Aggravated assault arrest notice for Uptown campus

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: the New Orleans Police Department and Tulane University Police Department are both named as authorities.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Names 'The New Orleans Police Department' and 'Tulane University Police Department'.
  2. present: Names "The New Orleans Police Department" as the arresting authority.
  3. present: 'The New Orleans Police Department' and 'Tulane University Police Department' are named.
  4. present: 'The New Orleans Police Department has arrested the subjects'.
  5. present: Names 'New Orleans Police Department' and 'Tulane University Police Department'.
  6. present: Names "New Orleans Police Department" and "Tulane University Police Department."
  7. present: Names 'New Orleans Police Department' and 'Tulane University Police Department'.
  8. present: Names "New Orleans Police Department" and "Tulane University Police Department".
  9. present: 'The New Orleans Police Department' identifies the responding agency
  10. present: Names 'New Orleans Police Department' and references TUPD contact info.
  11. present: Signed by New Orleans Police Department/Tulane Police Department, arrest update.
  12. present: 'The New Orleans Police Department has arrested' identifies authority.
  13. present: New Orleans Police Department and Tulane University Police Department named.
  14. present: New Orleans Police Department and Tulane University Police Department named.
  15. present: References New Orleans Police Department and Tulane University Police Department.
  16. present: References 'New Orleans Police Department' and 'Tulane University Police Department'.
  17. present: Names 'New Orleans Police Department' and 'Tulane University Police Department'
  18. present: 'The New Orleans Police Department has arrested' identifies the authority.
  19. present: Names Tulane University Police Department and New Orleans Police Department.
  20. present: Names 'New Orleans Police Department' and 'Tulane University Police Department' as sources.
  21. present: References 'The New Orleans Police Department' and TUPD.
  22. present: 'New Orleans Police Department' and Tulane named.
  23. present: Names 'New Orleans Police Department' and Tulane Police.
  24. present: References 'New Orleans Police Department' and 'Tulane University Police Department'.
  25. present: Names 'New Orleans Police Department' and 'Tulane University Police Department'.
• Hazardpresent19/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads (19 of 25) credit the reference to the prior armed robberies as naming the hazard, though some dissented since this is an arrest closure update with no new active threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: References prior 'armed robberies of Tulane students'.
  2. present: References "the armed robberies of Tulane students".
  3. absent: Reports an arrest of prior suspects, no current active threat named.
  4. present: References the prior 'armed robberies' being resolved.
  5. present: References prior 'armed robberies'.
  6. present: Names "armed robberies" cleared by arrest.
  7. present: Names 'Armed Robbery'.
  8. present: References prior "armed robberies".
  9. absent: Describes an arrest after the fact, no current hazard named
  10. present: References prior 'armed robberies' now cleared by arrest.
  11. present: References the prior 'armed robberies' now cleared by arrest.
  12. present: 'armed robberies' named.
  13. present: 'Armed Robbery' named as the offense cleared.
  14. present: References prior armed robberies now resolved by arrest.
  15. present: References the prior armed robberies now cleared by arrest.
  16. absent: Describes an arrest resolving a prior robbery, no ongoing threat.
  17. present: References the prior 'armed robberies' now cleared by arrest
  18. absent: Describes a resolved arrest for a prior robbery, not an active hazard warning.
  19. present: References the prior "armed robberies".
  20. absent: References prior robberies but this notice is an arrest update, no ongoing threat named for action.
  21. present: References prior 'armed robberies'.
  22. absent: This is an arrest update on prior robberies, no active threat named.
  23. present: References prior 'armed robberies' now cleared by arrest.
  24. present: References prior 'armed robberies'.
  25. present: References the prior 'armed robberies'.
• Locationpresent20/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads (20 of 25) found Hillary Street named, tied to the original robbery, though a minority noted this update itself gives no fresh location.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Names 'Hillary Street'.
  2. present: States "on Hillary Street".
  3. present: References 'Hillary Street'.
  4. present: 'committed...on Hillary Street'.
  5. present: Names 'Hillary Street'.
  6. present: Names "Hillary Street."
  7. present: States 'Hillary Street'.
  8. present: Names "Hillary Street".
  9. absent: No specific location given
  10. present: Names 'Hillary Street'.
  11. present: Names 'Hillary Street'.
  12. absent: No specific location in this update, refers to prior incident generally.
  13. absent: No specific location given, references prior incident generally.
  14. present: 'on Hillary Street' referenced.
  15. present: References 'Hillary Street'.
  16. present: References 'Hillary Street' from the prior incident.
  17. present: Names 'Hillary Street'
  18. absent: No location given for this notice.
  19. present: References Hillary Street.
  20. present: References 'Hillary Street' from the prior incident.
  21. present: Names 'Hillary Street'.
  22. absent: No location given for this update.
  23. present: States 'on Hillary Street'.
  24. present: References 'Hillary Street'.
  25. present: Names 'Hillary Street'.
• Guidancepresent20/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads (20 of 25) found protective safety tips like parking in well-lit areas, though some called it a pure arrest update with no real instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Advises 'Always park in a well-lit area'.
  2. absent: Only asks for information, describes closed arrest, no protective action.
  3. present: 'Always park in a well-lit area.'
  4. present: 'Always park in a well-lit area', safety tips listed.
  5. absent: Purely an arrest update, only generic safety tips not tied to action.
  6. present: Advises awareness, parking well-lit areas.
  7. present: Advises 'Be aware of your surroundings' and 'Always park in a well-lit area'.
  8. present: Advises "Beware of individuals approaching your vehicle" and "Always park in a well-lit area".
  9. present: 'Be aware of your surroundings at all times' and other tips instruct action
  10. present: Provides safety tips like 'Beware of individuals approaching your vehicle'.
  11. present: Safety tips: be aware of surroundings, park in well-lit areas.
  12. absent: No protective instruction; reports an arrest.
  13. present: Safety tips like being aware, parking in well-lit areas.
  14. absent: No protective action instructed, this is a closure notice.
  15. absent: No protective action, this is an arrest resolution update.
  16. present: Lists safety tips like parking in well-lit areas.
  17. present: Advises 'Beware of individuals approaching your vehicle', 'park in a well-lit area'
  18. present: Safety tips e.g. 'Always park in a well-lit area.'
  19. present: Gives safety tips like parking in well-lit areas.
  20. present: Lists safety tips: be aware of surroundings, park in well-lit area.
  21. present: Gives tips like 'Always park in a well-lit area'.
  22. present: Safety tips: be aware, beware of vehicles approaching, park in lit areas.
  23. present: Advises awareness, parking in well-lit areas.
  24. present: Advises 'Beware of individuals approaching your vehicle', 'park in a well-lit area'.
  25. present: Advises 'Beware of individuals approaching your vehicle'.
• Timepresent24/25

  Final assessment

  Nearly unanimous: Sunday January 15, 2023 is given as the date of the original incident.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Gives 'Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  2. present: States "committed on Sunday January 15, 2023".
  3. present: 'Sunday January 15, 2023' referenced with the notice dated 'January 24, 2023'.
  4. present: 'committed on Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  5. present: References 'Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  6. present: Gives "Sunday January 15, 2023."
  7. present: States 'committed on Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  8. present: Gives "Sunday January 15, 2023".
  9. present: 'Sunday January 15, 2023' gives date
  10. present: Gives 'Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  11. present: 'Sunday January 15, 2023' given for original incident.
  12. present: 'Sunday January 15, 2023' given.
  13. present: 'Sunday January 15, 2023' referenced.
  14. absent: References 'Sunday January 15, 2023' as past incident, no new incident time.
  15. present: Gives 'Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  16. present: Gives 'Sunday January 15, 2023' as the date of the original incident.
  17. present: References 'Sunday January 15, 2023'
  18. present: 'committed on Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  19. present: References "Sunday January 15, 2023" and dated January 24, 2023.
  20. present: 'committed on Sunday January 15, 2023' gives specific date.
  21. present: Gives 'Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  22. present: 'Sunday January 15, 2023' referenced.
  23. present: States 'Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  24. present: States 'Sunday January 15, 2023'.
  25. present: Gives 'Sunday January 15, 2023' referencing the arrest context.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: no harm, injury, or consequence is stated; this is purely an arrest resolution notice.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No stated harm, this is an arrest follow-up notice.
  2. absent: No stated harm or severity.
  3. absent: No stated consequence.
  4. absent: No stated harm or severity, purely an arrest update.
  5. absent: No stated harm or consequence.
  6. absent: No stated harm severity beyond the robbery description.
  7. absent: No stated consequence or severity beyond reporting an arrest.
  8. absent: No stated harm; this is an arrest follow-up notice.
  9. absent: No stated consequence
  10. absent: No stated harm or severity.
  11. absent: No stated consequence or severity beyond describing the arrest.
  12. absent: No explicit statement of potential harm or severity.
  13. absent: No stated consequence, describes arrest resolution.
  14. absent: No stated harm or severity described.
  15. absent: No statement of harm or severity.
  16. absent: No stated harm or severity, purely a resolution announcement.
  17. absent: No stated harm, this is an arrest follow-up
  18. absent: No statement of potential harm.
  19. absent: No stated harm or consequence conveyed.
  20. absent: No stated consequence or severity.
  21. absent: No explicit statement of potential harm; describes arrest outcome.
  22. absent: No stated harm or consequence.
  23. absent: No stated severity, this is a follow-up arrest notice.
  24. absent: No stated potential harm, this is an arrest update.
  25. absent: No new statement of harm, just reports an arrest.