Fondling reported on a Tiger Transit bus

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It opens with TIGERALERT and later names the Department of Public Safety and Princeton University as issuers.
  2. present: TIGERALERT, the Department of Public Safety, and Princeton University all identify the issuing authority.
  3. present: Branded TIGERALERT, the Department of Public Safety, and Princeton University identify the issuer.
  4. present: "TIGERALERT" brands the sender, and the Department of Public Safety and Princeton University are named.
  5. present: TIGERALERT is a branded sender tag, and Public Safety plus Princeton University are named as authorities.
  6. present: TIGERALERT branding, the Department of Public Safety, and Princeton University issuing this alert identify the sender.
  7. present: TIGERALERT brands the sender, Public Safety is named, and Princeton University says it is issuing the alert.
  8. present: TIGERALERT brands the sender, Public Safety is named, and Princeton University says it is issuing the alert.
  9. present: TIGERALERT is a branded sender tag, and the body also names Public Safety and Princeton University.
  10. present: TIGERALERT, the Department of Public Safety, and Princeton University all identify who is issuing the notice.
  11. present: TIGERALERT, the Department of Public Safety, and Princeton University identify the issuing authority.
  12. present: TIGERALERT is a branded sender tag, and the text also names Princeton University and the Department of Public Safety.
  13. present: The branded TIGERALERT tag plus Department of Public Safety and Princeton University identify the issuer.
  14. present: TIGERALERT, Princeton University, and the Department of Public Safety name the sender and authority.
  15. present: TIGERALERT brands the sender, and Princeton University plus the Department of Public Safety are named.
  16. present: The branded tag TIGERALERT identifies the sender, and the Department of Public Safety and Princeton University are named.
  17. present: TIGERALERT branding, Princeton University, and the Department of Public Safety identify the source.
  18. present: TIGERALERT brands the sender, and Princeton University plus the Department of Public Safety are named.
  19. present: "TIGERALERT" brands the sender, and Princeton University plus Public Safety are named as issuing parties.
  20. present: TIGERALERT brands the notice, and Princeton University plus the Department of Public Safety are named as issuers.
  21. present: TIGERALERT brands the sender, and the Department of Public Safety and Princeton University are named.
  22. present: TIGERALERT plus Princeton University and the Department of Public Safety identify the issuing authority.
  23. present: TIGERALERT brands the sender, and Princeton University plus the Department of Public Safety are named issuers.
  24. present: TIGERALERT, Public Safety, and Princeton University identify who is issuing the notice.
  25. present: "TIGERALERT" brands the sender, and Princeton University plus Public Safety are named as authorities.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It labels the incident as Fondling and describes unwanted sexual contact, a specific crime.
  2. present: The notice labels the incident Fondling and describes unwanted sexual contact on Tiger Transit.
  3. present: The notice names fondling and unwanted sexual contact as the specific crime.
  4. present: "Fondling" and "unwanted sexual contact" name a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  5. present: The notice specifies fondling and unwanted sexual contact, a concrete crime rather than a vague incident.
  6. present: It labels the incident Fondling and describes unwanted sexual contact, a specific crime rather than a generic event.
  7. present: The incident is labeled Fondling and described as unwanted sexual contact on the bus.
  8. present: The hazard is specified as Fondling and unwanted sexual contact by an unidentified male passenger.
  9. present: The hazard is specified as fondling and unwanted sexual contact, a named crime rather than a generic incident.
  10. present: The incident is named as fondling and unwanted sexual contact by an unidentified male passenger.
  11. present: Fondling and unwanted sexual contact name a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  12. present: The incident is labeled fondling and described as unwanted sexual contact, a specific crime.
  13. present: It names fondling and unwanted sexual contact, a specific crime hazard rather than a generic incident.
  14. present: The incident is named as fondling, with unwanted sexual contact described on Tiger Transit.
  15. present: The alert labels the incident Fondling and describes unwanted sexual contact on Tiger Transit.
  16. present: It titles the incident Fondling and describes unwanted sexual contact by an unidentified male passenger.
  17. present: The alert names fondling and unwanted sexual contact as the specific crime.
  18. present: The notice names fondling and unwanted sexual contact as the specific crime.
  19. present: The notice names "Fondling" and describes unwanted sexual contact, a specific crime rather than a vague incident.
  20. present: The incident is named as fondling, with unwanted sexual contact on a Tiger Transit bus.
  21. present: The notice labels the crime as fondling and describes unwanted sexual contact, a specific threat.
  22. present: The notice names fondling and unwanted sexual contact, a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  23. present: The alert names fondling and unwanted sexual contact, a specific crime rather than a vague incident.
  24. present: The incident is named Fondling and described as unwanted sexual contact.
  25. present: The incident is specified as "Fondling" and unwanted sexual contact, a concrete crime rather than a generic situation.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It places the incident on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  2. present: It places the incident on a Tiger Transit bus near Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  3. present: It places the incident on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  4. present: The incident occurred on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  5. present: It places the offense on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  6. present: The contact is placed on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  7. present: It locates the crime on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  8. present: The incident is placed on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  9. present: The incident is placed on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  10. present: It places the contact on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  11. present: The incident is placed on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  12. present: It places the incident on a Tiger Transit bus in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  13. present: The incident is placed on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  14. present: It locates the incident on a Tiger Transit bus in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  15. present: It places the event on a Tiger Transit bus in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  16. present: It locates the crime on a Tiger Transit bus in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  17. present: It places the incident on Tiger Transit near Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  18. present: It places the incident on a Tiger Transit bus in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  19. present: It places the crime on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  20. present: It places the crime on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  21. present: It places the incident on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  22. present: It places the event on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  23. present: It places the incident on Tiger Transit in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  24. present: It places the crime on Tiger Transit near Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
  25. present: It places the offense on a Tiger Transit bus in the area of Theater Drive and Alexander Road.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It tells recipients to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel uncomfortable.
  2. present: It tells people to report suspicious activity immediately to 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel unsafe.
  3. present: It instructs people to call 9-1-1 to report suspicious activity and to leave if they feel unsafe.
  4. present: People are told to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 or a blue light phone and to leave if uncomfortable.
  5. present: It tells people to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they do not feel comfortable.
  6. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel unsafe.
  7. present: People are told to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1, stay alert, and leave if they feel unsafe.
  8. present: Readers are told to report suspicious activity to 9-1-1, stay alert, and leave if they feel unsafe.
  9. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel uncomfortable.
  10. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity immediately to 911 or a blue light phone and to leave if uncomfortable.
  11. present: Recipients are told to call Public Safety or 9-1-1, stay alert, and leave if they feel unsafe.
  12. present: It instructs people to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel uncomfortable.
  13. present: It tells people to call 9-1-1 to report suspicious activity, stay alert, and leave if they feel uncomfortable.
  14. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel uncomfortable.
  15. present: Readers are told to report suspicious activity to Public Safety at 9-1-1 or a blue light phone, and to leave if they feel unsafe.
  16. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 or Public Safety and to leave if uncomfortable.
  17. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity immediately by calling 9-1-1 or Public Safety, and to leave if they feel unsafe.
  18. present: Community members are told to call 9-1-1 or Public Safety, stay alert, and leave if they feel unsafe.
  19. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel unsafe.
  20. present: Readers are told to report suspicious activity immediately by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel unsafe.
  21. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if uncomfortable.
  22. present: It tells people to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel uncomfortable.
  23. present: Readers are told to report suspicious activity immediately by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they feel unsafe.
  24. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity to 9-1-1 and to leave if uncomfortable.
  25. present: Readers are told to report suspicious activity by calling 9-1-1 and to leave if they do not feel comfortable.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time present.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026, the clock time approximately 8:50 a.m., and the word immediately.
  2. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026 and a clock time of approximately 8:50 a.m.
  3. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026 and the incident clock time of approximately 8:50 a.m.
  4. present: The date August 11, 2026, the clock time "approximately 8:50 a.m.", and "immediately" all mark timing.
  5. present: It gives August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and instructs reporting immediately.
  6. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and tells people to report immediately.
  7. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and uses immediately for reporting.
  8. present: It gives August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and uses immediately for reporting.
  9. present: The text gives August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and tells people to report suspicious behavior immediately.
  10. present: The incident is dated Tuesday, August 11, 2026, at approximately 8:50 a.m., plus a report immediately cue.
  11. present: It gives August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and tells people to report immediately.
  12. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026, the time approximately 8:50 a.m., and says to report immediately.
  13. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and says to report immediately.
  14. present: It gives Tuesday, August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and says to report immediately.
  15. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026, an approximate 8:50 a.m. incident time, and says to report immediately.
  16. present: It states the date August 11, 2026, the approximate time 8:50 a.m., and to report immediately.
  17. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026 and an incident clock time of about 8:50 a.m.
  18. present: It gives August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and tells people to report immediately.
  19. present: It reports the date August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m. on the bus, and to report "immediately".
  20. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and tells people to report immediately.
  21. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and says to report immediately.
  22. present: It gives the date August 11 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and says to report suspicious behavior immediately.
  23. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m. on the bus, and says to report immediately.
  24. present: It gives the date August 11, 2026 and the clock time approximately 8:50 a.m.
  25. present: The notice gives August 11, 2026, about 8:50 a.m., and says to report suspicious behavior immediately.
• Impactabsent11/25

  Final assessment

  11 of 25 reads find Impact present, 14/25 absent. Majority absent.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Fondling is named and Clery procedure language mentions health or safety, but no consequence of the hazard is stated.
  2. present: Clery language states an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees.
  3. absent: Past sexual contact is described, but no consequence or severity such as dangerous is stated.
  4. absent: Describing the assault restates the crime and does not add severity language such as dangerous or life-threatening.
  5. absent: Details of the touching describe the crime itself and do not state added danger, injury risk, or severity.
  6. absent: Clery language about a health or safety threat is a legal test, not a statement of what this fondling could do.
  7. absent: It recounts the completed assault on the victim but does not state a consequence or severity for others.
  8. absent: The Clery line about a health or safety threat is legal boilerplate, and no harm or severity is stated for this crime.
  9. present: Clery wording states an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees on campus.
  10. present: It describes unwanted touching of a private area and states an ongoing threat to health or safety under Clery procedures.
  11. absent: The crime is described, but no consequence or severity such as injury or danger is stated.
  12. absent: The fondling is described as the crime itself, with no extra statement of danger, injury, or what further harm could follow.
  13. present: Clery wording states an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees, which conveys seriousness.
  14. absent: The crime is described without any statement of consequence or severity such as dangerous or injury risk.
  15. absent: The writeup describes a completed crime but does not state potential consequences or severity for the wider community.
  16. absent: The narrative describes the fondling but never states what harm it could cause or how severe it is.
  17. present: Clery wording states an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees.
  18. present: Clery language states an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees.
  19. present: Clery wording states an "ongoing threat to the health or safety" of students or employees.
  20. absent: The writeup recounts the completed fondling and Clery procedures without stating danger, injury, or other consequences.
  21. present: Clery language states an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees.
  22. absent: The crime is described but the text does not state consequences or severity such as danger or injury risk.
  23. present: Clery wording states an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees on campus.
  24. present: Clery language states an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students and employees.
  25. present: The narrative describes sexual contact already inflicted and cites an ongoing threat to health or safety on campus.