Pry attempt at Kathmandu House later called a prank
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedUC San Diego Police issued a Clery timely warning after a 2:22 a.m. report of someone prying a ground-level bedroom window screen at Kathmandu House. A later update said a friend of residents upstairs was playing a prank and that there was no evidence of an attempted burglary.
- Alerts
- 2
- Response
- —
- Killed
- —
- Injured
- —
Alert Sequence
2 messages in sequence · 2 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT June 7, 2026 ALL ACADEMICS, STAFF AND STUDENTS AT UC SAN DIEGO Timely Warning – Attempted Burglary On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM, the UC San Diego Police Department received a report of an attempted burglary at the Kathmandu House located on campus. The victim reported hearing someone trying to pry away the ground-level bedroom window screen. When the victim went to the window to investigate, the suspect ran off in an unknown direction. There is no suspect information at this time. At this time, the suspect is not in custody. The report is currently under investigation by the UC San Diego Police Department. If you have information that could be helpful in this investigation, please call the UC San Diego Police Department at (858) 534-4357 or submit an online tip at https://police.ucsd.edu/services/anonymous.html. If you are the victim of a burglary or you discover someone inside your residence: If possible, immediately leave your residence and go to a safe area (e.g., a neighbor’s apartment or a public place). Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1. If you are unable to leave your residence, secure yourself and your family members in a safe location, turn on all available lights, and call the police immediately. To help reduce the risk of being the victim of a burglary: Make sure doors and windows are closed and locked. When it is hot out, use a lock or item that only allows the window to open small distances. If you live on campus and your windows or doors won’t lock, please call Housing Maintenance at (858) 534-2600. If your office windows or doors won’t lock, please call Facilities Management. Visit https://hdhfacilities.ucsd.edu/ Be aware of your surroundings. If you see suspicious activity, call or text the UC San Diego Police Department immediately at 9-1-1. Know the location of campus emergency telephones on routes to and from campus destinations. Avoid displaying and/or placing high-value items close to windows. Items such as computers, cell phones, wallets, and purses can be easily grabbed from open windows and may be incentives for criminals to try and enter the residence. Secure your valuables at all times. Be alert and aware. Pay attention to who is around when you leave and return to your residence or office. If returning at night, leave a light on inside as a visual deterrent. What is this Notice? This notice is being provided to you to comply with the Jeanne Clery Campus Safety Act. Timely Warnings are intended to prevent similar crimes and to provide information that will assist community members in protecting themselves. University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093
Sourcepresent25/25
Final assessment
UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT is the branded sender.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: A first-time reader would see "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: The body names it with "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: Because the alert says "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is on the page, so present.
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
an attempted burglary names a specific crime.
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "an attempted burglary", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "an attempted burglary" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "an attempted burglary" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "an attempted burglary".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "an attempted burglary" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "an attempted burglary", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "an attempted burglary" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "an attempted burglary".
- present: A first-time reader would see "an attempted burglary" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "an attempted burglary".
- present: The body names it with "an attempted burglary", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "an attempted burglary".
- present: Because the alert says "an attempted burglary", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "an attempted burglary" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "an attempted burglary" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "an attempted burglary" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "an attempted burglary" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "an attempted burglary" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "an attempted burglary" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "an attempted burglary" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "an attempted burglary".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "an attempted burglary".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "an attempted burglary" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "an attempted burglary" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "an attempted burglary" is on the page, so present.
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
Kathmandu House is a named residence on campus.
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "Kathmandu House", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "Kathmandu House" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "Kathmandu House" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "Kathmandu House".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "Kathmandu House" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "Kathmandu House", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "Kathmandu House" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "Kathmandu House".
- present: A first-time reader would see "Kathmandu House" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "Kathmandu House".
- present: The body names it with "Kathmandu House", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "Kathmandu House".
- present: Because the alert says "Kathmandu House", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "Kathmandu House" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "Kathmandu House" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "Kathmandu House" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "Kathmandu House" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "Kathmandu House" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "Kathmandu House" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "Kathmandu House" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "Kathmandu House".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "Kathmandu House".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "Kathmandu House" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "Kathmandu House" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "Kathmandu House" is on the page, so present.
Guidancepresent25/25
Final assessment
Victims are told to leave if possible and to call or text police at 9-1-1.
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: A first-time reader would see "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: The body names it with "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: Because the alert says "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is on the page, so present.
Timepresent25/25
Final assessment
On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM is an explicit clock time and date.
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM".
- present: A first-time reader would see "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM".
- present: The body names it with "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM".
- present: Because the alert says "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "On 6/7/2026, at 2:22 AM" is on the page, so present.
Impactabsent0/25
Final assessment
The notice names an attempted burglary but does not state a consequence or severity.
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No consequence or severity language appears; attempted burglary names the hazard only.
- absent: Impact is absent: prying a window screen describes the act, not what it could do to people.
- absent: I mark absent because there is no phrase such as dangerous, injury, or life-threatening.
- absent: The generic burglary-prevention block does not supply this-incident impact.
- absent: This pass finds no explicit harm statement.
- absent: Absent: naming attempted burglary is Hazard, not Impact, under the rubric.
- absent: Nothing in the four corners states a consequence of this attempt.
- absent: A first-time reader is not told how serious the harm is, only that someone tried to pry a screen.
- absent: I score absent after searching for severity words and finding none for this incident.
- absent: The suspect ran off is an outcome, not an impact statement.
- absent: This reviewer records absent; the text does not convey what the hazard could do.
- absent: No impact cue such as could injure you is present for this incident.
- absent: The element is missing rather than implied by the crime name alone.
- absent: Direct language of consequence is not on the page, so absent.
- absent: Independent judgment: impact is not satisfied by attempted burglary plus boilerplate tips.
- absent: Quoted evidence of severity is not available in this message.
- absent: I do not treat ran off in an unknown direction as an impact statement.
- absent: This pass votes absent: no potential-consequences clause.
- absent: From the transmitted text, impact is not present.
- absent: The body never says the attempt was dangerous or injurious.
- absent: Absent vote rests on the lack of consequence wording.
- absent: Because the alert only reports a pry attempt, impact is not met.
- absent: Nothing undoes the absence of a harm or severity statement.
- absent: I quote no impact span because none exists, so the vote is absent.
- absent: The prevention tips are generic and do not state harm from this incident.
Coded by SuperGrok Heavy 4.5
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
Background
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- Official
- OfficialTimely Warning – ***UPDATED*** Attempted Burglary - 06-07-2026ucsdcampusnotices.atlassian.netarchived copy
Campus Alert Archive. "University of California, San Diego: Pry attempt at Kathmandu House later called a prank." Incident of June 7, 2026. Added August 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/uc-san-diego-kathmandu-house-attempted-burglary-2026-06-07/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.