Crime alert for a reported sexual assault at the medical center campus

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. University of Iowa and UI Police are named, establishing institutional source and campus safety branding.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: University of Iowa and UI Police are named, establishing institutional source and campus safety branding.
  2. present: Sender context is clear from University of Iowa officials and UI branding throughout the crime alert.
  3. present: Source is present because the message attributes reporting to University of Iowa officials for UI students and employees.
  4. present: Institutional authorship is shown by University of Iowa crime alert framing and UI Police contact details.
  5. present: Who is sending is recoverable from University of Iowa and UI Police references in the body and contacts.
  6. present: Source is established by University of Iowa officials, Crime Alert branding, and UI Police contact channels.
  7. present: Institutional sender cues include University of Iowa crime alert framing for students and employees plus UI Police lines.
  8. present: Who issued or owns the notice is clear from University of Iowa officials and UI Police non-emergency and emergency contacts.
  9. present: Branding and authority appear via University of Iowa Crime Alert language and UI Police reporting instructions.
  10. present: Source presence follows from University of Iowa officials receiving the report and UI Police as the reporting destination.
  11. present: University of Iowa crime alert branding with UI Police contacts and Clery-style federal disclosure framing.
  12. present: Issuer is UI officials / campus crime alert under university and UI Police authority.
  13. present: Source/brand is University of Iowa via formal Crime Alert email and linked UI safety pages.
  14. present: Attributed to University of Iowa campus safety and police channels in a federal timely-warning style notice.
  15. present: Clear UI institutional source with police non-emergency line and official crime-alert FAQ structure.
  16. present: University of Iowa officials are cited as receiving the report, and the alert is presented under federal campus crime disclosure duties.
  17. present: Sender-side authority appears as UI officials and UI Police contacts within a legally framed timely warning for the campus community.
  18. present: The notice identifies University of Iowa as the reporting institution and routes safety concerns to UI Police lines.
  19. present: Official university crime-alert framing and UI Police contact numbers establish the institutional source of the warning.
  20. present: Source is coded present because University of Iowa officials and UI Police are the named institutional actors behind the alert.
  21. present: Source is present: 'Crime Alert' branding, 'University of Iowa officials', and 'UI Police' as the reporting/responding authority.
  22. present: UI officials are credited with receiving the report, and UI Police is named for non-emergency and emergency contact, identifying the sender side.
  23. present: The Crime Alert header and references to University of Iowa / UI students and employees mark institutional authorship of the notice.
  24. present: Issuing side is clear from 'University of Iowa officials' and the UI Police contact block under a Crime Alert title.
  25. present: Source present through Crime Alert branding and explicit University of Iowa / UI Police identification in the body.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. The hazard is specific: sexual assault is named as the crime type, not a vague incident only.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The hazard is specific: sexual assault is named as the crime type, not a vague incident only.
  2. present: A defined threat appears in the title and body as sexual assault under the Crime Alert header.
  3. present: Hazard specificity is satisfied by naming sexual assault as the crime of concern.
  4. present: The named threat is sexual assault, which meets the bar for a specific hazard rather than emergency alone.
  5. present: Hazard is coded present because sexual assault is explicitly identified as the crime type.
  6. present: The threat type is sexual assault, named in the title and body as a specific crime rather than a vague emergency.
  7. present: Hazard is coded yes because sexual assault is the identified offense under a Crime Alert header.
  8. present: A named crime hazard - sexual assault - satisfies specificity; generic emergency alone is not used as the threat.
  9. present: The specific threat named throughout is sexual assault, meeting the hazard element beyond a generic incident label.
  10. present: Hazard is sexual assault as stated in the Crime Alert title and narrative of the reported offense.
  11. present: Hazard is named as sexual assault, not a generic crime label alone.
  12. present: Specific offense type is sexual assault reported on or near campus.
  13. present: Identifies sexual assault as the reported crime category.
  14. present: Hazard specificity is sexual assault occurring at a named medical center location.
  15. present: The alert title and body both name sexual assault as the crime.
  16. present: The hazard is a reported sexual assault, labeled as a Crime Alert for campus awareness.
  17. present: Crime type is explicitly sexual assault; the header and body both classify the notice as a Crime Alert.
  18. present: A sexual assault report is the named crime; limited detail is admitted (no additional information available).
  19. present: Hazard identity is a sexual assault already reported; the body clarifies the perpetrator alone is responsible for the crime.
  20. present: The crime hazard is named as sexual assault in the title and opening, with sparse further incident facts.
  21. present: Hazard is specifically named as a 'sexual assault', not a generic emergency or incident.
  22. present: The subject line and body both state 'Sexual Assault' as the reported crime.
  23. present: What happened is a reported sexual assault, a concrete interpersonal-violence hazard under Clery-style crime alerts.
  24. present: Threat named: sexual assault reported to university officials.
  25. present: Hazard present: the message opens with and recounts a reported sexual assault.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Place is given as University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center on the University campus, plus on or near campus framing.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Place is given as University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center on the University campus, plus on or near campus framing.
  2. present: Location coding is met by naming the Health Care Medical Center on the University of Iowa campus.
  3. present: Where is covered: on or near the University of Iowa campus, specifically the Health Care Medical Center university site.
  4. present: Site information is adequate with University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center, University campus.
  5. present: Location is present via campus-area scope and the medical center building on university grounds.
  6. present: Incident place is University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center on the University campus, also framed as on or near campus.
  7. present: Location coding is met by the Health Care Medical Center, University campus, and near-campus language.
  8. present: Where is specified: University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center on the University campus.
  9. present: Site is adequate: on or near University of Iowa campus at the Health Care Medical Center university location.
  10. present: Place is the University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center on University campus, within on or near campus scope.
  11. present: Place given as University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center on the University campus.
  12. present: Location detail centers on UI Health Care Medical Center, University campus.
  13. present: Site is specified rather than campus-wide only: Health Care Medical Center on university grounds.
  14. present: Geographic anchor is UIHC Medical Center, University of Iowa campus.
  15. present: Incident place is the University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center on the university campus.
  16. present: The incident is placed at the University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center on the university campus.
  17. present: Place detail is specific: on or near campus wording plus the Health Care Medical Center, University campus site of the report.
  18. present: Location coding is satisfied by the Medical Center on the University of Iowa campus as the place the assault occurred.
  19. present: Site is specified as University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center, University campus, within broader on or near campus language.
  20. present: Occurrence place is the UI Health Care Medical Center on the university campus, satisfying location coding.
  21. present: Location is given as the University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center on the University campus, plus on or near the UI campus framing.
  22. present: Where: 'University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center, University campus' is a specific facility and campus setting.
  23. present: Place detail is the UI Health Care Medical Center on the University campus, not merely 'somewhere nearby' without a site.
  24. present: The assault location is fixed at the University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center, University campus.
  25. present: Location present: UI Health Care Medical Center on the University campus, with broader on-or-near campus framing.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Recipients are told to report public safety threats to UI Police, call or text 911 in emergencies, and use the non-emergency line.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told to report public safety threats to UI Police, call or text 911 in emergencies, and use the non-emergency line.
  2. present: Protective instructions include immediate reporting of threats, 911 for emergencies, and 319-335-5022 for non-emergencies.
  3. present: Action for the audience is clear if a threat is witnessed: contact UI Police promptly or dial 911 when urgent.
  4. present: Guidance to recipients includes stay-safe purpose language plus concrete report and 911 instructions with a phone number.
  5. present: Protective action is directed at the reader: report threats soon, use 911 if emergency, or call the non-emergency line.
  6. present: Readers are urged to report threats to UI Police quickly, use 911 or text 911 if urgent, or call 319-335-5022 otherwise.
  7. present: Protective direction includes stay-safe purpose text and concrete steps to report threats or call emergency services.
  8. present: Audience actions listed: report public safety threats ASAP, call or text 911 in emergencies, use the non-emergency number.
  9. present: Guidance for recipients is to take precautions, report witnessed threats promptly, and use 911 or 319-335-5022 as appropriate.
  10. present: Actionable safety steps: report threats to UI Police as soon as possible; emergency 911 or text 911; non-emergency 319-335-5022.
  11. present: Urges reporting threats to UI Police, 911 for emergencies, and points to safety tips, Nite Ride, Rave Guardian, and resources.
  12. present: Protective content: report promptly, emergency vs non-emergency numbers, prevention services, reporting options.
  13. present: Reader-facing steps include 911/text, 319-335-5022, crime prevention tools, and confidential resources.
  14. present: Guidance to stay safe: report threats, use listed police lines, review safety tips and support services.
  15. present: Actionable safety guidance and resource paths (report, Nite Ride, Rave Guardian, medical/confidential help).
  16. present: Readers are urged to report threats to UI Police, use 911 or 319-335-5022, and review safety tips, Nite Ride, Rave Guardian, and reporting options.
  17. present: Actionable guidance covers emergency and non-emergency reporting, crime prevention resources, and confidential support pathways.
  18. present: Guidance blocks include Report a Crime, Safety Tips and Resources, Reporting Options, and Additional Resources with concrete phone options.
  19. present: Readers receive steps to report threats promptly, choose emergency versus non-emergency lines, and use listed prevention and support resources.
  20. present: Multiple guidance sections tell recipients how to report, whom to call, and where to find safety services and confidential help.
  21. present: Protective guidance includes reporting threats to UI Police ASAP and calling or texting 911 in an emergency.
  22. present: Readers who witness a public-safety threat are strongly encouraged to report to UI Police and to call or text 911 if it is an emergency.
  23. present: Actionable instructions: report to UI Police as soon as possible; emergency path is call or text 911; non-emergency line 319-335-5022 is provided.
  24. present: Guidance to recipients includes taking appropriate precautions and, more specifically, reporting threats and using 911 for emergencies.
  25. present: Protective-action content is present via report-to-UI-Police and call-or-text-911 instructions for threats and emergencies.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Time markers include Friday July 24 2026 for the message and morning hours on Wednesday July 22 2026 for the offense.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Time markers include Friday July 24 2026 for the message and morning hours on Wednesday July 22 2026 for the offense.
  2. present: Recency is explicit via recently reported language and dated offense and send times in July 2026.
  3. present: When is coded from the Friday July 24 send date and the Wednesday July 22 morning occurrence window.
  4. present: Temporal detail includes recently reported phrasing and exact calendar dates for the alert and the crime.
  5. present: Time coding holds with message date Friday July 24 2026 and crime time morning hours July 22 2026.
  6. present: Dates and windows appear: alert on Friday July 24 2026; offense during morning hours Wednesday July 22 2026; recently reported.
  7. present: When is supplied by the July 24 message date, the July 22 morning occurrence, and recently reported phrasing.
  8. present: Temporal detail covers Friday July 24 2026 send day and morning hours on Wednesday July 22 2026 for the crime.
  9. present: Recency and clock cues include recently reported plus exact July 2026 dates for the alert and the morning offense window.
  10. present: Time is coded from Friday July 24 2026, Wednesday July 22 2026 morning hours, and recently reported wording.
  11. present: Message dated Friday July 24, 2026; incident morning hours Wednesday July 22, 2026.
  12. present: Clear timestamps for the alert day and the earlier Wednesday morning occurrence.
  13. present: Recency established with July 24 send date and July 22 morning incident window.
  14. present: Time and recency are explicit for both the message and the reported assault.
  15. present: Dated alert (2026-07-24) plus incident timing on 2026-07-22 morning hours.
  16. present: The alert is dated Friday, July 24, 2026, and the assault is timed to morning hours on Wednesday, July 22, 2026.
  17. present: Two dated anchors appear: message day (July 24, 2026) and incident morning (July 22, 2026).
  18. present: Chronology is given for both the alert release date and the morning-hours window of the July 22 incident.
  19. present: Dated alert (July 24, 2026) and dated offense window (morning of July 22, 2026) both appear in the text.
  20. present: Temporal detail includes the Friday, July 24, 2026 alert date and Wednesday, July 22, 2026 morning incident timing.
  21. present: Dates and recency appear: Friday, July 24, 2026 message date and morning hours on Wednesday, July 22, 2026 for the assault.
  22. present: Time is covered by the July 24, 2026 header and the 'morning hours on Wednesday, July 22, 2026' occurrence window.
  23. present: Timing language includes 'recently reported', the Friday July 24 send date, and the July 22 morning occurrence.
  24. present: Both the alert date (July 24, 2026) and the incident time window (morning of July 22, 2026) supply the time element.
  25. present: Time present via dated header Friday July 24, 2026 and 'morning hours on Wednesday, July 22, 2026'.
• Impactpresent20/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 20/25 present. Impact is the reported sexual assault that already occurred, which is a concrete consequence to a person.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Impact is the reported sexual assault that already occurred, which is a concrete consequence to a person.
  2. present: What happened is stated: a sexual assault was reported as having taken place at the medical center.
  3. present: Consequence language is present in the completed crime report of sexual assault at the named facility.
  4. present: Impact is the assault event itself as a reported crime affecting campus safety awareness.
  5. present: What occurred is documented as a sexual assault reported to officials at the stated campus medical location.
  6. present: Impact is the reported sexual assault that already took place, a direct harm event to a person on campus.
  7. present: Consequence to a person is the completed sexual assault reported to University of Iowa officials at the medical center.
  8. present: What happened is a sexual assault already reported, which is an impact event affecting a person and campus safety posture.
  9. present: Impact coding is yes because the alert documents a sexual assault that occurred, a concrete personal harm outcome.
  10. present: Consequences to people are reflected in the reported sexual assault at the medical center with no further details released.
  11. present: Frames a possible serious or ongoing threat and the need to prevent similar crimes for students and employees.
  12. present: States timely-warning purpose because past crime may still pose threat, with campus safety implications.
  13. present: Impact language covers potential ongoing threat and community need for precautions after the report.
  14. present: Consequences framed as possible continued risk to the campus population and duty to reduce repeat offenses.
  15. present: Describes why the notice matters: serious or ongoing threat potential and prevention of similar crimes.
  16. present: It states the aim is campus safety for students and employees and notes a possible serious or ongoing threat without claiming rising crime rates.
  17. present: Audience impact is framed as staying safe and taking precautions; the text stresses this is not an emergency notification but a timely warning.
  18. present: Impact is community-level risk awareness for students and employees under Clery-style timely warning logic, not an active emergency order.
  19. present: Stated purpose is enabling students and employees to stay safe and take precautions after a crime that could signal ongoing threat.
  20. present: Impact language targets UI students and employees for awareness and prevention under federal disclosure rules, while denying emergency-status of the notice.
  21. absent: Naming sexual assault states the crime type but does not add separate consequence or severity language beyond the hazard label itself.
  22. absent: Boilerplate about a 'serious or ongoing threat' explains timely-warning policy in general and does not describe this hazard's specific harm outcomes.
  23. absent: No statement such as life-threatening, may cause injury beyond the crime name, or similar severity claim is attached to this report.
  24. absent: Impact stays at the hazard name; the text does not spell out potential consequences or severity for people in the path.
  25. absent: Absent as coded: sexual assault alone is the hazard label; no separate impact or severity clause is given for this incident.