Stalking reports on light rail and at Community Commons

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Source present. Campus Safety is the branded sender of the notice.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "University of Denver" and "Department of Campus Safety" names the sending institution.
  2. present: Present: "University of Denver" identifies the sender.
  3. present: On this reading, the named office is the "Department of Campus Safety."
  4. present: Quoting the span, "Campus Safety is sending this alert," the message names the sender.
  5. present: I find the named Department of Campus Safety sending the alert.
  6. present: Read as written, Campus Safety says it is sending the alert, and the Department of Campus Safety is named throughout.
  7. present: The message states that Campus Safety is sending the alert and names the University of Denver Department of Campus Safety.
  8. present: In the body, Campus Safety explicitly says it is sending this alert.
  9. present: From these sentences, the Department of Campus Safety is sending the alert for the University of Denver.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it says Campus Safety is sending the alert and names the Department of Campus Safety.
  11. present: A direct reading shows the Department of Campus Safety is sending the alert for the University of Denver.
  12. present: The notice states that Campus Safety is sending the alert and names the Department of Campus Safety.
  13. present: As printed, Campus Safety says it is sending the alert and the Department of Campus Safety is named.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, Campus Safety says it is sending the alert and the Department of Campus Safety is named.
  15. present: The alert says Campus Safety is sending it and names the University of Denver Department of Campus Safety.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, Campus Safety says it is sending this alert and the Department of Campus Safety is named.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the notice describes the incidents and then states that Campus Safety is sending this alert, and the footer names the Department of Campus Safety, so the sender is stated.
  18. present: This text identifies the University of Denver Department of Campus Safety as the sender.
  19. present: On the page, the sender is stated in "Campus Safety is sending this alert," with the Department of Campus Safety and the University of Denver named in the footer.
  20. present: The posted words say Campus Safety is sending the alert and name the University of Denver Department of Campus Safety.
  21. present: Within the message, Campus Safety says it is sending the alert and the Department of Campus Safety signs the notice.
  22. present: A plain reading shows Campus Safety states that it is sending this alert, and the message names the Department of Campus Safety at the University of Denver.
  23. present: The lines give the Department of Campus Safety as the sender and state that Campus Safety is issuing the alert under the Clery Act.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, "Campus Safety is sending this alert" and the Department of Campus Safety identify the sender.
  25. present: Only the given words say that Campus Safety is sending this alert and name the Department of Campus Safety.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Hazard present. The notice names stalking.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "Nature: Stalking" names stalking as the specific threat.
  2. present: Present: "Stalking" names the specific hazard.
  3. present: On this reading, the nature line gives the specific hazard "Stalking."
  4. present: Quoting the span, "Nature: Stalking," the message names the specific hazard.
  5. present: I find stalking named as the specific crime.
  6. present: Read as written, the stated nature is stalking, in which a man sat beside a student, blocked an exit from the train, and was encountered again days later.
  7. present: The message identifies the nature of the incidents as stalking by a man who blocked a student's path.
  8. present: In the body, the nature of the case is named as stalking.
  9. present: From these sentences, the nature of the alert is named as stalking.
  10. present: Taking only the text, the Nature line names stalking and the synopsis describes repeated unwanted contact and path blocking.
  11. present: A direct reading names stalking as the nature of the incidents.
  12. present: The notice labels the nature as stalking and describes a man who sat beside a student, blocked an exit, and appeared again later.
  13. present: As printed, the stated nature is stalking.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, the nature is listed as stalking, and the synopsis describes a man sitting beside a student and blocking an exit.
  15. present: The alert says the nature of the incidents is stalking.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, the specific hazard is stated as stalking.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the nature line states stalking, and the synopsis describes the repeated encounters that constitute that specific hazard.
  18. present: This text names the nature of the incidents as stalking.
  19. present: On the page, the nature line says "Stalking," and the synopsis describes repeated unwanted contact by the same man.
  20. present: The posted words label the nature as stalking and describe a man blocking a student's path plus a second encounter.
  21. present: Within the message, the nature of the incidents is stalking.
  22. present: A plain reading shows the stated nature of the incidents is stalking, with two unwanted encounters described.
  23. present: The lines give stalking as the nature of the incidents, including a man who repeatedly sat beside a student and blocked an exit.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, the nature line names "Stalking," a specific hazard, and the synopsis describes that conduct.
  25. present: Only the given words name the nature of the incidents as stalking.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Location present. RTD Light Rail and Community Commons are places.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "RTD Light Rail" and "Community Commons" names the incident places.
  2. present: Present: "RTD Light Rail" names a place.
  3. present: On this reading, the places named are the "RTD Light Rail" and "Community Commons."
  4. present: Quoting the span, "Community Commons," the message names a location of the incidents.
  5. present: I find RTD Light Rail and Community Commons named as places.
  6. present: Read as written, the incidents occurred on the RTD Light Rail and at Community Commons.
  7. present: The message locates the incidents on the RTD Light Rail and at Community Commons.
  8. present: In the body, the incidents are placed on the RTD Light Rail and at Community Commons.
  9. present: From these sentences, the incidents are placed on the RTD Light Rail and at Community Commons.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it lists the incident locations as the RTD Light Rail and Community Commons.
  11. present: A direct reading gives the locations of the incidents as the RTD Light Rail and Community Commons.
  12. present: The notice names the incident locations as the RTD Light Rail and Community Commons.
  13. present: As printed, the places are the RTD Light Rail and Community Commons.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, the incidents are located on the RTD Light Rail and at Community Commons.
  15. present: The alert says the incidents were on the RTD Light Rail and at Community Commons.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, the places named are the RTD Light Rail and Community Commons.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the locations line names the RTD Light Rail and Community Commons, and the synopsis places the two encounters at those same places.
  18. present: This text places the incidents on the RTD Light Rail and at Community Commons.
  19. present: On the page, the incidents are located at "RTD Light Rail" and "Community Commons."
  20. present: The posted words give the incident locations as the RTD Light Rail and Community Commons.
  21. present: Within the message, the incident locations are the RTD Light Rail and Community Commons.
  22. present: A plain reading shows the incidents are placed on the RTD Light Rail and at Community Commons.
  23. present: The lines give the RTD Light Rail and Community Commons as the locations of the two incidents.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, the incidents are placed on the "RTD Light Rail" and at "Community Commons."
  25. present: Only the given words place the incidents on the RTD Light Rail and at Community Commons.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Guidance present. The notice asks the community to report sightings and gives a contact.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "please contact" tells people to report sightings and call Campus Safety.
  2. present: Present: "report any sightings" tells readers to report.
  3. present: On this reading, Campus Safety is "asking the community to report any sightings."
  4. present: Quoting the span, "avoid them by entering a public place," the message gives a protective instruction.
  5. present: I find instructions to avoid suspicious people and to call Campus Safety or police.
  6. present: Read as written, readers are asked to report sightings, call Campus Safety or Denver Police, avoid suspicious people, and not confront a crime in progress.
  7. present: The message tells readers to report sightings and to call Campus Safety or police instead of confronting anyone.
  8. present: In the body, readers are instructed to report sightings, avoid suspicious people by entering a public place, call for help, and not confront anyone.
  9. present: From these sentences, readers are told to report sightings, contact Campus Safety or Denver Police, avoid suspicious people, and call for help instead of confronting anyone.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it tells readers to report sightings, contact Campus Safety or Denver Police, avoid suspicious people, call for help, and not confront anyone.
  11. present: A direct reading includes protective instructions to avoid suspicious people by entering a public place, to call for help, not to confront a crime in progress, and to use a security escort.
  12. present: The notice tells readers to report sightings, avoid suspicious people, call for help, not confront a crime in progress, request escorts, and use DU Safe.
  13. present: As printed, the community is asked to report sightings and to call Campus Safety or Denver Police.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, the alert tells people to report sightings, to avoid suspicious people, to call for help, not to confront anyone, and how to request an escort.
  15. present: The alert says to report sightings, avoid suspicious people, call for help, not confront individuals, and use a campus escort or DU Safe.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, the notice tells people to report sightings, contact Campus Safety or Denver Police, avoid confronting anyone, and call for help or an escort.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, Campus Safety asks the community to report sightings, later lines say to contact Campus Safety or Denver Police, and the tips say to avoid suspicious people, call for help, not confront anyone, and request an escort.
  18. present: This text tells readers to report sightings, call Campus Safety or police, and follow the listed safety steps.
  19. present: On the page, the community is asked to report sightings and to contact Campus Safety or Denver Police, and the safety tips give concrete actions such as avoiding suspicious people and calling for help.
  20. present: The posted words tell people to report sightings, call Campus Safety or Denver Police, avoid confrontation, and use escorts and DU Safe.
  21. present: Within the message, readers are asked to report sightings, contact Campus Safety or Denver Police, avoid suspicious people, and not confront a crime in progress.
  22. present: A plain reading shows readers are told to report sightings, call Campus Safety or Denver Police, avoid confrontation, and use steps such as escorts.
  23. present: The lines give reporting instructions with phone numbers and safety directives to avoid suspicious people, call for help, not confront a crime in progress, and use escorts.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, readers are told to report sightings, avoid suspicious people by entering a public place, call for help, and not confront individuals.
  25. present: Only the given words tell people to report sightings, contact Campus Safety or Denver Police, avoid suspicious people, and not confront a crime in progress.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found Time present. Date of Issue September 24, 2026 is a date on the notice.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "September 24, 2026" gives a date of issue for the alert.
  2. present: Present: "September 24, 2026" is a date in the alert.
  3. present: On this reading, the issue date is "September 24, 2026."
  4. present: Quoting the span, "September 24, 2026," the message includes a date of issue.
  5. present: I find printed dates, including September 24, 2026 and September 11 and 21, 2026.
  6. present: Read as written, the issue date is September 24, 2026, and the incidents are dated September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  7. present: The message gives an issue date of September 24, 2026 and incident dates of September 11 and 21, 2026.
  8. present: In the body, the issue date is September 24, 2026, and the incidents are dated September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  9. present: From these sentences, the issue date is September 24, 2026, and the incidents are dated September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it dates the incidents September 11 and September 21, 2026, and dates the alert September 24, 2026.
  11. present: A direct reading states an issue date of September 24, 2026 and incident dates of September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  12. present: The notice gives September 11 and September 21, 2026 as the incident dates and September 24, 2026 as the issue date.
  13. present: As printed, the issue date is September 24, 2026, and the incidents are dated September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, the date of issue is September 24, 2026, and the incident dates are September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  15. present: The alert says the date of issue is September 24, 2026 and the incidents were on September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, it gives an issue date of September 24, 2026 and incident dates of September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the issue date is September 24, 2026, the incident dates are September 11 and 21, 2026, and the synopsis repeats September 11th and September 21st.
  18. present: This text gives the incident dates as September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  19. present: On the page, the alert lists "Date of Issue: September 24, 2026" and incident dates of September 11 and 21, 2026.
  20. present: The posted words give an issue date of September 24, 2026 and incident dates of September 11 and 21, 2026.
  21. present: Within the message, the date of issue is September 24, 2026, and the incident dates are September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  22. present: A plain reading shows the incidents are dated September 11 and September 21, 2026, and the alert is dated September 24, 2026.
  23. present: The lines give September 24, 2026 as the issue date and September 11 and 21, 2026 as the incident dates.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, the issue date is September 24, 2026, and the incident dates are September 11 and September 21, 2026.
  25. present: Only the given words date the incidents September 11 and September 21, 2026 and date the alert September 24, 2026.
• Impactpresent24/25

  Final assessment

  24 of 25 passes found Impact present and 1 found it absent. The majority rests on serious and continuing threat as severity beyond the stalking name. The absent pass said no injury or loss was stated.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "serious and continuing threat" states severity beyond the stalking label.
  2. present: Present: "serious and continuing threat" states severity beyond the hazard name.
  3. present: On this reading, the suspect "could pose a serious and continuing threat" beyond the stalking name.
  4. present: Quoting the span, "serious and continuing threat," the message states severity beyond the name stalking.
  5. present: I find the words serious threat in the statement of a serious and continuing threat.
  6. present: Read as written, the suspect is said to pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community, which is severity beyond the name stalking.
  7. present: The message states that the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  8. present: In the body, the suspect is described as posing a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  9. present: From these sentences, the suspect is called a serious and continuing threat, which is severity beyond the name stalking.
  10. present: Taking only the text, it states the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  11. absent: A direct reading describes unwanted encounters and a possible continuing threat but does not state that injury, loss, or other harm occurred.
  12. present: The notice states that the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  13. present: As printed, the suspect is described as a serious and continuing threat.
  14. present: Nothing beyond the words, the suspect is said to pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community, and a student's path was blocked.
  15. present: The alert says the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  16. present: Looking at the lines, it states that the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  17. present: Sentence by sentence, the synopsis states that the man blocked the student's path when they tried to exit, and a later sentence states that the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  18. present: This text states that the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  19. present: On the page, the text states that the suspect "could pose a serious and continuing threat to our campus community."
  20. present: The posted words state that the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  21. present: Within the message, the suspect is described as someone who could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  22. present: A plain reading shows the message says the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  23. present: The lines give a realized interference with the student's exit and state that the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.
  24. present: Judged from the copy, the alert states that the suspect "could pose a serious and continuing threat to our campus community."
  25. present: Only the given words state that the suspect could pose a serious and continuing threat to the campus community.