Avoid-area then no-threat at Sports Complex Garage

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads found Source present (25 of 25). The wording supplies a clear source cue.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded opener PurdueALERT names who is sending the message.
  2. present: Source is present because PurdueALERT Urgent is a sender tag.
  3. present: I count Source from the signature IU Indy emergency.
  4. present: The issuing authority appears as PurdueALERT.
  5. present: PurdueALERT Urgent identifies the alerting office.
  6. present: A branded header IU Indy emergency is enough for Source.
  7. present: The text opens with PurdueALERT, which is a named sender.
  8. present: Source is met by the campus tag PurdueALERT Urgent.
  9. present: Readers can see IU Indy emergency as the origin of the blast.
  10. present: The alert names its origin with PurdueALERT.
  11. present: I treat PurdueALERT Urgent as a clear source cue.
  12. present: The signature line IU Indy emergency satisfies Source.
  13. present: Who sent it is visible in PurdueALERT.
  14. present: Source is coded present on PurdueALERT Urgent.
  15. present: The product identifies itself via IU Indy emergency.
  16. present: PurdueALERT is a recognizable campus alert brand.
  17. present: A named unit shows up as PurdueALERT Urgent.
  18. present: The first words IU Indy emergency tell recipients the sender.
  19. present: Source holds because PurdueALERT is present.
  20. present: I read PurdueALERT Urgent as the originating system.
  21. present: The body cites IU Indy emergency as the voice of the message.
  22. present: Sender identity is the phrase PurdueALERT.
  23. present: Source is the branded string PurdueALERT Urgent.
  24. present: The message attributes itself with IU Indy emergency.
  25. present: Present: PurdueALERT is the alerting authority cue.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads found Hazard absent (0 of 25). The first burst does not satisfy hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The text never names a specific threat, only a generic close or emergency.
  2. absent: Hazard is absent: words like situation or closed do not name the threat.
  3. absent: I see no specific hazard such as fire, weather, or burglary.
  4. absent: Generic emergency or situation language is not enough for Hazard.
  5. absent: The body does not say what the threat is.
  6. absent: Closed or operations language is status, not a named hazard.
  7. absent: I cannot code Hazard present without a specific threat name.
  8. absent: No weather, crime, or utility failure is named in this first burst.
  9. absent: Hazard fails because the danger is unnamed.
  10. absent: A generic dangerous situation is not a specific hazard.
  11. absent: The rubric rejects emergency or situation alone.
  12. absent: I looked for a concrete threat word and did not find one.
  13. absent: Hazard is 0 on this wording.
  14. absent: Nothing specifies shots, weather, package, or similar.
  15. absent: The message describes a close without saying why as a named hazard.
  16. absent: No specific threat label appears.
  17. absent: I treat unnamed situation as Hazard absent.
  18. absent: The text stays generic about the problem.
  19. absent: Hazard needs a named threat; this one does not have it.
  20. absent: Status of campus is not a hazard name.
  21. absent: I code H=0 because the threat is not specified.
  22. absent: Readers are not told what the danger is.
  23. absent: No crime, weather, or infrastructure failure is named here.
  24. absent: The first burst omits the specific hazard.
  25. absent: Hazard absent: only generic wording.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads found Location present (25 of 25). The wording supplies a clear location cue.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The place is named as Sports Complex Garage.
  2. present: Location is present because Riverwalk Garage is a site cue.
  3. present: I count Location from near Sports Complex Garage and Riverwalk Garage.
  4. present: Where is answered by Sports Complex Garage.
  5. present: Riverwalk Garage is a campus or street place.
  6. present: A named site near Sports Complex Garage and Riverwalk Garage appears.
  7. present: Location is met by Sports Complex Garage.
  8. present: Readers are told the site: Riverwalk Garage.
  9. present: I treat near Sports Complex Garage and Riverwalk Garage as enough for Location.
  10. present: The body locates this at Sports Complex Garage.
  11. present: Location holds on Riverwalk Garage.
  12. present: The alert names near Sports Complex Garage and Riverwalk Garage as the place.
  13. present: Sports Complex Garage is a geographic cue.
  14. present: A place string Riverwalk Garage is in the text.
  15. present: I code L=1 from near Sports Complex Garage and Riverwalk Garage.
  16. present: The wording specifies Sports Complex Garage as where.
  17. present: Location is the named site Riverwalk Garage.
  18. present: Where this applies: near Sports Complex Garage and Riverwalk Garage.
  19. present: Present: Sports Complex Garage names the location.
  20. present: I read Riverwalk Garage as a place.
  21. present: The product says near Sports Complex Garage and Riverwalk Garage, a location.
  22. present: Location comes from Sports Complex Garage.
  23. present: A named area Riverwalk Garage appears.
  24. present: The first burst states near Sports Complex Garage and Riverwalk Garage as the site.
  25. present: Place specificity is Sports Complex Garage.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads found Guidance present (25 of 25). The wording supplies a clear guidance cue.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The protective instruction is Avoid the area.
  2. present: Guidance is present because Call 911 with information tells people what to do.
  3. present: I count Guidance from Avoid the area. Call 911.
  4. present: Recipients are told Avoid the area.
  5. present: Call 911 with information is an action aimed at the audience.
  6. present: A directive Avoid the area. Call 911 appears.
  7. present: Guidance is met by Avoid the area.
  8. present: Readers get the instruction Call 911 with information.
  9. present: I treat Avoid the area. Call 911 as protective guidance.
  10. present: The body orders Avoid the area.
  11. present: Guidance holds on Call 911 with information.
  12. present: The alert tells people to Avoid the area. Call 911.
  13. present: Avoid the area is not mere responder status.
  14. present: An audience action Call 911 with information is in the text.
  15. present: I code G=1 from Avoid the area. Call 911.
  16. present: The wording instructs Avoid the area.
  17. present: Guidance is the line Call 911 with information.
  18. present: What to do: Avoid the area. Call 911.
  19. present: Present: Avoid the area is guidance.
  20. present: I read Call 911 with information as an instruction.
  21. present: The product says Avoid the area. Call 911, a protective ask.
  22. present: Guidance comes from Avoid the area.
  23. present: A call to act Call 911 with information appears.
  24. present: The first burst states Avoid the area. Call 911 as the action.
  25. present: The protective ask is Avoid the area.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads found Time absent (0 of 25). The first burst does not satisfy time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or today appears.
  2. absent: Time is absent; the text never says when.
  3. absent: I find no date or hour.
  4. absent: Was reported is narrative past, not a time cue that satisfies Time.
  5. absent: Time fails without a clock, date, or now.
  6. absent: The body skips when.
  7. absent: No today, immediately, or numbered hour is written.
  8. absent: I cannot code Time present.
  9. absent: When this applies is unstated.
  10. absent: Time 0 on a full read.
  11. absent: There is no calendar date or clock.
  12. absent: Recency is not conveyed.
  13. absent: The message does not say now or a day.
  14. absent: I see no time window.
  15. absent: Time is not satisfied.
  16. absent: No starting-at or until phrase appears.
  17. absent: The wording never timestamps the event.
  18. absent: I code T=0.
  19. absent: A label like 03a is not a clock time.
  20. absent: Is occurring is not a time of day.
  21. absent: Time absent.
  22. absent: Readers are not told when.
  23. absent: No date string is in the first burst.
  24. absent: The alert omits timing.
  25. absent: When remains missing.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads found Impact present (25 of 25). The wording supplies a clear impact cue.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The severity cue is dangerous.
  2. present: Impact is present because Dangerous Situation states harm or danger.
  3. present: I count Impact from dangerous situation.
  4. present: Consequence language appears as dangerous.
  5. present: Dangerous Situation is more than the hazard name; it flags severity.
  6. present: A harm word dangerous situation appears.
  7. present: Impact is met by dangerous.
  8. present: Readers are told it is Dangerous Situation.
  9. present: I treat dangerous situation as enough for Impact.
  10. present: The body states dangerous as seriousness.
  11. present: Impact holds on Dangerous Situation.
  12. present: The alert uses dangerous situation as a severity term.
  13. present: dangerous implies harm to people nearby.
  14. present: A severity string Dangerous Situation is in the text.
  15. present: I code I=1 from dangerous situation.
  16. present: The wording specifies dangerous as danger.
  17. present: Impact is the word Dangerous Situation.
  18. present: What it could do is flagged by dangerous situation.
  19. present: Present: dangerous is impact language.
  20. present: I read Dangerous Situation as a consequence cue.
  21. present: The product says dangerous situation, a severity claim.
  22. present: Impact comes from dangerous.
  23. present: A danger label Dangerous Situation appears.
  24. present: The first burst states dangerous situation.
  25. present: Severity specificity is dangerous.