Non-stranger sexual assault reported in a residence hall

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  The Longwood Title IX Office and Longwood Police are named issuing and reporting authorities.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "the Longwood Title IX Office", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "the Longwood Title IX Office" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "the Longwood Title IX Office" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "the Longwood Title IX Office".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "the Longwood Title IX Office" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "the Longwood Title IX Office", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "the Longwood Title IX Office" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "the Longwood Title IX Office".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "the Longwood Title IX Office" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "the Longwood Title IX Office".
  11. present: The body names it with "the Longwood Title IX Office", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "the Longwood Title IX Office".
  13. present: Because the alert says "the Longwood Title IX Office", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "the Longwood Title IX Office" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "the Longwood Title IX Office" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "the Longwood Title IX Office" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "the Longwood Title IX Office" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "the Longwood Title IX Office" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "the Longwood Title IX Office" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "the Longwood Title IX Office" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "the Longwood Title IX Office".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "the Longwood Title IX Office".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "the Longwood Title IX Office" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "the Longwood Title IX Office" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "the Longwood Title IX Office" is on the page, so present.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  The warning names a non-stranger sexual assault as the specific offense.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "non-stranger sexual assault", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "non-stranger sexual assault" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "non-stranger sexual assault" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "non-stranger sexual assault".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "non-stranger sexual assault" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "non-stranger sexual assault", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "non-stranger sexual assault" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "non-stranger sexual assault".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "non-stranger sexual assault" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "non-stranger sexual assault".
  11. present: The body names it with "non-stranger sexual assault", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "non-stranger sexual assault".
  13. present: Because the alert says "non-stranger sexual assault", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "non-stranger sexual assault" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "non-stranger sexual assault" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "non-stranger sexual assault" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "non-stranger sexual assault" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "non-stranger sexual assault" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "non-stranger sexual assault" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "non-stranger sexual assault" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "non-stranger sexual assault".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "non-stranger sexual assault".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "non-stranger sexual assault" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "non-stranger sexual assault" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "non-stranger sexual assault" is on the page, so present.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  The assault is placed in a campus residence hall, with the Title IX Office in Eason Hall G-08L.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "campus residence hall", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "campus residence hall" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "campus residence hall" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "campus residence hall".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "campus residence hall" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "campus residence hall", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "campus residence hall" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "campus residence hall".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "campus residence hall" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "campus residence hall".
  11. present: The body names it with "campus residence hall", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "campus residence hall".
  13. present: Because the alert says "campus residence hall", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "campus residence hall" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "campus residence hall" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "campus residence hall" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "campus residence hall" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "campus residence hall" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "campus residence hall" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "campus residence hall" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "campus residence hall".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "campus residence hall".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "campus residence hall" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "campus residence hall" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "campus residence hall" is on the page, so present.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Survivors are instructed to call Longwood Police, dial 911, email the Title IX Coordinator, or use Say Something.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911".
  11. present: The body names it with "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911".
  13. present: Because the alert says "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "call Longwood Police at 434-395-2091 or dial 911" is on the page, so present.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  early Sunday morning is a day-part time cue for when the assault occurred.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "early Sunday morning", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "early Sunday morning" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "early Sunday morning" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "early Sunday morning".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "early Sunday morning" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "early Sunday morning", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "early Sunday morning" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "early Sunday morning".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "early Sunday morning" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "early Sunday morning".
  11. present: The body names it with "early Sunday morning", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "early Sunday morning".
  13. present: Because the alert says "early Sunday morning", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "early Sunday morning" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "early Sunday morning" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "early Sunday morning" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "early Sunday morning" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "early Sunday morning" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "early Sunday morning" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "early Sunday morning" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "early Sunday morning".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "early Sunday morning".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "early Sunday morning" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "early Sunday morning" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "early Sunday morning" is on the page, so present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The product does not add harm language such as life-threatening; the offense name is the hazard, not an extra impact clause.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: This pass finds no a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault anywhere in the body, so the element is absent.
  2. absent: Absent: a full read never turns up a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault.
  3. absent: The message never supplies a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault, which this rubric requires.
  4. absent: I vote absent because a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault is not in the transmitted text.
  5. absent: Nothing in the wording amounts to a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault.
  6. absent: On this read the alert is silent on a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault.
  7. absent: Absent follows from the lack of a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault after reading the whole product.
  8. absent: A recipient would not learn a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault from this text.
  9. absent: The element fails: a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault does not appear.
  10. absent: I cannot mark present without a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault, and it is not there.
  11. absent: This independent pass sees no a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault to quote.
  12. absent: Coding absent; the body omits a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault.
  13. absent: No clause in the alert does the work of a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault.
  14. absent: The four corners of the message leave a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault unspecified.
  15. absent: Absent vote: a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault would have to be invented.
  16. absent: This reviewer looked for a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault and did not find it.
  17. absent: The text stays at other facts and never reaches a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault.
  18. absent: Without a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault in the wording, the element is missing.
  19. absent: Present would need a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault; that language is not used.
  20. absent: I record absent after confirming the product lacks a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault.
  21. absent: The alert does not identify a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault in any sentence.
  22. absent: Missing a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault is the reason for the absent vote.
  23. absent: This pass will not infer a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault from neighboring facts.
  24. absent: No quoted span equals a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault, so absent.
  25. absent: Independent judgment: a stated consequence or severity beyond naming the assault is not on the page.