Skip to content
Campus Alert Archive
SFSU

Police investigate a sexual battery reported at a residence lobby

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
CAsexual assaulttimely warninghigh confidence
Under Investigation

University police responded to a report of sexual battery at the West Grove Commons lobby and said the investigation is continuing. The bulletin is on the current timely warnings page.

Alerts
1
Response
—
Killed
—
Injured
—
Institution
San Francisco State University
Public Masters · CA
All SFSU cases →
~25,000 studentsSFSU Alert
Official alert policy
Read when and how SFSU says it will use SF State Alert: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim

Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.

INITIAL ALERTWebsite
Verified verbatim2565 chars
This Timely Warning Bulletin is being issued in compliance with the Jeanne Clery Act and the purpose is to provide preventative information to the campus community to aid members from becoming the victim of a similar crime. As such, it may contain information of a graphic nature that could trigger emotional response. On Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM, San Francisco State University Police Officers responded to 700 Font Blvd (West Grove Commons lobby) on the report of a suspicious circumstance later determined to be a report of sexual battery. The victim, who is an SFSU community member, reported that at approximately 4:00 PM they were walking from West Grove Commons to the Mashouf Wellness Center when an unknown subject approached the victim. The unknown subject began to engage in unwanted conversation with the victim. The unknown subject hugged and kissed the victim multiple times without their consent before leaving the area. The suspect was last seen on 750 Font Blvd traveling in an unknown direction. The suspect was last seen wearing a light green bandana, black jacket, and black sweat pants. The San Francisco State University Police Department is continuing with the investigation. If anyone saw or heard any part of this incident or may have further suspect information contact University Police at (415) 338-2222 or on the anonymous tip line at (415) 338-3030. In response to this incident, UPD is increasing patrols in this area of campus. Members of the SF State community are encouraged to remain alert and observant; please report any suspicious or concerning activity to UPD immediately. If you feel unsafe, contact UPD. UPD encourages students, staff and faculty to use the SafeWalk service, previously known as safety escorts, offered by the UPD as part of a broader personal safety management plan. Call (415) 338-7200 to arrange for a SafeWalk. Additional crime prevention and risk-reduction tips can be found on the UPD webpage. Please contact the San Francisco State University Police Department at (415) 338-7200 (non-emergency) or visit our website at http://upd.sfsu.edu/ for additional information. If you are a student and need emotional support, please contact Counseling & Psychological Services by calling (415) 338-2208 or visiting Student Services Building 208 on Monday-Thursday from 8:00am - 7:00pm and Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm. Crisis support services can be reached by all SF State community members by calling the San Francisco Trauma Recovery/Rape Treatment Center at (415) 437-3000.
Accordion title omitted. The body is the panel text. Empty spacer paragraphs were dropped.
Distinct incident from 2024-12-19-san-francisco-state-university-threat-lockdown.
Dual independent fetch 2026-10-04. sha256 65b8fa24b8049d53304409d8506d62cfe772fe3c0327d63aea9faed36c3aab63. Both reads took this body from the official bulletin.
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

This Timely Warning Bulletin is being issued in compliance with the Jeanne Clery Act and the purpose is to provide preventative information to the campus community to aid members from becoming the victim of a similar crime. As such, it may contain information of a graphic nature that could trigger emotional response. On Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM, San Francisco State University Police Officers responded to 700 Font Blvd (West Grove Commons lobby) on the report of a suspicious circumstance later determined to be a report of sexual battery. The victim, who is an SFSU community member, reported that at approximately 4:00 PM they were walking from West Grove Commons to the Mashouf Wellness Center when an unknown subject approached the victim. The unknown subject began to engage in unwanted conversation with the victim. The unknown subject hugged and kissed the victim multiple times without their consent before leaving the area. The suspect was last seen on 750 Font Blvd traveling in an unknown direction. The suspect was last seen wearing a light green bandana, black jacket, and black sweat pants. The San Francisco State University Police Department is continuing with the investigation. If anyone saw or heard any part of this incident or may have further suspect information contact University Police at (415) 338-2222 or on the anonymous tip line at (415) 338-3030. In response to this incident, UPD is increasing patrols in this area of campus. Members of the SF State community are encouraged to remain alert and observant; please report any suspicious or concerning activity to UPD immediately. If you feel unsafe, contact UPD. UPD encourages students, staff and faculty to use the SafeWalk service, previously known as safety escorts, offered by the UPD as part of a broader personal safety management plan. Call (415) 338-7200 to arrange for a SafeWalk. Additional crime prevention and risk-reduction tips can be found on the UPD webpage. Please contact the San Francisco State University Police Department at (415) 338-7200 (non-emergency) or visit our website at http://upd.sfsu.edu/ for additional information. If you are a student and need emotional support, please contact Counseling & Psychological Services by calling (415) 338-2208 or visiting Student Services Building 208 on Monday-Thursday from 8:00am - 7:00pm and Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm. Crisis support services can be reached by all SF State community members by calling the San Francisco Trauma Recovery/Rape Treatment Center at (415) 437-3000.

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    25 of 25 passes marked Source present and 0 absent. Under the amber test, source is present because the text names the San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD as the issuing authority.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Under the amber test, source is present because the text names the San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD as the issuing authority.
    2. present: Under birch review, San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD name the issuing authority.
    3. present: The cedar bulletin names San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD as the responding authority.
    4. present: This daisy alert identifies San Francisco State University Police Department, University Police, and UPD as the authority.
    5. present: The elm text names the San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD as the sender.
    6. present: The fern reading marks Source present because the bulletin names San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD as the issuing authority.
    7. present: The granite reading finds a sender because the text names the San Francisco State University Police Department, University Police, and UPD.
    8. present: The bulletin does harbor a named issuing authority, because it identifies the San Francisco State University Police Department and University Police.
    9. present: The ivory sender is named as the San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD, which identifies the issuing authority.
    10. present: The San Francisco State University Police Department is named as the investigating authority, so jasper finds a source.
    11. present: The kettle identifies the sender as the San Francisco State University Police Department, also called UPD.
    12. present: The linen text identifies San Francisco State University Police Department, University Police, and UPD as the responding and issuing authority.
    13. present: The maple alert identifies San Francisco State University Police Officers, University Police, and the San Francisco State University Police Department as the authority.
    14. present: The nectar notice names San Francisco State University Police Department, University Police, and UPD as the issuing authority.
    15. present: The olive bulletin identifies San Francisco State University Police Department, University Police, and UPD as the issuing authority.
    16. present: San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD are named as the issuing authority, which is the pebble that identifies the source.
    17. present: San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD are named as the quartz issuing and investigating authority.
    18. present: The raven coder marks source present because the bulletin names San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD as the issuing authority.
    19. present: The spruce bulletin names the San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD as the issuing authority.
    20. present: The thistle text names San Francisco State University Police Officers and the San Francisco State University Police Department as the sender.
    21. present: The umber bulletin names San Francisco State University Police Officers, University Police, and UPD as the issuing authority.
    22. present: The violet text names the San Francisco State University Police Department as the investigating and contact authority.
    23. present: San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD are named as the investigating authority, so willow counts a source.
    24. present: The message names San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD as the issuing authority, so yarrow marks source present.
    25. present: San Francisco State University Police Department and UPD are named as the issuing and responding authority in this zircon reading.
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present and 0 absent. Under the amber test, hazard is present because the text specifically names sexual battery rather than only a generic incident.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Under the amber test, hazard is present because the text specifically names sexual battery rather than only a generic incident.
    2. present: Under birch review, the text names sexual battery, a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
    3. present: The cedar text names sexual battery, a specific crime, after first calling it a suspicious circumstance.
    4. present: This daisy alert states the specific threat as a report of sexual battery, not a generic incident.
    5. present: The elm text specifies sexual battery, not a generic emergency or incident.
    6. present: The fern reading marks Hazard present because the text specifically names sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
    7. present: The granite reading finds a specific hazard because the text states the report was sexual battery, not a generic incident.
    8. present: The text does harbor a specific threat, because it says the report was determined to be sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
    9. present: The ivory text names sexual battery, a specific crime, after first calling the report a suspicious circumstance.
    10. present: The bulletin says the report was determined to be sexual battery, which jasper treats as a specific hazard.
    11. present: The kettle names sexual battery after a report that began as a suspicious circumstance.
    12. present: The linen text names sexual battery, a specific crime, rather than only a generic incident or situation.
    13. present: The maple text names the specific threat as sexual battery, not a generic incident or situation.
    14. present: The nectar text specifies sexual battery rather than a generic emergency or incident.
    15. present: The olive text specifically names sexual battery after unwanted hugging and kissing without consent.
    16. present: The bulletin names sexual battery as the reported crime, the pebble that states a specific hazard.
    17. present: The text names the quartz specific threat as sexual battery, not a generic incident.
    18. present: The raven coder marks hazard present because the text specifies sexual battery, not a generic emergency or incident.
    19. present: The spruce text names sexual battery and describes unwanted hugging and kissing, a specific threat.
    20. present: The thistle alert names sexual battery, specifically unwanted hugging and kissing without consent.
    21. present: The umber text specifies sexual battery, not a generic incident, after unwanted hugging and kissing.
    22. present: The violet bulletin names sexual battery as the specific crime after a report of a suspicious circumstance.
    23. present: The text says the report was sexual battery, a specific crime rather than a generic incident, so willow counts a hazard.
    24. present: It states the report was sexual battery, a specific crime rather than a generic incident, which yarrow treats as the hazard.
    25. present: The text names sexual battery, a specific crime, which satisfies the zircon hazard test.
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    25 of 25 passes marked Location present and 0 absent. Under the amber test, location is present because it cites 700 Font Blvd, the West Grove Commons lobby, and the Mashouf Wellness Center.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Under the amber test, location is present because it cites 700 Font Blvd, the West Grove Commons lobby, and the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    2. present: Under birch review, it places the event at 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons lobby, and toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    3. present: The cedar alert locates the report at 700 Font Blvd in the West Grove Commons lobby and on the walk toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    4. present: This daisy alert gives 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons lobby, Mashouf Wellness Center, and 750 Font Blvd.
    5. present: The elm text gives 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons lobby, and the path toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    6. present: The fern reading marks Location present because it gives 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons lobby, and the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    7. present: The granite reading finds a place because the text names 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons lobby, and the path toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    8. present: The message does harbor a place, because it locates the report at 700 Font Blvd in the West Grove Commons lobby.
    9. present: The ivory message places the incident at 700 Font Blvd in the West Grove Commons lobby and on the walk toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    10. present: It locates the response at 700 Font Blvd in the West Grove Commons lobby, so jasper finds a place.
    11. present: The kettle gives 700 Font Blvd, the West Grove Commons lobby, and the path toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    12. present: The linen text places the event at 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons, and the path toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    13. present: The maple message gives 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons lobby, the Mashouf Wellness Center, and 750 Font Blvd.
    14. present: The nectar text gives 700 Font Blvd, the West Grove Commons lobby, the Mashouf Wellness Center, and 750 Font Blvd.
    15. present: The olive places named are 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons lobby, the Mashouf Wellness Center, and 750 Font Blvd.
    16. present: It places the report at West Grove Commons, 700 Font Blvd, and the walk toward the Mashouf Wellness Center, a pebble of location.
    17. present: It places the quartz event at 700 Font Blvd in the West Grove Commons lobby and along the walk toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    18. present: The raven coder marks location present because it places the event at 700 Font Blvd, the West Grove Commons lobby, and toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    19. present: The spruce alert gives 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons lobby, and the path toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    20. present: The thistle message gives 700 Font Blvd, the West Grove Commons lobby, and the path toward the Mashouf Wellness Center.
    21. present: The umber message places events at 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons, and 750 Font Blvd.
    22. present: The violet account places the incident at 700 Font Blvd in the West Grove Commons lobby.
    23. present: It gives 700 Font Blvd, the West Grove Commons lobby, and the walk toward the Mashouf Wellness Center, so willow counts a location.
    24. present: It places the report at 700 Font Blvd (West Grove Commons lobby) and on the walk toward the Mashouf Wellness Center, so yarrow marks location present.
    25. present: It places the incident at 700 Font Blvd, West Grove Commons, and the Mashouf Wellness Center, so zircon location is present.
  • Guidancepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    25 of 25 passes marked Guidance present and 0 absent. Under the amber test, guidance is present because recipients are told to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Under the amber test, guidance is present because recipients are told to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk.
    2. present: Under birch review, recipients are told to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    3. present: The cedar message tells readers to remain alert, report suspicious activity to UPD immediately, contact UPD if unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk.
    4. present: This daisy alert instructs people to remain alert, report suspicious activity immediately, contact UPD if unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    5. present: The elm text instructs recipients to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    6. present: The fern reading marks Guidance present because it tells people to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    7. present: The granite reading finds guidance because recipients are told to report suspicious activity to UPD immediately, contact UPD if unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk.
    8. present: The alert does harbor a protective instruction, because it tells people to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk.
    9. present: The ivory bulletin tells people to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and call to arrange a SafeWalk.
    10. present: It tells recipients to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and call to arrange a SafeWalk, which jasper counts as guidance.
    11. present: The kettle tells people to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    12. present: The linen text instructs recipients to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk.
    13. present: The maple bulletin instructs people to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    14. present: The nectar text instructs recipients to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and arrange a SafeWalk.
    15. present: The olive message instructs people to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    16. present: Readers are told to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and use SafeWalk, a pebble of protective guidance.
    17. present: Recipients get a quartz instruction to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk.
    18. present: The raven coder marks guidance present because it tells people to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    19. present: The spruce message instructs people to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk.
    20. present: The thistle bulletin instructs readers to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    21. present: The umber bulletin instructs recipients to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and use SafeWalk.
    22. present: The violet instructions say to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk.
    23. present: It tells readers to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and request a SafeWalk, so willow counts guidance.
    24. present: It tells readers to remain alert, report suspicious activity, contact UPD if they feel unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk, so yarrow marks guidance present.
    25. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity, contact UPD if unsafe, and call for a SafeWalk, which is zircon guidance.
  • Timepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    25 of 25 passes marked Time present and 0 absent. Under the amber test, time is present because the text gives Monday, September 28, 2026, at about 6:22 PM and about 4:00 PM.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Under the amber test, time is present because the text gives Monday, September 28, 2026, at about 6:22 PM and about 4:00 PM.
    2. present: Under birch review, the bulletin states Monday, September 28, 2026, at about 6:22 PM and 4:00 PM, and says immediately.
    3. present: The cedar text states Monday, September 28, 2026, at about 6:22 PM, and also about 4:00 PM.
    4. present: This daisy alert states Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22 PM, and also about 4:00 PM.
    5. present: The elm text states Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22 PM and also approximately 4:00 PM.
    6. present: The fern reading marks Time present because it states Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM and 4:00 PM.
    7. present: The granite reading finds time because the text gives Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM and also about 4:00 PM.
    8. present: The text does harbor recency, because it gives Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22 PM.
    9. present: The ivory alert gives Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM and also says to report activity immediately.
    10. present: It gives Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM, so jasper finds when the response occurred.
    11. present: The kettle states Monday, September 28, 2026, at about 6:22 PM and about 4:00 PM, and also says immediately.
    12. present: The linen text gives Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM, plus about 4:00 PM and the word immediately.
    13. present: The maple notice includes Monday, September 28, 2026, about 6:22 PM, about 4:00 PM, and the word immediately.
    14. present: The nectar text includes Monday, September 28, 2026, approximately 6:22 PM, and approximately 4:00 PM.
    15. present: The olive text gives Monday, September 28, 2026, at about 6:22 PM, plus about 4:00 PM.
    16. present: It states Monday, September 28, 2026, at about 6:22 PM and 4:00 PM, a pebble of date and clock time.
    17. present: A quartz date and clock time appear as Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22 PM, plus about 4:00 PM.
    18. present: The raven coder marks time present because it states Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM and 4:00 PM, and says immediately.
    19. present: The spruce wording includes Monday, September 28, 2026, about 6:22PM and 4:00 PM, and the word immediately.
    20. present: The thistle text includes Monday, September 28, 2026, about 6:22 PM, about 4:00 PM, and the word immediately.
    21. present: The umber text gives the date September 28, 2026, the times 6:22 PM and 4:00 PM, and the word immediately.
    22. present: The violet warning dates the response to Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM.
    23. present: It states Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM, and approximately 4:00 PM, so willow counts a time.
    24. present: It gives Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM and about 4:00 PM, so yarrow marks time present.
    25. present: The zircon time element is met by Monday, September 28, 2026, at approximately 6:22PM and 4:00 PM.
  • Impactpresent16/25

    Final assessment

    16 of 25 passes marked Impact present and 9 absent. Under birch review, it says the notice should aid members from becoming the victim of a similar crime, which states possible harm.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: Under the amber test, impact is absent because the text does not state injury, danger, or any consequence beyond the sexual battery itself.
    2. present: Under birch review, it says the notice should aid members from becoming the victim of a similar crime, which states possible harm.
    3. absent: The cedar notice describes unwanted contact but states no injury, weapon, or other severity beyond the sexual battery itself.
    4. present: This daisy alert says the purpose is to aid members from becoming the victim of a similar crime, which states possible harm.
    5. absent: The elm text describes the crime but never states a consequence or severity such as injury, danger, or how serious the harm is.
    6. present: The fern reading marks Impact present because it warns that members could become the victim of a similar crime and offers trauma support.
    7. present: The granite reading finds impact because the text warns of becoming the victim of a similar crime and describes nonconsensual hugging and kissing.
    8. absent: The bulletin does not harbor a consequence or severity, because sexual battery is named without words such as dangerous or life threatening.
    9. present: The ivory wording says the bulletin should aid members from becoming the victim of a similar crime, which states a harm consequence.
    10. present: It says the notice should aid members from becoming the victim of a similar crime, so jasper finds a stated consequence.
    11. present: The kettle says the bulletin should aid members from becoming the victim of a similar crime, which states harm.
    12. present: The linen text states the suspect hugged and kissed the victim without consent and warns readers they could become the victim of a similar crime.
    13. absent: The maple alert never calls the threat dangerous, injurious, or otherwise severe beyond the crime name itself.
    14. present: The nectar text says the warning should help people avoid becoming the victim of a similar crime and describes nonconsensual hugging and kissing, which states personal harm.
    15. present: The olive purpose states a wish to stop people from becoming the victim of a similar crime, which conveys harm.
    16. absent: No pebble of consequence or severity appears, such as injury or danger, beyond naming the crime and the unwanted contact.
    17. present: The quartz consequence is stated as helping people avoid becoming the victim of a similar crime, with graphic content that could trigger an emotional response.
    18. present: The raven coder marks impact present because nonconsensual hugging and kissing harmed the victim and the notice says others could become the victim of a similar crime.
    19. present: The spruce purpose says the notice should aid members from becoming the victim of a similar crime, a stated harm.
    20. present: The thistle warning conveys harm by describing nonconsensual hugging and kissing and by warning readers against becoming the victim of a similar crime.
    21. present: The umber account states harm through nonconsensual hugging and kissing and warns of becoming a victim of a similar crime.
    22. present: The violet notice says it should help people avoid becoming the victim of a similar crime and offers trauma treatment contacts.
    23. absent: It names sexual battery and an unwanted hug and kiss but states no injury, danger, or other consequence, so willow counts no impact.
    24. absent: It describes unwanted contact but states no injury, danger, or other severity beyond the crime itself, so yarrow marks impact absent.
    25. absent: No zircon severity or consequence such as injury or danger is stated beyond naming the sexual battery itself.

Coded by SuperGrok Heavy 4.5

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

A timely warning says an unknown person sexually battered a community member who was walking from West Grove Commons toward the Mashouf Wellness Center. Patrols were increased and the investigation remains open.
Analysis

Key Findings

University police issued a timely warning for a reported sexual battery at the West Grove Commons lobby, and the investigation remains open.
Outcome
The police department said the investigation is continuing and that patrols in the area were increased.
Provenance

Sources

Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.

  1. Official
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "San Francisco State University: Police investigate a sexual battery reported at a residence lobby." Incident of September 28, 2026. Added October 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/san-francisco-state-university-west-grove-sexual-battery-2026-09-28/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
public-masterscaliforniasexual-assaultUnder Investigation
Added October 2026Updated October 2026Via ingestion