Hazardous weather closes campus Friday

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Institutional branding appears via "Triton College", which marks the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Institutional branding appears via "Triton College", which marks the sender.
  2. present: The notice identifies who is speaking through "Triton College".
  3. present: Source is present because "Triton College" names the issuing campus or alert brand.
  4. present: A campus or alert signature ("Triton College") supplies the authority line.
  5. present: Sender identity is clear from the wording "Triton College".
  6. present: The alert tags an official issuer with "Triton College".
  7. present: Who is sending this is stated through "Triton College".
  8. present: Branded language "Triton College" functions as the source element.
  9. present: Campus naming in "Triton College" tells recipients the origin of the message.
  10. present: An official voice is established by "Triton College".
  11. present: The opening or body includes "Triton College" as institutional source.
  12. present: "Triton College" is enough to code source present under the branding rule.
  13. present: Recipients can tell the sender from "Triton College".
  14. present: Source scores present: "Triton College" is an authority marker.
  15. present: The university or college is referenced as "Triton College".
  16. present: Alert-system or school labeling ("Triton College") covers source.
  17. present: Issuing body is identifiable from "Triton College".
  18. present: "Triton College" operates as a branded signature for source.
  19. present: The text attributes the message via "Triton College".
  20. present: Source present: campus authority language "Triton College".
  21. present: Readers see "Triton College" and know which campus is speaking.
  22. present: Official sender cue "Triton College" is explicit in the text.
  23. present: Source is coded yes based on "Triton College".
  24. present: The phrase "Triton College" identifies the responding institution.
  25. present: Authority is named through the fragment "Triton College".
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Hazard is specific: the text names "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Hazard is specific: the text names "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  2. present: A concrete threat appears as "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  3. present: The what of the emergency is "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…", not a vague incident label.
  4. present: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" satisfies hazard by naming the condition or threat.
  5. present: Readers learn the hazard type from "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  6. present: Hazard present via the explicit phrase "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  7. present: The threat is particularized as "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  8. present: Coding H=1 because "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" is a named hazard.
  9. present: Specific danger language: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  10. present: The alert states the problem as "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  11. present: Hazard element met by "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  12. present: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" is more than a generic emergency word.
  13. present: Threat identity is clear from "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  14. present: The message pins the hazard to "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  15. present: Named condition "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" counts as hazard.
  16. present: H is present: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" tells what is wrong.
  17. present: Concrete hazard wording includes "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  18. present: The incident type is given as "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  19. present: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" is the stated threat or weather/system hazard.
  20. present: Hazard codes yes on "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  21. present: Specifics beat generics here: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  22. present: The text's hazard signal is "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  23. present: What happened is labeled "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  24. present: Hazard present with the phrase "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  25. present: Threat naming succeeds through "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Location is given through "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Location is given through "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  2. present: Place is specified as "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  3. present: Where is answered by "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  4. present: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" functions as the location element.
  5. present: The alert situates the event with "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  6. present: Geographic or campus place: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  7. present: L=1 because "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" names where this applies.
  8. present: Recipients are told the place via "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  9. present: Location present in the phrase "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  10. present: A campus or building reference "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" covers location.
  11. present: The where cue is "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  12. present: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" identifies the affected area.
  13. present: Place naming succeeds with "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  14. present: Location codes yes on "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  15. present: Site detail appears as "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  16. present: The message anchors place with "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  17. present: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" is enough location under the rubric.
  18. present: Affected place language: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  19. present: L is present via "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  20. present: Campus geography is marked by "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  21. present: Where this matters is "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  22. present: The text localizes to "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  23. present: Location element met by "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  24. present: Place is not left blank: "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…".
  25. present: Spatial reference "Triton College will be closed Friday, J…" supports L=1.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Guidance is the instruction "closed".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Guidance is the instruction "closed".
  2. present: Protective action appears as "closed".
  3. present: Recipients are told to act via "closed".
  4. present: "closed" is a direct what-to-do line.
  5. present: G=1 because "closed" instructs the audience.
  6. present: The alert directs action with "closed".
  7. present: Guidance present: "closed".
  8. present: A clear instruction is "closed".
  9. present: What to do is stated as "closed".
  10. present: "closed" counts as protective guidance.
  11. present: Action language "closed" meets guidance.
  12. present: The message tells people "closed".
  13. present: Guidance codes yes on "closed".
  14. present: Operational direction: "closed".
  15. present: Instructional content includes "closed".
  16. present: "closed" is audience-facing guidance.
  17. present: G is present via the cue "closed".
  18. present: Protective or operational order "closed" is explicit.
  19. present: The text's guidance signal is "closed".
  20. present: Recipients receive the directive "closed".
  21. present: What-to-do element satisfied by "closed".
  22. present: "closed" tells the public how to respond or operate.
  23. present: Guidance met through "closed".
  24. present: Action instruction present: "closed".
  25. present: The alert's order to the audience is "closed".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Time is marked by "Friday".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Time is marked by "Friday".
  2. present: A temporal cue appears as "Friday".
  3. present: When is answered with "Friday".
  4. present: "Friday" supplies timing or recency.
  5. present: T=1 because "Friday" is a time reference.
  6. present: Clock or calendar language: "Friday".
  7. present: The alert times the event with "Friday".
  8. present: Temporal detail "Friday" is present.
  9. present: Time element met by "Friday".
  10. present: Recipients see timing via "Friday".
  11. present: "Friday" counts as the time cue.
  12. present: When-language includes "Friday".
  13. present: T codes yes on "Friday".
  14. present: A schedule or day marker "Friday" appears.
  15. present: Timing is explicit: "Friday".
  16. present: The text anchors time with "Friday".
  17. present: "Friday" is enough for the time element.
  18. present: Recency or clock cue "Friday" is stated.
  19. present: T is present via "Friday".
  20. present: Date or hour language "Friday" supports T=1.
  21. present: Temporal reference: "Friday".
  22. present: The when signal is "Friday".
  23. present: Time present through "Friday".
  24. present: "Friday" tells recipients the relevant when.
  25. present: Schedule wording "Friday" meets time.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.
  2. absent: Impact is absent: the text does not say what the threat could do.
  3. absent: Nothing states danger level, injuries, or disruptive effect.
  4. absent: I=0 because severity or harm is not conveyed.
  5. absent: Hazard may be named, but impact language is missing.
  6. absent: The alert omits consequence wording.
  7. absent: Impact fails the harm-or-severity test.
  8. absent: Readers are not told stakes or effects.
  9. absent: No life-safety or operational impact phrase is present.
  10. absent: Impact element codes absent.
  11. absent: Without consequence language, I is zero.
  12. absent: Severity is left unstated.
  13. absent: The text stops short of impact.
  14. absent: Harm potential is not described.
  15. absent: I fails on bare description without effects.
  16. absent: No dangerous/closed/injury-style impact cue appears.
  17. absent: Impact not established by the wording.
  18. absent: Consequence detail is missing.
  19. absent: The message lacks severity framing.
  20. absent: I is absent under the impact rule.
  21. absent: Stakes for people or property are not stated.
  22. absent: No disruption or harm language is included.
  23. absent: Impact cannot be coded present here.
  24. absent: Effect-on-campus language is omitted.
  25. absent: Severity/consequence element fails.