Severe thunderstorm warning seek shelter until 7:00 PM

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Institutional branding appears via "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…", which marks the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Institutional branding appears via "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…", which marks the sender.
  2. present: The notice identifies who is speaking through "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  3. present: Source is present because "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" names the issuing campus or alert brand.
  4. present: A campus or alert signature ("HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…") supplies the authority line.
  5. present: Sender identity is clear from the wording "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  6. present: The alert tags an official issuer with "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  7. present: Who is sending this is stated through "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  8. present: Branded language "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" functions as the source element.
  9. present: Campus naming in "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" tells recipients the origin of the message.
  10. present: An official voice is established by "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  11. present: The opening or body includes "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" as institutional source.
  12. present: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" is enough to code source present under the branding rule.
  13. present: Recipients can tell the sender from "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  14. present: Source scores present: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" is an authority marker.
  15. present: The university or college is referenced as "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  16. present: Alert-system or school labeling ("HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…") covers source.
  17. present: Issuing body is identifiable from "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  18. present: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" operates as a branded signature for source.
  19. present: The text attributes the message via "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  20. present: Source present: campus authority language "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  21. present: Readers see "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" and know which campus is speaking.
  22. present: Official sender cue "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" is explicit in the text.
  23. present: Source is coded yes based on "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  24. present: The phrase "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" identifies the responding institution.
  25. present: Authority is named through the fragment "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Hazard is specific: the text names "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Hazard is specific: the text names "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  2. present: A concrete threat appears as "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  3. present: The what of the emergency is "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM", not a vague incident label.
  4. present: "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM" satisfies hazard by naming the condition or threat.
  5. present: Readers learn the hazard type from "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  6. present: Hazard present via the explicit phrase "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  7. present: The threat is particularized as "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  8. present: Coding H=1 because "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM" is a named hazard.
  9. present: Specific danger language: "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  10. present: The alert states the problem as "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  11. present: Hazard element met by "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  12. present: "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM" is more than a generic emergency word.
  13. present: Threat identity is clear from "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  14. present: The message pins the hazard to "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  15. present: Named condition "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM" counts as hazard.
  16. present: H is present: "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM" tells what is wrong.
  17. present: Concrete hazard wording includes "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  18. present: The incident type is given as "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  19. present: "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM" is the stated threat or weather/system hazard.
  20. present: Hazard codes yes on "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  21. present: Specifics beat generics here: "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  22. present: The text's hazard signal is "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  23. present: What happened is labeled "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  24. present: Hazard present with the phrase "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
  25. present: Threat naming succeeds through "SEVERE THUNDERSTORM".
• Locationabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No building, campus, street, or area is named.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No building, campus, street, or area is named.
  2. absent: Location is absent: the text never says where.
  3. absent: There is no place cue for recipients to orient to.
  4. absent: L=0 because spatial reference is missing.
  5. absent: The alert omits campus or site detail.
  6. absent: Where this applies is never stated.
  7. absent: No location language appears in the body.
  8. absent: Place naming fails on this wording.
  9. absent: Readers get no geographic anchor.
  10. absent: Location element is not satisfied.
  11. absent: Without a place name, L is zero.
  12. absent: The message leaves location unspecified.
  13. absent: No hall, campus, or area reference is present.
  14. absent: Spatial information is missing entirely.
  15. absent: L fails the place-naming test.
  16. absent: Affected site is not identified.
  17. absent: Location codes absent here.
  18. absent: The text is silent on where.
  19. absent: No campus geography is given.
  20. absent: Place element cannot be coded present.
  21. absent: Where-cue is blank in this alert.
  22. absent: Location not established by the wording.
  23. absent: Site detail is omitted.
  24. absent: No area or building reference exists.
  25. absent: L is absent on a pure no-place text.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Guidance is the instruction "seek shelter".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Guidance is the instruction "seek shelter".
  2. present: Protective action appears as "seek shelter".
  3. present: Recipients are told to act via "seek shelter".
  4. present: "seek shelter" is a direct what-to-do line.
  5. present: G=1 because "seek shelter" instructs the audience.
  6. present: The alert directs action with "seek shelter".
  7. present: Guidance present: "seek shelter".
  8. present: A clear instruction is "seek shelter".
  9. present: What to do is stated as "seek shelter".
  10. present: "seek shelter" counts as protective guidance.
  11. present: Action language "seek shelter" meets guidance.
  12. present: The message tells people "seek shelter".
  13. present: Guidance codes yes on "seek shelter".
  14. present: Operational direction: "seek shelter".
  15. present: Instructional content includes "seek shelter".
  16. present: "seek shelter" is audience-facing guidance.
  17. present: G is present via the cue "seek shelter".
  18. present: Protective or operational order "seek shelter" is explicit.
  19. present: The text's guidance signal is "seek shelter".
  20. present: Recipients receive the directive "seek shelter".
  21. present: What-to-do element satisfied by "seek shelter".
  22. present: "seek shelter" tells the public how to respond or operate.
  23. present: Guidance met through "seek shelter".
  24. present: Action instruction present: "seek shelter".
  25. present: The alert's order to the audience is "seek shelter".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Time is marked by "7:00 PM".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Time is marked by "7:00 PM".
  2. present: A temporal cue appears as "7:00 PM".
  3. present: When is answered with "7:00 PM".
  4. present: "7:00 PM" supplies timing or recency.
  5. present: T=1 because "7:00 PM" is a time reference.
  6. present: Clock or calendar language: "7:00 PM".
  7. present: The alert times the event with "7:00 PM".
  8. present: Temporal detail "7:00 PM" is present.
  9. present: Time element met by "7:00 PM".
  10. present: Recipients see timing via "7:00 PM".
  11. present: "7:00 PM" counts as the time cue.
  12. present: When-language includes "7:00 PM".
  13. present: T codes yes on "7:00 PM".
  14. present: A schedule or day marker "7:00 PM" appears.
  15. present: Timing is explicit: "7:00 PM".
  16. present: The text anchors time with "7:00 PM".
  17. present: "7:00 PM" is enough for the time element.
  18. present: Recency or clock cue "7:00 PM" is stated.
  19. present: T is present via "7:00 PM".
  20. present: Date or hour language "7:00 PM" supports T=1.
  21. present: Temporal reference: "7:00 PM".
  22. present: The when signal is "7:00 PM".
  23. present: Time present through "7:00 PM".
  24. present: "7:00 PM" tells recipients the relevant when.
  25. present: Schedule wording "7:00 PM" meets time.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Impact is conveyed by "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Impact is conveyed by "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  2. present: Consequence language appears as "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  3. present: Severity or harm is signaled by "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  4. present: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" states what the hazard does to people or operations.
  5. present: I=1 because "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" implies real-world impact.
  6. present: The alert spells impact through "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  7. present: Impact present: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  8. present: Operational or safety consequence "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" is explicit.
  9. present: What could happen is framed as "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  10. present: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" counts as impact beyond bare hazard naming.
  11. present: Impact element met by "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  12. present: Severity cue "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" supports I=1.
  13. present: I codes yes on "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  14. present: The text links hazard to effect via "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  15. present: Consequence wording: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  16. present: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" shows stakes for the campus community.
  17. present: Impact is not left implicit only: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  18. present: Harm or closure effect appears as "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  19. present: I is present via "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  20. present: The message states impact with "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  21. present: Real-world effect language "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" is included.
  22. present: Impact signal: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  23. present: "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…" communicates severity or disruption.
  24. present: Consequence is clear from "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".
  25. present: Impact present through the phrase "HOYAlert: The National Weather Service…".