, so a clear hazard is stated.
  18. present: Present because sexual battery is identified as the reported offense.
  19. present: Hazard: a sexual battery is the specific crime reported in the notice.
  20. present: Sexual battery is stated as the offense so the hazard is present whereas without that crime label the threat type would be unknown.
  21. present: Identifies sexual battery as the reported threat.
  22. present: A sexual battery is reported as the offense covered by this Campus Safety Notice.
  23. present: The alert identifies a reported sexual battery as the specific crime hazard.
  24. present: Recipients are told a sexual battery was reported in a campus residence hall.
  25. present: The notice identifies sexual battery as the reported offense.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 agree (1): It places the offense in a "residence hall on the east side of campus."

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It places the offense in a "residence hall on the east side of campus."
  2. present: Because the incident is placed in a residence hall on the east side of campus.
  3. present: Location is given as a residence hall on the east side of campus without a building name.
  4. present: It says the crime happened in a residence hall on the east side of campus.
  5. present: The incident is situated in a residence hall on the east side of campus.
  6. present: The scene is given as a residence hall on the east side of campus.
  7. present: loc: residence hall, east side of campus.
  8. present: FSUPD places the incident in a residence hall on the east side of campus.
  9. present: "residence hall on the east side of campus" places the incident by building type and campus area.
  10. present: A second pass still places the report in a residence hall on the east side of campus.
  11. present: Location is operationally usable as a residence hall on the east side of campus, even without a building name.
  12. present: It places the incident in a residence hall on the east side of campus, a defined campus area.
  13. present: The occurrence is localized to a residence hall on the east side of campus, which constitutes a place designation.
  14. present: Residence hall on east side of campus.
  15. present: Location seems present at a coarse level as a residence hall on the east side of campus, without a named building.
  16. present: They put it in a residence hall on the east side of campus, even if they skip the exact building.
  17. present: The text places the incident in a residence hall on the east side of campus, so location is present.
  18. present: Present because the incident is placed in a residence hall on the east side of campus.
  19. present: Location: a residence hall on the east side of campus is given as where it occurred.
  20. present: A residence hall on the east side of campus places the event so location is present whereas without that setting the where would be blank.
  21. present: Places the incident in a residence hall on the east side of campus.
  22. present: A residence hall on the east side of campus is given as the location.
  23. present: The alert places the offense in a residence hall on the east side of campus.
  24. present: Recipients are given a residence hall on the east side of campus as the incident area.
  25. present: The notice states the incident occurred in a residence hall on the east side of campus.
• Guidanceabsent8/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 17/25 codes 0: Readers are only asked to contact FSUPD with information, not given protective safety steps.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Readers are only asked to contact FSUPD with information, not given protective safety steps.
  2. present: Since anyone with information is encouraged to contact FSUPD at the listed number.
  3. present: Recipients with information are directed to contact FSUPD at the listed phone number.
  4. absent: Readers are not told to lock doors, avoid a place, or take any other direct safety step right now.
  5. absent: Recipients receive awareness language and a tip line only, not concrete personal protective steps.
  6. absent: Readers get only a tip line to FSUPD, not steps to protect themselves.
  7. absent: no protective action for readers; tip-to-FSUPD only, awareness language not instruction.
  8. present: FSUPD encourages anyone with information to contact FSUPD at (850) 644-1234.
  9. absent: "heighten your awareness" and "contact FSUPD" give no protective action such as avoid the area or lock doors.
  10. absent: On re-read, tip contact to FSUPD is not protective guidance telling recipients how to stay safe.
  11. absent: No protective actions are directed to recipients; tip contact and awareness language do not instruct safety steps.
  12. absent: The text raises awareness and invites tips to FSUPD but does not instruct recipients to take a protective action.
  13. absent: The message solicits tips and general awareness but issues no directive protective action such as avoid, shelter, or secure in place.
  14. absent: No protective steps for readers only tip contact and awareness talk.
  15. absent: No protective steps for recipients appear to be offered, only tip-line contact and a privacy rationale for limited detail.
  16. present: They ask anyone with info to call FSUPD at the number they give and push general safety awareness.
  17. absent: The text urges awareness and tip reporting but gives no protective action instruction to recipients, so guidance is absent.
  18. present: Present because anyone with information is urged to contact FSUPD at (850) 644-1234.
  19. absent: Guidance: recipients get only tip contact and awareness language, not a protective action to take.
  20. present: Readers with information are told to contact FSUPD so guidance is present whereas without that call to act only the narrative would remain.
  21. absent: Omits protective action instructions and only invites tips to FSUPD.
  22. present: Contact with FSUPD at (850) 644-1234 is encouraged for anyone with information.
  23. absent: The alert only asks people with information to contact FSUPD and does not give protective safety steps.
  24. present: Recipients are urged to contact FSUPD at (850) 644-1234 with information and to heighten safety awareness.
  25. absent: The notice gives only tip contact and awareness language rather than protective steps for recipients.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 agree (1): The battery "was reported to have occurred" on "June 16, 2024."

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The battery "was reported to have occurred" on "June 16, 2024."
  2. present: Because the sexual battery is dated June 16, 2024.
  3. present: Date of June 16, 2024 is stated while exact clock times are intentionally withheld.
  4. present: The report is dated June 16, 2024, so you know when the incident took place.
  5. present: Occurrence is dated to June 16, 2024 within the body of the notice.
  6. present: The report is dated to June 16, 2024.
  7. present: date given: June 16, 2024; ref #2024-06160079 anchors the window.
  8. present: FSUPD dates the reported sexual battery to June 16, 2024.
  9. present: "June 16, 2024" states when the sexual battery was reported to have occurred.
  10. present: Second look still holds June 16, 2024 as the date the sexual battery was reported to have occurred.
  11. present: Incident timing is fixed to June 16, 2024, which meets the recency and when requirement.
  12. present: The date June 16, 2024 is stated for when the sexual battery was reported to have occurred.
  13. present: The report is dated June 16, 2024, thereby supplying a temporal reference.
  14. present: Incident dated June 16 2024 no clock time.
  15. present: The offense is said to have occurred on June 16, 2024, though exact clock time is deliberately omitted.
  16. present: The date is June 16, 2024, so you get when it happened.
  17. present: The text gives the date June 16, 2024, so a time reference is present.
  18. present: Present because the reported battery is dated June 16, 2024.
  19. present: Time: the sexual battery is dated June 16, 2024.
  20. present: June 16, 2024 dates the reported incident so timing is present whereas without that day the when would be missing.
  21. present: States the incident date as June 16, 2024.
  22. present: The offense is reported to have occurred on June 16, 2024.
  23. present: The alert dates the reported battery to June 16, 2024.
  24. present: Recipients learn the sexual battery was reported as occurring on June 16, 2024.
  25. present: The notice shows the reported date as June 16, 2024.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 agree (0): No details beyond the offense name describe harm, injuries, or offender identity.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No details beyond the offense name describe harm, injuries, or offender identity.
  2. absent: Since no injuries, weapons, or other severity details appear beyond the offense name itself.
  3. absent: Beyond naming the offense, the notice does not describe injuries, suspect description, or other community impact.
  4. absent: Beyond naming the offense, the text never says how serious the harm was or what could happen to others.
  5. absent: No injury status, victim count, or other severity metrics appear beyond naming the offense.
  6. absent: No injuries, suspect profile, or other harm detail appears beyond the offense label.
  7. absent: no stated consequence or severity beyond the offense name; survivor-harm note is policy rationale not impact of this event.
  8. absent: FSUPD gives no separate injury, casualty, or severity detail beyond naming the sexual battery offense.
  9. absent: "concerning" alone does not convey consequence or severity beyond the hazard name.
  10. absent: Re-checking finds no injuries, counts, or other severity detail beyond the sexual battery label itself.
  11. absent: Beyond naming sexual battery, the notice adds no severity, injury, or broader consequence language for the community.
  12. absent: No consequence or severity language is given about harm the offense could cause beyond naming the crime itself.
  13. absent: Beyond naming the offense, the text does not state consequences or severity of harm to the campus community from the hazard itself.
  14. absent: No severity or harm detail beyond the sexual battery label.
  15. absent: Beyond naming the offense, further impact such as injuries, a suspect description, or relational context appears largely withheld.
  16. absent: There's no suspect description, injury note, or other outcome detail beyond naming the offense.
  17. absent: The text does not state consequences or severity beyond naming the offense, so impact is absent.
  18. absent: Absent because no injuries, suspect facts, or other severity details go beyond naming sexual battery.
  19. absent: Impact: no suspect facts, injuries, or other severity details appear beyond naming the sexual battery.
  20. absent: No injuries, ongoing threat, or severity wording appear beyond the offense name so impact is absent whereas present impact would state harm scale past sexual battery alone.
  21. absent: Omits consequence or severity language beyond naming sexual battery.
  22. absent: No injuries, suspect description, or other consequences beyond the offense name are provided.
  23. absent: The alert adds no injury, suspect, or other severity detail beyond naming sexual battery.
  24. absent: Recipients get no suspect description, relationship details, injuries, or other effects beyond the sexual battery label.
  25. absent: The notice notes no injuries, suspect facts, or other severity beyond naming sexual battery.