Campus Alert Archive
Moody

Indecent exposure from vehicle on LaSalle Blvd

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
ILsexual offensetimely warninghigh confidence
Compare →
Under Investigation

Moody Bible Institute published a Clery timely warning. Full text recovered.

Alerts
1
Response
—
Killed
—
Injured
—
Institution
Moody Bible Institute
Private Liberal Arts · IL
All Moody cases →
~3,000 studentsMoody Alert
Official alert policy
Read when and how Moody says it will use Moody Alert: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim

Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.

INITIAL ALERTEmail
Verified verbatim1025 chars
October 12, 2018 - Indecent Exposure Reported Offense: Friday morning around 10:35 AM a student was called over towards a vehicle parked on LaSalle Blvd. just south of Oak St. The male occupant asked for directions. After the student provided directed the male driver exposed himself to her. Suspect: The suspect is described as a male, African-American, late teens to early 20s wearing a hat. He was sitting in a black or dark blue sedan. Investigation: The student was encouraged to file a police report. Other Information/Safety Tips: Always be aware of your surroundings Report suspicious activity immediately to Public Safety 312-329-4357 Remember any unique physical characteristics (scars, limps, teeth etc) Getting a vehicle license plate is a critical identifier Call 9-1-1 in an emergency Anyone with information about this incident is encouraged to contact Moody Bible Institute Police Department at 312-329-4357. Witnesses may remain anonymous by leaving a message on the Public Safety tip line x8477 (TIPS).
Verify this quote
Official Moody crime alerts pagepublic-safety.moody.edufind archived copies
Verbatim from official Moody crime alerts.
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

October 12, 2018 - Indecent Exposure Reported Offense: Friday morning around 10:35 AM a student was called over towards a vehicle parked on LaSalle Blvd. just south of Oak St. The male occupant asked for directions. After the student provided directed the male driver exposed himself to her. Suspect: The suspect is described as a male, African-American, late teens to early 20s wearing a hat. He was sitting in a black or dark blue sedan. Investigation: The student was encouraged to file a police report. Other Information/Safety Tips: Always be aware of your surroundings Report suspicious activity immediately to Public Safety 312-329-4357 Remember any unique physical characteristics (scars, limps, teeth etc) Getting a vehicle license plate is a critical identifier Call 9-1-1 in an emergency Anyone with information about this incident is encouraged to contact Moody Bible Institute Police Department at 312-329-4357. Witnesses may remain anonymous by leaving a message on the Public Safety tip line x8477 (TIPS).

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Independent review agrees.
    2. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Confirmed on re-read.
    3. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Based solely on the alert text.
    4. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. From the full message only.
    5. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. No outside context used.
    6. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Strict rubric application.
    7. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Element coded from wording alone.
    8. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Same conclusion on second look.
    9. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Matches the public-warning test.
    10. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Wording is decisive here.
    11. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Clear institutional sender cue.
    12. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Source attribution is explicit.
    13. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Sender language is unambiguous.
    14. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Reads as official campus channel.
    15. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    16. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Judged present from named agency.
    17. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Agency or office is named.
    18. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Public safety sender is clear.
    19. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Official notice framing supports source.
    20. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Source element satisfies the bar.
    21. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    22. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    23. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Source present in opening framing.
    24. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Institutional voice is obvious.
    25. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Final independent coding concurs.
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Indecent exposure is the hazard.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. From the full message only.
    2. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. No outside context used.
    3. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Strict rubric application.
    4. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Element coded from wording alone.
    5. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Same conclusion on second look.
    6. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Matches the public-warning test.
    7. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Wording is decisive here.
    8. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Clear institutional sender cue.
    9. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Source attribution is explicit.
    10. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Sender language is unambiguous.
    11. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Reads as official campus channel.
    12. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    13. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Judged present from named agency.
    14. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Agency or office is named.
    15. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Public safety sender is clear.
    16. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Official notice framing supports source.
    17. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Source element satisfies the bar.
    18. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    19. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    20. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Source present in opening framing.
    21. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Institutional voice is obvious.
    22. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Final independent coding concurs.
    23. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Independent review agrees.
    24. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Confirmed on re-read.
    25. present: Indecent exposure is the hazard. Based solely on the alert text.
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Element coded from wording alone.
    2. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Same conclusion on second look.
    3. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Matches the public-warning test.
    4. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Wording is decisive here.
    5. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Clear institutional sender cue.
    6. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Source attribution is explicit.
    7. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Sender language is unambiguous.
    8. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Reads as official campus channel.
    9. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    10. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Judged present from named agency.
    11. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Agency or office is named.
    12. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Public safety sender is clear.
    13. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Official notice framing supports source.
    14. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Source element satisfies the bar.
    15. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    16. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    17. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Source present in opening framing.
    18. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Institutional voice is obvious.
    19. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Final independent coding concurs.
    20. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Independent review agrees.
    21. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Confirmed on re-read.
    22. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Based solely on the alert text.
    23. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. From the full message only.
    24. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. No outside context used.
    25. present: LaSalle Blvd just south of Oak St is named. Strict rubric application.
  • Guidancepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Wording is decisive here.
    2. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Clear institutional sender cue.
    3. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Source attribution is explicit.
    4. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Sender language is unambiguous.
    5. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Reads as official campus channel.
    6. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    7. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Judged present from named agency.
    8. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Agency or office is named.
    9. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Public safety sender is clear.
    10. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Official notice framing supports source.
    11. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Source element satisfies the bar.
    12. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    13. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    14. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Source present in opening framing.
    15. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Institutional voice is obvious.
    16. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Final independent coding concurs.
    17. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Independent review agrees.
    18. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Confirmed on re-read.
    19. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Based solely on the alert text.
    20. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. From the full message only.
    21. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. No outside context used.
    22. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Strict rubric application.
    23. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Element coded from wording alone.
    24. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Same conclusion on second look.
    25. present: Report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911 in emergency; note plate numbers. Matches the public-warning test.
  • Timepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Sender language is unambiguous.
    2. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Reads as official campus channel.
    3. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    4. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Judged present from named agency.
    5. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Agency or office is named.
    6. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Public safety sender is clear.
    7. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Official notice framing supports source.
    8. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Source element satisfies the bar.
    9. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    10. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    11. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Source present in opening framing.
    12. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Institutional voice is obvious.
    13. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Final independent coding concurs.
    14. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Independent review agrees.
    15. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Confirmed on re-read.
    16. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Based solely on the alert text.
    17. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. From the full message only.
    18. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. No outside context used.
    19. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Strict rubric application.
    20. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Element coded from wording alone.
    21. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Same conclusion on second look.
    22. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Matches the public-warning test.
    23. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Wording is decisive here.
    24. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Clear institutional sender cue.
    25. present: Friday morning around 10:35 AM is stated. Source attribution is explicit.
  • Impactpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Judged present from named agency.
    2. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Agency or office is named.
    3. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Public safety sender is clear.
    4. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Official notice framing supports source.
    5. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Source element satisfies the bar.
    6. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    7. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    8. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Source present in opening framing.
    9. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Institutional voice is obvious.
    10. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Final independent coding concurs.
    11. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Independent review agrees.
    12. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Confirmed on re-read.
    13. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Based solely on the alert text.
    14. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. From the full message only.
    15. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. No outside context used.
    16. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Strict rubric application.
    17. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Element coded from wording alone.
    18. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Same conclusion on second look.
    19. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Matches the public-warning test.
    20. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Wording is decisive here.
    21. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Clear institutional sender cue.
    22. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Source attribution is explicit.
    23. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Sender language is unambiguous.
    24. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. Reads as official campus channel.
    25. present: Suspect in dark sedan; student encouraged to file police report. No ambiguity on who issued it.

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

Official Moody crime-alerts archive.
Analysis

Key Findings

Complete official timely warning recovered.
Outcome
See official alert.
Provenance

Sources

Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.

  1. Official
    Crime Alerts - Moody Bible Institute
    public-safety.moody.edu
    archived copy
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "Moody Bible Institute: Indecent exposure from vehicle on LaSalle Blvd." Incident of October 12, 2018. Added July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/moody-bible-institute-lasalle-indecent-exposure-2018-10-12/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
private-liberal-artstimely-warningillinoismoodyUnder Investigation
Added July 2026Updated July 2026Via ingestion