City boil-water advisory on campus until Monday

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: the branded IUB alert tag identifies the sender, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.
  2. present: The branded "IUB alert" and the City of Bloomington as issuer identify the source.
  3. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.
  4. present: The branded tag "IUB alert" and the City of Bloomington identify the issuing authorities.
  5. present: The branded "IUB alert" tag and the City of Bloomington as issuer identify the source.
  6. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the "City of Bloomington" is named as the issuing authority.
  7. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the "City of Bloomington" is named as the issuing authority.
  8. present: The branded tag "IUB alert" identifies the sender, and the City of Bloomington is named as issuer.
  9. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.
  10. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.
  11. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.
  12. present: The branded "IUB alert" tag and the City of Bloomington as issuer identify the source.
  13. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and "City of Bloomington" is named as the issuing authority.
  14. present: The branded "IUB alert" and issuance by the City of Bloomington identify the sender and issuing authority.
  15. present: "IUB alert" is a branded signature, and "City of Bloomington" is named as the issuing authority.
  16. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.
  17. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and "City of Bloomington" is named as the issuing authority.
  18. present: The branded "IUB alert" and the "City of Bloomington" as issuer identify the source.
  19. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.
  20. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.
  21. present: "IUB alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Bloomington is named as the issuing authority.
  22. present: The branded tag "IUB alert" identifies the sender, and the City of Bloomington is named as issuer.
  23. present: The branded "IUB alert" and "City of Bloomington" identify the sender and issuing authority.
  24. present: The branded "IUB alert" and the City of Bloomington as issuer identify the source.
  25. present: "IUB alert" is a branded signature, and "City of Bloomington" is named as the issuing authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present because a boil water advisory names a specific water-safety threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific water-safety threat.
  2. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific threat.
  3. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water-safety threat.
  4. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water-safety threat.
  5. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific threat.
  6. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water safety threat.
  7. present: A "boil water advisory" is a specific water-quality hazard.
  8. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water quality threat.
  9. present: A "boil water advisory" is a specific water-safety hazard, not a generic incident.
  10. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific water safety hazard.
  11. present: A boil water advisory is a specific water contamination threat.
  12. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water safety threat.
  13. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water-safety threat.
  14. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water hazard.
  15. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water hazard.
  16. present: It names a "boil water advisory" as the specific threat.
  17. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water-safety threat.
  18. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water quality threat.
  19. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water quality threat.
  20. present: It names a "boil water advisory" as the specific threat.
  21. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water safety threat.
  22. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water quality threat.
  23. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water-safety threat.
  24. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water safety threat.
  25. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific water-safety threat.
• Locationabsent9/25

  Final assessment

  16 of 25 reads find Location absent because City of Bloomington names the issuer, not where the advisory applies; 9 treat the city name as a place.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The city is named as the issuer, but the text never says where the advisory applies, such as campus or an area.
  2. present: The City of Bloomington is the named place the advisory covers, alongside the IUB campus brand.
  3. absent: The city is named as the issuer, but the text never says where the advisory applies (no campus, street, or area).
  4. absent: City of Bloomington is the issuer, and no campus, building, or other place is given for where the advisory applies.
  5. absent: The city is named as the issuer, not as an affected building, campus, street, or area.
  6. absent: No campus, building, street, or other place is given for where the advisory applies.
  7. absent: The city is named as the issuer, but the text never says where the advisory applies, such as campus.
  8. absent: The text never says where the advisory applies, such as campus or a named area; the city is only the issuer.
  9. absent: The City of Bloomington is the issuer, and the text never says where the advisory applies.
  10. absent: The City of Bloomington is named as the issuer, not as a campus, building, or other place the advisory covers.
  11. present: The advisory is tied to the City of Bloomington, a named place.
  12. absent: The City of Bloomington is named as the issuer, not as where the advisory applies, and campus is not mentioned.
  13. absent: "City of Bloomington" is the issuer, and no campus, building, or other place for the advisory is given.
  14. absent: The City of Bloomington is named as the issuer, not as a place where the advisory applies, and campus is not mentioned.
  15. present: "City of Bloomington" is a named place for the advisory, alongside the IUB campus brand.
  16. present: The advisory is issued by the City of Bloomington, a named place.
  17. present: The advisory is tied to the City of Bloomington, a named place.
  18. absent: The City of Bloomington is the issuer, and the text never says where the advisory applies.
  19. present: The advisory is issued for the City of Bloomington, a named place.
  20. present: The advisory is issued for the "City of Bloomington", a named place, under an IUB campus alert.
  21. absent: The city is named as the issuer, but the text never says where the advisory applies.
  22. absent: The City of Bloomington is who issued the advisory, not a stated place where it applies.
  23. absent: "City of Bloomington" is the issuer, and the text never says where the advisory applies.
  24. present: The "City of Bloomington" is a named place the advisory concerns.
  25. present: The advisory is tied to the City of Bloomington, a named place.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present: Check IU email for more info is an instruction to monitor updates.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor updates.
  2. present: It tells recipients to "Check IU email for more info", a monitor-for-updates instruction.
  3. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor for updates.
  4. present: Recipients are told to "Check IU email for more info", an instruction to monitor for updates.
  5. present: It tells recipients to "Check IU email for more info", a monitor-for-updates instruction.
  6. present: Recipients are told to "Check IU email for more info", an instruction to monitor updates.
  7. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor updates.
  8. present: It tells recipients to "Check IU email for more info", which is monitoring for updates.
  9. present: "Check IU email for more info" tells recipients to monitor for updates.
  10. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor updates.
  11. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor updates.
  12. present: It tells recipients to "Check IU email for more info", an instruction to monitor updates.
  13. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor for updates.
  14. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor for updates.
  15. present: "Check IU email for more info" tells recipients to monitor for updates.
  16. present: A boil water advisory is an instruction to boil water, and it also says to check IU email.
  17. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor for updates.
  18. present: It instructs recipients to "Check IU email for more info", which is monitoring for updates.
  19. present: It instructs recipients to "Check IU email for more info".
  20. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor for updates.
  21. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor for updates.
  22. present: It tells recipients to "Check IU email for more info", which is monitoring for updates.
  23. present: It tells recipients to "Check IU email for more info", a monitor-for-updates instruction.
  24. present: It tells recipients to "Check IU email for more info", an instruction to monitor updates.
  25. present: "Check IU email for more info" instructs recipients to monitor for updates.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time present via until 3pm Monday (9/21), an explicit end time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a clock time and date.
  2. present: It gives a duration of "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  3. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a clear time bound.
  4. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  5. present: It gives a duration: "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  6. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  7. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a clock time and date.
  8. present: It gives a duration of "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  9. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a clock time and date.
  10. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a clock time and date.
  11. present: It lasts until 3pm Monday (9/21).
  12. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  13. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a stated end time.
  14. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a stated end time and date.
  15. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a clear time bound.
  16. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  17. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  18. present: It gives a duration: "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  19. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  20. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  21. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a clock time and date.
  22. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)", a clock time and date.
  23. present: It gives a bound of "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  24. present: The advisory lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
  25. present: It lasts "until 3pm Monday (9/21)".
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: the advisory is named without a stated consequence such as illness from unsafe water.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No illness, contamination harm, or other consequence of the advisory is stated.
  2. absent: It does not state any consequence of the advisory, such as illness from unsafe water.
  3. absent: No illness, unsafety, or other consequence is stated beyond the advisory name.
  4. absent: No consequence or severity, such as illness from unsafe water, is stated.
  5. absent: The advisory is named without stating illness risk or other harm from unsafe water.
  6. absent: No illness, contamination harm, or other consequence is stated.
  7. absent: No illness, contamination, or other harm from the water is stated.
  8. absent: No consequence or severity, such as illness risk from contaminated water, is stated.
  9. absent: No illness, danger, or other consequence of the water problem is stated.
  10. absent: The advisory is named without stating illness, contamination harm, or other consequences.
  11. absent: The advisory is named without stating illness risk or any other consequence of the water.
  12. absent: The advisory is named without stating illness risk or other harm from the water.
  13. absent: The advisory is named but no consequence, such as illness from unsafe water, is stated.
  14. absent: No illness, contamination, or other consequence of the water advisory is stated.
  15. absent: No consequence such as illness or unsafe drinking water is stated.
  16. absent: No consequence or severity, such as illness risk, is stated beyond the advisory name.
  17. absent: No illness, unsafe drinking water, or other consequence is stated beyond the advisory name.
  18. absent: The advisory is named, but no illness, contamination harm, or other consequence is stated.
  19. absent: No illness, unsafe water consequence, or other severity is stated.
  20. absent: The advisory is named without stating illness risk or other harm from the water.
  21. absent: No illness, contamination, or other consequence of the water is stated.
  22. absent: The advisory is named without stating illness risk or other harm from the water.
  23. absent: The advisory is named, but no consequence or severity for people or property is stated.
  24. absent: No illness, contamination harm, or other consequence is stated beyond the advisory name.
  25. absent: The advisory is named but no illness risk or other consequence of untreated water is stated.