Winter weather moves Monday classes fully online

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Institutional branding appears via "Stephen F. Austin State University", which marks the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Institutional branding appears via "Stephen F. Austin State University", which marks the sender.
  2. present: The notice identifies who is speaking through "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  3. present: Source is present because "Stephen F. Austin State University" names the issuing campus or alert brand.
  4. present: A campus or alert signature ("Stephen F. Austin State University") supplies the authority line.
  5. present: Sender identity is clear from the wording "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  6. present: The alert tags an official issuer with "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  7. present: Who is sending this is stated through "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  8. present: Branded language "Stephen F. Austin State University" functions as the source element.
  9. present: Campus naming in "Stephen F. Austin State University" tells recipients the origin of the message.
  10. present: An official voice is established by "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  11. present: The opening or body includes "Stephen F. Austin State University" as institutional source.
  12. present: "Stephen F. Austin State University" is enough to code source present under the branding rule.
  13. present: Recipients can tell the sender from "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  14. present: Source scores present: "Stephen F. Austin State University" is an authority marker.
  15. present: The university or college is referenced as "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  16. present: Alert-system or school labeling ("Stephen F. Austin State University") covers source.
  17. present: Issuing body is identifiable from "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  18. present: "Stephen F. Austin State University" operates as a branded signature for source.
  19. present: The text attributes the message via "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  20. present: Source present: campus authority language "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  21. present: Readers see "Stephen F. Austin State University" and know which campus is speaking.
  22. present: Official sender cue "Stephen F. Austin State University" is explicit in the text.
  23. present: Source is coded yes based on "Stephen F. Austin State University".
  24. present: The phrase "Stephen F. Austin State University" identifies the responding institution.
  25. present: Authority is named through the fragment "Stephen F. Austin State University".
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Hazard is specific: the text names "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Hazard is specific: the text names "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  2. present: A concrete threat appears as "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  3. present: The what of the emergency is "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…", not a vague incident label.
  4. present: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" satisfies hazard by naming the condition or threat.
  5. present: Readers learn the hazard type from "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  6. present: Hazard present via the explicit phrase "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  7. present: The threat is particularized as "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  8. present: Coding H=1 because "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" is a named hazard.
  9. present: Specific danger language: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  10. present: The alert states the problem as "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  11. present: Hazard element met by "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  12. present: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" is more than a generic emergency word.
  13. present: Threat identity is clear from "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  14. present: The message pins the hazard to "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  15. present: Named condition "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" counts as hazard.
  16. present: H is present: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" tells what is wrong.
  17. present: Concrete hazard wording includes "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  18. present: The incident type is given as "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  19. present: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" is the stated threat or weather/system hazard.
  20. present: Hazard codes yes on "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  21. present: Specifics beat generics here: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  22. present: The text's hazard signal is "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  23. present: What happened is labeled "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  24. present: Hazard present with the phrase "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  25. present: Threat naming succeeds through "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Location is given through "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Location is given through "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  2. present: Place is specified as "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  3. present: Where is answered by "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  4. present: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" functions as the location element.
  5. present: The alert situates the event with "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  6. present: Geographic or campus place: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  7. present: L=1 because "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" names where this applies.
  8. present: Recipients are told the place via "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  9. present: Location present in the phrase "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  10. present: A campus or building reference "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" covers location.
  11. present: The where cue is "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  12. present: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" identifies the affected area.
  13. present: Place naming succeeds with "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  14. present: Location codes yes on "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  15. present: Site detail appears as "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  16. present: The message anchors place with "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  17. present: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" is enough location under the rubric.
  18. present: Affected place language: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  19. present: L is present via "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  20. present: Campus geography is marked by "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  21. present: Where this matters is "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  22. present: The text localizes to "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  23. present: Location element met by "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  24. present: Place is not left blank: "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…".
  25. present: Spatial reference "❄️ Winter Weather Update ❄️ Based on cu…" supports L=1.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Guidance is the instruction "closed".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Guidance is the instruction "closed".
  2. present: Protective action appears as "closed".
  3. present: Recipients are told to act via "closed".
  4. present: "closed" is a direct what-to-do line.
  5. present: G=1 because "closed" instructs the audience.
  6. present: The alert directs action with "closed".
  7. present: Guidance present: "closed".
  8. present: A clear instruction is "closed".
  9. present: What to do is stated as "closed".
  10. present: "closed" counts as protective guidance.
  11. present: Action language "closed" meets guidance.
  12. present: The message tells people "closed".
  13. present: Guidance codes yes on "closed".
  14. present: Operational direction: "closed".
  15. present: Instructional content includes "closed".
  16. present: "closed" is audience-facing guidance.
  17. present: G is present via the cue "closed".
  18. present: Protective or operational order "closed" is explicit.
  19. present: The text's guidance signal is "closed".
  20. present: Recipients receive the directive "closed".
  21. present: What-to-do element satisfied by "closed".
  22. present: "closed" tells the public how to respond or operate.
  23. present: Guidance met through "closed".
  24. present: Action instruction present: "closed".
  25. present: The alert's order to the audience is "closed".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Time is marked by "Monday".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Time is marked by "Monday".
  2. present: A temporal cue appears as "Monday".
  3. present: When is answered with "Monday".
  4. present: "Monday" supplies timing or recency.
  5. present: T=1 because "Monday" is a time reference.
  6. present: Clock or calendar language: "Monday".
  7. present: The alert times the event with "Monday".
  8. present: Temporal detail "Monday" is present.
  9. present: Time element met by "Monday".
  10. present: Recipients see timing via "Monday".
  11. present: "Monday" counts as the time cue.
  12. present: When-language includes "Monday".
  13. present: T codes yes on "Monday".
  14. present: A schedule or day marker "Monday" appears.
  15. present: Timing is explicit: "Monday".
  16. present: The text anchors time with "Monday".
  17. present: "Monday" is enough for the time element.
  18. present: Recency or clock cue "Monday" is stated.
  19. present: T is present via "Monday".
  20. present: Date or hour language "Monday" supports T=1.
  21. present: Temporal reference: "Monday".
  22. present: The when signal is "Monday".
  23. present: Time present through "Monday".
  24. present: "Monday" tells recipients the relevant when.
  25. present: Schedule wording "Monday" meets time.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.
  2. absent: Impact is absent: the text does not say what the threat could do.
  3. absent: Nothing states danger level, injuries, or disruptive effect.
  4. absent: I=0 because severity or harm is not conveyed.
  5. absent: Hazard may be named, but impact language is missing.
  6. absent: The alert omits consequence wording.
  7. absent: Impact fails the harm-or-severity test.
  8. absent: Readers are not told stakes or effects.
  9. absent: No life-safety or operational impact phrase is present.
  10. absent: Impact element codes absent.
  11. absent: Without consequence language, I is zero.
  12. absent: Severity is left unstated.
  13. absent: The text stops short of impact.
  14. absent: Harm potential is not described.
  15. absent: I fails on bare description without effects.
  16. absent: No dangerous/closed/injury-style impact cue appears.
  17. absent: Impact not established by the wording.
  18. absent: Consequence detail is missing.
  19. absent: The message lacks severity framing.
  20. absent: I is absent under the impact rule.
  21. absent: Stakes for people or property are not stated.
  22. absent: No disruption or harm language is included.
  23. absent: Impact cannot be coded present here.
  24. absent: Effect-on-campus language is omitted.
  25. absent: Severity/consequence element fails.