Campus Alert Archive
OSU

Two students assaulted near campus in an attack classified as an antisemitic hate crime

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
OHaggravated assaulttimely warninghigh confidence
Compare →
Confirmed Threat

At approximately 1:30 a.m. EST on November 10, 2023, two Ohio State students were assaulted by two unknown men outside a bar near 1840 N. High Street after the men spotted a chai necklace and asked if the students were Jewish. One victim suffered a fractured jaw, the other a fractured nose. Ohio State's Department of Public Safety issued a Public Safety Notice classifying the attack as a hate crime motivated by bias against the Jewish community.

Alerts
1
Response
—
Killed
0
Injured
2
Institution
The Ohio State University
Public R1 · OH
All OSU cases →
~65,000 studentsRaveBuckeye Alert / Public Safety Notice
Official alert policy
Read when and how OSU says it will use Buckeye Alert: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim

INITIAL ALERTEmail
Verified verbatimOSU Department of Public Safety, Public Safety Notice archive1510 chars
Public Safety Notice — Columbus — November 10, 2023 In the early morning hours of Friday, November 10, an incident occurred in the immediate off-campus area classified by Ohio law as assault but classified by the Clery Act as a hate crime motivated by bias against the Jewish community. At approximately 1:30 a.m., Ohio State students were approached by two unknown male suspects near 1840 N. High Street. According to reports, the suspects yelled a derogatory term and assaulted two students while asking if they were Jewish. One of the two victims was treated at the Wexner Medical Center and released. The Columbus Division of Police (CPD) is the lead law enforcement agency and is investigating the crime with assistance from The Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD). Ohio State will not tolerate violations of the law or university policy, including but is not limited to antisemitism, bigotry, Islamophobia, racism, sexism and violence. Anyone with information is encouraged to call CPD at 614-645-4545. Anyone with information concerning this crime should contact either the University Police, 614-292-2121 or Columbus Police, 614-645-4545. You may also report information anonymously to the Central Ohio Crime Stoppers at 614-461-TIPS or the University Crime Stoppers Tips line at 614-247-TIPS. This Public Safety Notice is issued in compliance with the 'Timely Warning' provisions of the federal Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act of 1998.
OSU's PSN explicitly distinguishes between Ohio criminal law (assault) and the Clery Act classification (hate crime motivated by bias against the Jewish community), a careful legal-frame separation rare in campus alerts
The phrase 'including but is not limited to antisemitism, bigotry, Islamophobia, racism, sexism and violence' is OSU's standard hate-crime PSN language and was used identically in 2020 anti-Black incidents (the 'Together as Buckeyes' alerts)
Naming a specific street address (1840 N. High Street) provides geographic specificity that locates the incident scene
OSU's PSN is the formal Clery Timely Warning channel; the closing paragraph cites the Clery Act's 'Timely Warning' provisions directly
The incident occurred in OSU's immediate Clery 'noncampus' / 'public property' geography on the High Street commercial strip
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

Public Safety Notice — Columbus — November 10, 2023 In the early morning hours of Friday, November 10, an incident occurred in the immediate off-campus area classified by Ohio law as assault but classified by the Clery Act as a hate crime motivated by bias against the Jewish community. At approximately 1:30 a.m., Ohio State students were approached by two unknown male suspects near 1840 N. High Street. According to reports, the suspects yelled a derogatory term and assaulted two students while asking if they were Jewish. One of the two victims was treated at the Wexner Medical Center and released. The Columbus Division of Police (CPD) is the lead law enforcement agency and is investigating the crime with assistance from The Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD). Ohio State will not tolerate violations of the law or university policy, including but is not limited to antisemitism, bigotry, Islamophobia, racism, sexism and violence. Anyone with information is encouraged to call CPD at 614-645-4545. Anyone with information concerning this crime should contact either the University Police, 614-292-2121 or Columbus Police, 614-645-4545. You may also report information anonymously to the Central Ohio Crime Stoppers at 614-461-TIPS or the University Crime Stoppers Tips line at 614-247-TIPS. This Public Safety Notice is issued in compliance with the 'Timely Warning' provisions of the federal Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act of 1998.

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree the source is present; it names the Columbus Division of Police and the Ohio State University Police Division.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Names "Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "Ohio State University Police Division".
    2. present: It names "The Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "OSUPD".
    3. present: Names "The Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD)".
    4. present: It names "The Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD)" and "Columbus Division of Police", responding authorities.
    5. present: Names "Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "OSUPD", the investigating authorities.
    6. present: It names "The Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "Ohio State University Police Division".
    7. present: It names "The Ohio State University Police Division" and "Columbus Division of Police", authorities.
    8. present: Names "Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD)".
    9. present: Names "Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "OSUPD".
    10. present: It names "The Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "University Police Division (OSUPD)".
    11. present: It names "Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "OSUPD".
    12. present: Names "The Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "OSUPD".
    13. present: Names "Columbus Division of Police" and "Ohio State University Police Division", the authorities.
    14. present: It names the "Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "OSUPD".
    15. present: It names "The Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD)", the senders.
    16. present: Names "The Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD)".
    17. present: It names the "Columbus Division of Police" and "Ohio State University Police Division".
    18. present: It names "The Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "The Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD)".
    19. present: It names "The Ohio State University Police Division" and Columbus Division of Police.
    20. present: It names the "Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "University Police Division (OSUPD)", the authorities.
    21. present: Names "The Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD)" and "Columbus Division of Police".
    22. present: Names "the Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "OSUPD".
    23. present: It names "The Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD)" and "Columbus Division of Police".
    24. present: It names "Columbus Division of Police (CPD)" and "OSUPD".
    25. present: It names "The Ohio State University Police Division (OSUPD)" and "Columbus Division of Police".
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that the hazard is present; it names an assault classified as a hate crime.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Names an "assault" classified as a "hate crime", specific hazards.
    2. present: It names an "assault" classified as "a hate crime", a specific threat.
    3. present: Names an "assault ... classified by the Clery Act as a hate crime", a specific crime.
    4. present: It names "assault" classified as "a hate crime", a specific threat.
    5. present: States an "assault" and "hate crime" where suspects "assaulted two students", a specific threat.
    6. present: It names an "assault ... classified by the Clery Act as a hate crime", a specific threat.
    7. present: It states an "assault" classified as "a hate crime motivated by bias", a specific threat.
    8. present: States an "assault... classified by the Clery Act as a hate crime", a specific threat.
    9. present: States an "assault" classified as "a hate crime" against Jewish students.
    10. present: It names an "assault" classified as a "hate crime", a specific threat.
    11. present: It states an "assault" classified as "a hate crime", a specific threat.
    12. present: States an "assault" classified "as a hate crime", a specific hazard.
    13. present: States an "assault" classified as "a hate crime", where suspects "assaulted two students", a specific threat.
    14. present: It states an "assault" classified as "a hate crime", a specific hazard.
    15. present: It names an "assault" classified as a "hate crime" where suspects "assaulted two students", a specific threat.
    16. present: Names an "assault" classified as "a hate crime motivated by bias against the Jewish community".
    17. present: It names an "assault" classified as a "hate crime", a specific threat.
    18. present: It names "assault" classified as "a hate crime", a specific threat.
    19. present: It reports an "assault" and "hate crime" where suspects assaulted students, a specific threat.
    20. present: It describes an "assault" classified as a "hate crime", a specific named threat.
    21. present: States an "assault... classified by the Clery Act as a hate crime", a specific threat.
    22. present: Names "assault" classified as "a hate crime motivated by bias against the Jewish community".
    23. present: It names an "assault... classified by the Clery Act as a hate crime", a specific threat.
    24. present: It names "assault" classified as "a hate crime", with suspects who "assaulted two students".
    25. present: It names an "assault" classified as "a hate crime", where suspects "assaulted two students".
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All reads agree a location is present, citing near 1840 N. High Street.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Locates it "in the immediate off-campus area" "near 1840 N. High Street".
    2. present: It says "near 1840 N. High Street" in the off-campus area, a specific place.
    3. present: Specifies "near 1840 N. High Street", an address.
    4. present: It cites "near 1840 N. High Street", a specific location.
    5. present: Says "near 1840 N. High Street", a precise location.
    6. present: It says "near 1840 N. High Street", a specific location.
    7. present: It cites "near 1840 N. High Street", a specific address.
    8. present: Says "near 1840 N. High Street" in the "off-campus area", a specific location.
    9. present: Locates it "near 1840 N. High Street".
    10. present: It cites "near 1840 N. High Street" in "the immediate off-campus area".
    11. present: It gives "the immediate off-campus area" "near 1840 N. High Street".
    12. present: Locates it "near 1840 N. High Street" in the "off-campus area".
    13. present: Says "near 1840 N. High Street", a specific location.
    14. present: It locates it "in the immediate off-campus area" "near 1840 N. High Street".
    15. present: It cites "the immediate off-campus area" and "near 1840 N. High Street", specific locations.
    16. present: Locates it "in the immediate off-campus area" "near 1840 N. High Street".
    17. present: It locates it "near 1840 N. High Street" in the off-campus area.
    18. present: It locates it "in the immediate off-campus area" "near 1840 N. High Street".
    19. present: It locates it "near 1840 N. High Street", a specific address.
    20. present: It locates it "near 1840 N. High Street", a specific place.
    21. present: Says it occurred "near 1840 N. High Street", a specific location.
    22. present: Specifies "near 1840 N. High Street" in "the immediate off-campus area".
    23. present: It locates it "near 1840 N. High Street" in the off-campus area.
    24. present: It gives "near 1840 N. High Street", a specific location.
    25. present: It locates it "near 1840 N. High Street".
  • Guidanceabsent3/25

    Final assessment

    Final call absent; a strong majority found the message only asks for tips rather than directing protective action to recipients.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: Asks only for information and tips, not protective action for recipients.
    2. absent: It narrates the incident and asks for tips, giving recipients no protective action.
    3. absent: Asks for tips but gives recipients no protective action to take.
    4. absent: The text gives only contact-with-information lines, not a protective action to recipients.
    5. present: Encourages "Anyone with information ... to call CPD" and report tips, a protective action.
    6. absent: The text gives tip-contacts but no protective action instruction to recipients.
    7. absent: It asks for information but gives recipients no protective action.
    8. absent: The message reports the incident and tip lines but gives recipients no protective action.
    9. absent: Gives only tip lines, no protective action to recipients.
    10. present: It instructs "Anyone with information is encouraged to call CPD" and report tips.
    11. absent: It gives only reporting numbers, no protective action to recipients.
    12. absent: Asks only for information; no protective action is instructed to recipients.
    13. absent: Only asks for information and condemns; no protective action is directed to recipients.
    14. absent: It only asks anyone with information to call; it gives recipients no protective action.
    15. absent: It narrates the incident and gives tip lines, with no protective action for recipients.
    16. absent: Gives only reporting contacts, no protective action instructed to recipients.
    17. absent: It asks only for information/tips; no protective action is directed to recipients.
    18. absent: It only narrates the incident and gives tip lines, providing no protective action to recipients.
    19. present: It encourages anyone with information "to call CPD" or University Police, a directed action.
    20. absent: It gives contact tip lines but no protective action instruction to recipients.
    21. absent: Asks for information but gives recipients no protective action to take.
    22. absent: The text describes the incident and gives tip lines, with no protective action to recipients.
    23. absent: It gives only investigative tip lines, no protective instruction to recipients.
    24. absent: It gives only contact/tip lines, no protective action directed at recipients.
    25. absent: It gives only contacts to report information, not a protective instruction.
  • Timepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree timing is present, citing November 10 at approximately 1:30 a.m.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Gives "Friday, November 10 ... At approximately 1:30 a.m.".
    2. present: It gives "November 10" at "approximately 1:30 a.m.", a clock time and date.
    3. present: Gives "November 10" and "approximately 1:30 a.m.", a date and clock time.
    4. present: It states "November 10, 2023" and "At approximately 1:30 a.m.".
    5. present: Gives "Friday, November 10" at "approximately 1:30 a.m."
    6. present: It gives "Friday, November 10" and "approximately 1:30 a.m.".
    7. present: It gives "Friday, November 10" "At approximately 1:30 a.m.", a clock time and date.
    8. present: Gives "Friday, November 10" and "At approximately 1:30 a.m.", a date and clock time.
    9. present: Gives "November 10, 2023" and "approximately 1:30 a.m.".
    10. present: It says "Friday, November 10" "At approximately 1:30 a.m.", a clock time and date.
    11. present: It gives "Friday, November 10" "At approximately 1:30 a.m."
    12. present: Gives "Friday, November 10" at "approximately 1:30 a.m."
    13. present: Gives "Friday, November 10" and "At approximately 1:30 a.m."
    14. present: It provides "Friday, November 10" and "approximately 1:30 a.m.".
    15. present: It states "Friday, November 10" and "approximately 1:30 a.m.", a clock time and date.
    16. present: Gives "Friday, November 10" and "At approximately 1:30 a.m."
    17. present: It gives "Friday, November 10" "At approximately 1:30 a.m.", specific date and time.
    18. present: It gives the date and time "Friday, November 10" "At approximately 1:30 a.m.".
    19. present: It gives "Friday, November 10" "At approximately 1:30 a.m.".
    20. present: It states "November 10, 2023" and "approximately 1:30 a.m.", a clock time and date.
    21. present: Says "At approximately 1:30 a.m." on "November 10, 2023".
    22. present: Gives "Friday, November 10" and "approximately 1:30 a.m."
    23. present: It cites "November 10, 2023" and "approximately 1:30 a.m.".
    24. present: It gives "Friday, November 10" and "At approximately 1:30 a.m.".
    25. present: It gives "November 10, 2023" at "approximately 1:30 a.m.".
  • Impactpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Present by unanimous agreement. The notice describes a bias-motivated assault where two students were attacked and one was treated at a medical center, an explicit stated injury.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: It describes a hate-crime assault on two students with one treated at a medical center, an explicit stated injury.
    2. present: Reports an assault and hate crime where victims were attacked and one was treated at a medical center, a stated injury.
    3. present: Reports that suspects assaulted two students in a bias-motivated hate crime and one was treated at a medical center, a stated injury.
    4. present: Describes a bias-motivated assault in which a victim was treated at a medical center, an explicit injury.
    5. present: It reports a bias-motivated assault where two students were attacked and one was treated at a medical center, conveying actual injury.
    6. present: It describes a bias-motivated assault where students were attacked and one was treated at a medical center, a stated harm to victims.
    7. present: Describes a hate-crime assault where students were attacked and one was treated at a medical center, a stated harm.
    8. present: Reports an assault and hate crime where two students were attacked and one treated, a stated harm.
    9. present: States two students were assaulted in a hate crime with one treated at the medical center, a stated injury.
    10. present: The text reports a bias-motivated assault where two students were attacked and one was treated at a hospital, a stated injury.
    11. present: It reports two students were assaulted in a bias-motivated hate crime and one was treated at the medical center, a stated harm.
    12. present: Describes a hate-crime assault where two students were assaulted and one treated at a medical center, a stated harm with injury.
    13. present: It reports a bias-motivated assault where a victim was treated at a medical center, a clear injury.
    14. present: Describes a bias-motivated assault where students were attacked and one was treated at a medical center, a stated harm.
    15. present: It reports a bias-motivated assault where victims were attacked and one was treated at a medical center, a stated injury.
    16. present: Describes a hate-crime assault on two students with one treated at a medical center, explicit stated injury.
    17. present: Describes an assault hate crime where two students were assaulted and one treated at a medical center, a stated injury.
    18. present: It describes a bias-motivated assault where students were attacked and one was treated at the medical center, a stated harm.
    19. present: It describes a bias-motivated assault that sent a victim to the medical center, a clear harm.
    20. present: Describes a bias-motivated assault on two students with one treated at a hospital, a stated harm.
    21. present: It reports a bias-motivated assault in which two students were assaulted and one was treated at a medical center, a stated harm.
    22. present: It reports two students were assaulted in a bias attack and one was treated at a medical center, a stated harm.
    23. present: Describes a hate-crime assault in which two students were attacked and one was treated at a medical center, an explicit stated injury.
    24. present: Reports a hate-crime assault on two students with one treated at a medical center, an explicit injury.
    25. present: Reports a hate-crime assault where victims were assaulted and one treated at a medical center, a stated injury.

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

The Ohio State University, a public R1 land-grant institution with approximately 65,000 students in Columbus, Ohio, operates one of the largest sworn campus police forces in the country (OSU Police Division) and one of the most-cited Clery alert systems (Buckeye Alert). At approximately 1:30 a.m. EST on Friday, November 10, 2023, five OSU students walked past two men, Timur Mamatov and a friend, outside a bar at 1840 N. High Street. One student was wearing a chai necklace, a Hebrew symbol meaning 'life'. Mamatov asked if the students were Jewish, and when they answered yes, he punched one victim in the face, fracturing his jaw; during the continuing altercation in the street, a second victim's nose was broken. The students said the assailants shouted 'free Palestine' and called the chai-wearing student a racial slur. OSU's Department of Public Safety issued a Public Safety Notice the same day, explicitly classifying the attack as a Clery-Act hate crime. The case occurred 34 days after the October 7 Hamas attacks and amid a surge in reported antisemitic incidents on US campuses. In April 2024, StandWithUs, the ADL, and the Brandeis Center filed a Title VI complaint against OSU. Mamatov was federally indicted on July 3, 2025 and pleaded guilty in August 2025 under the Hate Crimes Prevention Act. The case is significant because the PSN's legal framing (distinguishing Ohio assault law from the Clery hate-crime classification) is an unusually explicit example of dual-statutory hate-crime alert language.
Analysis

Key Findings

OSU explicitly distinguished Ohio criminal-law classification (assault) from Clery Act classification (hate crime motivated by bias) in the alert itself
Naming the specific address (1840 N. High Street) gave geographic specificity to a Clery 'noncampus / public property' incident
OSU's PSN was issued the same day as the early-morning incident
The PSN's standardized language ('including but is not limited to antisemitism, bigotry, Islamophobia, racism, sexism and violence') matches OSU's earlier hate-crime PSN wording
Federal hate-crime charges (Hate Crimes Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. § 249) followed in 2025, ending in a guilty plea, a multi-year path from campus PSN to federal prosecution
A federal Title VI complaint against OSU was filed in April 2024 by StandWithUs, the ADL, and the Brandeis Center amid the post-October 7 rise in campus antisemitism reports
Outcome
One victim was treated at the Wexner Medical Center for a fractured jaw and released; the second suffered a broken nose. Suspect Timur Mamatov, 20, of Tipp City, Ohio, was federally charged on July 3, 2025 with violating the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. § 249). Mamatov pleaded guilty on August 15, 2025 and faces up to 10 years in federal prison at sentencing.
Provenance

Sources

  1. Official
    Public Safety Notice - Columbus – November 10, 2023 — OSU Department of Public Safety
    dps.osu.edu
    archived copy
  2. Official
    Man Pleads Guilty to Antisemitic Assault Near College Campus — DOJ
    justice.gov
    archived copy
  3. Student Paper
    Man pleads guilty to 2023 hate crime that took place at Ohio State — The Lantern
    thelantern.com
    archived copy
  4. News
    Ohio State reports 2 antisemitic incidents against students in 24 hours — ABC News
    abcnews.go.com
    archived copy
  5. News
    Ohio man admits to federal hate crime for antisemitic attack on Jewish students at Ohio State — JTA
    jta.org
    archived copy
  6. Source
    Ohio State University — ADL Campus Antisemitism Report Card
    adl.org
    archived copy
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "The Ohio State University: Two students assaulted near campus in an attack classified as an antisemitic hate crime." Incident of November 10, 2023. Added May 2026; last updated July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/ohio-state-university-antisemitic-assault-2023-11-10/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
hate-crimeantisemitismaggravated-assaultohio-state-universityohiocolumbushigh-streetbuckeye-alertpublic-safety-noticepost-october-7federal-hate-crime-prosecutiontimely-warning
Added May 2026Updated July 2026Via ingestion