Multi-day campus closure during record Skagit River flooding
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedOn December 10, 2025, Skagit Valley College closed all campuses and centers from 4 PM Wednesday through 5 PM Friday as a back-to-back atmospheric river event drove the Skagit River toward record levels. All Skagit residents in the 100-year floodplain (roughly 75,000 people) were ordered to evacuate. SVC moved some final exams online and rescheduled others. Governor Bob Ferguson held a press conference at the college during the flood event.
- Alerts
- 4
- Response
- —
- Killed
- 0
- Injured
- 0
Alert Sequence
4 messages in sequence · 4 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
Skagit Valley College remains open today Wed., Dec. 10; however, we are monitoring regional flooding and road conditions closely. Please use caution when traveling to campus and allow extra time for your commute. We understand that some individuals may be unable to reach campus due to flooding or other circumstances impacting their ability to travel. If you encounter unsafe conditions or are unable to reach campus due to flooding, please notify your supervisor or instructor as soon as possible regarding adjusted schedules or remote work options where appropriate. Students: Finals are still taking place as scheduled, and you are encouraged to attend if you can do so safely. If you are unable to travel due to flooding or other extenuating circumstances, please contact your instructor! right away. We will continue to provide updates if conditions change. Stay safe and travel carefully, Cardinals!
Sourcepresent25/25
Final assessment
Majority finds S present based on Skagit Valley College named.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Source present: Skagit Valley College named appears as the issuing institution. Independent read 1.
- present: The message identifies the sender through Skagit Valley College named. Independent read 2.
- present: Institutional source is clear via Skagit Valley College named. Independent read 3.
- present: Sender authority is Skagit Valley College named, meeting the source criterion. Independent read 4.
- present: Named organization Skagit Valley College named functions as the source tag. Independent read 5.
- present: Source element satisfied by Skagit Valley College named self-identification. Independent read 6.
- present: The alert is framed as an official Skagit Valley College named notice. Independent read 7.
- present: Present source because Skagit Valley College named is named in the body. Independent read 8.
- present: Authority wording points to Skagit Valley College named as the issuer. Independent read 9.
- present: Source=1 from the Skagit Valley College named naming. Independent read 10.
- present: Clear institutional authorship: Skagit Valley College named. Independent read 11.
- present: The university or college name Skagit Valley College named counts as source. Independent read 12.
- present: Source present through explicit Skagit Valley College named language. Independent read 13.
- present: Issuing body is identifiable as Skagit Valley College named. Independent read 14.
- present: Rubric source met by Skagit Valley College named. Independent read 15.
- present: Self-named institution Skagit Valley College named is enough for source. Independent read 16.
- present: Source coded present due to Skagit Valley College named. Independent read 17.
- present: The text attributes the notice to Skagit Valley College named. Independent read 18.
- present: Branded or named sender Skagit Valley College named is present. Independent read 19.
- present: Source element is present via Skagit Valley College named. Independent read 20.
- present: Institutional identity Skagit Valley College named anchors the source. Independent read 21.
- present: Sender is established by Skagit Valley College named wording. Independent read 22.
- present: Source verdict 1 based on Skagit Valley College named. Independent read 23.
- present: Named campus authority Skagit Valley College named satisfies source. Independent read 24.
- present: Present: Skagit Valley College named identifies who is communicating. Independent read 25.
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
Majority finds H present based on flooding and road conditions.
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Hazard present: flooding and road conditions is a specific threat type. Independent read 1.
- present: The text names flooding and road conditions rather than a generic emergency. Independent read 2.
- present: Specific hazard language appears as flooding and road conditions. Independent read 3.
- present: Hazard element met by flooding and road conditions. Independent read 4.
- present: Concrete threat: flooding and road conditions. Independent read 5.
- present: Hazard=1 because flooding and road conditions is specified. Independent read 6.
- present: Named hazard flooding and road conditions satisfies the rubric. Independent read 7.
- present: The causal threat is flooding and road conditions. Independent read 8.
- present: Hazard coded present from flooding and road conditions wording. Independent read 9.
- present: Present hazard via flooding and road conditions. Independent read 10.
- present: Threat type is explicit: flooding and road conditions. Independent read 11.
- present: Rubric hazard satisfied by flooding and road conditions. Independent read 12.
- present: Hazard is not vague; it is flooding and road conditions. Independent read 13.
- present: The message identifies flooding and road conditions as the hazard. Independent read 14.
- present: Specific threat flooding and road conditions is stated. Independent read 15.
- present: Hazard present through flooding and road conditions. Independent read 16.
- present: Named danger flooding and road conditions counts for hazard. Independent read 17.
- present: Hazard element is present: flooding and road conditions. Independent read 18.
- present: Clear hazard reference to flooding and road conditions. Independent read 19.
- present: The alert opens or centers on flooding and road conditions. Independent read 20.
- present: Hazard verdict 1 for flooding and road conditions. Independent read 21.
- present: Specificity of flooding and road conditions meets hazard. Independent read 22.
- present: Threat named as flooding and road conditions. Independent read 23.
- present: Hazard is flooding and road conditions, clearly stated. Independent read 24.
- present: Present: flooding and road conditions is a concrete hazard. Independent read 25.
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
Majority finds L present based on campus.
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Location present: campus places the event. Independent read 1.
- present: Where is stated via campus. Independent read 2.
- present: Place cues include campus. Independent read 3.
- present: Location element met by campus. Independent read 4.
- present: Geographic or campus site campus is named. Independent read 5.
- present: Location=1 from campus. Independent read 6.
- present: Named place campus satisfies location. Independent read 7.
- present: The text situates the incident at campus. Independent read 8.
- present: Location coded present using campus. Independent read 9.
- present: Present location via campus. Independent read 10.
- present: Site reference campus is enough. Independent read 11.
- present: Location satisfied by campus wording. Independent read 12.
- present: Place language: campus. Independent read 13.
- present: Location element is present: campus. Independent read 14.
- present: Clear where: campus. Independent read 15.
- present: Campus or address cue campus appears. Independent read 16.
- present: Location present through campus. Independent read 17.
- present: Named area campus counts for location. Independent read 18.
- present: The message specifies campus as the place. Independent read 19.
- present: Location verdict 1 for campus. Independent read 20.
- present: Where recipients are affected: campus. Independent read 21.
- present: Location is explicit via campus. Independent read 22.
- present: Place named: campus. Independent read 23.
- present: Location from campus is sufficient. Independent read 24.
- present: Present: campus identifies location. Independent read 25.
Guidancepresent25/25
Final assessment
Majority finds G present based on use caution, notify supervisor/instructor.
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Guidance present: use caution, notify supervisor/instructor instructs recipients. Independent read 1.
- present: Protective or operational direction: use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 2.
- present: Action language includes use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 3.
- present: Guidance element met by use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 4.
- present: Recipients are told to use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 5.
- present: Guidance=1 from use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 6.
- present: Instructional content: use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 7.
- present: The message directs people to use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 8.
- present: Guidance coded present via use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 9.
- present: Present guidance through use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 10.
- present: Do-this language appears as use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 11.
- present: Guidance satisfied by use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 12.
- present: Actionable instruction: use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 13.
- present: Guidance element is present: use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 14.
- present: Clear instruction: use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 15.
- present: Community told to use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 16.
- present: Guidance present in use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 17.
- present: Protective action use caution, notify supervisor/instructor counts. Independent read 18.
- present: The alert instructs use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 19.
- present: Guidance verdict 1 for use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 20.
- present: Operational order: use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 21.
- present: Guidance is explicit via use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 22.
- present: Instruction named: use caution, notify supervisor/instructor. Independent read 23.
- present: Guidance from use caution, notify supervisor/instructor is sufficient. Independent read 24.
- present: Present: use caution, notify supervisor/instructor is guidance to recipients. Independent read 25.
Timepresent25/25
Final assessment
Majority finds T present based on today Wed., Dec. 10.
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Time present: today Wed., Dec. 10 is a temporal cue. Independent read 1.
- present: When is stated via today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 2.
- present: Time language includes today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 3.
- present: Time element met by today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 4.
- present: Clock or calendar cue today Wed., Dec. 10 appears. Independent read 5.
- present: Time=1 from today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 6.
- present: Named time today Wed., Dec. 10 satisfies the rubric. Independent read 7.
- present: The message times the event with today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 8.
- present: Time coded present using today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 9.
- present: Present time via today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 10.
- present: Temporal reference today Wed., Dec. 10 is enough. Independent read 11.
- present: Time satisfied by today Wed., Dec. 10 wording. Independent read 12.
- present: Schedule language: today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 13.
- present: Time element is present: today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 14.
- present: Clear when: today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 15.
- present: Date or hour cue today Wed., Dec. 10 appears. Independent read 16.
- present: Time present through today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 17.
- present: Timing today Wed., Dec. 10 counts for time. Independent read 18.
- present: The alert specifies today Wed., Dec. 10 as when. Independent read 19.
- present: Time verdict 1 for today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 20.
- present: Temporal scope: today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 21.
- present: Time is explicit via today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 22.
- present: Time marker: today Wed., Dec. 10. Independent read 23.
- present: Time from today Wed., Dec. 10 is sufficient. Independent read 24.
- present: Present: today Wed., Dec. 10 identifies timing. Independent read 25.
Impactabsent0/25
Final assessment
Majority finds I absent: no severity consequence beyond flooding name.
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: Impact absent: hazard is named without consequence language (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 1.
- absent: No severity or harm statement appears (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 2.
- absent: Impact=0; nothing about injury, death, or damage risk (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 3.
- absent: Consequence wording is missing (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 4.
- absent: Does not state what the hazard could do (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 5.
- absent: Impact not established beyond the hazard name (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 6.
- absent: No life-threatening or dangerous severity clause (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 7.
- absent: Impact coded absent: no severity consequence beyond flooding name. Independent read 8.
- absent: Severity is not articulated (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 9.
- absent: People harm is not described (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 10.
- absent: Impact element fails: no severity consequence beyond flooding name. Independent read 11.
- absent: No Sutton-style consequence language (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 12.
- absent: Impact missing in this text (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 13.
- absent: Without consequence phrasing, impact is 0 (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 14.
- absent: Impact verdict 0: no severity consequence beyond flooding name. Independent read 15.
- absent: Hazard alone does not satisfy impact (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 16.
- absent: No explicit harm to people or property (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 17.
- absent: Impact not present (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 18.
- absent: Severity cue absent (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 19.
- absent: Consequence language not found (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 20.
- absent: Impact fails the rubric (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 21.
- absent: Does not convey potential harm (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 22.
- absent: Impact unsupported: no severity consequence beyond flooding name. Independent read 23.
- absent: No impact statement (no severity consequence beyond flooding name). Independent read 24.
- absent: Absent impact: no severity consequence beyond flooding name. Independent read 25.
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
About this analysisBackground
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- News
- News
- Official
- Source
- Report
- Report
Campus Alert Archive. "Skagit Valley College: Multi-day campus closure during record Skagit River flooding." Incident of December 10, 2025. Added May 2026; last updated July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/skagit-valley-college-atmospheric-river-flooding-2025-12-10/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.