Shelter in place after off-campus armed robbery then all-clear

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  EAGLE ALERT is a branded sender tag.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score S from EAGLE ALERT
  2. present: This pass treats EAGLE ALERT as the deciding S evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on EAGLE ALERT for S
  4. present: I find EAGLE ALERT sufficient for S in this pass
  5. present: Element S is present because the text has EAGLE ALERT
  6. present: For S I rely on the words EAGLE ALERT
  7. present: This burst carries EAGLE ALERT, so S is present
  8. present: I code S from the phrase EAGLE ALERT
  9. present: The deciding language for S is EAGLE ALERT
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: EAGLE ALERT meets S
  11. present: I read EAGLE ALERT and therefore mark S present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: EAGLE ALERT covers S
  13. present: Scoring S against EAGLE ALERT in this burst
  14. present: The alert names EAGLE ALERT, which satisfies S
  15. present: My S vote follows EAGLE ALERT
  16. present: Present for S: EAGLE ALERT
  17. present: I treat EAGLE ALERT as the S marker
  18. present: This wording, EAGLE ALERT, is my S basis
  19. present: From EAGLE ALERT I conclude S is in the message
  20. present: Cue EAGLE ALERT is enough for S here
  21. present: I separately score S using EAGLE ALERT
  22. present: The text supplies EAGLE ALERT for S
  23. present: S is 1 on this pass because of EAGLE ALERT
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, EAGLE ALERT is the S hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, EAGLE ALERT gives S
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  armed robbery names a specific crime hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score H from armed robbery
  2. present: This pass treats armed robbery as the deciding H evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on armed robbery for H
  4. present: I find armed robbery sufficient for H in this pass
  5. present: Element H is present because the text has armed robbery
  6. present: For H I rely on the words armed robbery
  7. present: This burst carries armed robbery, so H is present
  8. present: I code H from the phrase armed robbery
  9. present: The deciding language for H is armed robbery
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: armed robbery meets H
  11. present: I read armed robbery and therefore mark H present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: armed robbery covers H
  13. present: Scoring H against armed robbery in this burst
  14. present: The alert names armed robbery, which satisfies H
  15. present: My H vote follows armed robbery
  16. present: Present for H: armed robbery
  17. present: I treat armed robbery as the H marker
  18. present: This wording, armed robbery, is my H basis
  19. present: From armed robbery I conclude H is in the message
  20. present: Cue armed robbery is enough for H here
  21. present: I separately score H using armed robbery
  22. present: The text supplies armed robbery for H
  23. present: H is 1 on this pass because of armed robbery
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, armed robbery is the H hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, armed robbery gives H
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Armstrong Campus plus Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St name places.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score L from Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St
  2. present: This pass treats Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St as the deciding L evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St for L
  4. present: I find Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St sufficient for L in this pass
  5. present: Element L is present because the text has Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St
  6. present: For L I rely on the words Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St
  7. present: This burst carries Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St, so L is present
  8. present: I code L from the phrase Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St
  9. present: The deciding language for L is Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St meets L
  11. present: I read Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St and therefore mark L present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St covers L
  13. present: Scoring L against Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St in this burst
  14. present: The alert names Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St, which satisfies L
  15. present: My L vote follows Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St
  16. present: Present for L: Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St
  17. present: I treat Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St as the L marker
  18. present: This wording, Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St, is my L basis
  19. present: From Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St I conclude L is in the message
  20. present: Cue Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St is enough for L here
  21. present: I separately score L using Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St
  22. present: The text supplies Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St for L
  23. present: L is 1 on this pass because of Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St is the L hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, Armstrong Campus and Mercy Blvd and Abercorn St gives L
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR is a protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score G from Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR
  2. present: This pass treats Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR as the deciding G evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR for G
  4. present: I find Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR sufficient for G in this pass
  5. present: Element G is present because the text has Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR
  6. present: For G I rely on the words Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR
  7. present: This burst carries Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR, so G is present
  8. present: I code G from the phrase Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR
  9. present: The deciding language for G is Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR meets G
  11. present: I read Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR and therefore mark G present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR covers G
  13. present: Scoring G against Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR in this burst
  14. present: The alert names Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR, which satisfies G
  15. present: My G vote follows Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR
  16. present: Present for G: Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR
  17. present: I treat Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR as the G marker
  18. present: This wording, Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR, is my G basis
  19. present: From Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR I conclude G is in the message
  20. present: Cue Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR is enough for G here
  21. present: I separately score G using Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR
  22. present: The text supplies Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR for G
  23. present: G is 1 on this pass because of Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR is the G hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, Shelter in place until an ALL CLEAR gives G
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  6:45 p.m. is a clock time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score T from 6:45 p.m.
  2. present: This pass treats 6:45 p.m. as the deciding T evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on 6:45 p.m. for T
  4. present: I find 6:45 p.m. sufficient for T in this pass
  5. present: Element T is present because the text has 6:45 p.m.
  6. present: For T I rely on the words 6:45 p.m.
  7. present: This burst carries 6:45 p.m., so T is present
  8. present: I code T from the phrase 6:45 p.m.
  9. present: The deciding language for T is 6:45 p.m.
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: 6:45 p.m. meets T
  11. present: I read 6:45 p.m. and therefore mark T present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: 6:45 p.m. covers T
  13. present: Scoring T against 6:45 p.m. in this burst
  14. present: The alert names 6:45 p.m., which satisfies T
  15. present: My T vote follows 6:45 p.m.
  16. present: Present for T: 6:45 p.m.
  17. present: I treat 6:45 p.m. as the T marker
  18. present: This wording, 6:45 p.m., is my T basis
  19. present: From 6:45 p.m. I conclude T is in the message
  20. present: Cue 6:45 p.m. is enough for T here
  21. present: I separately score T using 6:45 p.m.
  22. present: The text supplies 6:45 p.m. for T
  23. present: T is 1 on this pass because of 6:45 p.m.
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, 6:45 p.m. is the T hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, 6:45 p.m. gives T
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The burst names the robbery without stating consequence or severity, so Impact is absent.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: On this independent read I find no I cue: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  2. absent: This pass sees no I because it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  3. absent: My vote withholds I: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  4. absent: I cannot mark I present: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  5. absent: Element I is absent: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  6. absent: For I the text never it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  7. absent: This burst lacks I; it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  8. absent: I code I absent given it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  9. absent: No deciding I language: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  10. absent: Pass-level judgment: I missing because it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  11. absent: I read the whole burst and still lack I: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  12. absent: Nothing in the text names I: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  13. absent: Scoring I as 0: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  14. absent: The alert never it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  15. absent: My I vote is 0: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  16. absent: Absent for I: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  17. absent: I treat I as missing because it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  18. absent: This wording does not meet I: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  19. absent: From the full text I conclude I is out: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  20. absent: Cue for I is missing: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  21. absent: I separately score I 0 using it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  22. absent: The text does not supply I: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  23. absent: I is 0 on this pass because it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  24. absent: Looking only at this burst, I fails: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening
  25. absent: Independent of other elements, I is not here: it names the robbery but states no harm or severity such as dangerous or life-threatening