Robbery at 1000 block Olivia Ave (off campus)

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the source is identified: this numbered Crime Alert cites the Ann Arbor Police and directs tips to the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It cites the Ann Arbor Police and directs information to the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  2. present: It cites 'the Ann Arbor Police' and the 'U-M Division of Public Safety and Security' as authorities.
  3. present: It is a U-M "Crime Alert" citing the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  4. present: It is a numbered 'Crime Alert' citing the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  5. present: It cites the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  6. present: It is a numbered U-M 'Crime Alert' citing the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  7. present: It is 'Crime Alert 2019-8' and asks readers to contact the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  8. present: It cites the Ann Arbor Police and directs information to the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  9. present: It cites 'the Ann Arbor Police' and the 'U-M Division of Public Safety and Security', identifying the authorities.
  10. present: It is a numbered 'Crime Alert' that cites the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  11. present: It is 'Crime Alert 2019-8' citing the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security as contacts.
  12. present: It cites the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security in this Crime Alert.
  13. present: The Crime Alert cites the Ann Arbor Police and U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  14. present: The 'Crime Alert 2019-8' refers readers to the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security and names Ann Arbor Police.
  15. present: It is "Crime Alert 2019-8" and directs contact to the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  16. present: It cites the Ann Arbor Police and the 'U-M Division of Public Safety and Security' as sources.
  17. present: It references the Ann Arbor Police and says to contact 'the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security', naming authorities.
  18. present: It cites the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security as the authorities.
  19. present: It is a numbered Crime Alert directing information to the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  20. present: The 'Crime Alert 2019-8' cites the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  21. present: It directs information to 'the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security' and cites the Ann Arbor Police, identifying the source.
  22. present: It is 'Crime Alert 2019-8' citing the Ann Arbor Police and the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security.
  23. present: It cites 'the Ann Arbor Police' and gives the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security as contact.
  24. present: It is labeled 'Crime Alert 2019-8' and refers to the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security and Ann Arbor Police.
  25. present: It is a numbered U-M 'Crime Alert' naming the U-M Division of Public Safety and Security and Ann Arbor Police.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: the alert names an "Unarmed Robbery" in which four males stole a student's cell phone and wallet, a specific threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names an "Unarmed Robbery" where four males stole a student's phone and wallet.
  2. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which a phone and wallet were stolen.
  3. present: It names an "Unarmed Robbery" in which four males approached a student and stole his phone and wallet.
  4. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which a suspect stole a phone and wallet.
  5. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which a phone and wallet were stolen.
  6. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which the victim's phone and wallet were stolen.
  7. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which suspects stole a phone and wallet.
  8. present: It names an Unarmed Robbery by four males who stole a phone and wallet.
  9. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which a suspect punched the victim and stole his phone and wallet.
  10. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which four males punched a student and took his phone and wallet.
  11. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which four males stole a student's cell phone and wallet.
  12. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which a cell phone and wallet were stolen.
  13. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which four males stole a phone and wallet.
  14. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' where a student's phone and wallet were stolen.
  15. present: It names an "Unarmed Robbery" by four males in dark hoodies who stole a phone and wallet.
  16. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which a student's phone and wallet were stolen.
  17. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' where a student's phone and wallet were stolen, a specific crime.
  18. present: It is headed 'Unarmed Robbery' and describes four males robbing a student.
  19. present: It names an unarmed robbery in which a phone and wallet were stolen.
  20. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which a student was punched and robbed.
  21. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which four males stole a student's phone and wallet.
  22. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which a phone and wallet were stolen.
  23. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' where a student was punched and robbed.
  24. present: It names an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which four males stole a phone and wallet.
  25. present: It reports an 'Unarmed Robbery' in which a suspect punched the victim and stole his phone and wallet.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: the robbery is placed "on Olivia Ave." with the suspects last seen running towards Cambridge Rd.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It locates the robbery "on Olivia Ave." with suspects running toward Cambridge Rd.
  2. present: It places the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects fleeing toward Cambridge Rd.
  3. present: It says the robbery happened "on Olivia Ave." and suspects ran toward "Cambridge Rd."
  4. present: It places the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects running 'towards Cambridge Rd.'.
  5. present: It places the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects running toward Cambridge Rd.
  6. present: It places the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects fleeing toward Cambridge Rd.
  7. present: It places the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects fleeing toward Cambridge Rd.
  8. present: The robbery occurred on Olivia Ave., with suspects running toward Cambridge Rd.
  9. present: It says the student was approached 'on Olivia Ave.' and suspects ran 'towards Cambridge Rd.'.
  10. present: It says the robbery happened 'on Olivia Ave.' and suspects ran 'towards Cambridge Rd.'.
  11. present: The student was approached 'on Olivia Ave.', and suspects ran 'towards Cambridge Rd.'
  12. present: It locates the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects fleeing 'towards Cambridge Rd.'.
  13. present: The robbery occurred on 'Olivia Ave.', and the four suspects were last seen running toward 'Cambridge Rd.'.
  14. present: The robbery happened 'on Olivia Ave.', with suspects running toward Cambridge Rd.
  15. present: It says the robbery was "on Olivia Ave." with suspects running toward Cambridge Rd.
  16. present: It locates the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects fleeing toward Cambridge Rd.
  17. present: It places the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects running 'towards Cambridge Rd.'.
  18. present: It says the robbery occurred 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects running toward Cambridge Rd.
  19. present: It places the robbery on Olivia Ave. with suspects running toward Cambridge Rd.
  20. present: The robbery occurred 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects running toward Cambridge Rd.
  21. present: It says the robbery occurred 'on Olivia Ave.' and suspects ran towards Cambridge Rd.
  22. present: It places the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects running toward Cambridge Rd.
  23. present: It places the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects running 'towards Cambridge Rd.'
  24. present: It places the robbery 'on Olivia Ave.' with suspects running toward 'Cambridge Rd.'
  25. present: It places the robbery on 'Olivia Ave.' with suspects running toward 'Cambridge Rd.'.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find protective guidance in the reminder list, such as "Walk with a trusted friend" and "Keep all exterior doors and windows locked".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Its reminders tell readers to "Keep all exterior doors and windows locked" and walk with a trusted friend.
  2. present: It advises 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked' and to walk with a trusted friend.
  3. present: It advises "Keep all exterior doors and windows locked" and "Walk with a trusted friend", protective actions.
  4. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  5. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  6. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  7. present: It advises readers to 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked' and walk with a trusted friend.
  8. present: It lists 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked' and walking with a trusted friend.
  9. present: It lists protective tips like 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked' and 'Walk with a trusted friend'.
  10. present: It advises readers to 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked' and walk with a trusted friend.
  11. present: It lists actions such as 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  12. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  13. present: It advises readers to 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  14. present: It lists actions like 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  15. present: It advises "Walk with a trusted friend" and "Keep all exterior doors and windows locked".
  16. present: It advises readers to 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  17. present: It advises 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked' and walking with a friend, protective actions.
  18. present: It lists steps such as 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  19. present: It advises keeping doors and windows locked, walking with a trusted friend, and having keys in hand.
  20. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  21. present: It lists actions such as 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  22. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  23. present: It lists actions such as 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
  24. present: It tells readers to 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked' and walk with a trusted friend, which are protective actions.
  25. present: It lists protective steps like 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Keep all exterior doors and windows locked'.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: the text gives no date, clock time, or recency cue for the robbery; only the alert number 2019-8 hints at a year.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue appears in the alert text.
  2. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue is given for the robbery.
  3. absent: No date, clock time or recency word such as "today" appears in this crime alert.
  4. absent: The summary gives no date, clock time, or recency cue for the robbery.
  5. absent: No date or clock time for the robbery appears in the text.
  6. absent: No date or clock time for the robbery appears in the alert text.
  7. absent: No date, clock time, or recency term such as 'today' or 'ongoing' appears in the alert.
  8. absent: The alert gives no date, clock time, or recency word for when the robbery happened.
  9. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue for the robbery appears in the alert text.
  10. absent: The summary gives no date, clock time, or recency cue for when the robbery happened.
  11. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue is given for when the robbery happened or the alert was sent.
  12. absent: Apart from the alert number, it gives no date, clock time, or recency cue for the robbery.
  13. absent: The alert gives no date, clock time, or recency word for when the robbery happened.
  14. absent: No date, clock time, or recency word appears in this alert text.
  15. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue appears anywhere for when this Olivia Ave. robbery occurred.
  16. absent: No date, clock time or recency cue appears; only the alert number 2019-8 hints at the year.
  17. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue is given for the robbery.
  18. absent: No date, clock time, or recency word appears in the summary or the tips.
  19. absent: The summary gives no date, clock time, or recency cue for the robbery.
  20. absent: No date, clock time, or recency word appears in the alert text.
  21. absent: It gives no date, clock time, or recency cue for when the robbery happened.
  22. absent: The alert gives no date, clock time, or recency cue for when the robbery happened.
  23. absent: No date or clock time for the robbery is given beyond the alert number '2019-8'.
  24. absent: It gives no date, clock time, or recency word for the robbery.
  25. absent: No date or clock time for the robbery or the alert appears in the text.
• Impactpresent20/25

  Final assessment

  A clear majority (20 of 25) find impact because "One suspect punched the victim in the face" states physical harm; five dissenters said no injury severity or wider danger is stated.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It says a suspect "punched the victim in the face", stating actual physical harm.
  2. present: It says 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', stating physical harm.
  3. present: It reports that "One suspect punched the victim in the face", stating physical harm to a person.
  4. present: It says 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', stating physical harm.
  5. present: It says 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', stating physical harm.
  6. absent: It describes the punch as part of the robbery but states no resulting injury or severity.
  7. present: It says a suspect 'punched the victim in the face', describing physical harm from the robbery.
  8. present: It states that one suspect 'punched the victim in the face', describing physical harm.
  9. absent: It describes the punch and theft but states no injury outcome or severity for recipients.
  10. absent: It narrates the punch but does not state injury severity or what the threat could do to others.
  11. present: It says 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', stating physical harm to the student.
  12. present: It says 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', stating physical harm to a person.
  13. present: It says a suspect 'punched the victim in the face', an explicit physical harm.
  14. present: It states 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', conveying physical harm.
  15. present: It states "One suspect punched the victim in the face", an explicit harm.
  16. present: It states 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', a described physical harm.
  17. present: It states 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', conveying physical harm.
  18. present: It states 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', conveying physical harm.
  19. present: It says a suspect punched the victim in the face, stating physical harm to a person.
  20. present: It says 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', conveying physical harm.
  21. present: It says 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', which states physical harm done in the robbery.
  22. present: It says 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', a stated physical harm.
  23. absent: It recounts a punch and theft but states no injury outcome or severity.
  24. present: It states 'One suspect punched the victim in the face', describing physical harm to the victim.
  25. absent: It notes the victim was punched but uses no words stating injury severity or potential consequences.