Skip to content
Campus Alert Archive
Penn State Beaver

Timely warning issued for a two-week stalking pattern reported to campus police

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
PAstalkingtimely warninghigh confidence
Under Investigation

Between March 19, 2024 and April 2, 2024, Penn State Beaver University Police received reports of a stalking pattern. The report was made at 6:08 PM EDT on April 6, 2024, and a Clery VAWA timely warning was posted on April 8, 2024, two days later. The case is part of Penn State's centralized timely-warning archive, which spans 24 campuses and is one of the most transparent in higher education.

Alerts
1
Response
Killed
Injured
Institution
Pennsylvania State University, Beaver
Public R1 · PA
All Penn State Beaver cases →
~600 studentsPSUAlert
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim

INITIAL ALERTEmail
Stalking - VAWA has occurred at Beaver Case Number: 24BR00014 University Police received a report of a stalking at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024. The reported incident occurred between March 19, 2024 and April 2, 2024 at Penn State Beaver. It can be assumed that conditions continue to exist that may pose a threat to members and guests of the University community. This warning is being issued in compliance with the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act (VAWA). Members of the campus community are urged to use caution. Anyone with information regarding this incident is asked to contact Penn State University Police at (724) 773-3888.
Penn State maintains a centralized timely-warning archive at timelywarnings.psu.edu spanning all 24 campuses, one of the most transparent in higher education
Headline format 'Stalking - VAWA has occurred at [Campus]' uses the federal statutory category (VAWA) directly in the title
Case numbering (24BR00014) is published — 'BR' = Beaver, 14th case logged in 2024
Two-week incident window (March 19 - April 2) is unusually long for a single timely warning; it reflects the cumulative-pattern nature of stalking
'It can be assumed that conditions continue to exist' is Penn State's standardized continuing-threat language across all campuses
Penn State Beaver is a small branch campus (~600 students), even small campuses have full Clery obligations and issue formal timely warnings
No suspect description is provided, common in stalking cases to protect investigation and potentially the survivor's identity
VAWA citation alongside Clery is appropriate and best practice for stalking, dating violence, and domestic violence warnings
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

Stalking - VAWA has occurred at Beaver Case Number: 24BR00014 University Police received a report of a stalking at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024. The reported incident occurred between March 19, 2024 and April 2, 2024 at Penn State Beaver. It can be assumed that conditions continue to exist that may pose a threat to members and guests of the University community. This warning is being issued in compliance with the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act (VAWA). Members of the campus community are urged to use caution. Anyone with information regarding this incident is asked to contact Penn State University Police at (724) 773-3888.

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree the source is present; Penn State University Police is named as the issuer.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Names "University Police" / "Penn State University Police" as issuer.
    2. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police", the issuer.
    3. present: Names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police", the issuing authority.
    4. present: It names "University Police" / "Penn State University Police", a responding authority.
    5. present: Names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police" as issuing authority.
    6. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police", the issuing authority.
    7. present: It names "University Police" / "Penn State University Police", the issuing authority.
    8. present: Names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police" as the issuing authority.
    9. present: Names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police".
    10. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police".
    11. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police".
    12. present: Names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police".
    13. present: Names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police", the issuing authority.
    14. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police" as the reporting authority.
    15. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police" as the issuing authority.
    16. present: Names "University Police" / "Penn State University Police" as the issuing authority.
    17. present: It names "University Police" / "Penn State University Police" as issuer.
    18. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police", the issuing authority.
    19. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police" as the authority.
    20. present: It names "Penn State University Police" and "University Police", the issuing authority.
    21. present: Names "University Police" / "Penn State University Police", the issuing authority.
    22. present: Names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police".
    23. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police" as the issuing authority.
    24. present: It names "University Police" and "Penn State University Police".
    25. present: It names "University Police" / "Penn State University Police" as the issuing authority.
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that the hazard is present; stalking under VAWA is named as a specific crime.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Names "a stalking", a specific Clery hazard.
    2. present: It names "Stalking", a specific threat.
    3. present: Names "Stalking - VAWA", a specific crime.
    4. present: It names "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    5. present: States "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    6. present: It names "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    7. present: It states "Stalking - VAWA has occurred", a specific threat.
    8. present: States "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    9. present: States "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    10. present: It names "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    11. present: It states "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    12. present: States "Stalking - VAWA has occurred", a specific threat.
    13. present: States "Stalking - VAWA has occurred", a specific threat.
    14. present: It states "Stalking" occurred, a specific hazard.
    15. present: It names "stalking", a specific threat.
    16. present: Names "a stalking", a specific threat.
    17. present: It names "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    18. present: It names "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    19. present: It states "Stalking - VAWA has occurred", a specific threat.
    20. present: It states "Stalking - VAWA has occurred", a specific named threat.
    21. present: States "Stalking - VAWA", a specific named offense.
    22. present: Names "Stalking", a specific threat.
    23. present: It names "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    24. present: It names "Stalking - VAWA", a specific threat.
    25. present: It names "Stalking - VAWA", a specific offense.
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree a location is given, at Penn State Beaver.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Locates it "at Penn State Beaver".
    2. present: It says the incident occurred "at Penn State Beaver", naming the campus.
    3. present: Specifies "Penn State Beaver", the campus location.
    4. present: It cites "Penn State Beaver", a specific place.
    5. present: Says "at Penn State Beaver", referencing the campus.
    6. present: It says the incident occurred "at Penn State Beaver", a specific campus place.
    7. present: It cites "Penn State Beaver", a campus location.
    8. present: Says "at Penn State Beaver", a specific place.
    9. present: Locates it "at Penn State Beaver".
    10. present: It says the incident occurred "at Penn State Beaver".
    11. present: It says it occurred "at Penn State Beaver".
    12. present: Locates it "at Penn State Beaver".
    13. present: Says it occurred "at Penn State Beaver", a campus location.
    14. present: It locates the incident "at Penn State Beaver".
    15. present: It locates it at "Penn State Beaver", a specific campus.
    16. present: Says it occurred "at Penn State Beaver".
    17. present: It locates it "at Penn State Beaver", a named campus.
    18. present: It locates it "at Penn State Beaver".
    19. present: It locates it "at Penn State Beaver", a named campus.
    20. present: It locates the report "at Penn State Beaver", a campus location.
    21. present: Says the incident occurred "at Penn State Beaver", a place.
    22. present: Says the incident occurred "at Penn State Beaver", naming the campus.
    23. present: It locates the incident "at Penn State Beaver".
    24. present: It says "at Penn State Beaver", a named place.
    25. present: It locates the incident "at Penn State Beaver".
  • Guidancepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that guidance is present; community members are urged to use caution.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Urges members "to use caution", a protective action.
    2. present: It urges recipients to "use caution".
    3. present: Urges community members to "use caution".
    4. present: It urges "use caution", a protective action to recipients.
    5. present: Urges members to "use caution" and contact police, a protective action.
    6. present: It urges "Members of the campus community ... to use caution".
    7. present: It urges members "to use caution", a protective action.
    8. present: Urges members "to use caution", a protective action.
    9. present: Urges members "to use caution".
    10. present: It urges members "to use caution" and contact police with information.
    11. present: It urges members "to use caution" and provides a contact number.
    12. present: Urges members "to use caution" and to contact police.
    13. present: Urges members "to use caution", a protective action.
    14. present: It urges community members to "use caution", a protective instruction.
    15. present: It urges members to "use caution" and contact police, protective actions.
    16. present: Urges members "to use caution" and to contact police with information.
    17. present: It urges members "to use caution", a protective action.
    18. present: It urges members "to use caution", a protective action.
    19. present: It urges members "to use caution" and to contact police, a protective action.
    20. present: It urges members "to use caution", a protective action.
    21. present: Urges members "to use caution", a protective instruction to recipients.
    22. present: Urges members to "use caution", a protective action.
    23. present: It urges community members to "use caution" and to contact police, a protective action.
    24. present: It urges "Members of the campus community... to use caution".
    25. present: It urges members to "use caution".
  • Timepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree time is present; the alert gives 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024 and a March to April window.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Gives "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a March-April window.
    2. present: It gives times and dates like "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024".
    3. present: Gives "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and the window "between March 19, 2024 and April 2, 2024".
    4. present: It gives times and dates like "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024".
    5. present: Gives "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and "between March 19, 2024 and April 2, 2024".
    6. present: It gives "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range.
    7. present: It gives "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024", a clock time and date.
    8. present: Gives "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range, clock time and dates.
    9. present: Gives "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range.
    10. present: It gives times like "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range.
    11. present: It gives "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range.
    12. present: Gives report time "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range.
    13. present: Gives "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range.
    14. present: It provides times and dates such as "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024".
    15. present: It gives the date and time "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range, conveying when.
    16. present: Gives times and dates such as "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024".
    17. present: It gives "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range, specific times.
    18. present: It gives times and dates such as "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024".
    19. present: It gives the report time "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range.
    20. present: It states "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date range, a clock time and date.
    21. present: Gives "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a March 19 to April 2 window.
    22. present: Gives "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and "between March 19, 2024 and April 2, 2024".
    23. present: It cites "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and a date window.
    24. present: It gives "6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024" and "between March 19, 2024 and April 2, 2024".
    25. present: It gives times and dates like "at 6:08 p.m. on April 6, 2024".
  • Impactpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Present by unanimous agreement. The warning reports stalking and states conditions continue to exist that may pose a threat to members and guests of the community, an explicit stated danger.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: It reports stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to the community, an explicit stated danger.
    2. present: Reports stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to the community, an explicit stated peril.
    3. present: Reports stalking and warns conditions may pose a threat to community members, an explicit statement of peril.
    4. present: Reports stalking and notes conditions may pose a threat to the community, a stated potential harm.
    5. present: It reports stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to community members, conveying potential danger.
    6. present: It reports stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to members of the community, an explicit statement of potential harm.
    7. present: Reports stalking and warns conditions pose a threat to the community, a stated danger to people.
    8. present: Reports a stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to the community.
    9. present: Reports stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to the community, an explicit stated danger.
    10. present: A stalking report that warns conditions may pose a threat to the community states an explicit danger.
    11. present: It reports a stalking and warns conditions may pose a threat to the community, an explicit danger.
    12. present: Reports stalking and warns conditions may pose a threat to members and guests of the community.
    13. present: It reports stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to the community, an explicit danger.
    14. present: Reports stalking and warns conditions may pose a threat to the community, a stated danger.
    15. present: It reports stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to community members, a stated danger.
    16. present: Reports stalking that may pose a threat to members and guests of the University community, a stated danger.
    17. present: Reports stalking and warns conditions may pose a threat to the community, an explicit stated danger.
    18. present: It reports stalking and warns of conditions that may pose a threat to the community, a stated danger.
    19. present: A stalking report noting conditions that may pose a threat to the community conveys ongoing danger.
    20. present: Reports stalking and warns conditions may pose a threat to the community, a stated danger.
    21. present: It reports stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to members and guests of the University community.
    22. present: It reports stalking and warns conditions may pose a threat to community members, a stated peril.
    23. present: Reports stalking and warns conditions may pose a threat to members of the community, an explicit stated danger.
    24. present: Reports stalking and warns conditions may pose a threat to community members, an explicit danger.
    25. present: Reports stalking and states conditions may pose a threat to the community, a stated danger.

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

Penn State operates one of the most transparent and well-organized timely warning archives in higher education. Every Clery and VAWA warning across the university's 24 campuses is published at timelywarnings.psu.edu under campus-specific URLs (e.g., '/beaver/' for Penn State Beaver), with case numbers, incident dates, and standardized continuing-threat language. According to Daily Collegian reporting, since January 2022 Penn State has issued 31 timely warnings system-wide, including 24 sexual offenses, two stalking cases, one aggravated assault, three burglaries, and one motor vehicle theft. This April 2024 Penn State Beaver stalking warning illustrates the legal framework: stalking is a VAWA-covered Clery crime requiring timely warning when continuing-threat conditions are met, and the standardized phrase 'It can be assumed that conditions continue to exist that may pose a threat' is the institution's bright-line trigger. The two-week incident window (March 19 to April 2) reflects the cumulative-pattern nature of stalking, unlike most Clery crimes, the offense is constituted by a course of conduct rather than a discrete event.
Analysis

Key Findings

Penn State's centralized timely-warning archive spans all 24 campuses with case numbers, a model of transparency
Stalking is a VAWA-covered Clery crime requiring timely warning; dual-statutory citation is best practice
The incident-window format (March 19 - April 2) reflects stalking's cumulative-pattern nature rather than a discrete event
Even small branch campuses (~600 students at Penn State Beaver) have full Clery obligations
Standardized continuing-threat language ('It can be assumed that conditions continue to exist') reflects an institutional bright-line trigger
Stalking warnings rarely include suspect descriptions to protect investigation and potentially the survivor's identity
Stalking timely warnings are rare, only 2 of 31 Penn State warnings since 2022, despite stalking being a common reported crime
Outcome
Investigation ongoing. Warning posted with Clery/VAWA continuing-threat language. Suspect identification not made public.
Provenance

Sources

  1. Official
  2. Official
  3. Student Paper
  4. Clery ASR
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "Pennsylvania State University, Beaver: Timely warning issued for a two-week stalking pattern reported to campus police." Incident of March 19, 2024. Added May 2026; last updated July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/penn-state-beaver-stalking-timely-warning-2024-03-19/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
stalkingvawatimely-warningbranch-campuspublic-r1penn-statesmall-campuscentralized-archiveUnder Investigation
Added May 2026Updated July 2026Via ingestion