Shooting at N Broad St / Cecil B Moore Ave

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, unanimous at 25 of 25. The alert is signed "TUalertEMER" and names police as responding, identifying the institutional source clearly.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "TUalertEMER" is the sender signature on this notice.
  2. present: "TUalertEMER" serves as the branded source identifier.
  3. present: "TUalertEMER" marks the university alert system as sender.
  4. present: "TUalertEMER" serves as the institutional sender signature.
  5. present: It bears the "TUalertEMER" signature and names police as responding.
  6. present: It bears the "TUalertEMER" signature with police named as responders.
  7. present: "TUalertEMER" opens the message as the identifying sender tag.
  8. present: "TUalertEMER" is the branded signature of the alert system.
  9. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" and responding police identify the source.
  10. present: The alert carries the "TUalertEMER" branded sender label.
  11. present: "TUalertEMER" is the recognizable sender tag for this campus system.
  12. present: "TUalertEMER" identifies the sending alert system and police are named.
  13. present: "TUalertEMER" marks the sender and police are named as responding.
  14. present: The "TUalertEMER" header identifies the university system and police are cited.
  15. present: "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender and police are named as responding.
  16. present: The message opens with the Temple "TUalertEMER" brand.
  17. present: "TUalertEMER" identifies the sending alert system, with police named as responding.
  18. present: The message is signed "TUalertEMER" with police responding.
  19. present: "TUalertEMER" marks the sender, with police identified as responding.
  20. present: The "TUalertEMER" prefix identifies the official sender.
  21. present: "TUalertEMER" is the branded emergency signature identifying the sending university.
  22. present: "TUalertEMER" is the branded signature identifying who sent the alert.
  23. present: "TUalertEMER" is the university emergency alert signature.
  24. present: The "TUalertEMER" signature identifies the sender, with police responding.
  25. present: The "TUalertEMER" tag marks this as an official Temple alert.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "Shooting reported" states the hazard plainly at the top of the message, with no euphemism.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: A "Shooting" is the specific threat reported.
  2. present: "Shooting reported" names a specific violent hazard.
  3. present: A "Shooting" is named as the specific incident.
  4. present: "Shooting reported" specifies gun violence as the hazard.
  5. present: "Shooting" names a specific violent hazard.
  6. present: "Shooting reported" specifies a violent hazard.
  7. present: "Shooting" is named as the specific hazard.
  8. present: "Shooting reported" names the specific hazard.
  9. present: "Shooting" specifies the violent hazard being reported.
  10. present: "Shooting reported" is a specific violent hazard.
  11. present: "Shooting reported" names a specific violent hazard.
  12. present: "Shooting" specifies the violent hazard being reported.
  13. present: "Shooting" is a specifically named violent threat.
  14. present: "Shooting" is a specific violent hazard named directly.
  15. present: "Shooting" names the specific violent threat.
  16. present: "Shooting reported" identifies a specific violent hazard.
  17. present: "Shooting" is a specific, explicitly named threat.
  18. present: "Shooting reported" specifies the threat clearly.
  19. present: "Shooting reported" is a specific violent hazard.
  20. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific violent threat.
  21. present: "Shooting reported" names a specific violent hazard.
  22. present: "Shooting reported" names a specific violent hazard.
  23. present: "Shooting reported" specifies the violent hazard.
  24. present: "Shooting reported" names a specific violent threat.
  25. present: "Shooting reported" names a specific violent hazard.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The location is given as the intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave", a major corner at Temple's main campus.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The site is given as "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  2. present: The intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is specified.
  3. present: The location "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is specified.
  4. present: The site is "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  5. present: The scene is "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  6. present: The intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is named.
  7. present: The site is given as "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  8. present: "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is a precise intersection.
  9. present: The place is given as "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  10. present: It names the intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  11. present: The intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is given.
  12. present: The site is "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave", a named intersection.
  13. present: It locates the report at "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  14. present: It locates the event at "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  15. present: The site is "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  16. present: The corner "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is given.
  17. present: The intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is given.
  18. present: It names the junction "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  19. present: The intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is named.
  20. present: The intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is named.
  21. present: The intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" gives the location.
  22. present: The intersection "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" gives the place.
  23. present: "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is a named intersection.
  24. present: It is placed at "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave".
  25. present: "N Broad St/ Cecil B Moore Ave" is a named intersection.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Recipients are told to "Use caution." and "Avoid the area.", direct instructions on how to respond to the shooting.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are explicit protective directions.
  2. present: Readers are told to "Use caution" and "Avoid the area".
  3. present: Readers are instructed to use caution and avoid the area.
  4. present: Readers are instructed to use caution and avoid the area.
  5. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." direct the reader's behavior.
  6. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  7. present: The instructions "Use caution" and "Avoid the area" direct recipient behavior.
  8. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  9. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are protective actions for recipients.
  10. present: Use caution and avoid the area instruct recipients directly.
  11. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  12. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." directs recipient behavior.
  13. present: Recipients are told to use caution and stay away from the area.
  14. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  15. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are protective directives.
  16. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." directs recipient behavior.
  17. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." directs recipient behavior.
  18. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instruct recipients on protective behavior.
  19. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instructs readers directly.
  20. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are actions for recipients.
  21. present: Recipients are told to "Use caution" and "Avoid the area".
  22. present: Use caution and avoid the area instruct recipients on protective action.
  23. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  24. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are protective instructions.
  25. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Nothing in the text says when the shooting happened or whether it is still unfolding, with no time, date, or recency cue.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing in the text indicates when the shooting occurred.
  2. absent: No time, date or recency cue accompanies the report.
  3. absent: No time, date, or immediacy cue is present.
  4. absent: Nothing fixes when the shooting happened.
  5. absent: Nothing indicates when the shooting occurred or that it is current.
  6. absent: The message gives no indication of when this occurred.
  7. absent: No time stamp or immediacy language appears.
  8. absent: The message offers no time reference at all.
  9. absent: Nothing indicates when this occurred or that it is current.
  10. absent: No clock time or word conveying recency appears.
  11. absent: No time of occurrence or recency marker is included.
  12. absent: No clock time or recency cue appears.
  13. absent: No time reference or recency indicator appears.
  14. absent: No clock time or recency indicator is provided.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, or recency term appears.
  16. absent: There is no clock time or recency language.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word appears.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word is included.
  19. absent: The message gives no clock time or recency phrase.
  20. absent: No clock time or recency word accompanies the report.
  21. absent: No time of the shooting or recency phrase is included.
  22. absent: The text includes no clock time, date, or recency marker.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency phrase appears.
  24. absent: No clock time or recency term appears.
  25. absent: Nothing tells the reader when this happened.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. The alert names a shooting but reports no casualties, no weapon detail, and no statement of continuing danger at the intersection.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No harm or severity beyond the bare hazard name is stated.
  2. absent: The message gives no casualty, danger or severity information.
  3. absent: Nothing states injuries or how dangerous the situation is.
  4. absent: No wounded persons or danger statement is included.
  5. absent: The text mentions no casualties or level of danger.
  6. absent: It states no consequences such as injuries or ongoing danger.
  7. absent: Nothing tells readers how dangerous the situation is or what could happen.
  8. absent: It states no consequences such as injuries or ongoing danger.
  9. absent: No casualties, danger level, or consequences are mentioned.
  10. absent: Nothing states the consequences, such as victims or continued risk.
  11. absent: The message reports no casualties, risk level, or other consequence.
  12. absent: No injuries or degree of danger are mentioned.
  13. absent: Nothing describes injuries, ongoing risk, or severity.
  14. absent: Nothing conveys injuries, danger, or severity.
  15. absent: No consequence, casualty, or severity statement is made.
  16. absent: No consequences or severity indicators are stated.
  17. absent: No statement of harm or danger accompanies the report.
  18. absent: Possible injuries or danger level are not stated.
  19. absent: No severity or consequence statement is offered.
  20. absent: No severity or consequence statement is offered.
  21. absent: The alert never states consequences, casualties or how dangerous the scene is.
  22. absent: Nothing is said about casualties or the danger posed.
  23. absent: No injuries or level of danger are described.
  24. absent: Nothing states consequences or degree of danger.
  25. absent: The alert conveys no potential harm or severity.