Robbery at the Martin Luther King Boulevard bus stop

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Source present. The text names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding agency.
  2. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding authority.
  3. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and contact authority.
  4. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and contact authority.
  5. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding agency.
  6. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding authority.
  7. present: The alert names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the sender and responding authority.
  8. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the issuing authority.
  9. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  10. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  11. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  12. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  13. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  14. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  15. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  16. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and contact authority.
  17. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  18. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and contact authority.
  19. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding agency.
  20. present: The alert names the University of Houston Police Department and identifies itself as a University of Houston Security Alert.
  21. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the issuing authority.
  22. present: The alert names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the authority behind the notice.
  23. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  24. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
  25. present: The message names UHPD and the University of Houston Police Department as the responding and issuing authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present. It names a robbery.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It specifically names a robbery as the crime police responded to at the bus stop.
  2. present: It reports a robbery, a specific crime, rather than only a generic emergency or incident.
  3. present: It states the specific threat as a robbery reported at the Metro bus stop.
  4. present: It reports a robbery, which is a specific crime rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  5. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident.
  6. present: It names a robbery, which is a specific crime rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  7. present: It states that the reported crime was a robbery, which is a specific threat.
  8. present: It reports a robbery, which names the specific threat instead of a generic incident.
  9. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  10. present: It names a robbery, which is a specific crime rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  11. present: It names a robbery, which is a specific crime rather than a generic incident or situation.
  12. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  13. present: It specifically names a robbery, which is a concrete crime rather than a generic incident or situation.
  14. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  15. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident.
  16. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident.
  17. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident.
  18. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the crime rather than a generic incident.
  19. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident.
  20. present: It states that the reported threat was a robbery, a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  21. present: It specifically reports a robbery at the bus stop, which names the crime rather than calling it a generic incident.
  22. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat instead of using only a generic incident label.
  23. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident.
  24. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than using only a generic word like incident.
  25. present: It specifically reports a robbery, which names the threat rather than a generic incident.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present. It places the robbery at Metro bus stop 11474 on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It places the robbery at Metro bus stop 11474 on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  2. present: It locates the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  3. present: It places the robbery at Metro bus stop 11474 on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  4. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  5. present: It places the robbery at Metro bus stop 11474 on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  6. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  7. present: It gives the Metro bus stop number and the intersection of Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  8. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  9. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  10. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  11. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  12. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  13. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  14. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  15. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  16. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  17. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  18. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  19. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  20. present: It gives the place as the Metro bus stop at Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  21. present: It places the robbery at Metro bus stop 11474 on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  22. present: It gives the Metro bus stop at Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue, on the west side.
  23. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  24. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
  25. present: It places the robbery at the Metro bus stop on Martin Luther King Boulevard and Wheeler Avenue.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance present. It tells readers to be alert and cautious and to call 911 about suspicious activity.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs readers to be alert and cautious and to call 911 if they see suspicious activity.
  2. present: It tells people to stay alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  3. present: It instructs readers to stay alert, be cautious of surroundings, and call 9-1-1 for emergencies or suspicious activity.
  4. present: It tells students, faculty, and staff to stay alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see trouble.
  5. present: It tells people to stay alert, be cautious of surroundings, and call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  6. present: It instructs people to be alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  7. present: It instructs readers to be alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 about emergencies or suspicious activity.
  8. present: It tells people to be alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  9. present: It tells people to stay alert, be cautious of surroundings, and call 911 for emergencies or suspicious activity.
  10. present: It tells readers to stay alert, be cautious of surroundings, and call 9-1-1 for emergencies or suspicious activity.
  11. present: It tells recipients to be alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  12. present: Recipients are told to be alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  13. present: It tells recipients to be alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  14. present: It instructs recipients to stay alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  15. present: It instructs people to be alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  16. present: It instructs people to stay alert, be cautious of surroundings, and call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  17. present: It instructs recipients to stay alert, remain cautious of their surroundings, and call 9-1-1 for emergencies.
  18. present: It tells people to stay alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  19. present: It tells people to be cautious of their surroundings and to call 9-1-1 about suspicious activity.
  20. present: It tells recipients to call 9-1-1 for emergencies or suspicious activity and to remain alert and cautious.
  21. present: It tells people to stay alert, be cautious of surroundings, and call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  22. present: It instructs readers to stay alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 for suspicious activity.
  23. present: It tells people to be alert and cautious and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  24. present: It tells faculty, staff, and students to be alert and cautious, and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  25. present: It tells recipients to stay alert, be cautious of surroundings, and call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Time present. It gives Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at approximately 8:18 am.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and a clock time of approximately 8:18 am.
  2. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at approximately 8:18 am.
  3. present: It gives the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
  4. present: It gives Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and says the robbery was reported at approximately 8:18 am.
  5. present: It gives the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
  6. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at approximately 8:18 am.
  7. present: It timestamps the robbery as Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at approximately 8:18 am.
  8. present: It dates the robbery to Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at approximately 8:18 am.
  9. present: It gives the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
  10. present: It gives the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
  11. present: It gives the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
  12. present: It gives the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
  13. present: It gives both a calendar date, Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and a clock time of about 8:18 am.
  14. present: It gives a date and clock time, Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at approximately 8:18 am.
  15. present: It gives both a date, Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and a clock time of about 8:18 am.
  16. present: It gives the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
  17. present: It gives the date and clock time as Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at about 8:18 am.
  18. present: It gives Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the approximate time of 8:18 am.
  19. present: It dates the response to Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at approximately 8:18 am.
  20. present: It reports that the robbery occurred on Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at about 8:18 am.
  21. present: It gives both the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
  22. present: It states the event happened on Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at approximately 8:18 am.
  23. present: It gives the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
  24. present: It gives Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the approximate clock time of 8:18 am.
  25. present: It gives the date Wednesday, August 12, 2026, and the time of approximately 8:18 am.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Impact absent. It lists the weapon as none and does not state an injury or other harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It names a robbery but states no injury, danger, or other harm, and it lists the weapon as none.
  2. absent: It never states injury, danger, or any other consequence beyond naming the robbery itself.
  3. absent: It names a robbery and notes no weapon, but states no injury, loss, or other harm.
  4. absent: It never states injury, danger, or other harm, and it notes that no weapon was involved.
  5. absent: It names a robbery with no weapon but does not state injury, danger, or any other consequence.
  6. absent: It gives no statement of harm, danger, or severity, and it notes that no weapon was involved.
  7. absent: It never says anyone was hurt or that the robbery was dangerous, and it notes that no weapon was used.
  8. absent: It names a robbery with no weapon but never states injury, danger, or any severity.
  9. absent: It names a robbery with no weapon but never states injury, danger, or any other consequence.
  10. absent: It names the robbery but never states injury, danger, or any other consequence or severity.
  11. absent: It does not state any consequence or severity, such as injury, danger, or harm beyond naming the robbery.
  12. absent: It names a robbery but states no injury, danger, or other consequence, and it notes no weapon.
  13. absent: It never states injury, danger, or any other consequence beyond the name of the robbery.
  14. absent: It names a robbery and says no weapon was involved, but it states no injury, danger, or other harm.
  15. absent: It never states a consequence or severity such as injury, danger, or a threat to safety.
  16. absent: It names a robbery but never states injury, danger, or any other consequence or severity.
  17. absent: It never states any harm, danger, or severity, and it notes that no weapon was involved.
  18. absent: It names a robbery with no weapon but never states injury, danger, or any other consequence.
  19. absent: It names a robbery but does not state injury, danger, or any other harm to people or property.
  20. absent: It never says anyone was hurt, that the event was dangerous, or what harm the robbery caused.
  21. absent: It names a robbery and says no weapon was used, but it never states injury, loss, or other harm.
  22. absent: It says the weapon was none but never describes injury, danger, or any other harm.
  23. absent: It names a robbery with no weapon but states no injury, danger, or other consequence.
  24. absent: It names a robbery with no weapon but never states injury, danger, or any other consequence or severity.
  25. absent: It names a robbery but never states injury, danger, property loss, or any other consequence or severity.