Burglary at 97 Bay State Road
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedMIT Police issued a crime alert / timely warning on or about 2019-06-18. Full text is preserved from the official MIT Police Crime Alerts archive.
- Alerts
- 1
- Response
- —
- Killed
- 0
- Injured
- 0
Alert Sequence
1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
On June 18, 2019, the MIT Police received a walk-in report of a burglary from a bedroom at 97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity). The reporting party stated that sometime between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15, someone entered his room and stole his passport, Social Security card and other documentation. There is no suspect information available. Issued by Captain Andrew Turco
Sourcepresent25/25
Final assessment
Present, 25 of 25. The notice states "the MIT Police received a walk-in report" and closes "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco", naming both the agency and the signing officer.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The message names the MIT Police and is "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco".
- present: "the MIT Police received a walk-in report" and the sign-off by Captain Andrew Turco name the sender.
- present: "the MIT Police received a walk-in report" and it is "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco".
- present: The message names "the MIT Police" and is issued by Captain Andrew Turco.
- present: The brief notice ends "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco", identifying MIT Police as sender.
- present: "the MIT Police" received the report and "Captain Andrew Turco" issued the notice.
- present: The closing line "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco" plus "the MIT Police received" identifies the source.
- present: The MIT Police are named as receiving the report and "Captain Andrew Turco" signs it.
- present: The closing line "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco" plus "the MIT Police" identifies the sender.
- present: The MIT Police received the report and Captain Andrew Turco signs off on it.
- present: The text cites "the MIT Police" receiving the report and closes "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco".
- present: The text names the MIT Police and is "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco".
- present: The message names "the MIT Police" and is signed "Captain Andrew Turco".
- present: The text names the MIT Police and is "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco".
- present: "the MIT Police received a walk-in report" and Captain Andrew Turco's name identify the sender.
- present: The closing line "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco" plus "the MIT Police" identifies the sender.
- present: The closing line "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco" plus "the MIT Police received" identifies the sender.
- present: It ends "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco", and the MIT Police are named as receiving the report.
- present: It is attributed to "the MIT Police" and signed by Captain Andrew Turco.
- present: "the MIT Police received a walk-in report" and the sign-off "Captain Andrew Turco" name the source.
- present: "the MIT Police received a walk-in report" and "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco" name the sender.
- present: "The MIT Police" and the signature of Captain Andrew Turco identify the sender.
- present: The short notice is issued by Captain Andrew Turco and cites the MIT Police receiving the report.
- present: The message names "the MIT Police" and is "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco".
- present: The text names "the MIT Police" and closes with "Issued by Captain Andrew Turco".
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
Present, 25 of 25, unanimously. The text reports "a burglary from a bedroom at 97 Bay State Road" in which a passport and Social Security card were taken.
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom", a specific criminal intrusion.
- present: A burglary from a bedroom is reported, with a passport and Social Security card stolen.
- present: The named crime is "a burglary from a bedroom" with documents and a passport stolen.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom", a clearly named crime.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom" with a passport and Social Security card stolen.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom", a specific criminal intrusion.
- present: It describes "a burglary from a bedroom" in which someone entered the room and stole documents.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom", naming the crime committed.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom", a named crime with someone entering the room.
- present: A burglary from a bedroom is named, with documents taken by someone who entered.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom" in which a passport and Social Security card were stolen.
- present: It describes "a burglary from a bedroom" in which someone entered and took documents.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom", identifying the specific crime.
- present: A burglary is reported in which a passport and Social Security card were stolen.
- present: It names "a burglary from a bedroom", a definite criminal act.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom" where someone entered and stole documents.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom" in which a passport and Social Security card were stolen.
- present: The text reports "a burglary from a bedroom", someone entering and stealing documents.
- present: The message reports "a burglary from a bedroom", a specifically named crime.
- present: A burglary is named, with a passport, Social Security card and documents stolen from a bedroom.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom" in which a passport and Social Security card were stolen.
- present: A burglary from a bedroom is reported, a specific crime rather than a generic event.
- present: It names "a burglary from a bedroom" in which a passport and Social Security card were stolen.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom", a specific crime against a resident.
- present: It reports "a burglary from a bedroom", a specific criminal act.
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
Present, 25 of 25. The address is exact: "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)", with the theft placed in a bedroom there.
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The address "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)" identifies where it happened.
- present: The site is given as "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)."
- present: It gives the address "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The address given is "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The site is given as "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The place is given as "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The location is "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)", a named address.
- present: The place is "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The location is "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The address 97 Bay State Road, the Phi Theta fraternity, is given.
- present: The address is given as "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The place is "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The address "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)" pinpoints the location.
- present: It identifies "a bedroom at 97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The bedroom is placed at "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The address "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)" is given.
- present: The address given is "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: It locates the incident at "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The address "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)" identifies the location.
- present: The location "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)" is specified.
- present: The location is "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)", a named address.
- present: The bedroom is at "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The location is "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: It locates the burglary at "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)".
- present: The address "97 Bay State Road. (Phi Theta Fraternity)" is named.
Guidanceabsent0/25
Final assessment
Absent, 0 of 25. Every read agrees this short notice ends at "There is no suspect information available" and the signature, offering readers no precaution, action or reporting instruction.
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: This short notice contains no safety advice or action for readers, only the facts and a signature.
- absent: This short notice offers no protective instruction at all, only a factual account and a signature.
- absent: This short notice carries no safety tips or any instruction directed at recipients.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips, reporting request or any instruction to the reader.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instructions; it only recounts the report.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or any action for recipients to take.
- absent: This short notice contains no safety tips or instruction to recipients, only a factual account.
- absent: This short notice gives no safety instruction at all, offering neither a precaution nor a number to call.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instructions to recipients, only a factual report.
- absent: This short notice offers no instruction to readers, not even a tip line or a reminder to lock up.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instruction of any kind to recipients.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instructions of any kind to recipients.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instructions to recipients, only a factual account.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instructions for recipients to act on.
- absent: This short notice gives no safety tips or actions for readers, only the facts and signature.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instruction to recipients, only a factual account.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instructions of any kind to recipients.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instructions for recipients to follow.
- absent: This short notice offers no protective instruction to recipients, only the incident facts.
- absent: This short notice offers no instruction to recipients, not even a number to call.
- absent: This short notice offers no safety tips or instructions to recipients, only a factual account.
- absent: This short notice gives no safety tips or instructions to recipients at all.
- absent: This stub carries no safety tips or instruction of any kind to the reader.
- absent: The short notice offers no protective advice or action request to recipients at all.
- absent: This short notice carries no safety tips or instruction to the reader, only a factual account.
Timepresent25/25
Final assessment
Present, 25 of 25. The report is dated "On June 18, 2019" and the theft is bracketed "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: It gives a report date and an incident window "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: Times are supplied: report on June 18, 2019, theft between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15.
- present: It dates the theft to "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: It cites June 18, 2019 and the window "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: It dates the report June 18, 2019 and the theft to Saturday, June 15, between 10:00 AM and midnight.
- present: It cites June 18, 2019 and a window "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: It gives the report date June 18 and the window "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: It states the report date and the window "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: Dates are given: reported June 18, 2019, theft between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15.
- present: It dates the report June 18, 2019 and the theft to Saturday, June 15 between 10:00 AM and midnight.
- present: It dates the theft "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15", reported June 18, 2019.
- present: The theft window is "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: Dates are given: reported June 18, 2019, theft between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15.
- present: It dates the report June 18, 2019 and the theft window to Saturday, June 15.
- present: It cites "June 18, 2019" and a window "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: It dates the report June 18, 2019 and the theft between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15.
- present: It dates the report to June 18, 2019 and the theft to "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: It says the theft occurred "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: It gives "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15" for the entry.
- present: It cites "June 18, 2019" and the window "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: Times are given: "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15."
- present: It cites the June 18 report and a theft window "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
- present: It dates the report June 18, 2019 and the theft to Saturday, June 15 between 10:00 AM and midnight.
- present: It gives "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15" and the June 18 report date.
- present: It dates the report to June 18, 2019 and the theft "between 10:00 AM and midnight on Saturday, June 15".
Impactpresent16/25
Final assessment
Present, 16 of 25, a real split. The majority counts the named consequence, a stolen "passport, Social Security card and other documentation", as identity-theft loss; dissenters wanted an explicit danger or severity statement.
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Serious loss is stated: "stole his passport, Social Security card and other documentation".
- absent: Loss of documents is listed without any statement of danger, seriousness, or further risk.
- absent: No consequence, danger, or severity statement accompanies the report.
- present: Serious loss is described: a stolen "passport, Social Security card and other documentation".
- absent: The loss of identity documents is noted without any statement about risk or seriousness.
- present: The stated harm is serious document loss: "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation".
- present: The stated harm is the theft of "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation".
- present: Loss is specified: "someone entered his room and stole his passport, Social Security card and other documentation".
- present: The stolen items are identified as "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation".
- present: Loss of a passport, Social Security card and other documentation is stated, a serious concrete consequence.
- absent: No sentence conveys risk, harm or how serious the intrusion might be for readers.
- present: It notes a passport and Social Security card were stolen, identity documents whose loss matters.
- present: The stolen items, "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation", convey a serious personal loss.
- absent: No consequence or severity statement appears, only the fact of the missing documents.
- present: Theft of "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation" signals a serious identity loss.
- present: The stolen items are serious: "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation".
- absent: Identity documents were taken but no harm, risk, or seriousness is spelled out.
- present: Losing "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation" states the concrete harm done.
- present: The consequence is spelled out: "stole his passport, Social Security card and other documentation".
- absent: No consequence, danger, or severity statement accompanies the report of the theft.
- absent: The message stops at what was stolen and never states any risk or severity.
- present: The victim lost "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation", a serious identity exposure.
- absent: Although identity documents were taken, no risk or consequence is spelled out for readers.
- present: The theft of "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation" conveys serious personal loss.
- present: The stolen items are identity documents: "his passport, Social Security card and other documentation".
Coded by Claude Opus 5
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
Background
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- Official
Campus Alert Archive. "Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Burglary at 97 Bay State Road." Incident of June 18, 2019. Added July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/mit-burglary-97-bay-state-road-2019-06-18/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.