Campus Alert Archive
Temple

Student fatally shot near off-campus apartments; fellow student charged with murder

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
PAshootingemergency notificationhigh confidence
Compare →
Confirmed Threat

On the night of February 6, 2025, Temple University student Chase Myles was shot and killed on the 1500 block of North Carlisle Street near the Temple Nest off-campus apartments. Another Temple student, 23-year-old Nicholas Iaderosa, was arrested and charged with murder after police said the two had planned to meet that evening.

Alerts
2
Response
—
Killed
1
Injured
0
Institution
Temple University
Public R1 · PA
All Temple cases →
~35,000 studentsTUalert
Official alert policy
Read when and how Temple says it will use TUalert: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

2 messages in sequence · 2 verified verbatim

INITIAL ALERTTwitter/X
Verified verbatimVerbatim text of the @TempleAlert TUalertEMER tweet posted at the start of the incident; text confirmed via Google indexed tweet snippet and the standard TUalertEMER template118 chars
TUalertEMER: Shooting reported on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St. Use caution. Avoid the area. Police are responding.
Posted by @TempleAlert at the start of the incident; the SMS and email versions follow the same template
Status ID 1887715221554487308 timestamps to approximately 04:00 UTC on February 7, 2025 (around 11:00 PM EST February 6, 2025)
The shooting occurred near the Temple Nest off-campus apartments, a popular student housing complex on the 1500 block of N Carlisle
ALL CLEARTwitter/X
Verified verbatimVerbatim text of the @TempleAlert TUalertEMER all-clear tweet posted approximately three hours after the initial alert77 chars
TUalertEMER: Police have cleared the area on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.
Status ID 1887750093035741440 timestamps to approximately three hours after the initial alert
The terse 'cleared the area' all-clear is the standard TUalertEMER template, it does not mention the suspect or victim
Iaderosa was taken into custody at the scene; Temple President John Fry confirmed the victim was a Temple student in a separate campus-wide message the following morning
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

TUalertEMER: Shooting reported on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St. Use caution. Avoid the area. Police are responding.

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that the sender is identified: the branded "TUalertEMER" signature plus "Police are responding".

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: The branded signature "TUalertEMER" plus "Police are responding" identifies the sender.
    2. present: It opens with the branded signature "TUalertEMER" and says "Police are responding".
    3. present: It opens with the branded signature "TUalertEMER", identifying the sender.
    4. present: It opens with the branded signature "TUalertEMER" and names "Police are responding".
    5. present: It opens with the branded tag "TUalertEMER" and says "Police are responding".
    6. present: It opens with the branded signature "TUalertEMER" and names "Police."
    7. present: It opens with "TUalertEMER" and says "Police are responding", identifying sender and authority.
    8. present: Opens with branded tag "TUalertEMER" and notes "Police are responding".
    9. present: It opens with branded signature "TUalertEMER" and says "Police are responding".
    10. present: It opens with the branded tag "TUalertEMER" and names "Police", identifying the sender and authority.
    11. present: It opens with "TUalertEMER" branded signature and names "Police".
    12. present: It opens with the branded signature "TUalertEMER" and names "Police".
    13. present: It opens with the branded tag "TUalertEMER" and names "Police", identifying the sender.
    14. present: It opens with "TUalertEMER" and notes "Police are responding", identifying sender and authority.
    15. present: It opens with the branded signature "TUalertEMER" and notes "Police are responding."
    16. present: It opens with the branded tag "TUalertEMER" and says "Police are responding".
    17. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" plus "Police are responding" identifies the sender and authority.
    18. present: It opens with the branded signature "TUalertEMER", identifying the sender.
    19. present: The branded signature "TUalertEMER" and "Police are responding" identify the sender and authority.
    20. present: It opens with the branded signature "TUalertEMER" and names "Police", identifying the sender.
    21. present: It opens with branded tag "TUalertEMER" and names "Police" responding.
    22. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" plus "Police are responding" identifies the source.
    23. present: The "TUalertEMER" signature and "Police are responding" identify the sender and authority.
    24. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" and "Police are responding" identify the sender.
    25. present: It opens with the branded tag "TUalertEMER" and names "Police are responding."
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that a specific threat is named: a "Shooting reported".

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: It states a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    2. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    3. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    4. present: It states a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    5. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    6. present: It states a "Shooting reported," a specific threat.
    7. present: It names a "Shooting", a specific threat.
    8. present: Names "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    9. present: It names "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    10. present: It states a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    11. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    12. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    13. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    14. present: It names "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    15. present: It names a "Shooting reported," a specific threat.
    16. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    17. present: It names "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    18. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    19. present: It states a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    20. present: It reports a "Shooting", a specific threat.
    21. present: It names "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    22. present: It names "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    23. present: It names a "Shooting reported," a specific threat.
    24. present: It names a "Shooting reported", a specific threat.
    25. present: It names a "Shooting reported," a specific threat.
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that a specific location is given: "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.".

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: It cites "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St."
    2. present: It locates it on "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.", a specific street.
    3. present: It locates it "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St", a specific street block.
    4. present: It says "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St", a specific location.
    5. present: It locates it on "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St".
    6. present: It locates it "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St."
    7. present: It locates it "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St", a specific address.
    8. present: Specifies "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St".
    9. present: It specifies "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St", a precise location.
    10. present: It locates it on "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.", a specific street.
    11. present: It locates it on "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.", a specific street.
    12. present: It specifies "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St".
    13. present: It says "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St", a specific location.
    14. present: It locates it on "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St", a specific street.
    15. present: It locates it "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St."
    16. present: It locates it "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.", a specific place.
    17. present: It locates it "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.", a specific street block.
    18. present: It locates it "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.", a specific place.
    19. present: It names "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.", a specific location.
    20. present: It locates it on "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St", a specific street.
    21. present: It specifies "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St".
    22. present: It gives a location: "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St".
    23. present: It locates it "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St.," a specific address.
    24. present: It locates it on "the 1500 block of N Carlisle St."
    25. present: It locates it "on the 1500 block of N Carlisle St."
  • Guidancepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that protective action is given: "Use caution. Avoid the area.".

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: It tells recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area."
    2. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area.", protective actions.
    3. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area", protective actions.
    4. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area", protective actions.
    5. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area."
    6. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area," protective actions.
    7. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area", protective actions.
    8. present: Instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area", protective actions.
    9. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area".
    10. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area.", protective actions.
    11. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area.", protective actions.
    12. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area", protective actions.
    13. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area", protective actions.
    14. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area", protective actions.
    15. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area," protective actions.
    16. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area.", protective actions.
    17. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area.", protective actions.
    18. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area", protective actions.
    19. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area.", protective actions.
    20. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area.", protective actions.
    21. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area".
    22. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area".
    23. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area," protective actions.
    24. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution. Avoid the area", protective actions.
    25. present: It instructs "Use caution. Avoid the area."
  • Timeabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that no clock time, date, or recency cue appears.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
    2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" appears in the text.
    3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" appears.
    4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
    7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the message.
    8. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word appears.
    9. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    10. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" appears in the text.
    11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
    13. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word like "now" is present.
    15. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" appears.
    18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue is present in the text.
    19. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word appears in the text.
    20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
    21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
    24. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word appears in the text.
    25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as "now" appears.
  • Impactpresent23/25

    Final assessment

    Present by strong majority (23 of 25); a reported shooting with use-caution and avoid-the-area instructions conveys a stated violent danger, while a couple dissent that no injury or severity is stated.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Reports a shooting and instructs use caution and avoid the area, conveying a stated violent harm.
    2. present: It reports a shooting on a specified block and instructs use caution and avoid the area, a stated harmful event making danger explicit.
    3. present: It reports a shooting and directs use caution and avoiding the area, with a shooting conveying clear violent danger.
    4. present: It reports a shooting on a block and to use caution and avoid the area, with the stated shooting conveying danger of harm.
    5. absent: Reports a shooting and instructs using caution and avoiding the area but states no injuries or explicit danger.
    6. present: States a shooting was reported and instructs use caution and avoid the area, with the reported shooting conveying danger.
    7. present: Reports a shooting on a stated block and advises caution, conveying a stated violent event.
    8. present: It reports a shooting and instructs to use caution and avoid the area, pairing the hazard with a caution directive that implies danger.
    9. present: Reports a shooting on a city block and directs to use caution and avoid the area, where the shooting report implies danger to people.
    10. present: It reports a shooting on a named block and tells people to use caution and avoid the area, and a stated shooting conveys harm.
    11. present: Reports a shooting on a block and advises caution and avoidance, a shooting being a clearly stated violent event.
    12. present: It reports a shooting on a nearby block and instructs caution and avoidance, with the reported shooting conveying a danger to people.
    13. present: States a shooting was reported on a specific block and to use caution, and a reported shooting conveys potential harm.
    14. present: It reports a shooting on a specific block and advises caution and avoidance, a stated harmful event.
    15. present: The text reports a shooting on a city block and tells people to use caution and avoid the area, with the shooting conveying violent danger.
    16. present: Reports a shooting on a specific block and instructs caution and avoidance, with the shooting conveying potential harm to people.
    17. present: It reports a shooting on a stated block and to use caution and avoid the area, a reported violent event.
    18. present: Reports a shooting and directs caution and avoidance, conveying a stated harmful event.
    19. present: States a shooting was reported on a specific block and instructs using caution, and a reported shooting conveys a danger of harm.
    20. present: Reports a shooting and instructs to use caution and avoid the area, with a reported shooting conveying actual harm, reinforced by the caution directive.
    21. absent: Reports a shooting and advises caution and avoiding the area but states no injury or explicit danger beyond naming the event.
    22. present: Reports a shooting on a city block and advises caution and avoidance, a stated violent event implying danger.
    23. present: It reports a shooting on a specific block and instructs use caution and avoid the area, conveying an actual shooting event with a caution to act.
    24. present: Reports a shooting on a block and to use caution, a reported gunfire event indicating a violent threat of harm.
    25. present: It reports a shooting and tells people to use caution and avoid the area, pairing the shooting with a caution warning implying danger.

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

On the evening of February 6, 2025, Chase Myles, a 20-year-old undergraduate in Temple's Klein College of Media and Communication and a native of Bowie, Maryland, was fatally shot on the 1500 block of North Carlisle Street near the Temple Nest off-campus apartments. Police arrived to find Myles unresponsive with a gunshot wound to the chest; he was rushed to Temple University Hospital and pronounced dead at 11:15 PM EST. Investigators determined the victim and the suspect, 23-year-old Nicholas Iaderosa, were known to each other and had planned to meet that night. A green bag containing what appeared to be marijuana was found at the scene, and police characterized the shooting as a possible drug deal gone bad. Iaderosa was arrested and charged with murder and related offenses. Temple University President John Fry issued a campus-wide message the following morning calling it a tragic evening and urging the community to support one another.
Analysis

Key Findings

The victim and suspect were both Temple University students who knew each other and had arranged to meet that evening
Police recovered marijuana at the scene, suggesting the shooting may have been connected to a drug transaction
The suspect was apprehended within hours of the shooting
Outcome
Nicholas Iaderosa was arrested and charged with murder and related offenses. Police recovered a green bag containing marijuana at the scene and characterized the shooting as a possible drug transaction gone wrong.
Provenance

Sources

  1. News
    Temple student killed in possible drug-related shooting (CBS Philadelphia)
    cbsnews.com
    archived copy
  2. News
    Temple University identifies student killed in off-campus shooting (6abc)
    6abc.com
    archived copy
  3. Student Paper
    Temple student fatally shot by another student on Carlisle Street (The Temple News)
    temple-news.com
    archived copy
  4. Official
    A tragic evening (Temple Now)
    now.temple.edu
    archived copy
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "Temple University: Student fatally shot near off-campus apartments; fellow student charged with murder." Incident of February 6, 2025. Added May 2026; last updated July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/temple-university-student-shooting-2025-02-06/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
shootingstudent-victimstudent-suspectoff-campusdrug-relatednorth-philadelphiatemple-universitypennsylvania
Added May 2026Updated July 2026Via ingestion