Campus Alert Archive
Moody

Forced vehicle theft 220 W Walton south of Solheim

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
ILrobberytimely warninghigh confidence
Compare →
Under Investigation

Moody Bible Institute published a Clery timely warning. Full text recovered.

Alerts
1
Response
—
Killed
—
Injured
—
Institution
Moody Bible Institute
Private Liberal Arts · IL
All Moody cases →
~3,000 studentsMoody Alert
Official alert policy
Read when and how Moody says it will use Moody Alert: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim

Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.

INITIAL ALERTEmail
Verified verbatim906 chars
February 13, 2018 - Motor Vehicle Theft and Aggravated Assault Reported Offense: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM a man was removed from his vehicle by force and the vehicle was stolen. This occurred on the street at 220 W Walton St. just south of the Solheim Center. The victim was not a member of the Moody Community. Suspect: The suspect was later involved in a traffic accident, detained, and is being held at a nearby hospital in serious condition. Investigation: The Chicago Police Department is handling the investigation. Other Information/Safety Tips: Avoid walking alone at night Always be aware of your surroundings Report suspicious activity immediately to Public Safety 312-329-4357 If you are confronted by an assailant, remain calm Remember any unique physical characteristics (scars, limps, teeth etc) Give up personal belongings to ensure your personal safety Call 9-1-1 in an emergency
Verify this quote
Official Moody crime alerts pagepublic-safety.moody.edufind archived copies
Verbatim from official Moody crime alerts.
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

February 13, 2018 - Motor Vehicle Theft and Aggravated Assault Reported Offense: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM a man was removed from his vehicle by force and the vehicle was stolen. This occurred on the street at 220 W Walton St. just south of the Solheim Center. The victim was not a member of the Moody Community. Suspect: The suspect was later involved in a traffic accident, detained, and is being held at a nearby hospital in serious condition. Investigation: The Chicago Police Department is handling the investigation. Other Information/Safety Tips: Avoid walking alone at night Always be aware of your surroundings Report suspicious activity immediately to Public Safety 312-329-4357 If you are confronted by an assailant, remain calm Remember any unique physical characteristics (scars, limps, teeth etc) Give up personal belongings to ensure your personal safety Call 9-1-1 in an emergency

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Independent review agrees.
    2. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Confirmed on re-read.
    3. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Based solely on the alert text.
    4. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. From the full message only.
    5. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. No outside context used.
    6. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Strict rubric application.
    7. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Element coded from wording alone.
    8. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Same conclusion on second look.
    9. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Matches the public-warning test.
    10. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Wording is decisive here.
    11. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Clear institutional sender cue.
    12. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Source attribution is explicit.
    13. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Sender language is unambiguous.
    14. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Reads as official campus channel.
    15. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    16. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Judged present from named agency.
    17. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Agency or office is named.
    18. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Public safety sender is clear.
    19. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Official notice framing supports source.
    20. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Source element satisfies the bar.
    21. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    22. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    23. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Source present in opening framing.
    24. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Institutional voice is obvious.
    25. present: Moody Bible Institute Public Safety crime alert is the source. Final independent coding concurs.
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. From the full message only.
    2. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. No outside context used.
    3. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Strict rubric application.
    4. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Element coded from wording alone.
    5. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Same conclusion on second look.
    6. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Matches the public-warning test.
    7. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Wording is decisive here.
    8. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Clear institutional sender cue.
    9. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Source attribution is explicit.
    10. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Sender language is unambiguous.
    11. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Reads as official campus channel.
    12. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    13. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Judged present from named agency.
    14. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Agency or office is named.
    15. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Public safety sender is clear.
    16. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Official notice framing supports source.
    17. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Source element satisfies the bar.
    18. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    19. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    20. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Source present in opening framing.
    21. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Institutional voice is obvious.
    22. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Final independent coding concurs.
    23. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Independent review agrees.
    24. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Confirmed on re-read.
    25. present: Forced vehicle theft / aggravated assault is the hazard. Based solely on the alert text.
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Element coded from wording alone.
    2. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Same conclusion on second look.
    3. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Matches the public-warning test.
    4. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Wording is decisive here.
    5. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Clear institutional sender cue.
    6. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Source attribution is explicit.
    7. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Sender language is unambiguous.
    8. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Reads as official campus channel.
    9. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    10. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Judged present from named agency.
    11. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Agency or office is named.
    12. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Public safety sender is clear.
    13. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Official notice framing supports source.
    14. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Source element satisfies the bar.
    15. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    16. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    17. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Source present in opening framing.
    18. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Institutional voice is obvious.
    19. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Final independent coding concurs.
    20. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Independent review agrees.
    21. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Confirmed on re-read.
    22. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Based solely on the alert text.
    23. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. From the full message only.
    24. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. No outside context used.
    25. present: 220 W Walton St just south of Solheim Center is named. Strict rubric application.
  • Guidancepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Wording is decisive here.
    2. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Clear institutional sender cue.
    3. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Source attribution is explicit.
    4. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Sender language is unambiguous.
    5. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Reads as official campus channel.
    6. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    7. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Judged present from named agency.
    8. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Agency or office is named.
    9. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Public safety sender is clear.
    10. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Official notice framing supports source.
    11. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Source element satisfies the bar.
    12. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    13. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    14. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Source present in opening framing.
    15. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Institutional voice is obvious.
    16. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Final independent coding concurs.
    17. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Independent review agrees.
    18. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Confirmed on re-read.
    19. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Based solely on the alert text.
    20. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. From the full message only.
    21. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. No outside context used.
    22. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Strict rubric application.
    23. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Element coded from wording alone.
    24. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Same conclusion on second look.
    25. present: Avoid walking alone at night; report to Public Safety 312-329-4357; call 911. Matches the public-warning test.
  • Timepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Sender language is unambiguous.
    2. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Reads as official campus channel.
    3. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. No ambiguity on who issued it.
    4. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Judged present from named agency.
    5. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Agency or office is named.
    6. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Public safety sender is clear.
    7. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Official notice framing supports source.
    8. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Source element satisfies the bar.
    9. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    10. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    11. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Source present in opening framing.
    12. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Institutional voice is obvious.
    13. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Final independent coding concurs.
    14. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Independent review agrees.
    15. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Confirmed on re-read.
    16. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Based solely on the alert text.
    17. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. From the full message only.
    18. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. No outside context used.
    19. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Strict rubric application.
    20. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Element coded from wording alone.
    21. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Same conclusion on second look.
    22. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Matches the public-warning test.
    23. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Wording is decisive here.
    24. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Clear institutional sender cue.
    25. present: Tuesday evening around 10:45 PM is stated. Source attribution is explicit.
  • Impactpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Judged present from named agency.
    2. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Agency or office is named.
    3. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Public safety sender is clear.
    4. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Official notice framing supports source.
    5. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Source element satisfies the bar.
    6. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Re-checked against full paragraph.
    7. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Pass agrees with majority logic.
    8. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Source present in opening framing.
    9. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Institutional voice is obvious.
    10. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Final independent coding concurs.
    11. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Independent review agrees.
    12. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Confirmed on re-read.
    13. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Based solely on the alert text.
    14. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. From the full message only.
    15. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. No outside context used.
    16. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Strict rubric application.
    17. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Element coded from wording alone.
    18. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Same conclusion on second look.
    19. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Matches the public-warning test.
    20. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Wording is decisive here.
    21. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Clear institutional sender cue.
    22. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Source attribution is explicit.
    23. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Sender language is unambiguous.
    24. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. Reads as official campus channel.
    25. present: Victim not Moody community; suspect later in accident and detained in serious condition. No ambiguity on who issued it.

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

Official Moody crime-alerts archive.
Analysis

Key Findings

Complete official timely warning recovered.
Outcome
See official alert.
Provenance

Sources

Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.

  1. Official
    Crime Alerts - Moody Bible Institute
    public-safety.moody.edu
    archived copy
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "Moody Bible Institute: Forced vehicle theft 220 W Walton south of Solheim." Incident of February 13, 2018. Added July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/moody-bible-institute-walton-carjacking-2018-02-13/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
private-liberal-artstimely-warningillinoismoodyUnder Investigation
Added July 2026Updated July 2026Via ingestion