Stay-in-place for shots fired in the 1200 block of Glendora

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found S present (25 present / 0 absent).

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  2. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  3. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature and "Police" names the issuing responders.
  4. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and "Police" identify who is sending or responding.
  5. present: The "UC Emergency" tag identifies the sender, and "Police" names the agency.
  6. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  7. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" names the sender and responding authority.
  8. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature and "Police" identifies the responding agency.
  9. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature and "Police" identifies the responding agency.
  10. present: UC Emergency is a branded sender tag and Police identifies the responding agency.
  11. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature and "Police" names the responding agency.
  12. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag, and "Police" identifies the responding agency.
  13. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature and "Police" names the responding agency.
  14. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the issuing authority.
  15. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and "Police" name the issuing and responding authority.
  16. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag and "Police" is a named agency.
  17. present: Branded prefix "UC Emergency" identifies the sender, and "Police" names the responding agency.
  18. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature and "Police" names the responding agency.
  19. present: The message opens with "UC Emergency" and cites "Police", which names the issuing and responding authority.
  20. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  21. present: "UC Emergency-" is a branded sender tag and "Police" names the responding agency.
  22. present: The sender tag "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies who is issuing and responding.
  23. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  24. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature and "Police" identifies the responding agency.
  25. present: "UC Emergency-" is a branded sender tag and "Police" names the agency that is responding.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found H absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It only says an "emergency reported", which is a generic label and names no specific threat.
  2. absent: It only says "emergency reported", a generic label that names no specific threat.
  3. absent: Only "emergency reported" appears, which does not specify the hazard.
  4. absent: It refers only to an "emergency reported" and never names a specific hazard.
  5. absent: The hazard is only an unnamed "emergency reported", not a specific threat type.
  6. absent: The text only says "emergency reported", a generic label that does not name a specific threat.
  7. absent: It only says "emergency reported", which is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  8. absent: Only "emergency" is named, which the rubric treats as too generic to count as a hazard.
  9. absent: It says only an "emergency reported", with no specific threat such as shots, fire, or robbery.
  10. absent: Only the generic word emergency appears, with no named hazard.
  11. absent: Only the generic word "emergency" is used, with no specific hazard named.
  12. absent: Only the generic word "emergency" is used; no specific hazard is named.
  13. absent: "emergency reported" is generic and does not specify what the threat is.
  14. absent: The text only says "emergency reported" and never names a specific threat.
  15. absent: Only a generic "emergency" is named, with no specific hazard.
  16. absent: "emergency reported" does not identify what the hazard actually is.
  17. absent: The threat is only an "emergency reported", not a specific hazard such as shots fired or fire.
  18. absent: The hazard is only an unspecified "emergency", not a named threat such as shots fired or fire.
  19. absent: It refers only to an "emergency reported" and does not specify the hazard type.
  20. absent: The text only names an "emergency" and does not specify a threat such as shots fired or fire.
  21. absent: Only the generic phrase "emergency reported" is used, with no specific hazard named.
  22. absent: It refers only to an "emergency reported", not a named threat such as shots fired or fire.
  23. absent: The text only says "emergency reported", a generic word that does not name a specific threat.
  24. absent: "emergency reported" does not specify what the threat is, only that something unspecified is happening.
  25. absent: "emergency reported" does not specify the hazard, such as shots fired, fire, or robbery.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found L present (25 present / 0 absent).

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The incident is placed "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  2. present: The report is placed "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  3. present: The report is placed "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  4. present: The report is located "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  5. present: Gives "1200 block Glendora" as the location of the report.
  6. present: It places the report "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  7. present: It locates the report "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  8. present: The report is located "on 1200 block Glendora", a specific street block.
  9. present: The site is given as the "1200 block Glendora", a street block location.
  10. present: The report is placed on 1200 block Glendora, a block-level street location.
  11. present: The report is placed on the "1200 block Glendora", a street block.
  12. present: The report is located "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  13. present: It locates the report on the "1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  14. present: It places the report "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  15. present: It places the report "on 1200 block Glendora", a street block.
  16. present: The "1200 block Glendora" is a specific street block.
  17. present: Gives a place: "on 1200 block Glendora".
  18. present: The site is given as the "1200 block Glendora".
  19. present: It locates the event "on 1200 block Glendora", a street block.
  20. present: It locates the report "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  21. present: The report is located "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  22. present: The site is given as the "1200 block Glendora", a specific street block.
  23. present: It locates the report "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  24. present: The report is placed "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
  25. present: The report is located "on 1200 block Glendora", a named street block.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found G present (25 present / 0 absent).

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to "stay at your location" and to "take action as needed".
  2. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to "stay at your location" and to "take action as needed".
  3. present: The line "If safe, stay at your location" instructs people to remain in place.
  4. present: It instructs people to "stay at your location" if safe, a protective action.
  5. present: Tells people to "stay at your location" if it is safe, plus be observant.
  6. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to be observant and take action as needed.
  7. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "be observant/take action as needed".
  8. present: The instruction "stay at your location" is a protective action for the recipient.
  9. present: Recipients are instructed: "If safe, stay at your location" and to take action as needed.
  10. present: The instruction If safe, stay at your location is a protective action for recipients.
  11. present: It instructs people to "stay at your location" if safe, a stay-put action.
  12. present: "If safe, stay at your location" instructs people to remain where they are.
  13. present: Recipients are told to "stay at your location" if safe, which is protective guidance.
  14. present: It tells recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "take action as needed".
  15. present: Recipients are told "If safe, stay at your location".
  16. present: Recipients are instructed to stay at their location if it is safe.
  17. present: Tells people to "stay at your location" if safe, a protective stay-put instruction.
  18. present: The line "stay at your location" directs people to remain where they are.
  19. present: It instructs people to "stay at your location" if safe, a remain-in-place action.
  20. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "take action as needed".
  21. present: "stay at your location" instructs people to remain where they are if it is safe.
  22. present: The instruction "stay at your location" is a stay-in-place protective action if it is safe.
  23. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe, a protective action.
  24. present: The message instructs people to "stay at your location" if safe, which is a stay-put protective action.
  25. present: The line "If safe, stay at your location" instructs people to remain where they are.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found T absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  3. absent: There is no time of day, date, or word like now or immediately.
  4. absent: There is no clock time, date, now, immediately, or other when cue.
  5. absent: Lacks a time of day, date, or recency cue about the event itself.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  8. absent: There is no time of day, date, or word such as now, immediately, or ongoing.
  9. absent: "More info soon" is a promise of later updates, not a time for the hazard itself.
  10. absent: No time of day, date, or recency cue is given; soon only promises later information.
  11. absent: There is no time of day, date, or cue like now or immediately.
  12. absent: There is no time of day, date, or recency cue like now or immediately.
  13. absent: There is no clock time, date, now, immediately, or other listed recency cue.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  15. absent: There is no clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar recency wording.
  16. absent: There is no clock time, date, now, today, or until-further-notice phrasing.
  17. absent: Lacks a time, date, or recency cue; "More info soon" is about a later update, not when the event is.
  18. absent: "More info soon" promises later updates and does not time the event itself.
  19. absent: There is no clock time, date, or word marking recency such as now or immediately.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or today appears.
  21. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency word in the message.
  22. absent: No time of day, date, or words like now or immediately appear in the text.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  24. absent: There is no time of day, date, or words like now, immediately, or ongoing about the event.
  25. absent: There is no time of day, date, or wording like ongoing or until further notice.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found I absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity beyond the unlabeled emergency itself.
  2. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity the unlabeled emergency could cause.
  3. absent: The text does not describe what the emergency could do to people or property.
  4. absent: No harm, danger, or severity language is given beyond the generic emergency.
  5. absent: Does not say what the emergency could do or how serious it is for people or property.
  6. absent: Nothing states consequence or severity, such as dangerous or risk of injury.
  7. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity beyond the unnamed emergency itself.
  8. absent: No harm, danger, or severity language describes what the emergency could do.
  9. absent: No wording such as dangerous, deadly, or injury describes what the event could do.
  10. absent: The message does not say what harm the event could cause or how serious it is.
  11. absent: The message does not describe harm, danger, or how serious the event is.
  12. absent: The message does not describe what the emergency could do or how serious it is.
  13. absent: No harm, danger, or severity is stated beyond the unnamed emergency.
  14. absent: It states no consequence or severity, only that an emergency was reported.
  15. absent: No consequence or severity language is present.
  16. absent: The text never says what harm the emergency could cause.
  17. absent: No harm, danger, or severity language appears beyond the unnamed emergency itself.
  18. absent: No harm, injury, or severity language is stated.
  19. absent: The alert does not say what the emergency could do to people or property.
  20. absent: Nothing states consequence or severity, such as dangerous or could cause injury.
  21. absent: The wording does not describe what the emergency could do or how severe it is.
  22. absent: The message does not describe harm, danger, or what the emergency could do to people.
  23. absent: It does not state any consequence or severity beyond the generic word emergency.
  24. absent: No harm, danger, or severity language is present beyond naming an unspecified emergency.
  25. absent: The message does not say what harm the emergency could do to people or property.