Aggravated battery near 5th & Green

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the message carries the "Illini-Alert Emergency" branding and notes that "Officers are on scene", naming the responding police.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" and referencing officers on scene.
  2. present: "Illini-Alert" brands the sender and "Officers are on scene" names responders.
  3. present: The branded "Illini-Alert" tag and the reference to officers on scene identify the source.
  4. present: The "Illini-Alert Emergency" signature plus "Officers are on scene" identify sender and responders.
  5. present: The branded lead "Illini-Alert Emergency" plus "Officers are on scene" identifies authority.
  6. present: The alert is signed "Illini-Alert Emergency" and mentions officers on scene.
  7. present: "Illini-Alert Emergency" brands it, and "Officers are on scene" names police.
  8. present: "Illini-Alert Emergency" signs the message and "Officers are on scene" names the responders.
  9. present: The branded opener "Illini-Alert Emergency" plus "Officers are on scene" show who is behind it.
  10. present: The message is branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" and cites "Officers are on scene".
  11. present: The branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" prefix plus "Officers are on scene" identify sender and responders.
  12. present: Branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" opening plus a reference to officers on scene.
  13. present: The branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" header, plus "Officers are on scene", establishes authority.
  14. present: The "Illini-Alert Emergency" tag plus "Officers are on scene" name sender and responders.
  15. present: Sent under the "Illini-Alert Emergency" banner, with officers mentioned on scene.
  16. present: The branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" tag plus "Officers are on scene" identify the source.
  17. present: The branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" opener plus "Officers are on scene" identify the source.
  18. present: It is branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" and notes "Officers are on scene".
  19. present: The "Illini-Alert Emergency" signature identifies the sender, and officers are noted on scene.
  20. present: Branded with "Illini-Alert Emergency" and referencing "Officers are on scene".
  21. present: The branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" opening identifies the source, and officers are named on scene.
  22. present: The message is issued under the "Illini-Alert Emergency" banner.
  23. present: The branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" opener plus "Officers are on scene" identify authority.
  24. present: "Illini-Alert Emergency" identifies the sender and "Officers are on scene" names responders.
  25. present: The branded "Illini-Alert Emergency" tag plus "Officers are on scene" identify source and responders.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent offense rather than an unspecified police incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "An aggravated battery" is a specific violent offense.
  2. present: "An aggravated battery" is a specific violent crime, clearly named.
  3. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  4. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  5. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  6. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  7. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  8. present: "An aggravated battery just occurred" names a specific violent crime.
  9. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  10. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  11. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  12. present: Names "An aggravated battery", a specific violent crime.
  13. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  14. present: "An aggravated battery" is a specific violent crime.
  15. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  16. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  17. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  18. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  19. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  20. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  21. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  22. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  23. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
  24. present: "An aggravated battery" is a specific violent crime.
  25. present: "An aggravated battery" names a specific violent crime.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the crime is placed "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign", a named intersection recipients can picture.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It happened "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  2. present: It locates the crime "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  3. present: It locates the crime "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  4. present: It places the event "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  5. present: It occurred "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign", a stated intersection.
  6. present: It happened "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign", a specific intersection.
  7. present: It occurred "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  8. present: It locates the crime "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  9. present: It occurred "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign", a named intersection.
  10. present: It locates the crime "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  11. present: It locates the event "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  12. present: Locates it "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  13. present: The site is given as "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  14. present: It happened "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  15. present: It occurred "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign", a stated place.
  16. present: It happened "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  17. present: It happened "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  18. present: The location is "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  19. present: It happened "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign", a named intersection.
  20. present: It happened "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  21. present: The location is "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  22. present: It gives the corner of "5th St and Green St in Champaign".
  23. present: "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign" gives an intersection.
  24. present: It happened "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign."
  25. present: It locates the event "near 5th St and Green St in Champaign".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the closing clause "avoid the area" gives recipients a concrete protective action.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The closing "avoid the area" gives recipients an action.
  2. present: The closing phrase "avoid the area" is a protective action for recipients.
  3. present: "Avoid the area" is the protective action given to recipients.
  4. present: "avoid the area" instructs readers on a protective action.
  5. present: The words "avoid the area" give recipients a protective instruction.
  6. present: The closing phrase "avoid the area" gives recipients a protective action.
  7. present: "avoid the area" instructs recipients on protective action.
  8. present: Readers are told to "avoid the area" while officers work the scene.
  9. present: The directive "avoid the area" is clear protective guidance.
  10. present: The directive "avoid the area" is a protective action for recipients.
  11. present: The alert tells readers to "avoid the area".
  12. present: Ends with the instruction "avoid the area".
  13. present: The closing phrase "avoid the area" instructs recipients directly.
  14. present: "avoid the area" instructs recipients on what to do.
  15. present: The instruction "avoid the area" is aimed at recipients.
  16. present: Recipients are instructed to "avoid the area".
  17. present: The instruction "avoid the area" is a protective action for recipients.
  18. present: The closing phrase "avoid the area" is direct protective advice.
  19. present: The instruction "avoid the area" is protective guidance.
  20. present: "avoid the area" instructs recipients on protective action.
  21. present: The closing direction "avoid the area" is an action for recipients.
  22. present: "avoid the area" instructs recipients on protective action.
  23. present: The closing instruction is to "avoid the area".
  24. present: The closing phrase "avoid the area" instructs recipients directly.
  25. present: The closing direction "avoid the area" is protective guidance.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the phrase "just occurred" tells readers the battery happened moments before the message was sent.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "just occurred" signals that the event is very recent.
  2. present: "Just occurred" tells readers the crime happened moments ago.
  3. present: "Just occurred" is an explicit recency cue.
  4. present: "just occurred" conveys that the event happened moments ago.
  5. present: "just occurred" is an explicit recency cue about when this happened.
  6. present: "Just occurred" establishes that the event is very recent.
  7. present: "just occurred" signals the event is very recent.
  8. present: "just occurred" signals that the battery happened moments ago.
  9. present: "just occurred" is an explicit recency statement.
  10. present: The phrase "just occurred" conveys that the event is very recent.
  11. present: "just occurred" signals that the event is very recent.
  12. present: "just occurred" signals that the event is very recent.
  13. present: "just occurred" signals that the event happened moments ago.
  14. present: "just occurred" signals that the event is very recent.
  15. present: The phrase "just occurred" establishes recency.
  16. present: "just occurred" establishes that the event is very recent.
  17. present: The phrase "just occurred" establishes that the crime is very recent.
  18. present: "just occurred" establishes that the event is very recent.
  19. present: "just occurred" signals that the event is very recent.
  20. present: "just occurred" conveys that the event is very recent.
  21. present: "just occurred" establishes that the event is very recent.
  22. present: "just occurred" places the event in the immediate past.
  23. present: "just occurred" tells readers the event is very recent.
  24. present: "just occurred" establishes that the crime happened moments ago.
  25. present: "Just occurred" conveys that the event happened moments ago.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25: the alert reports the battery and the police response but never states whether anyone was hurt or what risk remains to others.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No description of possible harm to readers is offered.
  2. absent: No statement of ongoing danger or potential injury to others is made.
  3. absent: The message gives no sense of ongoing danger or possible harm.
  4. absent: There is no statement about injury risk or severity for readers.
  5. absent: Nothing conveys continuing danger or the severity of the assault.
  6. absent: No harm to recipients or severity of the battery is described.
  7. absent: No potential harm to recipients is spelled out.
  8. absent: Nothing states the harm or seriousness resulting from the battery.
  9. absent: No harm potential or severity descriptor accompanies the crime report.
  10. absent: No harm potential or severity statement follows the description of the battery.
  11. absent: Nothing conveys ongoing danger or consequences to the community.
  12. absent: No statement of ongoing danger or potential injury is given.
  13. absent: No statement conveys ongoing danger level or possible injury to readers.
  14. absent: No description of injury risk or ongoing danger is provided.
  15. absent: No harm potential or severity statement accompanies the crime report.
  16. absent: No potential harm or severity to recipients is described.
  17. absent: No statement of continuing danger or possible harm is included.
  18. absent: No description of injury severity or ongoing danger is offered.
  19. absent: No injury detail or danger statement is offered to recipients.
  20. absent: The alert conveys no consequence or severity beyond naming the crime.
  21. absent: No harm level or consequence to the community is stated.
  22. absent: No statement describes ongoing danger or potential harm.
  23. absent: No harm, injury severity, or continuing danger is described.
  24. absent: The message gives no sense of ongoing danger or possible injury to readers.
  25. absent: No potential harm to recipients or severity assessment is offered.