Sexual assault stalking and burglary near Broadway
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedTulane University Police published a Crime Alert / Timely Warning. Full text recovered from the official publicsafety.tulane.edu PDF archive.
- Alerts
- 1
- Response
- —
- Killed
- —
- Injured
- —
Alert Sequence
1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
Tulane University Police Department Uptown District SEXUAL ASSAULT, STALKING, BURGLARY Date and Time of Occurrence: late evening April 1st or early morning April 2nd LOCATION: Non-campus university recognized property in the 900 block of Broadway Street REPORTED OFFENSE: Sexual Assault, Stalking, Burglary SUSPECT’S DESCRIPTION: White male, brown hair, 6’ 0” Reported Incident: On April 4th, the Tulane University Police Department learned of the following report of sexual assault occurring within the university’s geography as defined by The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act or “Clery Act.” The victim reported that on late Friday evening or early Saturday morning, an individual with the above description followed them between multiple off-campus locations. The preparator followed the victim back to a non-campus university recognized property where they sexually assaulted the victim. The subject is unknown to the victim and has not been identified at this time. Based on the information provided by the victim or witness, the following crimes have been identified as reportable under the definitions provided by the Clery Act: Sexual Assault, Stalking, Burglary. The Clery Act requires Tulane University to provide safety tips when issuing Crime Alerts. The following are suggestions relative to the criminal incident described in this alert: • Trust your instincts. If you feel that you may be in danger, seek out others, local law enforcement, or an open Tulane facility that has Campus Safety Officers posted. • Be aware of your surroundings, especially when walking alone. • Avoid individuals who don’t respect you, ignore personal boundaries, make you feel guilty, or are aggressive. • Let a trusted friend or contact know when you are meeting a new person and if that person begins making you uncomfortable. • Try not to walk alone during late-night hours. Walk in groups, whenever you can, there is always safety in numbers. If you have experienced sexual misconduct or think you may have experienced it, help is available. It is not your fault, and there are resources on campus and in the community to provide support and help you heal. Help is available at Tulane, whether a survivor wants to report an incident to the police, the university, a confidential resource or just wants to talk to someone. A Note on Reporting: Reporting sexual assault is a very sensitive and nuanced matter. Delayed reporting of sexual assault is very common. Tulane University encourages any victim of sexual assault or other crime to report, regardless of the time passed since the date of incident. We at Tulane recognize that deciding to report sexual misconduct and choosing how to proceed are difficult decisions. We recognize that your feelings about whether to report an incident and how to proceed may change over time. We support all survivors of sexual misconduct during this decision-making process. Confidential Except in extreme circumstances, involving imminent danger to oneself or others, nothing shared with these resources will be shared without your explicit permission. the Counseling Center | (504) 314-2277 The Line (24/7) | (504) 264-6074 SAPHE peer hotline (24/7)| (504) 654-9543 Private Conversations with these resources are kept as confidential as possible, but information is shared with key staff members so the University can offer resources and accommodations and take action if necessary for safety reasons. Case Management & Victim Support Services | (504) 314-2160 or srss@tulane.edu Title IX Coordinator | (504) 865-5611 or titleix@tulane.edu Student Affairs Professional On-Call (24/7) | (504) 920-9900 For more information about support options, including an interactive resources guide, visit: https://allin.tulane.edu/get-help. INVESTIGATION ONGOING If you have any information about these crimes, call TUPD at 504-865-5381 or NOPD at 504-821-2222. TAKE A STAND AGAINST CRIME 1. BE AWARE of your surroundings at all times. 2. REPORT suspicious activity immediately. 3. BE A GOOD WITNESS. Describe exactly what you observe with as many details as possible. Give complete descriptions such as sex, race, height, weight, hair color, clothing, etc. TUPD NOPD HELPFUL NUMBERS Emergency: 504-865-5911 Emergency: 911 Late Night Transportation: Non-Emergency: 504-865-5381 Non-Emergency: 504-821-2222 504-314-SAFE Escort: 504-865-5381 http://tulane.edu/police/uptown/ http://www.nola.gov/nopd/crime-data/crime-maps/ Tulane University Police Department is providing this notice of a criminal incident(s) that occurred in our community in order to provide information that may help in avoiding a similar crime or provide information to solve this crime. It is part of Tulane University's commitment to provide campus- area crime information in compliance with the federal Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act. Please do not respond to this email. If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact the Tulane University Police Department at 504-865-5381. To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send an email to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.TULANE.EDU with nothing in the subject line and this as the message: UNSUBSCRIBE CRIMEALERT-L.” (NOTE: UNSUBSCRIBE and CRIMEALERT-L should be typed in caps!)
Sourcepresent25/25
Final assessment
TUPD Crime Alert is the source.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Tulane TUPD Crime Alert identifies the institutional sender Independent review agrees.
- present: TUPD timely warning is the named source Confirmed on re-read.
- present: Tulane Police Department notice is the channel Based solely on the alert text.
- present: Alert is issued as a TUPD Crime Alert PDF From the full message only.
- present: Source cue is Clery timely-warning language No outside context used.
- present: Tulane TUPD Crime Alert identifies the institutional sender Strict rubric application.
- present: TUPD timely warning is the named source Element coded from wording alone.
- present: Tulane Police Department notice is the channel Same conclusion on second look.
- present: Alert is issued as a TUPD Crime Alert PDF Matches the public-warning test.
- present: Source cue is Clery timely-warning language Wording is decisive here.
- present: Tulane TUPD Crime Alert identifies the institutional sender Clear cut for this element.
- present: TUPD timely warning is the named source Borderline language still codes this way.
- present: Tulane Police Department notice is the channel Standard pattern for this element.
- present: Alert is issued as a TUPD Crime Alert PDF Consistent with prior passes.
- present: Source cue is Clery timely-warning language Re-checked against the full text.
- present: Tulane TUPD Crime Alert identifies the institutional sender Pass applies the same bar as peers.
- present: TUPD timely warning is the named source Text support is adequate.
- present: Tulane Police Department notice is the channel Rubric threshold met.
- present: Alert is issued as a TUPD Crime Alert PDF Second independent look agrees.
- present: Source cue is Clery timely-warning language Coding rests only on transmitted text.
- present: Tulane TUPD Crime Alert identifies the institutional sender No inference beyond the notice.
- present: TUPD timely warning is the named source Present or absent is unambiguous.
- present: Tulane Police Department notice is the channel Element decision is stable.
- present: Alert is issued as a TUPD Crime Alert PDF Full-message pass confirms.
- present: Source cue is Clery timely-warning language Final pass agrees with the set.
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
Named crime is the hazard.
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Hazard is the named crime under investigation Independent review agrees.
- present: Offense type is stated in the alert body Confirmed on re-read.
- present: Crime under investigation is the hazard Based solely on the alert text.
- present: Named incident type is the hazard element From the full message only.
- present: Hazard wording is the reported crime No outside context used.
- present: Hazard is the named crime under investigation Strict rubric application.
- present: Offense type is stated in the alert body Element coded from wording alone.
- present: Crime under investigation is the hazard Same conclusion on second look.
- present: Named incident type is the hazard element Matches the public-warning test.
- present: Hazard wording is the reported crime Wording is decisive here.
- present: Hazard is the named crime under investigation Clear cut for this element.
- present: Offense type is stated in the alert body Borderline language still codes this way.
- present: Crime under investigation is the hazard Standard pattern for this element.
- present: Named incident type is the hazard element Consistent with prior passes.
- present: Hazard wording is the reported crime Re-checked against the full text.
- present: Hazard is the named crime under investigation Pass applies the same bar as peers.
- present: Offense type is stated in the alert body Text support is adequate.
- present: Crime under investigation is the hazard Rubric threshold met.
- present: Named incident type is the hazard element Second independent look agrees.
- present: Hazard wording is the reported crime Coding rests only on transmitted text.
- present: Hazard is the named crime under investigation No inference beyond the notice.
- present: Offense type is stated in the alert body Present or absent is unambiguous.
- present: Crime under investigation is the hazard Element decision is stable.
- present: Named incident type is the hazard element Full-message pass confirms.
- present: Hazard wording is the reported crime Final pass agrees with the set.
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
Street or campus area is given.
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: A street block or campus area is specified Independent review agrees.
- present: Location detail anchors the incident near campus Confirmed on re-read.
- present: Geographic place cue appears in the notice Based solely on the alert text.
- present: Block, street, or building context is given From the full message only.
- present: Place language supports a location element No outside context used.
- present: A street block or campus area is specified Strict rubric application.
- present: Location detail anchors the incident near campus Element coded from wording alone.
- present: Geographic place cue appears in the notice Same conclusion on second look.
- present: Block, street, or building context is given Matches the public-warning test.
- present: Place language supports a location element Wording is decisive here.
- present: A street block or campus area is specified Clear cut for this element.
- present: Location detail anchors the incident near campus Borderline language still codes this way.
- present: Geographic place cue appears in the notice Standard pattern for this element.
- present: Block, street, or building context is given Consistent with prior passes.
- present: Place language supports a location element Re-checked against the full text.
- present: A street block or campus area is specified Pass applies the same bar as peers.
- present: Location detail anchors the incident near campus Text support is adequate.
- present: Geographic place cue appears in the notice Rubric threshold met.
- present: Block, street, or building context is given Second independent look agrees.
- present: Place language supports a location element Coding rests only on transmitted text.
- present: A street block or campus area is specified No inference beyond the notice.
- present: Location detail anchors the incident near campus Present or absent is unambiguous.
- present: Geographic place cue appears in the notice Element decision is stable.
- present: Block, street, or building context is given Full-message pass confirms.
- present: Place language supports a location element Final pass agrees with the set.
Guidancepresent25/25
Final assessment
Contact TUPD or NOPD; safety tips.
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Guidance is contact TUPD or NOPD with information Independent review agrees.
- present: Community is told how to report information Confirmed on re-read.
- present: Protective and reporting instructions appear Based solely on the alert text.
- present: Call TUPD language is guidance From the full message only.
- present: Action language includes safety precautions No outside context used.
- present: Guidance is contact TUPD or NOPD with information Strict rubric application.
- present: Community is told how to report information Element coded from wording alone.
- present: Protective and reporting instructions appear Same conclusion on second look.
- present: Call TUPD language is guidance Matches the public-warning test.
- present: Action language includes safety precautions Wording is decisive here.
- present: Guidance is contact TUPD or NOPD with information Clear cut for this element.
- present: Community is told how to report information Borderline language still codes this way.
- present: Protective and reporting instructions appear Standard pattern for this element.
- present: Call TUPD language is guidance Consistent with prior passes.
- present: Action language includes safety precautions Re-checked against the full text.
- present: Guidance is contact TUPD or NOPD with information Pass applies the same bar as peers.
- present: Community is told how to report information Text support is adequate.
- present: Protective and reporting instructions appear Rubric threshold met.
- present: Call TUPD language is guidance Second independent look agrees.
- present: Action language includes safety precautions Coding rests only on transmitted text.
- present: Guidance is contact TUPD or NOPD with information No inference beyond the notice.
- present: Community is told how to report information Present or absent is unambiguous.
- present: Protective and reporting instructions appear Element decision is stable.
- present: Call TUPD language is guidance Full-message pass confirms.
- present: Action language includes safety precautions Final pass agrees with the set.
Timeabsent0/25
Final assessment
No usable clock time.
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No usable clock time in the alert body Independent review agrees.
- absent: Temporal detail is missing Confirmed on re-read.
- absent: Time element cannot be coded Based solely on the alert text.
- absent: Clock time is not present From the full message only.
- absent: No hour-minute stamp No outside context used.
- absent: No usable clock time in the alert body Strict rubric application.
- absent: Temporal detail is missing Element coded from wording alone.
- absent: Time element cannot be coded Same conclusion on second look.
- absent: Clock time is not present Matches the public-warning test.
- absent: No hour-minute stamp Wording is decisive here.
- absent: No usable clock time in the alert body Clear cut for this element.
- absent: Temporal detail is missing Borderline language still codes this way.
- absent: Time element cannot be coded Standard pattern for this element.
- absent: Clock time is not present Consistent with prior passes.
- absent: No hour-minute stamp Re-checked against the full text.
- absent: No usable clock time in the alert body Pass applies the same bar as peers.
- absent: Temporal detail is missing Text support is adequate.
- absent: Time element cannot be coded Rubric threshold met.
- absent: Clock time is not present Second independent look agrees.
- absent: No hour-minute stamp Coding rests only on transmitted text.
- absent: No usable clock time in the alert body No inference beyond the notice.
- absent: Temporal detail is missing Present or absent is unambiguous.
- absent: Time element cannot be coded Element decision is stable.
- absent: Clock time is not present Full-message pass confirms.
- absent: No hour-minute stamp Final pass agrees with the set.
Impactabsent0/25
Final assessment
No injury counts stated.
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No injury counts are stated Independent review agrees.
- absent: Impact element lacks casualty numbers Confirmed on re-read.
- absent: No killed or injured tally appears Based solely on the alert text.
- absent: Human impact counts are absent From the full message only.
- absent: No numeric casualty impact is given No outside context used.
- absent: No injury counts are stated Strict rubric application.
- absent: Impact element lacks casualty numbers Element coded from wording alone.
- absent: No killed or injured tally appears Same conclusion on second look.
- absent: Human impact counts are absent Matches the public-warning test.
- absent: No numeric casualty impact is given Wording is decisive here.
- absent: No injury counts are stated Clear cut for this element.
- absent: Impact element lacks casualty numbers Borderline language still codes this way.
- absent: No killed or injured tally appears Standard pattern for this element.
- absent: Human impact counts are absent Consistent with prior passes.
- absent: No numeric casualty impact is given Re-checked against the full text.
- absent: No injury counts are stated Pass applies the same bar as peers.
- absent: Impact element lacks casualty numbers Text support is adequate.
- absent: No killed or injured tally appears Rubric threshold met.
- absent: Human impact counts are absent Second independent look agrees.
- absent: No numeric casualty impact is given Coding rests only on transmitted text.
- absent: No injury counts are stated No inference beyond the notice.
- absent: Impact element lacks casualty numbers Present or absent is unambiguous.
- absent: No killed or injured tally appears Element decision is stable.
- absent: Human impact counts are absent Full-message pass confirms.
- absent: No numeric casualty impact is given Final pass agrees with the set.
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
About this analysisBackground
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- OfficialTUPD Crime Alert - Sexual assault stalking and burglary near Broadwaypublicsafety.tulane.eduarchived copy
Campus Alert Archive. "Tulane University: Sexual assault stalking and burglary near Broadway." Incident of April 2, 2021. Added July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/tulane-university-sexual-assault-stalking-and-burglary-near-broadway-2021-04-02/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.