Southwest Boulder outage takes Williams Village offline twice

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree CU Advisory identifies the university sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the sender of the advisory.
  2. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the sending authority.
  3. present: CU Advisory identifies the university alert system as the sender.
  4. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the sender.
  5. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the sender.
  6. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the sender.
  7. present: CU Advisory identifies the university alert system as the sender.
  8. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the sender.
  9. present: CU Advisory identifies the university alert system as the source.
  10. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the alert sender.
  11. present: CU Advisory identifies the University of Colorado as the sender.
  12. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the sender.
  13. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the alert sender.
  14. present: CU Advisory identifies the university alert system as the sender.
  15. present: CU Advisory identifies the university advisory system as sender.
  16. present: CU Advisory identifies the University of Colorado as the sender.
  17. present: CU Advisory and the colorado.edu alerts link identify the university sender.
  18. present: CU Advisory identifies the University of Colorado as the sender.
  19. present: CU Advisory identifies the university advisory as the sender.
  20. present: CU Advisory brands the University of Colorado as the sender.
  21. present: CU Advisory identifies the university advisory system as the sender.
  22. present: CU Advisory identifies the university advisory system as the sender.
  23. present: CU Advisory identifies the University of Colorado as the sender.
  24. present: CU Advisory identifies the university advisory system as sender.
  25. present: CU Advisory identifies the university as the sender.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree an unplanned power outage and out lights are specific hazards.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Names an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights as the hazards.
  2. present: Names an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights specifically.
  3. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  4. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  5. present: An unplanned power outage and out traffic lights are specified.
  6. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  7. present: Names an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights.
  8. present: It names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  9. present: Reports an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights.
  10. present: Names an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights.
  11. present: Unplanned power outage and out traffic lights name specific hazards.
  12. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  13. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  14. present: Names an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights as hazards.
  15. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  16. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  17. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  18. present: Names an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights.
  19. present: Names an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights.
  20. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  21. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out specifically.
  22. present: Names an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights as hazards.
  23. present: Names an unplanned power outage and traffic lights out.
  24. present: Names an unplanned power outage and out traffic lights.
  25. present: Unplanned power outage and traffic lights out are specific hazards.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree southwest Boulder and Williams Village locate the outage.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Places impacts in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village and the city.
  2. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  3. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  4. present: Gives southwest Boulder, Williams Village, and the city as places.
  5. present: Southwest Boulder, Williams Village, and the city are named.
  6. present: Locates effects in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village and the city.
  7. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  8. present: Southwest Boulder, Williams Village, and the city locate the event.
  9. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder including Williams Village.
  10. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  11. present: Southwest Boulder and Williams Village specify the affected place.
  12. present: Places it in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village and the city.
  13. present: Locates effects in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village and the city.
  14. present: Locates effects in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village and the city.
  15. present: Places it in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  16. present: Locates impacts in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  17. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village and the city.
  18. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  19. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  20. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  21. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  22. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  23. present: Places the outage in southwest Boulder, including Williams Village.
  24. present: Places impacts in southwest Boulder, Williams Village, and the city.
  25. present: Southwest Boulder and Williams Village locate the affected area.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find only an updates URL, not a protective action.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Only directs readers to a URL for updates, not a protective action.
  2. absent: Only directs readers to a website for updates, not a protective action.
  3. absent: Only directs readers to a URL for updates, not protective action.
  4. absent: Only directs readers to a URL, not protective action.
  5. absent: The updates link is not a protective action for recipients.
  6. absent: Only directs people to an updates page, not protective action.
  7. absent: Only directs readers to a URL for updates, not a protective action.
  8. absent: Visiting the alerts page is information only, not protective guidance.
  9. absent: Only directs readers to a URL for updates, not protective action.
  10. absent: Only directs people to a URL for updates, not protective action.
  11. absent: Visiting the alerts site for updates is not protective guidance.
  12. absent: Only directs readers to a URL for updates, not a protective action.
  13. absent: Only points to a website for updates, not a protective action.
  14. absent: Only directs readers to a URL for updates, not a protective action.
  15. absent: Only directs readers to an updates page, not protective action.
  16. absent: Only directs readers to a website, with no protective action.
  17. absent: Only points to a website for updates, not what to do for safety.
  18. absent: Only directs readers to a website, not a protective action.
  19. absent: Only directs readers to a URL, not a protective action.
  20. absent: Only points to a website for updates, not protective action.
  21. absent: Only links to an alerts page for updates, with no protective action.
  22. absent: Only directs readers to a website, not a protective action.
  23. absent: Only links to an alerts page for updates, with no protective action.
  24. absent: Only directs readers to an updates URL, not protective action.
  25. absent: Visiting the alerts site is information seeking, not protective guidance.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find no clock time, date, or recency cue.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Contains no clock time, date, or timing cue such as now or until.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, immediately, ongoing, or similar time cue appears.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, until, or ongoing cue is given.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, immediately, ongoing, or similar timing.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or temporal urgency cue is present.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, immediate, until, or similar time wording appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, immediately, until, or other timing cue is given.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, until, or ongoing cue is given.
  9. absent: Contains no clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar time cue.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, until, or ongoing cue.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar time wording appears.
  12. absent: Has no clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar time marker.
  13. absent: Contains no clock time, date, or words like now, today, or until.
  14. absent: Contains no clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar timing cue.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, until, or ongoing cue.
  16. absent: Gives no clock time, date, now, immediately, or duration cue.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar time cue.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar time cue.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, or timing cue is given.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar time cue.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, immediately, ongoing, or similar time cue appears.
  22. absent: No time, date, or temporal cue such as now or until is given.
  23. absent: Contains no clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar time cue.
  24. absent: Contains no clock time, date, now, immediately, or duration cue.
  25. absent: No time, date, immediate cue, or duration appears in the text.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find no stated harm or consequence beyond naming the outage.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: States the outage itself without harm, severity, or downstream consequence.
  2. absent: Gives no harm, severity, or consequence beyond naming the outage itself.
  3. absent: States the outage and dark lights without a harm or severity consequence.
  4. absent: No stated consequence beyond naming the outage and dark lights.
  5. absent: No harm, severity, or consequence is stated beyond naming the outage.
  6. absent: No harm, injury, or clear consequence is stated beyond the outage itself.
  7. absent: Affecting an area describes scope, not a stated harm or consequence.
  8. absent: No harm, severity, or consequence is stated beyond the hazard names.
  9. absent: States the outage scope but not harm, severity, or consequences.
  10. absent: No stated or implied harm or consequence beyond the outage itself.
  11. absent: No harm, severity, or consequence is stated beyond the hazard itself.
  12. absent: Describes the outage and lights out only, with no stated harm or consequence.
  13. absent: Describes outage extent but states no harm, severity, or consequence.
  14. absent: States the outage itself without describing harm, severity, or consequences.
  15. absent: States the outage alone with no harm, severity, or consequence.
  16. absent: States the outage itself without harm, severity, or consequence.
  17. absent: Gives no harm, danger, or consequence beyond naming the outage itself.
  18. absent: States the outage itself without harm, severity, or other consequence.
  19. absent: No harm or consequence is stated beyond naming the outage.
  20. absent: Describes the outage and lights out without stating harm or consequences.
  21. absent: Describes outage extent but states no harm, severity, or consequence.
  22. absent: Does not state or clearly imply harm beyond naming the outage.
  23. absent: Describes the outage and dark lights but states no harm or consequence beyond the hazard.
  24. absent: Describes the outage extent only, with no stated harm or consequence.
  25. absent: No harm, severity, or consequence is stated beyond naming the outage.