Nearby shots with no campus threat then avoid North Street

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Police is a named agency in the opening clause Police investigating, which the rubric counts as source.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "Police", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "Police" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "Police" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "Police".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "Police" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "Police", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "Police" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "Police".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "Police" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "Police".
  11. present: The body names it with "Police", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "Police".
  13. present: Because the alert says "Police", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "Police" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "Police" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "Police" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "Police" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "Police" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "Police" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "Police" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "Police".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "Police".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "Police" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "Police" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "Police" is on the page, so present.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  The product names shots fired as the specific threat, not a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "shots fired", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "shots fired" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "shots fired" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "shots fired".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "shots fired" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "shots fired", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "shots fired" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "shots fired".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "shots fired" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "shots fired".
  11. present: The body names it with "shots fired", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "shots fired".
  13. present: Because the alert says "shots fired", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "shots fired" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "shots fired" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "shots fired" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "shots fired" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "shots fired" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "shots fired" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "shots fired" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "shots fired".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "shots fired".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "shots fired" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "shots fired" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "shots fired" is on the page, so present.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Location is given as nearby and later as campus in no indication of threat to campus.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "nearby", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "nearby" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "nearby" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "nearby".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "nearby" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "nearby", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "nearby" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "nearby".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "nearby" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "nearby".
  11. present: The body names it with "nearby", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "nearby".
  13. present: Because the alert says "nearby", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "nearby" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "nearby" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "nearby" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "nearby" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "nearby" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "nearby" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "nearby" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "nearby".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "nearby".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "nearby" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "nearby" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "nearby" is on the page, so present.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Recipients are told to Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior, both instructions to them.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior".
  11. present: The body names it with "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior".
  13. present: Because the alert says "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "Exercise caution and report suspicious behavior" is on the page, so present.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Currently is a recency cue the rubric lists alongside now and immediately.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "Currently", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "Currently" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "Currently" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "Currently".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "Currently" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "Currently", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "Currently" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "Currently".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "Currently" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "Currently".
  11. present: The body names it with "Currently", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "Currently".
  13. present: Because the alert says "Currently", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "Currently" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "Currently" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "Currently" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "Currently" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "Currently" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "Currently" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "Currently" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "Currently".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "Currently".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "Currently" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "Currently" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "Currently" is on the page, so present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  No consequence language such as dangerous or could cause injury appears; no threat to campus denies severity rather than stating harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: This pass finds no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots anywhere in the body, so the element is absent.
  2. absent: Absent: a full read never turns up a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots.
  3. absent: The message never supplies a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots, which this rubric requires.
  4. absent: I vote absent because a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots is not in the transmitted text.
  5. absent: Nothing in the wording amounts to a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots.
  6. absent: On this read the alert is silent on a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots.
  7. absent: Absent follows from the lack of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots after reading the whole product.
  8. absent: A recipient would not learn a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots from this text.
  9. absent: The element fails: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots does not appear.
  10. absent: I cannot mark present without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots, and it is not there.
  11. absent: This independent pass sees no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots to quote.
  12. absent: Coding absent; the body omits a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots.
  13. absent: No clause in the alert does the work of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots.
  14. absent: The four corners of the message leave a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots unspecified.
  15. absent: Absent vote: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots would have to be invented.
  16. absent: This reviewer looked for a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots and did not find it.
  17. absent: The text stays at other facts and never reaches a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots.
  18. absent: Without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots in the wording, the element is missing.
  19. absent: Present would need a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots; that language is not used.
  20. absent: I record absent after confirming the product lacks a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots.
  21. absent: The alert does not identify a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots in any sentence.
  22. absent: Missing a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots is the reason for the absent vote.
  23. absent: This pass will not infer a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots from neighboring facts.
  24. absent: No quoted span equals a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots, so absent.
  25. absent: Independent judgment: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the shots is not on the page.