Robbery without a weapon on the 3500 block of Market

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present. UPennAlert or Public Safety identifies the issuing authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded tag UPennAlert identifies the sender, and police on scene names a responding agency.
  2. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender, and police on scene names a responding authority.
  3. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and "police" are named on scene.
  4. present: The branded opening UPennAlert and police on scene identify the source and responding authority.
  5. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies who is sending the alert, and police are named on scene.
  6. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies who is sending the message.
  7. present: The branded UPennAlert tag identifies the sender, and police are named as on scene.
  8. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender, and police are named as on scene.
  9. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and "police on scene" names a responding agency.
  10. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies who is sending the message, and police are named on scene.
  11. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender, and police on scene names a responding agency.
  12. present: The message opens with the branded signature "UPennAlert", which identifies the sender.
  13. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender, and police on scene names a responding authority.
  14. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies who is sending the message.
  15. present: UPennAlert is a branded sender tag that counts as source.
  16. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender, and police names the responding agency.
  17. present: The branded tag "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and "police on scene" names a responding agency.
  18. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and "police on scene" names a responding agency.
  19. present: The branded tag "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and "police on scene" names a responding agency.
  20. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and police are named on scene.
  21. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sending system.
  22. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and "police on scene" names a responding agency.
  23. present: The branded tag UPennAlert and police on scene identify the sender and responding authority.
  24. present: The branded tag "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and "police on scene" names a responding agency.
  25. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and "police on scene" names a responding agency.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present. The text names a specific threat such as shots, robbery, or inclement weather.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names robbery no weapon, a specific crime threat.
  2. present: It names ROBBERY NO WEAPON, a specific crime threat.
  3. present: It names "ROBBERY NO WEAPON" as the specific crime threat.
  4. present: It names a robbery with no weapon, which is a specific crime threat.
  5. present: ROBBERY NO WEAPON names a specific crime as the threat.
  6. present: It names "ROBBERY NO WEAPON", a specific crime threat.
  7. present: The alert names a robbery with no weapon, which is a specific crime threat.
  8. present: It names a robbery with no weapon, which is a specific threat.
  9. present: It names "ROBBERY NO WEAPON", a specific crime threat.
  10. present: It names "ROBBERY NO WEAPON", a specific crime threat rather than a generic incident.
  11. present: ROBBERY NO WEAPON names a specific crime type as the threat.
  12. present: It names "ROBBERY NO WEAPON", and robbery is a specific named threat.
  13. present: It names ROBBERY NO WEAPON, a specific crime threat.
  14. present: It names the specific crime "ROBBERY NO WEAPON".
  15. present: ROBBERY NO WEAPON names a specific crime threat rather than a generic emergency.
  16. present: It names ROBBERY NO WEAPON, a specific crime threat.
  17. present: It names "ROBBERY NO WEAPON" as the specific threat.
  18. present: It names "ROBBERY NO WEAPON", a specific threat.
  19. present: It names "ROBBERY", a specific threat, and adds "NO WEAPON".
  20. present: It names "ROBBERY", a specific crime threat listed in the hazard examples.
  21. present: It names a specific crime threat: ROBBERY NO WEAPON.
  22. present: The text names "ROBBERY NO WEAPON", a specific crime threat listed in the hazard examples.
  23. present: It names robbery with no weapon, a specific crime threat.
  24. present: It names "ROBBERY", a specific threat, and adds "NO WEAPON".
  25. present: It names "ROBBERY NO WEAPON", a specific crime threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present. A street, block, or campus location is given.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It places the robbery at the 3500 block of Market Street, with travel east on Market Street.
  2. present: It places the robbery at the 3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET with travel East on Market Street.
  3. present: It places the robbery in the "3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET" with travel east on Market Street.
  4. present: It places the robbery in the area of the 3500 block of Market Street, with travel east on Market Street.
  5. present: The robbery is located at the 3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET, with travel east on Market Street.
  6. present: It places the robbery at the "3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET" heading east on Market Street.
  7. present: The robbery is on the 3500 block of Market Street, with travel east on Market Street.
  8. present: It places the robbery at the 3500 block of Market Street, with travel east on Market Street.
  9. present: It places the robbery at the "3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET" and travel "East on Market Street".
  10. present: The report is "in the area of 3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET", with travel east on Market Street.
  11. present: It places the robbery in the 3500 block of Market Street, with travel east on Market Street.
  12. present: It places the event at the "3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET" with travel east on Market Street.
  13. present: It places the robbery in the 3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET and travel east on Market Street.
  14. present: It places the robbery at the "3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET" and travel east on Market Street.
  15. present: The robbery is placed in the area of the 3500 block of Market Street, with travel east on Market Street.
  16. present: The robbery is at 3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET, with travel east on Market Street.
  17. present: It places the robbery in the "3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET" with travel east on Market Street.
  18. present: It places the incident at the "3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET" with travel east on Market Street.
  19. present: It places the robbery in "the area of 3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET" with travel east on Market Street.
  20. present: It places the robbery in the area of the 3500 block of Market Street, with travel east on Market Street.
  21. present: It places the robbery at the 3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET and travel east on Market Street.
  22. present: It places the robbery in "the area of 3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET" with travel east on Market Street.
  23. present: It places the robbery at the 3500 block of Market Street, with travel east on Market Street.
  24. present: The robbery is at the "3500 BLOCK MARKET STREET", with travel east on Market Street.
  25. present: It places the robbery at the 3500 block of Market Street, with travel east on Market Street.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present. Recipients are told a protective action such as use caution, avoid the area, or travel carefully.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  2. present: Recipients are told to Use caution and avoid area.
  3. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "avoid area".
  4. present: It tells recipients to use caution and avoid the area.
  5. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  6. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "avoid area".
  7. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area, which are protective instructions.
  8. present: It instructs recipients to use caution and avoid the area.
  9. present: Recipients are told to "Use caution" and "avoid area", which are protective instructions.
  10. present: Recipients are instructed to use caution and avoid the area.
  11. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area, which are protective instructions to them.
  12. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "avoid area", which are protective actions.
  13. present: It instructs recipients to Use caution and avoid area.
  14. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "avoid area".
  15. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the area.
  16. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid area, which are protective instructions.
  17. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "avoid area".
  18. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "avoid area".
  19. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "avoid area".
  20. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "avoid area".
  21. present: Recipients are told to Use caution and avoid area.
  22. present: It instructs people to "Use caution" and "avoid area", which are protective actions.
  23. present: It instructs recipients to use caution and avoid the area.
  24. present: It instructs people to "Use caution" and "avoid area".
  25. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "avoid area".
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time absent. No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  2. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  5. absent: The message has no clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  7. absent: The text has no clock time, date, or recency word such as now, immediately, or ongoing.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately is given.
  9. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency word such as now, immediately, or ongoing.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or today appears.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately is given.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other when or recency phrase appears.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent. Naming the crime or closing operations does not state a consequence for people or property.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Robbery no weapon names the crime type only and does not state injury, danger, or other harm.
  2. absent: NO WEAPON describes the crime type, not harm or severity such as injury or danger to people.
  3. absent: "NO WEAPON" describes how the robbery occurred, not harm or severity to people or property.
  4. absent: Saying no weapon describes the crime type, not harm or severity such as injury or danger.
  5. absent: NO WEAPON describes how the robbery was done, not injuries, danger, or other consequences.
  6. absent: It does not state harm or severity, and "NO WEAPON" describes the crime not consequences to people.
  7. absent: No weapon classifies the crime but does not state harm or severity to people or property.
  8. absent: Naming an unarmed robbery does not say what harm it could cause or how serious it is.
  9. absent: "NO WEAPON" describes the crime, not harm or severity to people or property, and no other consequence is stated.
  10. absent: Naming a robbery, even "NO WEAPON", does not state consequences or severity such as injury or danger.
  11. absent: No injuries, danger, or other harm is stated, and saying the robbery involved no weapon does not describe consequences.
  12. absent: It does not state consequences or severity; "NO WEAPON" describes the crime, not harm to people or property.
  13. absent: Robbery is named without stating what it could do to people or property, and NO WEAPON is a hazard detail not a consequence.
  14. absent: Robbery is named, including no weapon, but no harm, injury, or severity is stated.
  15. absent: The text does not state consequences or severity such as injury, danger, or what the robbery could do.
  16. absent: It does not state injuries, danger, or other harm, only the crime type and that there was no weapon.
  17. absent: "NO WEAPON" describes the offense, not harm or severity to people or property.
  18. absent: Naming an unarmed robbery does not state what harm it could cause to people or property.
  19. absent: "NO WEAPON" characterizes the crime but does not state harm, injury, or severity.
  20. absent: "NO WEAPON" describes the offense, not harm or severity to people or property.
  21. absent: NO WEAPON details the crime, not harm or severity for people or property.
  22. absent: No harm or severity is stated; "NO WEAPON" describes the offense, not injury or damage.
  23. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond naming the robbery, and no weapon does not describe harm.
  24. absent: Robbery is named but no consequence or severity, such as injury or danger, is stated.
  25. absent: Robbery is named, including that there was no weapon, but no harm or severity to people or property is stated.