Burglary at Fenway House

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25, unanimous. "the MIT Police responded to Fenway House" and the notice is signed by Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: MIT Police responded and Sergeant David J. O'Connor is named as the issuer.
  2. present: "the MIT Police responded" and Sergeant O'Connor's sign-off identify the issuing agency.
  3. present: "the MIT Police responded" and Sergeant David J. O'Connor signs the notice.
  4. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police is listed as issuing the notice.
  5. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police signs the notice with address and phone.
  6. present: "the MIT Police" responded and Sergeant David J. O'Connor of MIT Police signed it.
  7. present: Signed by Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police, who responded to the call.
  8. present: "the MIT Police responded" and the issuer is "Sergeant David J. O'Connor, MIT Police".
  9. present: Issued by Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police, who responded to the scene.
  10. present: MIT Police responded and Sergeant David J. O'Connor is listed as issuing the notice.
  11. present: "the MIT Police responded" opens the notice and Sergeant O'Connor signs the closing block.
  12. present: MIT Police responded and Sergeant David J. O'Connor issued the notice.
  13. present: "the MIT Police responded" and Sergeant David J. O'Connor signs on behalf of MIT Police.
  14. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor and the MIT Police are identified as sending it.
  15. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police signs it, and MIT Police are the responders.
  16. present: Issued by "Sergeant David J. O'Connor" of the MIT Police, who responded to the scene.
  17. present: The notice is issued by "Sergeant David J. O'Connor" of the "MIT Police".
  18. present: "the MIT Police responded" and Sergeant O'Connor signs the notice, naming the authority.
  19. present: "The MIT Police responded" and Sergeant David J. O'Connor issues the notice.
  20. present: Closing attribution to "Sergeant David J. O'Connor ... MIT Police" names the issuing office.
  21. present: "the MIT Police responded" and the signature of Sergeant David J. O'Connor identify the sender.
  22. present: The MIT Police responded and Sergeant David J. O'Connor issues the notice.
  23. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police signs the notice and officers responded.
  24. present: "The MIT Police responded" and Sergeant David J. O'Connor issues the notice.
  25. present: "the MIT Police responded" and Sergeant David J. O'Connor signs the notice.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. It reports "a report of a burglary" where "the front door had been forced open", with one suspect in custody and a second still unaccounted for.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It reports a burglary with a forced front door and two suspects inside the house.
  2. present: It reports "a burglary" at Fenway House where the front door had been forced open.
  3. present: It reports a burglary with a forced-open front door and two suspects inside the house.
  4. present: It reports a burglary by two suspects, one still unaccounted for in the area.
  5. present: It reports "a burglary" with a forced front door and two suspects, one still unlocated.
  6. present: It reports a burglary with a forced front door and two intruders, one still unaccounted for.
  7. present: It reports "a burglary" by two suspects who forced entry into a residence.
  8. present: It reports "a burglary" with two suspects, one arrested and one still unaccounted for.
  9. present: It reports "a burglary" with a forced front door and two break-in suspects.
  10. present: A burglary with two suspects breaking into the house is named specifically.
  11. present: It reports a burglary with a forced front door and two suspects breaking into the house.
  12. present: It reports "a burglary" by two suspects who broke into the house through a forced front door.
  13. present: It is "a report of a burglary" with two suspects, one arrested and one still unlocated.
  14. present: Officers responded to "a report of a burglary" with the front door "forced open".
  15. present: It reports "a burglary" with two suspects breaking into the house.
  16. present: It reports a burglary with two break in suspects, one still unlocated.
  17. present: Officers answered "a report of a burglary" and found "the front door had been forced open".
  18. present: It reports a burglary with a forced front door and two intruders in the house.
  19. present: A burglary with forced entry by two suspects is described, one still unaccounted for.
  20. present: It reports "a burglary" where "the front door had been forced open" by two break-in suspects.
  21. present: It reports "a burglary" with a forced front door and two break in suspects, one still unfound.
  22. present: A burglary with forced entry by two suspects into an occupied house is described.
  23. present: It reports "a burglary" with a forced front door and two suspects inside the house.
  24. present: It reports a burglary with a forced front door and two suspects, one still unlocated.
  25. present: It reports a burglary by two suspects who forced the front door of the house.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The address is given plainly as "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The address is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  2. present: The address appears as "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston."
  3. present: It names "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  4. present: Fenway House is placed "at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  5. present: The place is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  6. present: Place named as "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  7. present: The address is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  8. present: The location is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  9. present: The address is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  10. present: Fenway House at 34 the Fenway, Boston is given as the place.
  11. present: The location is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  12. present: The address is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  13. present: The address is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  14. present: It names "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  15. present: The place is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  16. present: It names "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  17. present: It names "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  18. present: The address is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  19. present: It gives "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  20. present: The address is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  21. present: The place is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston."
  22. present: Fenway House is "located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  23. present: The address is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  24. present: It names "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
  25. present: The address is "Fenway House, located at 34 the Fenway, Boston".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Readers are told to "Always lock your office and residential doors and windows", to close doors behind them, report tailgaters, and call MIT Police immediately.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told to lock doors and windows and to notify police if a crime is occurring.
  2. present: Community members are instructed to lock doors and windows and report suspicious persons immediately.
  3. present: It directs readers to lock doors and windows and to report suspicious people at once.
  4. present: Readers are instructed to lock doors and windows and to notify MIT Police about suspicious people.
  5. present: Readers are directed to lock doors and windows and notify MIT Police about suspicious people.
  6. present: It advises locking doors and windows and immediately notifying MIT Police of suspicious activity.
  7. present: Tips instruct readers to lock residential doors and windows and report suspicious people to police.
  8. present: It tells readers to lock doors and windows and to report suspicious people to MIT Police at once.
  9. present: It tells readers to lock residential doors and windows and to report suspicious people.
  10. present: Readers are told to lock doors and windows, report suspicious people, and notify MIT Police immediately.
  11. present: It instructs readers to lock residential and office doors and to report suspicious people.
  12. present: Readers are told to lock doors and windows and to report suspicious people immediately.
  13. present: Readers are told to lock doors and windows, close doors tightly behind them, and report suspicious people.
  14. present: Readers are urged to lock doors and windows and report suspicious people immediately.
  15. present: Readers are told to lock doors and windows and to report suspicious people promptly.
  16. present: Tips direct readers to lock doors and windows and report suspicious people and tailgaters.
  17. present: Readers are told to lock doors and windows and to report suspicious people to police.
  18. present: Tips instruct readers to lock doors and windows and report suspicious people immediately.
  19. present: Recipients are told to lock doors, watch doors close behind them, and report suspicious people.
  20. present: Readers are instructed to lock doors and windows and to report suspicious people immediately.
  21. present: Readers are advised to lock doors and windows and to notify MIT Police about crimes immediately.
  22. present: Tips instruct residents to lock doors and windows and to report suspicious people.
  23. present: Readers are told to lock doors and windows and to report suspicious people and tailgaters.
  24. present: It tells readers to lock doors and windows and immediately notify MIT Police of crimes.
  25. present: Readers are instructed to lock doors and windows and report suspicious people to MIT Police.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The response is timed exactly, "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.", with the original typo preserved.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The response is timed "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  2. present: The response is timed at "February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  3. present: It is timed "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.".
  4. present: Dated "February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  5. present: The response is dated "February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.".
  6. present: The response time is "February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  7. present: The response time is "February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  8. present: The response is timed "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.".
  9. present: It gives "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  10. present: February 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m. is the stated response time.
  11. present: The response is timed "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  12. present: The response is timed "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  13. present: The response is timed "February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  14. present: The response is timed "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.".
  15. present: "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m." gives an exact date and time.
  16. present: The response is timed to "February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.".
  17. present: The response is timed "February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  18. present: It states "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  19. present: It dates the response "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.".
  20. present: "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m." gives the response date and time.
  21. present: "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m." fixes the date and time of the response.
  22. present: It is timed "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.".
  23. present: The response is timed "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m.".
  24. present: The response time is given as "On February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
  25. present: It is dated "February, 8, 2019 at 7:26 p.m."
• Impactpresent15/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 15 of 25, the narrowest split in this set. The majority weighs the forced-open front door and a second suspect who "was unable to be located"; ten reads hold that no harm or severity is actually stated.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It notes the "front door had been forced open" and that a second suspect was never located.
  2. absent: A second suspect remains unlocated, but the text states no consequence, danger, or severity.
  3. absent: Although a second suspect remains unfound, no harm or severity is actually stated.
  4. present: It conveys severity: "the front door had been forced open" and a second intruder could not be located.
  5. absent: Despite an uncaught second suspect, the text never says what harm could follow.
  6. present: Severity is implied by a door "forced open" and a second suspect who could not be located.
  7. present: It notes the door "had been forced open" and a second suspect could not be found inside the house.
  8. present: Officers "observed the front door had been forced open", and a second suspect could not be found inside.
  9. absent: No injury, loss or severity is described, only that one suspect was arrested and one not found.
  10. present: The front door was forced open and a second suspect was never found, implying continuing risk.
  11. absent: Even with a second suspect unlocated, no harm, danger or severity is stated to readers.
  12. present: The front door "had been forced open" and a second suspect could not be found, leaving danger unresolved.
  13. present: Officers found "the front door had been forced open" and a second intruder remained unaccounted for.
  14. absent: Although a second suspect was never found, no danger or consequence is spelled out.
  15. present: The forced front door and a second suspect never located imply continuing danger to residents.
  16. present: It notes "the front door had been forced open" and a second suspect could not be found, an ongoing risk.
  17. absent: A second suspect remains unfound, yet no danger or possible harm is stated to readers.
  18. present: It notes "the front door had been forced open" and that a second suspect could not be located.
  19. present: Severity is conveyed by the forced front door and a second suspect who could not be located.
  20. absent: Even with a second suspect unaccounted for, the text states no danger or possible harm.
  21. absent: No explicit danger or consequence is stated, even though one suspect was not located.
  22. present: The front door "had been forced open" and a second suspect remains unaccounted for, an ongoing risk.
  23. absent: One suspect remains unlocated but the notice never calls the situation dangerous or serious.
  24. present: The "front door had been forced open" and a second break in suspect could not be found.
  25. present: The door "had been forced open" and a second break in suspect could not be found, so risk continues.