Arrests in antisemitic poster investigation on River Campus

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The letter opens "Dear University Community" and speaks for the institution, crediting "DPS investigators" with collecting the evidence.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The letter is from University leadership and references "DPS investigators" conducting the inquiry.
  2. present: The letter is addressed from the University leadership and cites "DPS investigators" handling the case.
  3. present: It is written from the University in the first person, citing "DPS investigators" and the institution.
  4. present: The letter speaks for the University and cites "DPS investigators" as its investigators.
  5. present: It is a letter from university leadership referencing "our University" and DPS investigators.
  6. present: The letter is written from the University to the "University Community" and cites its own DPS investigators.
  7. present: The letter is from University leadership and cites "DPS investigators" handling the case.
  8. present: It is a letter to the University Community citing "our investigation" and DPS investigators, so the university is the sender.
  9. present: The letter comes from a University leader and references "DPS investigators" and the institution.
  10. present: Written to the "University Community" by an official who speaks of "our DPS investigators" and university action.
  11. present: It is a letter to the "University Community" referencing "our" DPS investigators and the University.
  12. present: The letter is from University leadership and references "DPS investigators" and the University.
  13. present: It is a signed letter from University leadership citing "DPS investigators" and local law enforcement.
  14. present: The letter comes from University leadership and cites "DPS investigators" as its investigators.
  15. present: The letter speaks for "the University" and credits "DPS investigators" with the inquiry.
  16. present: It is a letter from University leadership referencing "our DPS investigators."
  17. present: It is a letter from University leadership referencing "our" DPS investigators.
  18. present: The letter speaks for "the University" and cites its own "DPS investigators".
  19. present: It is written to the University Community by an official citing DPS investigators and the University.
  20. present: The letter speaks for "the University" and cites its "DPS investigators".
  21. present: Written to the University Community by an administrator citing "DPS investigators" and the University.
  22. present: The letter is written on behalf of the University and cites "DPS investigators" and law enforcement partners.
  23. present: The letter is from University leadership and cites "DPS investigators" and the institution itself.
  24. present: The letter comes from the University leadership and references its own DPS investigators.
  25. present: It addresses "Dear University Community" from university leadership and credits "DPS investigators".
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. It names the conduct precisely: distributing the antisemitic "Wanted" posters, with four individuals "charged with felony criminal mischief".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names a specific incident: distributing antisemitic "Wanted" posters, charged as felony criminal mischief.
  2. present: It describes distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters and felony criminal mischief targeting Jewish community members.
  3. present: The named threat is distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters treated as criminal conduct.
  4. present: It names the threat conduct: distributing antisemitic "Wanted" posters charged as felony criminal mischief.
  5. present: It describes distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters and felony criminal mischief, a specific incident.
  6. present: It names the distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters and felony criminal mischief as the specific conduct.
  7. present: It describes distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters charged as felony criminal mischief.
  8. present: The named incident is distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters leading to felony criminal mischief charges.
  9. present: It specifies distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters charged as felony criminal mischief.
  10. present: The threat described is distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters charged as felony criminal mischief.
  11. present: It names distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters charged as felony criminal mischief.
  12. present: It describes distributing antisemitic "Wanted" posters, a specific targeted incident and felony charges.
  13. present: The named harm is distributing antisemitic "Wanted" posters, charged as felony criminal mischief.
  14. present: The named threat is the distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters treated as felony criminal mischief.
  15. present: It names the distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters and felony criminal mischief.
  16. present: It concerns distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters and related felony criminal mischief.
  17. present: It describes antisemitic "Wanted" posters and felony criminal mischief on campus.
  18. present: It describes distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters treated as felony criminal mischief targeting community members.
  19. present: The incident is distribution of antisemitic Wanted posters, later charged as felony criminal mischief.
  20. present: It describes distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters treated as felony criminal mischief.
  21. present: The threat described is the distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters, a specific targeted act.
  22. present: It identifies the distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters and felony criminal mischief as the incident.
  23. present: It names the specific offense: antisemitic "Wanted" posters and felony criminal mischief.
  24. present: It describes antisemitic "Wanted" posters and felony criminal mischief targeting Jewish community members.
  25. present: It describes the distribution of antisemitic "Wanted" posters and felony criminal mischief, a specific bias incident.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The posters were distributed "around River Campus", and the letter adds that the incident "took place on our campus".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The posters were placed "around River Campus", a named campus location.
  2. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", a named campus location.
  3. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus" and in classrooms and facilities.
  4. present: The incident occurred "around River Campus" and "on our campus".
  5. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", a named campus area.
  6. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", a named campus location.
  7. present: The incident is placed "around River Campus" and on "our campus".
  8. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", a named place.
  9. present: The incident is placed "around River Campus" and "on our campus".
  10. present: The posters were placed "around River Campus", a named campus location.
  11. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", a named campus area.
  12. present: The conduct is placed "around River Campus" and in classrooms and facilities.
  13. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus" and on "our campus".
  14. present: The posters were placed "around River Campus", a named campus area.
  15. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", a named campus location.
  16. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus."
  17. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus," a named campus area.
  18. present: The posters were placed "around River Campus", a named campus location.
  19. present: The posters were distributed around River Campus, on our campus.
  20. present: The posters were placed "around River Campus", a named campus area.
  21. present: Says the posters were distributed "around River Campus".
  22. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", a named location.
  23. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", a named campus location.
  24. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", an identified campus location.
  25. present: The posters were distributed "around River Campus", a named place.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Unanimous: the letter reports arrests, statutory duties and the hate crime evaluation, but never asks recipients to do anything protective.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing asks community members to take any protective action; it reports arrests and legal reasoning.
  2. absent: The letter reports arrests and legal reasoning but asks recipients to take no action at all.
  3. absent: No protective action is asked of readers; the letter reports arrests and reasoning.
  4. absent: It informs about arrests but gives readers no protective action to take.
  5. absent: The letter explains arrests and legal process but gives readers no protective action to take.
  6. absent: It reports arrests and legal reasoning but never asks readers to take any action.
  7. absent: The letter reports arrests and legal reasoning but asks recipients to take no action.
  8. absent: The letter reports arrests and legal reasoning but asks recipients to take no action.
  9. absent: It reports arrests and legal reasoning but asks recipients to take no action themselves.
  10. absent: It reports arrests and legal reasoning but gives readers no protective action to take.
  11. absent: The letter explains arrests and legal reasoning but asks recipients to do nothing.
  12. absent: The letter reports on arrests and law but asks recipients to take no action.
  13. absent: The letter explains arrests and legal reasoning but asks recipients to take no action.
  14. absent: No protective action or instruction of any kind is given to readers.
  15. absent: The message reports arrests and legal reasoning but asks recipients to take no action.
  16. absent: The letter reports arrests and legal reasoning but asks nothing of recipients.
  17. absent: The letter reports arrests but gives recipients no protective action to take.
  18. absent: It informs the community about arrests but never asks recipients to take any action.
  19. absent: The letter reports arrests and legal reasoning but asks readers to do nothing.
  20. absent: It informs the community about arrests but asks recipients to do nothing.
  21. absent: The letter reports arrests and legal reasoning but asks nothing of the reader.
  22. absent: The letter explains arrests and legal reasoning but asks nothing of readers.
  23. absent: The community letter gives readers no protective action to take.
  24. absent: The letter explains actions taken but asks nothing protective of readers.
  25. absent: The letter reports arrests and legal reasoning but asks nothing of recipients.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The first words, "Today, we began the arrests of four individuals", anchor the action to the day of sending.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  2. present: It begins "Today, we began the arrests", locating the events in the present day.
  3. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  4. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  5. present: It begins "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  6. present: It begins "Today, we began the arrests", fixing the events in the present day.
  7. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency cue.
  8. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency cue.
  9. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  10. present: It begins "Today, we began the arrests", anchoring the message to the current day.
  11. present: It begins "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  12. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  13. present: It says "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  14. present: It opens "Today, we began the arrests", placing the action in the present day.
  15. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  16. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests of four individuals."
  17. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests," a clear recency marker.
  18. present: It opens "Today, we began the arrests of four individuals", a clear recency marker.
  19. present: It opens with Today, we began the arrests, placing events in the present.
  20. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", establishing recency.
  21. present: Opens with "Today, we began the arrests of four individuals", a clear recency cue.
  22. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  23. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", establishing recency.
  24. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
  25. present: It opens with "Today, we began the arrests", a clear recency marker.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. It cites conduct that "recklessly or intentionally endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others in classrooms and other facilities".

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It describes conduct that "recklessly or intentionally endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".
  2. present: It cites conduct that "recklessly or intentionally endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".
  3. present: It describes conduct that "endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".
  4. present: It cites conduct that "recklessly or intentionally endangers mental or physical health" and intimidates people.
  5. present: It cites conduct that "endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".
  6. present: It describes conduct that "endangers mental or physical health" and was "intimidating to others" in classrooms.
  7. present: It cites conduct that "endangers mental or physical health" and was "intimidating to others".
  8. present: It describes conduct that "recklessly or intentionally endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".
  9. present: It calls the incident "deeply disturbing" and "intimidating", endangering members' mental or physical health.
  10. present: It calls the incident "deeply disturbing" and intimidating, citing conduct that endangers mental or physical health.
  11. present: It describes conduct "intimidating to others" that "endangers mental or physical health" of community members.
  12. present: It cites conduct that "endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".
  13. present: It cites conduct that "recklessly or intentionally endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".
  14. present: It describes conduct that "endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".
  15. present: It calls the conduct "intimidating to others" and cites conduct endangering mental or physical health.
  16. present: It describes conduct that "endangers mental or physical health" and is intimidating to community members.
  17. present: It calls the conduct "intimidating to others" and cites endangerment of mental or physical health.
  18. present: It calls the incident "deeply disturbing" and "intimidating to others", conduct endangering mental or physical health.
  19. present: It calls the conduct deeply disturbing and intimidating and cites endangerment of mental or physical health.
  20. present: It calls the incident "deeply disturbing" and intimidating, endangering members' mental or physical health.
  21. present: Describes conduct that "recklessly or intentionally endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".
  22. present: It describes conduct that is "intimidating to others" and that "endangers mental or physical health".
  23. present: It describes conduct that "recklessly or intentionally endangers mental or physical health" and intimidates others.
  24. present: It calls the conduct "intimidating to others" and cites conduct that "endangers mental or physical health".
  25. present: It cites conduct that "recklessly or intentionally endangers mental or physical health" and is "intimidating to others".