Missing child reported at Tangeman University Center

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: UC Emergency brands the sender, and Police are named in the area.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: UC Emergency brands the sender, and police are named in the area.
  2. present: UC Emergency is a branded signature and Police names the responding agency.
  3. present: UC Emergency brands the sender and Police are named as present in the area.
  4. present: UC Emergency is a branded signature and Police are named in the area.
  5. present: UC Emergency is a branded tag and Police are named in the area.
  6. present: UC Emergency identifies the sender and police are named in the area.
  7. present: The branded UC Emergency tag and Police identify the sender and responding agency.
  8. present: UC Emergency brands the sender and police are named in the area of TUC.
  9. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag, and Police is named as the responding agency.
  10. present: UC Emergency is a branded tag and Police are named in the area.
  11. present: It opens with branded "UC Emergency" and names Police as present in the area.
  12. present: The branded "UC Emergency" tag and "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  13. present: UC Emergency is a branded tag and Police is named as the responding authority.
  14. present: UC Emergency brands the sender and Police names the responding agency.
  15. present: UC Emergency is a branded sender tag, and Police are named as present in the area.
  16. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded source, and "Police" are identified in the area.
  17. present: UC Emergency identifies the sender and Police is named as present in the area.
  18. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" names the responding agency.
  19. present: UC Emergency brands the sender and Police are named as being in the area.
  20. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag, and Police is named as the responding agency.
  21. present: The UC Emergency signature and Police name the sender brand and a responding agency.
  22. present: UC Emergency is a branded sender tag, and Police names the responding agency.
  23. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag, and "Police" names the responding agency.
  24. present: The branded UC Emergency tag and Police identify the issuing and responding authority.
  25. present: The UC Emergency signature is a branded sender tag and Police are named as in the area.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present: a missing 6 year old named Bronx is a missing person, a specific listed threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a missing person hazard.
  2. present: It reports a missing 6 year old male, which is a missing person hazard.
  3. present: A missing 6 year old male is a missing person, which is a specific listed threat.
  4. present: A missing 6 year old male is a specific missing person hazard.
  5. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a specific missing person hazard.
  6. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a specific missing person hazard.
  7. present: A missing 6 year old boy is a specific missing person threat named in the text.
  8. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a specific missing person hazard.
  9. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a specific missing person threat.
  10. present: Missing 6 year old male names a missing person, which is a specific hazard.
  11. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a specific missing person hazard.
  12. present: It reports a missing 6 year old named Bronx, a specific missing person threat.
  13. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a specific missing person threat.
  14. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a missing person hazard.
  15. present: Missing 6 year old male names a specific missing person hazard.
  16. present: A "Missing 6 year old" is a missing person hazard, which is a specific named threat.
  17. present: Missing 6 year old male is a missing person threat, which counts as a specific hazard.
  18. present: "Missing 6 year old male" names a missing person, a specific listed hazard.
  19. present: A missing 6 year old male is a specific missing person threat.
  20. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a specific missing person threat.
  21. present: A Missing 6 year old male is a missing person, which is a specific named hazard.
  22. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a missing person, which counts as a specific hazard.
  23. present: It reports a "Missing 6 year old male", which is a specific missing person threat.
  24. present: A missing 6 year old named Bronx is a specific missing person hazard.
  25. present: A Missing 6 year old male is a specific missing person threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present: police are in the area of TUC, a named campus place.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named place.
  2. present: It places police in the area of TUC, a named campus location.
  3. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named place.
  4. present: It places the search in the area of TUC.
  5. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named campus place.
  6. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named campus place.
  7. present: Police are in area of TUC, a named place.
  8. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named campus place.
  9. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named campus place.
  10. present: Police are in area of TUC, a named campus place.
  11. present: It places police in the area of TUC, a named campus site.
  12. present: It places police in the area of TUC, a named campus place.
  13. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named place.
  14. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named place.
  15. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named campus place.
  16. present: Police are "in area of TUC", a named place.
  17. present: Area of TUC names a campus place where police are and the search is focused.
  18. present: Police are "in area of TUC", a named campus place.
  19. present: It places police in the area of TUC, a named campus location.
  20. present: Police are "in area of TUC", a named campus place.
  21. present: Police are in area of TUC, a named place.
  22. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named campus place.
  23. present: Police are "in area of TUC", a named campus place.
  24. present: Police are in the area of TUC, a named campus place.
  25. present: Police are in area of TUC, a named place.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present: if the child is located, recipients are told to call 911, a listed protective action.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: If the child is located, recipients are told to call 911.
  2. present: It instructs recipients to call 911 if the child is located.
  3. present: If the child is located, recipients are told to call 911.
  4. present: It tells recipients to call 911 if the child is located.
  5. present: Anyone who locates the child is told to call 911.
  6. present: If located call 911 is an instruction to contact emergency services.
  7. present: Recipients are told If located call 911, which is an instruction to take action.
  8. present: It tells recipients to call 911 if the child is located.
  9. present: If the child is located, recipients are told to call 911.
  10. present: It instructs If located call 911.
  11. present: It tells recipients to call 911 if the child is located.
  12. present: It instructs recipients to call 911 if the child is located.
  13. present: If the child is located, recipients are told to call 911.
  14. present: It instructs that if the child is located, call 911.
  15. present: If located call 911 is an instruction to recipients.
  16. present: If the child is located, recipients are told to "call 911".
  17. present: If located call 911 is a direct instruction to recipients.
  18. present: If the child is located, recipients are told to call 911.
  19. present: It instructs anyone who locates the child to call 911.
  20. present: It instructs "If located call 911", a listed protective action.
  21. present: Recipients are told If located call 911, an instructed action.
  22. present: Anyone who locates the child is instructed to call 911.
  23. present: It instructs "If located call 911", a listed protective action.
  24. present: If the child is located, recipients are told to call 911.
  25. present: If the child is located, recipients are told to call 911.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time present: last seen 40 minutes ago is an explicit recency cue for the disappearance.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago conveys recency of the disappearance.
  2. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago conveys recency of the disappearance.
  3. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is an explicit recency cue.
  4. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago conveys recency.
  5. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is an explicit recency statement.
  6. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is an explicit recency statement.
  7. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is an explicit recency cue.
  8. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is a recency cue.
  9. present: "Last seen 40 minutes ago" is a clear recency cue.
  10. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago gives a clear recency cue.
  11. present: "Last seen 40 minutes ago" conveys recency.
  12. present: "Last seen 40 minutes ago" is a recency cue.
  13. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is an explicit recency cue.
  14. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago conveys recency.
  15. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is a recency cue for when the child was last observed.
  16. present: "Last seen 40 minutes ago" is a clear recency statement.
  17. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is an explicit recency cue.
  18. present: "Last seen 40 minutes ago" is a recency time cue.
  19. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago gives recency for the disappearance.
  20. present: "Last seen 40 minutes ago" is a recency time cue.
  21. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is a recency cue.
  22. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago gives a recency window for when the child went missing.
  23. present: "Last seen 40 minutes ago" conveys recency.
  24. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is a recency time cue.
  25. present: Last seen 40 minutes ago is a recency cue.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: the child is described as missing without stated danger, injury, or other consequences.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The missing child is named as the situation, with no stated harm or severity.
  2. absent: It does not state consequences or severity, such as that the child is in danger.
  3. absent: The missing child is named but the text does not state danger, injury, or other consequences.
  4. absent: It does not say the child is endangered or state other consequences.
  5. absent: Age and clothing describe the child but do not state he is endangered or what harm may follow.
  6. absent: The text does not say what harm could result or how serious the situation is.
  7. absent: The missing child is named without stating danger, harm, or other consequences.
  8. absent: The child is described as missing but no consequence such as in danger or life threatening is stated.
  9. absent: The missing child is described but no consequence or severity, such as endangered, is stated.
  10. absent: The missing child is described but no danger, harm, or other consequence is stated.
  11. absent: It does not say the child is in danger or state any harm that may follow.
  12. absent: A missing child names the situation but does not state consequences or how serious the risk is.
  13. absent: The child is described as missing, but no consequence or danger is stated.
  14. absent: The missing child is described but no harm, danger, or severity is stated.
  15. absent: Missing person is the hazard only, with no stated danger, injury risk, or severity.
  16. absent: The missing child is described but the text does not say the child is in danger or may be harmed.
  17. absent: The missing child is described but no danger, injury risk, or other harm is stated.
  18. absent: The missing child is the hazard itself; the text does not state danger, harm, or other consequences.
  19. absent: The text does not say what harm could follow if the child remains missing.
  20. absent: The missing child is the hazard name, with no stated danger or harm.
  21. absent: The missing child is described but the text does not state harm or severity such as endangered or in danger.
  22. absent: It does not state danger, injury, or other harm that could result from the child being missing.
  23. absent: A missing child names the situation but does not state consequences such as danger or harm.
  24. absent: The child is described as missing but no consequence such as danger or harm is stated.
  25. absent: A missing child is named but no endangerment, injury risk, or other consequence is stated.