Skip to content
Campus Alert Archive
UMD

Two shootings outside the same nearby business four days apart; one wounded

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
MDshootingadvisoryhigh confidence
Confirmed Threat

Two separate shootings occurred outside the same commercial establishment in the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue in College Park on April 11 and April 15, 2024. In the first incident, a man sustained a gunshot wound and was hospitalized. No injuries were reported in the second shooting four days later.

Alerts
1
Response
Killed
0
Injured
1
Institution
University of Maryland, College Park
Public R1 · MD
All UMD cases →
~41,200 studentsUMD Alerts
Official alert policy
Read when and how UMD says it will use UMD Alerts: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim

INITIAL ALERTEmail
On April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m., a shooting occurred outside of a commercial establishment, located in the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland. A man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a local area hospital for treatment. On April 15, 2024, at approximately 11:26 p.m., a shooting occurred outside of the same commercial establishment, located in the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland. No injuries were reported. The Prince George's County Police Department is investigating both incidents.
Verbatim incident-description paragraphs from the official UMD Community Advisory posted April 16, 2024; the advisory combined both shootings into a single notification
The location in the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue is between Branchville Road and University Boulevard, within walking distance of campus
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

On April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m., a shooting occurred outside of a commercial establishment, located in the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland. A man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a local area hospital for treatment. On April 15, 2024, at approximately 11:26 p.m., a shooting occurred outside of the same commercial establishment, located in the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland. No injuries were reported. The Prince George's County Police Department is investigating both incidents.

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree the sender is present: the message names "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Identifies "The Prince George's County Police Department" as investigating authority.
    2. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    3. present: Names "The Prince George's County Police Department", the investigating authority.
    4. present: The message names "The Prince George's County Police Department", a responding authority.
    5. present: Names "The Prince George's County Police Department", the investigating authority.
    6. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department", the investigating authority.
    7. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department", the investigating authority.
    8. present: Identifies "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    9. present: Identifies "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    10. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    11. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    12. present: Attributes the investigation to "The Prince George's County Police Department", a named agency.
    13. present: Names "The Prince George's County Police Department", the investigating authority.
    14. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    15. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    16. present: Identifies "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    17. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department", the investigating authority.
    18. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department", the investigating authority.
    19. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    20. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department", the investigating authority.
    21. present: Names "The Prince George's County Police Department", the investigating authority.
    22. present: Identifies "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    23. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    24. present: It identifies "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
    25. present: It names "The Prince George's County Police Department" as the investigating authority.
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that the hazard is named, "a shooting" with "a gunshot wound".

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Names "a shooting" with a gunshot wound, a specific hazard.
    2. present: It states "a shooting occurred" and "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    3. present: Names "a shooting" and "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    4. present: It states "a shooting occurred" and "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    5. present: States "a shooting occurred" and "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    6. present: It names a "shooting" with a "gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    7. present: It states "a shooting occurred" with "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    8. present: States "a shooting occurred" and "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    9. present: Names "a shooting" with "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    10. present: It names a "shooting" and "gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    11. present: It states "a shooting occurred" and "a man sustained a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    12. present: Names "a shooting" and "a gunshot wound", a specific hazard.
    13. present: States "a shooting occurred" and "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    14. present: It states "a shooting occurred" with "a gunshot wound", a specific hazard.
    15. present: It states a "shooting occurred" and a "gunshot wound", naming a specific threat.
    16. present: Names "a shooting" with "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    17. present: It states "a shooting occurred" with "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    18. present: It states "a shooting occurred" and "a man sustained a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    19. present: It describes "a shooting" and "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    20. present: It describes "a shooting" and "a gunshot wound", a specific named threat.
    21. present: States a "shooting" with a "gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    22. present: Names "a shooting" with "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    23. present: It states "a shooting occurred" and "a man sustained a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    24. present: It names "a shooting" with "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
    25. present: It names "a shooting" with "a gunshot wound", a specific threat.
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads find a precise location, "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Gives a precise location, "9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".
    2. present: It gives "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific address.
    3. present: Specifies "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", an address.
    4. present: It cites "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific location.
    5. present: Specifies "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a precise location.
    6. present: It cites "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific location.
    7. present: It locates the incidents in "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific address.
    8. present: Gives the "9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific location.
    9. present: Specifies "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".
    10. present: It cites "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific location.
    11. present: It gives "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific location.
    12. present: Gives the location "9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".
    13. present: Says "9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific location.
    14. present: It gives the location "9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".
    15. present: It cites "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific location.
    16. present: Locates it in "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".
    17. present: It gives a precise place: "9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".
    18. present: It gives a precise location, "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".
    19. present: It gives the "9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific address.
    20. present: It gives the "9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific address.
    21. present: Gives "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific location.
    22. present: Specifies "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific address.
    23. present: It gives addresses in "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".
    24. present: It gives the "9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland", a specific location.
    25. present: It locates events in "the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland".
  • Guidanceabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that no protective action is directed to recipients: the text only narrates events and the investigation.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: It only narrates events and offers no protective action instruction to recipients.
    2. absent: It only narrates events and the investigation, giving recipients no protective action to take.
    3. absent: Describes police investigation but gives recipients no protective action to take.
    4. absent: The text only describes events and the investigation, giving no protective instruction to recipients.
    5. absent: No protective action is directed to recipients; it only recounts past incidents and the investigation.
    6. absent: The text only describes investigation and reports no protective action instruction to recipients.
    7. absent: It only describes investigation, giving recipients no protective action to take.
    8. absent: The message only describes events and the investigation, giving recipients no protective instruction.
    9. absent: Gives no protective instruction to recipients, only describes the investigation.
    10. absent: It only narrates events and the investigation, giving recipients no protective action to take.
    11. absent: It only describes the police investigation and gives no protective action to recipients.
    12. absent: Provides only a factual account with no protective action instructed to recipients.
    13. absent: No protective action is directed to recipients; it only narrates past events and investigation.
    14. absent: The message only reports facts and investigation status; it gives recipients no protective action to take.
    15. absent: It only narrates events and the investigation, giving recipients no protective action to take.
    16. absent: Purely a factual recap of past events with no protective action instructed to recipients.
    17. absent: It only describes the investigation; no protective action is directed to recipients.
    18. absent: It only narrates events and the investigation, giving recipients no protective action to take.
    19. absent: It only recounts what happened and who is investigating, giving no protective action to recipients.
    20. absent: It only describes the police investigation and gives no protective instruction to recipients.
    21. absent: The message only narrates events and the investigation; it gives recipients no protective action to take.
    22. absent: The message only describes what happened and that police are investigating, giving no protective action to recipients.
    23. absent: It only narrates events and the investigation, giving no protective instruction to recipients.
    24. absent: It describes only what police are doing, with no protective action directed at recipients.
    25. absent: It only describes police investigating and gives no protective instruction to recipients.
  • Timepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous that timing is present: the message gives "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m."

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Provides clock times and dates like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    2. present: It gives clock times and dates like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    3. present: Gives clock times and dates such as "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    4. present: It gives clock times and dates like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    5. present: Gives dates and clock times like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m."
    6. present: It gives dates and clock times like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    7. present: It gives clock times and dates such as "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m."
    8. present: Provides clock times and dates such as "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m."
    9. present: Provides dates and clock times like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    10. present: It gives dates and clock times like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m."
    11. present: It cites dates and clock times like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m."
    12. present: Gives clock times and dates, "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m." and "April 15".
    13. present: Gives clock times and dates like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m."
    14. present: It provides clock times and dates such as "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    15. present: It gives clock times like "10:25 p.m." and dates "April 11, 2024", conveying when.
    16. present: Gives clock times and dates such as "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m."
    17. present: It gives exact dates and times such as "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    18. present: It gives clock times and dates such as "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    19. present: It gives clock times and dates like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    20. present: It states clock times and dates such as "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    21. present: Provides dates and clock times like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    22. present: Gives specific dates and times like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m."
    23. present: It cites dates and clock times like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    24. present: It gives dates and times like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
    25. present: It gives clock times and dates like "April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 p.m.".
  • Impactpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Present by unanimous 25-0 read; the shooting alert conveys lethal danger to people beyond merely naming the hazard.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Reports a shooting in which a man sustained a gunshot wound and was hospitalized, a stated injury.
    2. present: Reports a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury.
    3. present: Reports a shooting in which a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury to a person.
    4. present: It reports a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, an explicit injury.
    5. present: It reports a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated serious injury.
    6. present: Reports a man sustained a gunshot wound, a stated injury from gunfire.
    7. present: It reports a shooting where a man sustained a gunshot wound and was hospitalized which is a stated injury.
    8. present: Reports two shootings, one in which a man sustained a gunshot wound, a stated injury.
    9. present: Reports a shooting in which a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury.
    10. present: The notice states a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, an explicit injury to a person.
    11. present: Reports a shooting where a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury.
    12. present: The notice states a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury.
    13. present: The notice reports a shooting in which a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury.
    14. present: Reports a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury.
    15. present: Reports a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury.
    16. present: The notice states a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, an explicit serious harm to a person.
    17. present: It reports a shooting in which a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury.
    18. present: The message states a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, an explicit stated injury.
    19. present: It reports a shooting in which a man sustained a gunshot wound and was hospitalized, a clearly stated harm.
    20. present: Reports a shooting in which a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated injury.
    21. present: Reports a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital which is a stated injury.
    22. present: States a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, an explicit reported injury.
    23. present: Reports a shooting in which a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a stated harm.
    24. present: The notice reports a shooting in which a man sustained a gunshot wound and was hospitalized, a stated injury.
    25. present: Reports a man sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to a hospital, a clear stated injury.

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

Two shootings occurred at the same commercial establishment in the 9000 block of Baltimore Avenue in College Park, Maryland, within four days of each other. The first shooting on April 11, 2024, at approximately 10:25 PM EDT left one man with a gunshot wound; he was transported to a local hospital. The second shooting on April 15, 2024, at approximately 11:26 PM EDT occurred outside the same business but resulted in no injuries. Both incidents were investigated by the Prince George's County Police Department rather than campus police, as the location was off campus. The UMD Police Department issued a community advisory on April 16 combining both incidents and reminded the campus community about safety resources including walking escort services, the UMD Shuttle/Bus system, and the importance of reporting suspicious activity. The proximity of the shooting location to the campus and student-frequented businesses along Baltimore Avenue heightened concern among the university community.
Analysis

Key Findings

Both shootings occurred at the same off-campus commercial establishment on Baltimore Avenue within four days
UMD chose to issue a combined community advisory rather than individual emergency notifications, reflecting the off-campus nature of the incidents
The combined advisory was issued April 16, the day after the second shooting and five days after the first
Outcome
The Prince George's County Police Department investigated both incidents. UMD Police issued a community advisory on April 16 with safety resources for the campus community.
Provenance

Sources

  1. Official
  2. Official
  3. News
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "University of Maryland, College Park: Two shootings outside the same nearby business four days apart; one wounded." Incident of April 11, 2024. Added May 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/university-of-maryland-shooting-2024-04-11/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
shootingoff-campusrepeat-locationmarylandbig-tencommunity-advisoryadvisorybaltimore-avenue
Added May 2026Updated May 2026Via ingestion