Campus closed Sunday with emergency page for latest information

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Institutional branding appears via "Rice University", which marks the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Institutional branding appears via "Rice University", which marks the sender.
  2. present: The notice identifies who is speaking through "Rice University".
  3. present: Source is present because "Rice University" names the issuing campus or alert brand.
  4. present: A campus or alert signature ("Rice University") supplies the authority line.
  5. present: Sender identity is clear from the wording "Rice University".
  6. present: The alert tags an official issuer with "Rice University".
  7. present: Who is sending this is stated through "Rice University".
  8. present: Branded language "Rice University" functions as the source element.
  9. present: Campus naming in "Rice University" tells recipients the origin of the message.
  10. present: An official voice is established by "Rice University".
  11. present: The opening or body includes "Rice University" as institutional source.
  12. present: "Rice University" is enough to code source present under the branding rule.
  13. present: Recipients can tell the sender from "Rice University".
  14. present: Source scores present: "Rice University" is an authority marker.
  15. present: The university or college is referenced as "Rice University".
  16. present: Alert-system or school labeling ("Rice University") covers source.
  17. present: Issuing body is identifiable from "Rice University".
  18. present: "Rice University" operates as a branded signature for source.
  19. present: The text attributes the message via "Rice University".
  20. present: Source present: campus authority language "Rice University".
  21. present: Readers see "Rice University" and know which campus is speaking.
  22. present: Official sender cue "Rice University" is explicit in the text.
  23. present: Source is coded yes based on "Rice University".
  24. present: The phrase "Rice University" identifies the responding institution.
  25. present: Authority is named through the fragment "Rice University".
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. Only generic words like emergency or incident appear, with no specific threat named.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Only generic words like emergency or incident appear, with no specific threat named.
  2. absent: Hazard is absent: the text never names a concrete danger type.
  3. absent: No weather, violence, fire, outage, or other specific hazard is stated.
  4. absent: The message does not say what the threat is.
  5. absent: H=0 because specificity of hazard is missing.
  6. absent: Nothing identifies a particular hazard beyond vague wording.
  7. absent: A specific threat noun is not present.
  8. absent: Hazard fails the named-threat test.
  9. absent: Readers cannot tell what danger is being reported.
  10. absent: No concrete hazard language appears in the body.
  11. absent: The alert omits the what of the emergency.
  12. absent: Generic status language does not satisfy hazard.
  13. absent: Threat type is left unspecified.
  14. absent: Hazard element codes absent on this text.
  15. absent: Without a named hazard, H is zero.
  16. absent: The wording never specifies the danger.
  17. absent: No shots, storm, fire, leak, or similar is stated.
  18. absent: Hazard is too vague to count as present.
  19. absent: Specific threat naming is missing entirely.
  20. absent: H fails: no particular hazard term.
  21. absent: The message skips naming what is wrong.
  22. absent: Only non-specific incident language is used.
  23. absent: Hazard not established by the text.
  24. absent: A concrete hazard label is not found.
  25. absent: Named-threat requirement is not met.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Location is given through "Rice University campus will be closed S…".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Location is given through "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  2. present: Place is specified as "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  3. present: Where is answered by "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  4. present: "Rice University campus will be closed S…" functions as the location element.
  5. present: The alert situates the event with "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  6. present: Geographic or campus place: "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  7. present: L=1 because "Rice University campus will be closed S…" names where this applies.
  8. present: Recipients are told the place via "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  9. present: Location present in the phrase "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  10. present: A campus or building reference "Rice University campus will be closed S…" covers location.
  11. present: The where cue is "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  12. present: "Rice University campus will be closed S…" identifies the affected area.
  13. present: Place naming succeeds with "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  14. present: Location codes yes on "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  15. present: Site detail appears as "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  16. present: The message anchors place with "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  17. present: "Rice University campus will be closed S…" is enough location under the rubric.
  18. present: Affected place language: "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  19. present: L is present via "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  20. present: Campus geography is marked by "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  21. present: Where this matters is "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  22. present: The text localizes to "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  23. present: Location element met by "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  24. present: Place is not left blank: "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  25. present: Spatial reference "Rice University campus will be closed S…" supports L=1.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Guidance is the instruction "closed".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Guidance is the instruction "closed".
  2. present: Protective action appears as "closed".
  3. present: Recipients are told to act via "closed".
  4. present: "closed" is a direct what-to-do line.
  5. present: G=1 because "closed" instructs the audience.
  6. present: The alert directs action with "closed".
  7. present: Guidance present: "closed".
  8. present: A clear instruction is "closed".
  9. present: What to do is stated as "closed".
  10. present: "closed" counts as protective guidance.
  11. present: Action language "closed" meets guidance.
  12. present: The message tells people "closed".
  13. present: Guidance codes yes on "closed".
  14. present: Operational direction: "closed".
  15. present: Instructional content includes "closed".
  16. present: "closed" is audience-facing guidance.
  17. present: G is present via the cue "closed".
  18. present: Protective or operational order "closed" is explicit.
  19. present: The text's guidance signal is "closed".
  20. present: Recipients receive the directive "closed".
  21. present: What-to-do element satisfied by "closed".
  22. present: "closed" tells the public how to respond or operate.
  23. present: Guidance met through "closed".
  24. present: Action instruction present: "closed".
  25. present: The alert's order to the audience is "closed".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Time is marked by "Rice University campus will be closed S…".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Time is marked by "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  2. present: A temporal cue appears as "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  3. present: When is answered with "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  4. present: "Rice University campus will be closed S…" supplies timing or recency.
  5. present: T=1 because "Rice University campus will be closed S…" is a time reference.
  6. present: Clock or calendar language: "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  7. present: The alert times the event with "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  8. present: Temporal detail "Rice University campus will be closed S…" is present.
  9. present: Time element met by "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  10. present: Recipients see timing via "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  11. present: "Rice University campus will be closed S…" counts as the time cue.
  12. present: When-language includes "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  13. present: T codes yes on "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  14. present: A schedule or day marker "Rice University campus will be closed S…" appears.
  15. present: Timing is explicit: "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  16. present: The text anchors time with "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  17. present: "Rice University campus will be closed S…" is enough for the time element.
  18. present: Recency or clock cue "Rice University campus will be closed S…" is stated.
  19. present: T is present via "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  20. present: Date or hour language "Rice University campus will be closed S…" supports T=1.
  21. present: Temporal reference: "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  22. present: The when signal is "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  23. present: Time present through "Rice University campus will be closed S…".
  24. present: "Rice University campus will be closed S…" tells recipients the relevant when.
  25. present: Schedule wording "Rice University campus will be closed S…" meets time.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.
  2. absent: Impact is absent: the text does not say what the threat could do.
  3. absent: Nothing states danger level, injuries, or disruptive effect.
  4. absent: I=0 because severity or harm is not conveyed.
  5. absent: Hazard may be named, but impact language is missing.
  6. absent: The alert omits consequence wording.
  7. absent: Impact fails the harm-or-severity test.
  8. absent: Readers are not told stakes or effects.
  9. absent: No life-safety or operational impact phrase is present.
  10. absent: Impact element codes absent.
  11. absent: Without consequence language, I is zero.
  12. absent: Severity is left unstated.
  13. absent: The text stops short of impact.
  14. absent: Harm potential is not described.
  15. absent: I fails on bare description without effects.
  16. absent: No dangerous/closed/injury-style impact cue appears.
  17. absent: Impact not established by the wording.
  18. absent: Consequence detail is missing.
  19. absent: The message lacks severity framing.
  20. absent: I is absent under the impact rule.
  21. absent: Stakes for people or property are not stated.
  22. absent: No disruption or harm language is included.
  23. absent: Impact cannot be coded present here.
  24. absent: Effect-on-campus language is omitted.
  25. absent: Severity/consequence element fails.