Sexual assault in west-side residence hall room

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  S 25/25 majority present. The NIU Police Department is named as the investigating and issuing authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The NIU Police Department opens the message and is the named issuing authority.
  2. present: NIU Police Department is investigating names the department as the authority on the case.
  3. present: Campus police are identified by name as the NIU Police Department.
  4. present: The lead clause The NIU Police Department is investigating is a police byline.
  5. present: NIU in NIU Police Department names the university police unit behind the bulletin.
  6. present: A named agency, NIU Police Department, is who is investigating and thus who is sending.
  7. present: Police in NIU Police Department is a named public-safety source at the start.
  8. present: Northern Illinois University police are identified through the NIU Police Department label.
  9. present: The investigating agency is written as the NIU Police Department, a named police source.
  10. present: NIU Police Department identifies campus police as the sender of this safety notice.
  11. present: Source is the NIU Police Department, the first noun phrase in the bulletin.
  12. present: The message is a campus-police product because NIU Police Department is named.
  13. present: Who sends is NIU Police Department, written before the assault report.
  14. present: University police, namely NIU Police, are the identified sender.
  15. present: A police department byline is present: The NIU Police Department.
  16. present: Investigating a report is credited to NIU Police Department, the source.
  17. present: The bulletin attributes the case to the NIU Police Department.
  18. present: Named public-safety source: NIU Police Department.
  19. present: Campus police, NIU PD, open the warning.
  20. present: The only agency named is the NIU Police Department, which is who sends.
  21. present: NIU Police Department is the unit speaking in the lead sentence.
  22. present: Readers learn the sender is the NIU Police Department.
  23. present: Opening with The NIU Police Department is a police attribution.
  24. present: A department name, NIU Police, supplies Source.
  25. present: The safety notice is from the NIU Police Department as written.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  H 25/25 majority present. Sexual assault is a specific named crime, not a generic incident or situation.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Sexual assault is a specific crime threat, not a generic incident or situation.
  2. present: A report of sexual assault names the offense with enough specificity to code Hazard present.
  3. present: The threat is sexual assault, a listed-style specific crime rather than emergency alone.
  4. present: Sexual assault is named in the first sentence as the reported crime.
  5. present: The incident is specified as sexual assault rather than an unnamed situation.
  6. present: Report of sexual assault is a specific named hazard under the coding rules.
  7. present: Sexual assault, not incident alone, is what police are investigating.
  8. present: The specific threat named is sexual assault in a residence hall room.
  9. present: Sexual assault is specific; generic words like incident appear only after the crime is named.
  10. present: Investigating a report of sexual assault names the hazard in the opening sentence.
  11. present: A sexual assault report is more specific than situation or police activity.
  12. present: The crime named is sexual assault, which satisfies Hazard.
  13. present: Hazard is sexual assault, a specific threat.
  14. present: Named hazard: sexual assault, not incident by itself.
  15. present: The event type is sexual assault, a concrete crime label.
  16. present: West-side hall room assault is specified as sexual assault.
  17. present: The bulletin is about sexual assault, a specific threat.
  18. present: Hazard present because sexual assault specifies the threat type.
  19. present: Not a generic incident: the text says sexual assault.
  20. present: The threat an individual committed is named as sexual assault.
  21. present: Sexual assault is the deciding hazard phrase.
  22. present: Specific threat language is sexual assault, not activity alone.
  23. present: A residence-hall sexual assault is the named crime.
  24. present: The first sentence's object is a report of sexual assault, the hazard.
  25. present: Crime specificity is met by the words sexual assault.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  L 25/25 majority present. A residence hall room on the west side of campus names a hall, room, cardinal area, and campus.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: A residence hall room on the west side of campus names a hall, a room, and a cardinal area.
  2. present: West side of campus is a cardinal area, which the Location rubric accepts.
  3. present: Residence hall plus room name a hall as the place.
  4. present: The incident took place in a residence hall room, a building-level indoor location.
  5. present: On the west side of campus places the hall with a cardinal campus area.
  6. present: Campus in west side of campus is an on-campus where the Location element allows.
  7. present: Residence hall room is an indoor named space in that hall.
  8. present: West side of campus plus residence hall give both a cardinal area and a hall.
  9. present: The where is a residence hall room on the west side of campus.
  10. present: Location is the west-side residence hall room.
  11. present: A hall room is a more specific place than campus alone.
  12. present: West side of campus is an area stamp attached to the hall.
  13. present: In a residence hall room locates the assault indoors.
  14. present: Named place: residence hall on the west side of campus.
  15. present: The scene is a residence hall room, a mapped housing location class.
  16. present: Cardinal west plus campus plus hall room together satisfy Location.
  17. present: Housing is specified as a residence hall room, a place.
  18. present: The west side of campus is the campus area of the hall.
  19. present: Location present: residence hall room, west side of campus.
  20. present: Took place in a residence hall room is an explicit where clause.
  21. present: Social media is how they met, not the scene; the scene is the hall room.
  22. present: On-campus west-side residence hall is the location string.
  23. present: A room in a residence hall is a building-interior place.
  24. present: West side of campus names a campus zone.
  25. present: The geographic cues are residence hall, room, west side, and campus.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  G 0/25. Investigating is responder activity, and please see below for safety tips does not itself instruct a protective action.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Investigating a report describes what police are doing, which the rubric says is not guidance.
  2. absent: Please see below for a list of safety tips does not itself tell anyone to lock, leave, or call.
  3. absent: No shelter, avoid, lock, evacuate, or call 911 instruction appears in the given lines.
  4. absent: Safety tips and resources are promised below but are not actually stated as actions here.
  5. absent: See below is a pointer to omitted copy, not a protective action instruction in this body.
  6. absent: The police-are-investigating line is responder activity, which does not count as guidance.
  7. absent: Readers are not told to avoid the hall, stay inside, or contact police with a number.
  8. absent: A list of safety tips is mentioned but not given, so no actual protective step is instructed.
  9. absent: Please see below for resources is not lock doors, call 911, or any other listed protective action.
  10. absent: No second-person do this instruction such as avoid the area or report it immediately is here.
  11. absent: Please see below for a list of safety tips is not call police, shelter, or avoid the area.
  12. absent: Responder activity (investigating) is not a protective instruction to the recipient.
  13. absent: The body contains no imperative such as lock your door or call NIU Police.
  14. absent: Guidance is absent because the tips list is not in the supplied text.
  15. absent: See below is a referral, not a stay-away or call-police order.
  16. absent: Nothing tells the reader to take a protective action now.
  17. absent: Investigating is what officers are doing, not what the public should do.
  18. absent: Safety tips are named as a heading-to-come, not as instructions.
  19. absent: No phone number or call-police line appears in these sentences.
  20. absent: Protective instruction to the recipient is missing from the two paragraphs.
  21. absent: The west-side report does not include an avoid, lock, or evacuate order.
  22. absent: Resources mentioned below are not present as guidance in this extract.
  23. absent: A pointer to tips is not itself guidance under the rubric.
  24. absent: There is no recipient-facing protective action, only an investigation statement.
  25. absent: G is 0 because call-police can count but no call-police ask is written, and investigating does not count.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  T 25/25 majority present. Friday, February 6, 2026, at approximately 3:00 PM is a date and clock time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Friday, February 6, 2026, at approximately 3:00 PM is a date plus a clock time.
  2. present: Approximately 3:00 PM is a clock time, so Time is present even without a recency word.
  3. present: February 6, 2026 is an explicit calendar date for when the assault occurred.
  4. present: Friday and February 6, 2026 together date the event, which satisfies Time.
  5. present: The assault occurred at approximately 3:00 PM, a clock stamp.
  6. present: Friday, February 6, 2026 supplies the weekday and date the rubric wants.
  7. present: 3:00 PM is a clock time, and February 6, 2026 is a date.
  8. present: Occurred on Friday, February 6, 2026 is a dated when cue.
  9. present: Approximately 3:00 PM on February 6, 2026 combines clock and date.
  10. present: Time is Friday, February 6, 2026 at about 3:00 PM.
  11. present: A full date with year 2026 is printed: February 6, 2026.
  12. present: Clock time 3:00 PM meets the clock prong of Time.
  13. present: The when is Friday afternoon, February 6, 2026, around 3:00 PM.
  14. present: Dated occurrence: February 6, 2026.
  15. present: Time present from both the calendar date and the 3:00 PM clock.
  16. present: Approximately 3:00 PM is still a clock time under the rubric.
  17. present: February 6, 2026 plus 3:00 PM is more than enough for Time.
  18. present: The first sentence timestamps the assault on Friday, February 6, 2026.
  19. present: Weekday Friday, date February 6, 2026, and clock 3:00 PM are all Time cues.
  20. present: A PM clock is stated: 3:00 PM.
  21. present: The notice dates the crime to February 6, 2026.
  22. present: Time is not missing: February 6, 2026, at approximately 3:00 PM.
  23. present: Calendar plus clock appear together in the lead.
  24. present: Explicit when: Friday, February 6, 2026, approximately 3:00 PM.
  25. present: Date and clock are both present, so Time is 1.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  I 0/25. Sexual assault is the hazard name, and calling the person a victim adds no separate severity or consequence.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Sexual assault is the hazard name, and no extra severity or consequence wording appears.
  2. absent: Calling the person the victim restates that an assault occurred and adds no injury or danger clause.
  3. absent: Nothing says dangerous, injury, or serious threat; the crime title is left to stand alone.
  4. absent: Impact needs harm or severity beyond the hazard name, and this west-side text does not supply it.
  5. absent: Victim is a role word, not a statement of what the hazard could do or how severe it is.
  6. absent: No life-threatening, injury, or continuing-threat sentence is attached to the assault report.
  7. absent: Naming sexual assault states the hazard and does not add a consequence such as injury.
  8. absent: There is no dangerous, deadly, or serious-threat clause beyond the offense title.
  9. absent: The text never says what the assault did to the person beyond using the crime name and victim.
  10. absent: Serious or continuing threat language is not present in these lines.
  11. absent: Impact is absent because only the sexual-assault label and victim role appear.
  12. absent: No injury description is given beyond the crime name.
  13. absent: Hazard name alone is sexual assault; Impact requires more.
  14. absent: Met on social media describes acquaintance, not harm severity.
  15. absent: Investigating a report does not state community-level severity.
  16. absent: There is no stated severity such as serious or continuing threat.
  17. absent: The west-side report does not add a harm clause to sexual assault.
  18. absent: Impact stays at the hazard name only: sexual assault.
  19. absent: Victim without injury or danger language does not satisfy Impact.
  20. absent: No one is described as injured, hospitalized, or in continuing danger.
  21. absent: Stated harm is required and is not written beyond the offense name.
  22. absent: Sexual assault without an extra severity phrase is Hazard, not Impact.
  23. absent: I is 0 on this bulletin because the hazard name stands alone with no extra harm language.
  24. absent: Please see below for resources is not a severity statement.
  25. absent: The two paragraphs supply no consequence wording separate from sexual assault.