Non-forcible burglary at Bach Festival offices

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree source is present. Campus Safety is named as the unit that received the burglary report.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Campus Safety is named as the unit that received the burglary report.
  2. present: The narrative credits Campus Safety, a campus public safety agency, with taking the report.
  3. present: Source is present because Campus Safety appears as the responding authority.
  4. present: A named campus agency, Campus Safety, is the actor in the first sentence.
  5. present: Who issued the notice is identifiable from the Campus Safety intake line.
  6. present: Campus Safety functions here as the listed campus law enforcement office.
  7. present: The text attributes report receipt to Campus Safety rather than an unnamed sender.
  8. present: Naming Campus Safety satisfies the who is sending test for a campus authority.
  9. present: The only agency in the body is Campus Safety, which received the report.
  10. present: Recipients can tell the notice comes from Campus Safety, the named department.
  11. present: Campus Safety received a report is an identified public safety source.
  12. present: The timely notice is voiced through Campus Safety as the handling office.
  13. present: An identified campus safety unit, not a generic sender, is named in the body.
  14. present: Source coding is met by the phrase Campus Safety received a report.
  15. present: The burglary account is given by Campus Safety as the receiving agency.
  16. present: Campus Safety is the sole named authority in this short notice.
  17. present: The message identifies Campus Safety as the office that took the call.
  18. present: A campus public safety department, Campus Safety, is specified up front.
  19. present: Sender identity comes from Campus Safety in the report sentence.
  20. present: The opening body line names Campus Safety as the responding campus unit.
  21. present: Campus Safety is the agency that received and is reporting the burglary.
  22. present: Who is speaking is Campus Safety, stated as the report recipient.
  23. present: The text does not hide the sender: Campus Safety is named.
  24. present: Report intake is assigned to Campus Safety, a recognizable campus agency.
  25. present: Campus Safety appears as the official unit handling the Pioneer Building report.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous agreement that non-forcible burglary names a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The header names burglary with non-forcible entry, a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: A non-forcible burglary is a concrete named threat, not merely an emergency or situation.
  3. present: What the threat is is answered as burglary, stated in both the title and the body.
  4. present: Campus Safety received a report of a non-forcible burglary, which names the hazard plainly.
  5. present: Non generic wording appears: burglary, not incident or situation alone.
  6. present: The crime type is burglary, further labeled non-forcible entry.
  7. present: Header and body both specify burglary as the reported offense.
  8. present: A report of burglary is a defined property crime, not a vague label.
  9. present: Non-forcible entry names a particular manner of burglary, meeting the specific threat test.
  10. present: The opening crime label Burglary is specific enough for hazard.
  11. present: The threat is not generic, it is a non-forcible burglary of offices.
  12. present: What happened is named: burglary by non-forcible entry.
  13. present: The notice classifies the event as burglary, a particular offense.
  14. present: A specific Clery crime, burglary, is stated rather than a catch all incident phrase.
  15. present: The wording names burglary as the crime rather than hiding behind situation.
  16. present: Non-forcible burglary that occurred is a defined crime description.
  17. present: Hazard is present because burglary and non-forcible entry are both named.
  18. present: The message titles the event Burglary, Non-Forcible Entry, a specific threat type.
  19. present: It names burglary, a specific threat.
  20. present: The hazard line is burglary of the Bach Festival offices, a defined offense.
  21. present: A burglary that occurred is not a catch all emergency phrase.
  22. present: The text describes a non-forcible burglary, which specifies the act.
  23. present: Burglary, Non-Forcible Entry is a specific Clery category, not a vague label.
  24. present: The subject of the timely notification is a burglary, a named crime.
  25. present: Naming burglary and non-forcible entry satisfies the specific threat requirement.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find location in the Pioneer Building and the Bach Festival offices.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The burglary is placed in the Pioneer Building, a named site.
  2. present: Bach Festival offices inside the Pioneer Building further specify where.
  3. present: Location coding is met by the Pioneer Building parenthetical offices.
  4. present: Readers are told the event occurred in the Pioneer Building.
  5. present: A building name, Pioneer Building, answers where the crime happened.
  6. present: The parenthetical Bach Festival offices is a specific interior location.
  7. present: Place is given as the Pioneer Building rather than an unnamed area.
  8. present: Geography is a named campus building plus the Bach Festival offices.
  9. present: In the Pioneer Building is an explicit location phrase.
  10. present: The sentence that occurred in the Pioneer Building supplies location.
  11. present: A named hall-style building, Pioneer Building, is the scene.
  12. present: Bach Festival offices function as the on campus address inside the building.
  13. present: Where is answered with Pioneer Building and the offices noted in parentheses.
  14. present: The report is geographically anchored at the Pioneer Building.
  15. present: Named place: Pioneer Building.
  16. present: The offices of the Bach Festival locate the burglary inside a known campus space.
  17. present: Occurrence is tied to the Pioneer Building, which is a concrete site.
  18. present: The text places the incident in the Pioneer Building rather than campus at large only.
  19. present: It says the incident occurred in the Pioneer Building, a specific place on campus.
  20. present: Campus geography is given as Pioneer Building, Bach Festival offices.
  21. present: Readers can tell where: the Pioneer Building.
  22. present: The building Pioneer Building locates the reported burglary.
  23. present: The incident is located inside the Pioneer Building.
  24. present: A specific building plus office suite is given, not merely campus.
  25. present: The text says the burglary occurred in the Pioneer Building.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Complete agreement that the notice contains no protective instruction to recipients.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No sentence tells recipients to avoid the Pioneer Building, lock offices, or take other protective action.
  2. absent: The body only reports that a crime occurred and never instructs the audience.
  3. absent: There is no shelter, evacuate, stay away, or remain indoors language.
  4. absent: Received a report describes intake, which is responder work rather than public guidance.
  5. absent: Timely Notification is a product label, not an instruction to lock doors or leave.
  6. absent: Nothing directs people to call anyone, monitor updates, or avoid the area.
  7. absent: The short notice contains zero how to protect language for recipients.
  8. absent: Recipients are not told to stay inside, leave, or secure belongings.
  9. absent: Guidance is absent: the text has no instruction telling people what to do to stay safe.
  10. absent: The message informs about a burglary and does not tell readers what to do.
  11. absent: Protective action for the public is missing from this one-sentence body.
  12. absent: The rubric requires an instruction to the recipient, and none is present.
  13. absent: No run, hide, fight, avoid the area, or similar protective phrase appears.
  14. absent: Follow up actions are not even listed, and the public is given no safety step.
  15. absent: Call 911, lock doors, and stay away are all missing.
  16. absent: The notice never says remain alert, report suspicious persons, or avoid the offices.
  17. absent: Describing that Campus Safety received a report is not an instruction to the reader.
  18. absent: There is no monitor for updates or follow instructions line.
  19. absent: It does not instruct recipients to avoid the area or take shelter.
  20. absent: Guidance fails because no protective action is directed at recipients.
  21. absent: Nothing in the text tells students what protective action to take now.
  22. absent: The notice informs rather than directs and never says stay inside or leave.
  23. absent: The body is a one line crime report with no directed safety step.
  24. absent: Seek shelter, lock doors, and do not enter are all absent.
  25. absent: The only content is a report of a past burglary, with no audience directive.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Broad agreement that January 31, 2026 dates both the notice and the report, satisfying time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: January 31, 2026 appears as the header date.
  2. present: The first sentence dates the report On January 31, 2026.
  3. present: Two mentions of January 31, 2026 satisfy when.
  4. present: A calendar date stamps both the timely notification and the underlying report.
  5. present: Time is present via the printed January 31, 2026 dateline.
  6. present: On January 31, 2026, Campus Safety received a report supplies when.
  7. present: The timely notification carries the date January 31, 2026.
  8. present: Recency is conveyed by dating the report the same day as the header.
  9. present: A specific day in 2026 is given for the burglary report.
  10. present: Time coding is met by the January 31, 2026 references.
  11. present: The phrase On January 31, 2026 is a date stamp.
  12. present: Dated language is in both the title block and the body.
  13. present: Calendar time is given as January 31, 2026.
  14. present: When Campus Safety received the report is stated: January 31, 2026.
  15. present: The header January 31, 2026 is a sufficient date cue.
  16. present: Recipients can tell the event is tied to January 31, 2026.
  17. present: The notice tells when the department received the report: January 31, 2026.
  18. present: A full calendar date is stated twice, which satisfies the time element.
  19. present: A date, January 31, 2026, conveys when.
  20. present: Time is not missing: a full date is stated in the header and again in the body.
  21. present: The product date of January 31, 2026 is printed under the crime title.
  22. present: When is answered by January 31, 2026.
  23. present: Dated language appears in the first narrative sentence: January 31, 2026.
  24. present: The incident notice is calendar stamped January 31, 2026.
  25. present: The January 31, 2026 date meets the when or recency test.
• Impactabsent3/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no impact because burglary names the crime without severity wording. A few treat office burglary as implied property harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Burglary names the offense without extra severity words such as dangerous or damaging.
  2. absent: Non-forcible describes the method of entry, not harm to people or property.
  3. absent: The notice never says the burglary could injure anyone or destroy property.
  4. present: Burglary of offices strongly implies theft of property, a stated kind of harm.
  5. absent: Impact fails because only the crime name and a place appear, with no consequence clause.
  6. absent: No life threatening, may cause injury, or destructive wording is used.
  7. absent: Naming a burglary does not by itself convey how serious the effects are.
  8. absent: There is no statement of what the burglary could do to people or offices.
  9. absent: The message does not warn of injury, danger, or further attacks.
  10. absent: Consequences such as theft losses or occupant risk are not spelled out.
  11. absent: Without words like dangerous or may cause harm, impact is not met.
  12. absent: The Clery label burglary is the hazard name, which the rubric says is not enough for impact.
  13. absent: Identifying the building and the entry type does not convey consequence or seriousness.
  14. present: A burglary in offices is a statement of property invasion, which is harm to that space.
  15. absent: Property crime is named, and its potential effects are not.
  16. absent: No explicit statement of how serious the harm is appears beyond the crime name.
  17. absent: The text reports a crime, not the severity of harm to people or property.
  18. absent: There is no could be deadly, may cause injury, or similar consequence language.
  19. absent: It does not state any consequence or severity such as destructive or life threatening.
  20. absent: Nothing tells readers the incident could be harmful beyond the label burglary.
  21. absent: The notice is silent on outcomes such as missing property or occupant danger.
  22. present: Office burglary implies intrusion into a work space, a consequence for that property.
  23. absent: Non-forcible even softens force and still does not add a severity statement.
  24. absent: Investigative detail is missing entirely, and so is any harm clause.
  25. absent: Impact is not present: there is no stated consequence beyond the crime's name.