Power Outage Reported: Asa Packer Campus

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25 read it as present. No office, department or alert brand signs the notice; the unattributed 'Crews are en route' names responders, not a sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No issuing office, agency, or branded tag is named in the message.
  2. absent: No department, official, or branded tag identifies the sender of this outage notice.
  3. absent: No sender, department, or branded signature is given anywhere in the message.
  4. absent: Message names no department, university, or alert brand as its author.
  5. absent: No issuing office or alert brand is named; only 'crews' are referenced as responders.
  6. absent: No issuing office, agency or alert brand is identified in the notice.
  7. absent: Headline and body name no sender, department, or alert brand.
  8. absent: No issuing office or branded tag is present.
  9. absent: No office, agency, or alert brand identifies who sent this outage notice.
  10. absent: No sender, office or alert brand is named anywhere in the outage notice.
  11. absent: No department, university name, or alert branding identifies who sent this notice.
  12. absent: No sender, department, or branded signature appears in the notice.
  13. absent: No university, department, or branded sender tag is present in the message.
  14. absent: No department, university name, or alert brand identifies who sent this.
  15. absent: No department, brand tag or institution names itself as sender.
  16. absent: No department, brand, or sender name appears in the outage notice.
  17. absent: No sender, office, or branded signature is present in the notice.
  18. absent: No issuing office, police department, or alert brand is identified.
  19. absent: No department, university name or alert tag appears in the outage notice.
  20. absent: The notice names no sending office, agency, or branded alert signature.
  21. absent: No sending office, agency, or alert brand is identified in the text.
  22. absent: No sender is named anywhere; only 'Crews are en route' without an agency.
  23. absent: No university, department or alert brand signs the notice; it begins straight with the outage heading.
  24. absent: No sender, department, or alert brand is identified in the message.
  25. absent: No sender named; only unattributed 'crews' are mentioned as responding.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The condition is stated plainly: 'A power outage has been reported at Asa Packer Campus'.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: States a power outage as the specific problem.
  2. present: A power outage is the specific condition reported.
  3. present: A power outage is the named hazard.
  4. present: States 'A power outage has been reported', a concrete hazard.
  5. present: States 'A power outage has been reported'.
  6. present: A power outage is the specific condition reported.
  7. present: Names the hazard as a power outage.
  8. present: Names a power outage as the specific problem.
  9. present: Names a 'power outage' as the specific condition.
  10. present: States that 'A power outage has been reported', a specific condition.
  11. present: A power outage is the specific condition reported.
  12. present: Reports a 'power outage', a specific named condition.
  13. present: States a power outage as the specific problem.
  14. present: Names a 'power outage' as the specific condition.
  15. present: "A power outage has been reported" names the specific condition.
  16. present: 'A power outage has been reported' names the specific condition.
  17. present: 'A power outage' is the specific named condition.
  18. present: States 'A power outage has been reported'.
  19. present: A power outage is the named condition.
  20. present: Specifies the problem: 'A power outage has been reported'.
  21. present: 'A power outage has been reported' names the specific condition.
  22. present: 'A power outage has been reported' names the hazard.
  23. present: Names a specific condition: 'A power outage has been reported'.
  24. present: Names a power outage as the hazard.
  25. present: Names a 'power outage' as the specific problem.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Asa Packer Campus is named and ten affected buildings are listed, from Lamberton Hall to Linderman Library and the Dialogue Center.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Asa Packer Campus plus a list of named halls and buildings.
  2. present: Lists Asa Packer Campus buildings including Linderman Library and Grace Hall.
  3. present: Asa Packer Campus plus a list of ten affected buildings.
  4. present: Identifies Asa Packer Campus and lists buildings such as Linderman Library.
  5. present: Lists Asa Packer Campus buildings including Linderman Library and Grace Hall.
  6. present: Names Asa Packer Campus plus ten affected buildings including Linderman Library.
  7. present: Asa Packer Campus plus a list of affected halls such as Linderman Library.
  8. present: Lists Asa Packer Campus buildings including Linderman Library.
  9. present: Lists Asa Packer Campus plus Lamberton, Coxe, Linderman and other named buildings.
  10. present: Lists Asa Packer Campus buildings including Linderman Library and Grace Hall.
  11. present: Asa Packer Campus plus a list of ten named buildings pinpoints the area.
  12. present: Names Asa Packer Campus and lists buildings such as Linderman Library.
  13. present: Names Asa Packer Campus and lists affected buildings such as Linderman Library.
  14. present: Lists Asa Packer Campus and buildings such as Linderman Library.
  15. present: Asa Packer Campus plus a list of named halls locates it.
  16. present: 'Asa Packer Campus' plus a list of named halls.
  17. present: Lists Asa Packer Campus and buildings including Linderman Library and Grace Hall.
  18. present: Names Asa Packer Campus and lists affected halls such as Linderman Library.
  19. present: Asa Packer Campus plus a list of affected halls.
  20. present: Lists 'Asa Packer Campus' plus Lamberton Hall, Linderman Library and others.
  21. present: Asa Packer Campus plus a list of affected halls gives location.
  22. present: 'Asa Packer Campus' plus a list of named halls.
  23. present: Lists Asa Packer Campus and buildings such as Linderman Library and Grace Hall.
  24. present: Gives Asa Packer Campus plus a list of affected halls and offices.
  25. present: Names Asa Packer Campus and lists affected halls such as Linderman Library.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25 read it as present. Recipients are asked to do nothing; 'Crews are en route to make repairs' describes responder activity only.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Only says crews are en route, which is responder action, not reader guidance.
  2. absent: Reports crews en route but asks nothing of recipients.
  3. absent: Only reports crews en route; nothing is asked of recipients.
  4. absent: Lists affected buildings and repair status but asks nothing of recipients.
  5. absent: Reports crew response but asks nothing of recipients.
  6. absent: Readers are given no action; only crews being en route is described.
  7. absent: Crews being en route describes responders, not any action for recipients.
  8. absent: Gives no instruction to recipients, only that crews are en route.
  9. absent: Only says crews are en route, which describes responders rather than instructing recipients.
  10. absent: Reports that crews are en route but asks recipients to do nothing.
  11. absent: Crews responding is responder activity, not an instruction to recipients.
  12. absent: Lists affected buildings and crews en route but asks nothing of recipients.
  13. absent: Only reports that crews are en route; nothing is asked of recipients.
  14. absent: Only says crews are en route, which is responder action, not recipient guidance.
  15. absent: Crews en route is responder activity, not an instruction to recipients.
  16. absent: Readers are told crews are en route but given no action of their own.
  17. absent: Only crew activity is described; recipients get no instruction.
  18. absent: Gives no instruction to recipients, only that crews are en route.
  19. absent: Crews responding is described, but recipients are given no action.
  20. absent: Reports crews are en route but gives readers nothing to do.
  21. absent: Only crew response is described; recipients are asked to do nothing.
  22. absent: Recipients are given no protective action; only responder activity is described.
  23. absent: Crews being en route describes responders, not any action for recipients.
  24. absent: No action is asked of recipients; only crews' activity is described.
  25. absent: No instruction of any kind is given to recipients.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The locations are 'currently impacted' and crews are 'en route', both marking present-time status.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: 'currently impacted' and crews 'en route' convey present timing.
  2. present: Says locations are 'currently impacted' and crews are 'en route'.
  3. present: Uses currently impacted to convey present status.
  4. present: Uses 'currently impacted' and says crews are 'en route'.
  5. present: 'currently impacted' and crews 'en route' mark present recency.
  6. present: Uses 'currently impacted' and 'Crews are en route'.
  7. present: Says the listed locations are 'currently impacted'.
  8. present: Says locations are currently impacted and crews are en route.
  9. present: Uses 'currently impacted' to convey recency.
  10. present: Says locations are 'currently impacted' and crews 'are en route'.
  11. present: 'Currently impacted' and 'crews are en route' convey present recency.
  12. present: Says the locations are 'currently impacted' and crews are 'en route'.
  13. present: 'currently impacted' and 'en route' convey present recency.
  14. present: Uses 'currently impacted' and 'are en route' for recency.
  15. present: "currently impacted" conveys present recency.
  16. present: 'currently impacted' conveys present timing.
  17. present: 'currently impacted' and 'en route' convey present recency.
  18. present: Says locations are 'currently impacted' and crews 'are en route'.
  19. present: Currently impacted signals present recency.
  20. present: Says the listed locations are 'currently impacted'.
  21. present: 'currently impacted' and 'Crews are en route' convey present recency.
  22. present: 'currently impacted' and 'en route' mark present-time status.
  23. present: Says the listed locations are 'currently impacted'.
  24. present: 'Currently impacted' and 'crews are en route' mark present time.
  25. present: Uses 'currently impacted' and crews 'en route', conveying recency.
• Impactabsent3/25

  Final assessment

  Absent by majority, 3 of 25 read it as present. Nothing is said about consequence or severity beyond the outage itself; the dissenters counted the list of impacted buildings as the stated effect.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity of the outage is described.
  2. absent: No statement of danger or damage beyond loss of power.
  3. present: Enumerates the buildings currently impacted, stating the outage's concrete effect.
  4. absent: No description of consequences beyond the bare fact of the outage.
  5. absent: No statement of risk, danger, or consequence from the outage.
  6. absent: No consequence beyond the bare fact of lost power is stated.
  7. present: Spells out the consequence by listing ten buildings left without power.
  8. absent: No severity or consequence of the outage is stated.
  9. absent: No description of what the outage could cause beyond the affected list.
  10. absent: No description of what the outage could cause beyond the listing.
  11. absent: No statement of what the outage could cause or how serious it is.
  12. absent: No description of risk or severity beyond the loss of power itself.
  13. absent: No consequence beyond the outage itself is described.
  14. absent: Lists affected buildings without stating any danger or severity.
  15. absent: No consequence beyond the outage itself is described.
  16. absent: No consequence beyond the outage itself is described.
  17. absent: No potential consequence or severity of the outage is stated.
  18. absent: Impact beyond loss of power is not characterized as harmful or serious.
  19. absent: No consequence beyond loss of power is characterized.
  20. absent: No statement of what the outage could cause or how serious it is.
  21. absent: No consequence beyond the outage itself is described.
  22. absent: Affected buildings are listed but no danger or severity is stated.
  23. absent: No statement of what the outage could cause or how serious it is.
  24. present: Lists the specific buildings 'currently impacted', conveying the outage's effect.
  25. absent: Lists affected buildings but never says what the outage could cause.