Ski-masked knife brandishing behind Porter B

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  The UC Santa Cruz Police Department is named as the investigating and publishing authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "UC Santa Cruz Police Department", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "UC Santa Cruz Police Department".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "UC Santa Cruz Police Department", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "UC Santa Cruz Police Department".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "UC Santa Cruz Police Department".
  11. present: The body names it with "UC Santa Cruz Police Department", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "UC Santa Cruz Police Department".
  13. present: Because the alert says "UC Santa Cruz Police Department", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "UC Santa Cruz Police Department".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "UC Santa Cruz Police Department".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "UC Santa Cruz Police Department" is on the page, so present.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  brandishing a knife is a specific named weapons offense.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "brandishing a knife", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "brandishing a knife" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "brandishing a knife" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "brandishing a knife".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "brandishing a knife" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "brandishing a knife", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "brandishing a knife" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "brandishing a knife".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "brandishing a knife" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "brandishing a knife".
  11. present: The body names it with "brandishing a knife", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "brandishing a knife".
  13. present: Because the alert says "brandishing a knife", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "brandishing a knife" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "brandishing a knife" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "brandishing a knife" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "brandishing a knife" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "brandishing a knife" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "brandishing a knife" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "brandishing a knife" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "brandishing a knife".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "brandishing a knife".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "brandishing a knife" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "brandishing a knife" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "brandishing a knife" is on the page, so present.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  behind Porter B, near the Provost House is a named place.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "behind Porter B, near the Provost House", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "behind Porter B, near the Provost House".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "behind Porter B, near the Provost House", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "behind Porter B, near the Provost House".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "behind Porter B, near the Provost House".
  11. present: The body names it with "behind Porter B, near the Provost House", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "behind Porter B, near the Provost House".
  13. present: Because the alert says "behind Porter B, near the Provost House", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "behind Porter B, near the Provost House".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "behind Porter B, near the Provost House".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "behind Porter B, near the Provost House" is on the page, so present.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Recipients are told to contact UCPD or the tip line and are given personal safety tips.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "please contact UCPD", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "please contact UCPD" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "please contact UCPD" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "please contact UCPD".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "please contact UCPD" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "please contact UCPD", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "please contact UCPD" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "please contact UCPD".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "please contact UCPD" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "please contact UCPD".
  11. present: The body names it with "please contact UCPD", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "please contact UCPD".
  13. present: Because the alert says "please contact UCPD", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "please contact UCPD" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "please contact UCPD" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "please contact UCPD" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "please contact UCPD" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "please contact UCPD" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "please contact UCPD" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "please contact UCPD" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "please contact UCPD".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "please contact UCPD".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "please contact UCPD" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "please contact UCPD" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "please contact UCPD" is on the page, so present.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  On 06/09/2025 at approximately 1:39 a.m. is an explicit time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.".
  11. present: The body names it with "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.".
  13. present: Because the alert says "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m.".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "On 06/09/2025, at approximately 1:39 a.m." is on the page, so present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Naming knife brandishing is the hazard; there is no extra severity language such as dangerous.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: This pass finds no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing anywhere in the body, so the element is absent.
  2. absent: Absent: a full read never turns up a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing.
  3. absent: The message never supplies a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing, which this rubric requires.
  4. absent: I vote absent because a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing is not in the transmitted text.
  5. absent: Nothing in the wording amounts to a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing.
  6. absent: On this read the alert is silent on a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing.
  7. absent: Absent follows from the lack of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing after reading the whole product.
  8. absent: A recipient would not learn a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing from this text.
  9. absent: The element fails: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing does not appear.
  10. absent: I cannot mark present without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing, and it is not there.
  11. absent: This independent pass sees no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing to quote.
  12. absent: Coding absent; the body omits a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing.
  13. absent: No clause in the alert does the work of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing.
  14. absent: The four corners of the message leave a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing unspecified.
  15. absent: Absent vote: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing would have to be invented.
  16. absent: This reviewer looked for a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing and did not find it.
  17. absent: The text stays at other facts and never reaches a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing.
  18. absent: Without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing in the wording, the element is missing.
  19. absent: Present would need a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing; that language is not used.
  20. absent: I record absent after confirming the product lacks a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing.
  21. absent: The alert does not identify a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing in any sentence.
  22. absent: Missing a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing is the reason for the absent vote.
  23. absent: This pass will not infer a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing from neighboring facts.
  24. absent: No quoted span equals a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing, so absent.
  25. absent: Independent judgment: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the knife brandishing is not on the page.