assault campus emergency notice

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25 agree. The first entry closes "Police are responding" and later ones report subjects "in custody", naming law enforcement as the authority behind this update stream.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The closing line "Police are responding" identifies a responding authority behind the message.
  2. present: The updates attribute action to police, who have subjects "in custody" and are "responding".
  3. present: "Police are responding" and "in custody" identify law enforcement as the responding authority behind the updates.
  4. present: It says "Police are responding" and reports subjects taken into custody, identifying a responding authority.
  5. present: It says "Police are responding" and reports subjects taken into custody, identifying the responding authority.
  6. present: "Police are responding" identifies a responding agency issuing the update stream.
  7. present: The text says "Police are responding" and reports custody status, identifying law enforcement as the source.
  8. present: "Police are responding" and the custody updates identify law enforcement as the issuing authority.
  9. present: The messages state "Police are responding" and report subjects taken into custody, identifying law enforcement.
  10. present: "Police are responding" and the custody updates identify law enforcement as the issuing authority.
  11. present: "Police are responding" and the campus operating status framing identify the responding authority.
  12. present: It attributes the response to "Police" who "are responding" and later took subjects into custody.
  13. present: It refers to "Police are responding" and reports subjects in custody, identifying a responding authority.
  14. present: "Police are responding" and the custody updates show a police authority issuing the message.
  15. present: Police are cited as responding and holding subjects, marking an official law enforcement voice.
  16. present: "Police are responding" and the custody updates identify law enforcement as the source of the messages.
  17. present: It reports that "Police are responding" and that subjects are "in custody", identifying law enforcement as the source.
  18. present: Police are named as responding and holding subjects in custody, identifying the responding authority.
  19. present: "Police are responding" plus the all clear on campus conditions identify a law enforcement sender.
  20. present: "Police are responding" identifies the responding authority issuing these updates.
  21. present: Police are named as responding and taking subjects into custody, identifying the responding authority.
  22. present: "Police are responding" identifies the responding authority issuing these updates.
  23. present: It attributes the response to "Police" who "are responding" and are taking subjects into custody.
  24. present: Police are named as responding and holding subjects in custody, identifying the responding authority.
  25. present: "Police are responding" and the "ALL CLEAR" framing show an official policing authority issuing this.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Every entry names the threat as an "assault", with "Two of three subjects involved with assault" still uncaught at 7:26 p.m.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names the hazard as an "assault" involving subjects taken into custody.
  2. present: The named hazard is an "assault" involving three subjects.
  3. present: It names an "assault" with subjects involved, a specific offense rather than a generic incident.
  4. present: The hazard is given as an "assault" involving multiple subjects.
  5. present: The hazard is named as an "assault" involving multiple subjects.
  6. present: The message names an "assault" with subjects in custody, a specific violent offense.
  7. present: The hazard is an "assault" with multiple subjects involved.
  8. present: It names an "assault" involving multiple subjects as the hazard.
  9. present: It names an "assault" with multiple subjects involved, a specific violent act.
  10. present: The hazard is named as an "assault" involving subjects now in custody.
  11. present: The hazard is stated plainly as an "assault" involving multiple subjects.
  12. present: The named hazard is an "assault" involving multiple subjects.
  13. present: The threat is named as an "assault" involving multiple subjects.
  14. present: The hazard is stated plainly as an "assault" involving subjects, two later taken into custody.
  15. present: The event is named as an assault with multiple subjects involved.
  16. present: It names an "assault" involving three subjects as the threat.
  17. present: The hazard is named plainly as an "assault" involving multiple subjects.
  18. present: It names an "assault" with three subjects involved, a specific violent offense.
  19. present: The named threat is an "assault" involving multiple subjects.
  20. present: The message names an "assault" with subjects involved, a specific violent threat.
  21. present: The hazard is stated as an "assault" with multiple subjects involved, a specific violent act.
  22. present: It specifies an "assault" with subjects taken into custody.
  23. present: The threat is named as an "assault" with subjects involved, not merely an unspecified incident.
  24. present: The message names an "assault" involving multiple subjects.
  25. present: The hazard is stated plainly as an "assault" involving subjects now in custody.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The scene is fixed at "Tenth and Locust streets", repeated as the "area of Tenth and Locust streets" recipients must avoid.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The scene is given as "Tenth and Locust streets".
  2. present: It repeats the corner of "Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
  3. present: It repeatedly names "Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
  4. present: It pinpoints "Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
  5. present: It pinpoints "Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
  6. present: It places the assault at "Tenth and Locust streets".
  7. present: It names "area of Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
  8. present: It locates the incident at "Tenth and Locust streets".
  9. present: The location given is "Tenth and Locust streets".
  10. present: It places the incident at "Tenth and Locust streets".
  11. present: It names the "area of Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
  12. present: It pinpoints "Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
  13. present: It gives "Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
  14. present: It names the "area of Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene to avoid.
  15. present: The scene is given as "Tenth and Locust streets".
  16. present: The scene is "Tenth and Locust streets", a specific intersection.
  17. present: It pinpoints "Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene of the assault.
  18. present: It pins the scene at "Tenth and Locust streets".
  19. present: It names "Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
  20. present: It fixes the scene at "Tenth and Locust streets".
  21. present: It locates the assault at "Tenth and Locust streets" and refers to that area.
  22. present: The scene is given as "Tenth and Locust streets".
  23. present: It pinpoints "area of Tenth and Locust streets" as the place to avoid.
  24. present: The scene is given as "Tenth and Locust streets".
  25. present: It names "Tenth and Locust streets" as the scene.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The alert orders "Stay away from or leave the area", reinforced by "Stay away from area of Tenth and Locust streets" in the update.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area", a clear protective action.
  2. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  3. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  4. present: It tells readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  5. present: It instructs "Stay away from or leave the area".
  6. present: It directs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  7. present: It directs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area."
  8. present: It directs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  9. present: It instructs the community to "Stay away from or leave the area."
  10. present: It tells recipients to "Stay away from or leave the area."
  11. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  12. present: It directs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area."
  13. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  14. present: Recipients are told to "Stay away from or leave the area" while the situation is unresolved.
  15. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  16. present: It orders readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  17. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay away from or leave the area", a direct protective action.
  18. present: It directs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  19. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area."
  20. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area", a clear protective action.
  21. present: It instructs "Stay away from or leave the area", a direct protective action.
  22. present: Recipients are told to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  23. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away from or leave the area", a direct protective action.
  24. present: It instructs the community to "Stay away from or leave the area".
  25. present: Recipients are told to "Stay away from or leave the area".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Each entry carries a clock time, "7:12 p.m." through the "7:34 p.m." all clear, under a "December 28, 2020" header.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Each entry is stamped, running "7:12 p.m." to "7:34 p.m." on December 28, 2020.
  2. present: The three messages are timestamped 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m. on December 28, 2020.
  3. present: Three timestamped entries, 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m., mark the sequence.
  4. present: Entries are stamped "7:12 p.m.", "7:26 p.m." and "7:34 p.m." on December 28, 2020.
  5. present: Each update is stamped, 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m.
  6. present: Times of 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m. on December 28, 2020 mark the sequence.
  7. present: Three timestamped updates run from 7:12 p.m. to 7:34 p.m.
  8. present: Three updates carry clock times from "7:12 p.m." to "7:34 p.m." on December 28, 2020.
  9. present: Three timestamped updates run from 7:12 p.m. to 7:34 p.m.
  10. present: Each update is timestamped 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m. on December 28, 2020.
  11. present: Each entry carries a clock time, from "7:12 p.m." to the "7:34 p.m." all clear.
  12. present: The three entries are stamped 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m.
  13. present: Updates are stamped 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m. on December 28, 2020.
  14. present: Each entry is clock stamped at 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m. on December 28, 2020.
  15. present: Three timed updates run from 7:12 p.m. to the 7:34 p.m. all clear.
  16. present: Each message is timestamped 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m. on December 28, 2020.
  17. present: Each message is stamped, from "7:12 p.m." through the "7:34 p.m." all clear on December 28, 2020.
  18. present: Updates are stamped 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m. on December 28, 2020.
  19. present: Each entry is timed, from "7:12 p.m." to "7:34 p.m." on December 28, 2020.
  20. present: Updates are stamped "7:12 p.m.", "7:26 p.m." and "7:34 p.m." on a dated day.
  21. present: Three timestamped entries, 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m., mark the sequence on December 28, 2020.
  22. present: Three timestamped updates run from 7:12 p.m. to 7:34 p.m. on December 28, 2020.
  23. present: Each update is time stamped 7:12, 7:26 and 7:34 p.m. on December 28, 2020.
  24. present: Three stamped updates run from 7:12 p.m. to the 7:34 p.m. all clear on December 28, 2020.
  25. present: Three stamped updates run from 7:12 p.m. to 7:34 p.m.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. No line says what harm the assault caused or threatened; the close reports only that campus is "back to operating under normal conditions".

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Beyond saying normal conditions resumed, the text never describes the harm the assault suspects posed.
  2. absent: Nothing describes injury potential or how serious the assault threat is.
  3. absent: Nothing states what the assault could do to bystanders or how dangerous the subjects were.
  4. absent: No harm, injury or severity is described, and the last line says conditions are normal.
  5. absent: Nothing conveys how dangerous the assault was or what harm could come to others.
  6. absent: Nothing conveys potential harm or severity beyond naming the offense.
  7. absent: No injury, danger or severity is described, only the status of suspects.
  8. absent: It reports custody and normal operations without describing any harm or severity.
  9. absent: Beyond naming an assault, no injury, danger level or possible consequence is described.
  10. absent: No consequence or severity of the assault is described to the reader.
  11. absent: No sentence conveys severity or what the assault suspects might do to others.
  12. absent: No danger level or possible harm is conveyed, only custody status and a return to normal conditions.
  13. absent: Nothing describes injuries, danger level, or what the assault could lead to.
  14. absent: Nothing describes the severity of the assault or what the loose third subject might do.
  15. absent: No consequence or danger level is described, only the fact of an assault.
  16. absent: No sentence conveys how dangerous the assault suspects are or what harm might result.
  17. absent: No severity or consequence is conveyed; it closes by saying campus is "operating under normal conditions".
  18. absent: Nothing describes injuries or the danger the remaining subject might pose.
  19. absent: Nothing conveys how dangerous the assault situation is or what harm might result.
  20. absent: Nothing describes injury, danger or severity arising from the assault.
  21. absent: Nothing about injury, danger or severity is stated beyond the bare word assault.
  22. absent: Beyond naming an assault, nothing describes possible injury or how serious the threat is.
  23. absent: Nothing states the potential harm; the final message says campus is back to normal without describing severity.
  24. absent: No indication of how dangerous the assault is or what harm could follow.
  25. absent: No line conveys danger level or possible injury from the assault.