Shots fired on Health Sciences Campus 3500 block of N 13th St

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The branded "TUalertEMER" prefix names the sending alert system, and responding police are identified at the close. No dissent.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded prefix "TUalertEMER" names the sending alert system.
  2. present: The "TUalertEMER" signature identifies the issuing alert system.
  3. present: "TUalertEMER" serves as the sender signature for this notification.
  4. present: The "TUalertEMER" prefix identifies the issuing system.
  5. present: It opens with "TUalertEMER", the university's emergency alert tag.
  6. present: "TUalertEMER" is the branded sender and police are named as responding.
  7. present: The "TUalertEMER" tag identifies the university emergency notification sender.
  8. present: "TUalertEMER" marks the university emergency system as sender.
  9. present: "TUalertEMER" is the sending alert system and police are named as responding.
  10. present: The alert opens with the "TUalertEMER" sender tag.
  11. present: "TUalertEMER" is the branded emergency alert source line.
  12. present: The branded "TUalertEMER" tag names the university alert system as sender.
  13. present: The alert is signed "TUalertEMER" and says police are responding.
  14. present: "TUalertEMER" is the branded university alert signature and police are named.
  15. present: The "TUalertEMER" prefix identifies the issuing alert system.
  16. present: Branded "TUalertEMER", naming the issuing alert system.
  17. present: The "TUalertEMER" tag identifies the university alert system as sender.
  18. present: The "TUalertEMER" signature identifies the sender, with police responding.
  19. present: "TUalertEMER" is the branded sender tag on this message.
  20. present: The branded "TUalertEMER" prefix names the sending alert system.
  21. present: The "TUalertEMER" prefix identifies the university alert system, with police named as responding.
  22. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, with police responding.
  23. present: "TUalertEMER" is the sender tag, with police named as responders.
  24. present: The "TUalertEMER" prefix and responding police identify the source.
  25. present: The "TUalertEMER" prefix identifies the university alerting authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "Shots fired reported" specifies the threat clearly rather than describing a generic police response. Unanimous.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Shots fired" specifies the threat clearly.
  2. present: "Shots fired" names a specific gun related threat.
  3. present: "Shots fired" names the specific violent hazard.
  4. present: "Shots fired" names the specific weapons hazard.
  5. present: "Shots fired" is a specific, named threat.
  6. present: "Shots fired reported" specifies gunfire as the threat.
  7. present: "Shots fired" is a specifically named hazard.
  8. present: "Shots fired" is a clearly named hazard.
  9. present: "Shots fired" specifies the gunfire threat.
  10. present: "Shots fired reported" is a specifically named threat.
  11. present: "Shots fired" states the hazard explicitly.
  12. present: "Shots fired" names a concrete violent hazard.
  13. present: "Shots fired" is a specifically named hazard.
  14. present: "Shots fired" specifies gunfire as the threat.
  15. present: "Shots fired" names the threat specifically.
  16. present: "Shots fired" is a specifically named violent threat.
  17. present: "Shots fired" is a specific named threat.
  18. present: "Shots fired reported" is a clearly named threat.
  19. present: "Shots fired reported" is a clearly named threat.
  20. present: "Shots fired reported" identifies the specific threat.
  21. present: "Shots fired reported" names a specific firearms hazard.
  22. present: "Shots fired reported" is a specifically named gunfire threat.
  23. present: "Shots fired" names a specific violent hazard.
  24. present: "Shots fired" is an explicit and specific hazard.
  25. present: "Shots fired" names the specific threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The location is doubly specified as "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus". Every read voted present.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The location is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  2. present: The place is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  3. present: The place is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  4. present: It is placed "on the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  5. present: The site is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  6. present: The place is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  7. present: The site is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  8. present: "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus" specifies where.
  9. present: It names "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  10. present: Location given as "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  11. present: It names "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  12. present: The place is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  13. present: The place is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  14. present: The place is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  15. present: It cites "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  16. present: It gives "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  17. present: The place is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  18. present: The location is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  19. present: "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus" identifies the place.
  20. present: It is located on "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  21. present: The location is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  22. present: The place is "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  23. present: "3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus" locates the incident precisely.
  24. present: It specifies "the 3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus".
  25. present: The "3500 block of N 13th St, on Health Science Campus" pinpoints the place.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Readers are told to "Use caution" and "Avoid the area", the standard protective pair in this alert family. Complete agreement.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Readers are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  2. present: Protective instructions given are "Use caution" and "Avoid the area".
  3. present: Recipients are instructed to use caution and avoid the area.
  4. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are direct protective instructions.
  5. present: The reader is told to use caution and avoid the area.
  6. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instructs recipients what to do.
  7. present: "Use caution" and "Avoid the area" are directed at recipients.
  8. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  9. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  10. present: Use caution and avoid the area are instructions to recipients.
  11. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are protective directions to recipients.
  12. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are explicit instructions.
  13. present: It directs readers to use caution and avoid the area.
  14. present: It directs recipients to use caution and avoid the area.
  15. present: It tells recipients to use caution and avoid the area.
  16. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are recipient instructions.
  17. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instructs the reader.
  18. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instruct recipients directly.
  19. present: Tells recipients to use caution and avoid the area.
  20. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." gives protective direction to recipients.
  21. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." tells recipients what protective action to take.
  22. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  23. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are the protective instructions.
  24. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instruct recipients directly.
  25. present: Readers are told to use caution and avoid the area.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. No clock time, date, or recency cue accompanies the report, so recipients cannot tell how fresh it is. All reads agreed.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No time or recency cue accompanies the report.
  2. absent: The message includes no clock time, date or recency marker.
  3. absent: No clock time or recency wording appears.
  4. absent: No clock time or recency phrase is given.
  5. absent: No timing information or recency word appears.
  6. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency cue.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or word indicating recency appears.
  8. absent: No clock time or recency phrase is present.
  9. absent: The text carries no clock time or recency phrase.
  10. absent: No time stamp or word signaling recency is present.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency phrase appears.
  12. absent: No time or recency reference is given in the message.
  13. absent: There is no timestamp or word signaling when this occurred.
  14. absent: No timestamp or recency wording is included.
  15. absent: No time or recency reference is given.
  16. absent: The alert lacks any clock time or recency cue.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word is present.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word appears.
  19. absent: No clock time or recency phrasing appears.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word is present.
  21. absent: No hour, date or recency marker accompanies this report.
  22. absent: No time stamp or recency wording appears.
  23. absent: There is no time, date, or recency wording.
  24. absent: No clock time or recency wording is present.
  25. absent: No clock time or word like "now" is present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Beyond naming the gunfire, no harm, injury, or severity is described for the Health Science Campus block. Unanimous.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No harm or severity is described beyond naming the gunfire.
  2. absent: It does not say whether anyone was hurt or how dangerous the scene is.
  3. absent: No severity or consequence statement is offered.
  4. absent: No injuries or danger assessment are mentioned.
  5. absent: No severity or potential-harm statement is given.
  6. absent: No severity or potential harm statement is included.
  7. absent: The potential for injury or danger is not described.
  8. absent: The alert conveys no consequence or danger level.
  9. absent: No consequences or danger level are described.
  10. absent: No harm, injury, or severity is described.
  11. absent: No statement of harm or how dangerous the situation remains.
  12. absent: No harm or severity is stated beyond the bare report.
  13. absent: No consequences or danger level are conveyed in the text.
  14. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm accompanies the report.
  15. absent: No consequence or severity statement accompanies the report.
  16. absent: No statement of danger or harm accompanies the report.
  17. absent: The alert conveys no severity or possible harm.
  18. absent: Nothing conveys the danger level or possible injuries.
  19. absent: No severity or consequence language is present.
  20. absent: The alert does not describe any potential harm.
  21. absent: No statement of harm, risk or seriousness is offered.
  22. absent: No consequence or severity is conveyed to readers.
  23. absent: No statement of harm or seriousness accompanies the report.
  24. absent: No injuries or danger level are conveyed.
  25. absent: The alert conveys no severity or consequence.