Shooting near East 23rd and Willamette
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedUO Alert told the campus to avoid East 23rd and Willamette for a shooting, then posted all-clear 55 minutes later.
- Alerts
- 2
- Response
- —
- Killed
- —
- Injured
- —
Alert Sequence
2 messages in sequence · 2 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
3/3/25 3:23 p.m. Location: East 23rd & Willamette What/Suspect Description: Shooting near East 23rd & Willamette Law enforcement is responding. What-to-do: Avoid the area. If you can provide information about this incident call 541-346-2919. In emergencies or if you see a crime being committed, call 9-1-1. Resources and updates when and if available will be posted to alerts.uoregon.edu.
Sourceabsent0/25
Final assessment
No branded sender. Majority 0/25.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: I read no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product in this first burst (no branded UO Alert , pass 1).
- absent: No branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product is present on my read (no branded UO Alert , pass 2).
- absent: I score this element from no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 3).
- absent: The deciding words are no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 4).
- absent: Verdict follows no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product in the body (no branded UO Alert , pass 5).
- absent: I mark this from no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 6).
- absent: No branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product satisfies the rubric here (no branded UO Alert , pass 7).
- absent: My pass treats no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product as the cue (no branded UO Alert , pass 8).
- absent: I find no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product and code accordingly (no branded UO Alert , pass 9).
- absent: Element turns on no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 10).
- absent: I count this because of no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 11).
- absent: The text gives no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 12).
- absent: I rely on no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 13).
- absent: Present or absent per no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 14).
- absent: I do not need more than no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 15).
- absent: Coding follows no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 16).
- absent: I note no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product as the tell (no branded UO Alert , pass 17).
- absent: This pass keys off no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 18).
- absent: I take no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product as sufficient (no branded UO Alert , pass 19).
- absent: The body states no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 20).
- absent: I judge from no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 21).
- absent: No branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product is the evidence I use (no branded UO Alert , pass 22).
- absent: I apply the rubric to no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 23).
- absent: My reason is no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 24).
- absent: I close on no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal product (no branded UO Alert , pass 25).
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
Shooting names a specific hazard. Majority 25/25.
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: I read shooting near East 23rd and Willamette in this first burst (shooting near East 2, pass 1).
- present: Shooting near East 23rd and Willamette is present on my read (shooting near East 2, pass 2).
- present: I score this element from shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 3).
- present: The deciding words are shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 4).
- present: Verdict follows shooting near East 23rd and Willamette in the body (shooting near East 2, pass 5).
- present: I mark this from shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 6).
- present: Shooting near East 23rd and Willamette satisfies the rubric here (shooting near East 2, pass 7).
- present: My pass treats shooting near East 23rd and Willamette as the cue (shooting near East 2, pass 8).
- present: I find shooting near East 23rd and Willamette and code accordingly (shooting near East 2, pass 9).
- present: Element turns on shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 10).
- present: I count this because of shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 11).
- present: The text gives shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 12).
- present: I rely on shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 13).
- present: Present or absent per shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 14).
- present: I do not need more than shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 15).
- present: Coding follows shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 16).
- present: I note shooting near East 23rd and Willamette as the tell (shooting near East 2, pass 17).
- present: This pass keys off shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 18).
- present: I take shooting near East 23rd and Willamette as sufficient (shooting near East 2, pass 19).
- present: The body states shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 20).
- present: I judge from shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 21).
- present: Shooting near East 23rd and Willamette is the evidence I use (shooting near East 2, pass 22).
- present: I apply the rubric to shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 23).
- present: My reason is shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 24).
- present: I close on shooting near East 23rd and Willamette (shooting near East 2, pass 25).
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
East 23rd and Willamette is a named place. Majority 25/25.
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: I read East 23rd and Willamette as the named place in this first burst (East 23rd and Willam, pass 1).
- present: East 23rd and Willamette as the named place is present on my read (East 23rd and Willam, pass 2).
- present: I score this element from East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 3).
- present: The deciding words are East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 4).
- present: Verdict follows East 23rd and Willamette as the named place in the body (East 23rd and Willam, pass 5).
- present: I mark this from East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 6).
- present: East 23rd and Willamette as the named place satisfies the rubric here (East 23rd and Willam, pass 7).
- present: My pass treats East 23rd and Willamette as the named place as the cue (East 23rd and Willam, pass 8).
- present: I find East 23rd and Willamette as the named place and code accordingly (East 23rd and Willam, pass 9).
- present: Element turns on East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 10).
- present: I count this because of East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 11).
- present: The text gives East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 12).
- present: I rely on East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 13).
- present: Present or absent per East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 14).
- present: I do not need more than East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 15).
- present: Coding follows East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 16).
- present: I note East 23rd and Willamette as the named place as the tell (East 23rd and Willam, pass 17).
- present: This pass keys off East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 18).
- present: I take East 23rd and Willamette as the named place as sufficient (East 23rd and Willam, pass 19).
- present: The body states East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 20).
- present: I judge from East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 21).
- present: East 23rd and Willamette as the named place is the evidence I use (East 23rd and Willam, pass 22).
- present: I apply the rubric to East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 23).
- present: My reason is East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 24).
- present: I close on East 23rd and Willamette as the named place (East 23rd and Willam, pass 25).
Guidancepresent25/25
Final assessment
Avoid the area is a protective instruction. Majority 25/25.
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: I read Avoid the area as the protective instruction in this first burst (Avoid the area as th, pass 1).
- present: Avoid the area as the protective instruction is present on my read (Avoid the area as th, pass 2).
- present: I score this element from Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 3).
- present: The deciding words are Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 4).
- present: Verdict follows Avoid the area as the protective instruction in the body (Avoid the area as th, pass 5).
- present: I mark this from Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 6).
- present: Avoid the area as the protective instruction satisfies the rubric here (Avoid the area as th, pass 7).
- present: My pass treats Avoid the area as the protective instruction as the cue (Avoid the area as th, pass 8).
- present: I find Avoid the area as the protective instruction and code accordingly (Avoid the area as th, pass 9).
- present: Element turns on Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 10).
- present: I count this because of Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 11).
- present: The text gives Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 12).
- present: I rely on Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 13).
- present: Present or absent per Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 14).
- present: I do not need more than Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 15).
- present: Coding follows Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 16).
- present: I note Avoid the area as the protective instruction as the tell (Avoid the area as th, pass 17).
- present: This pass keys off Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 18).
- present: I take Avoid the area as the protective instruction as sufficient (Avoid the area as th, pass 19).
- present: The body states Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 20).
- present: I judge from Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 21).
- present: Avoid the area as the protective instruction is the evidence I use (Avoid the area as th, pass 22).
- present: I apply the rubric to Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 23).
- present: My reason is Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 24).
- present: I close on Avoid the area as the protective instruction (Avoid the area as th, pass 25).
Timepresent25/25
Final assessment
3/3/25 3:23 p.m. is a date and clock. Majority 25/25.
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: I read 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock in this first burst (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 1).
- present: 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock is present on my read (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 2).
- present: I score this element from 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 3).
- present: The deciding words are 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 4).
- present: Verdict follows 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock in the body (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 5).
- present: I mark this from 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 6).
- present: 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock satisfies the rubric here (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 7).
- present: My pass treats 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock as the cue (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 8).
- present: I find 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock and code accordingly (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 9).
- present: Element turns on 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 10).
- present: I count this because of 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 11).
- present: The text gives 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 12).
- present: I rely on 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 13).
- present: Present or absent per 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 14).
- present: I do not need more than 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 15).
- present: Coding follows 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 16).
- present: I note 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock as the tell (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 17).
- present: This pass keys off 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 18).
- present: I take 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock as sufficient (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 19).
- present: The body states 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 20).
- present: I judge from 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 21).
- present: 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock is the evidence I use (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 22).
- present: I apply the rubric to 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 23).
- present: My reason is 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 24).
- present: I close on 3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as date and clock (3/3/25 3:23 p.m. as , pass 25).
Impactabsent0/25
Final assessment
No consequence in the first burst. Majority 0/25.
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: I read no injury clause in the first burst in this first burst (no injury clause in , pass 1).
- absent: No injury clause in the first burst is present on my read (no injury clause in , pass 2).
- absent: I score this element from no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 3).
- absent: The deciding words are no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 4).
- absent: Verdict follows no injury clause in the first burst in the body (no injury clause in , pass 5).
- absent: I mark this from no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 6).
- absent: No injury clause in the first burst satisfies the rubric here (no injury clause in , pass 7).
- absent: My pass treats no injury clause in the first burst as the cue (no injury clause in , pass 8).
- absent: I find no injury clause in the first burst and code accordingly (no injury clause in , pass 9).
- absent: Element turns on no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 10).
- absent: I count this because of no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 11).
- absent: The text gives no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 12).
- absent: I rely on no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 13).
- absent: Present or absent per no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 14).
- absent: I do not need more than no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 15).
- absent: Coding follows no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 16).
- absent: I note no injury clause in the first burst as the tell (no injury clause in , pass 17).
- absent: This pass keys off no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 18).
- absent: I take no injury clause in the first burst as sufficient (no injury clause in , pass 19).
- absent: The body states no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 20).
- absent: I judge from no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 21).
- absent: No injury clause in the first burst is the evidence I use (no injury clause in , pass 22).
- absent: I apply the rubric to no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 23).
- absent: My reason is no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 24).
- absent: I close on no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 25).
Coded by SuperGrok Heavy 4.5
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
Background
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- Official
- Official
Campus Alert Archive. "University of Oregon: Shooting near East 23rd and Willamette." Incident of March 3, 2025. Added August 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/university-of-oregon-23rd-willamette-shooting-2025-03-03/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.