Police activity at 28th Street and University Avenue

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent19/25

  Final assessment

  19 of 25 passes marked Source present. Police activity names the responding authority. Six passes wanted a branded signature and voted absent.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names "police" as the responding authority even though no alert brand appears.
  2. present: The text names "police" as the agency involved in the activity, identifying a responding authority.
  3. present: It identifies "police" as the responding authority through "police activity", though no branded signature appears.
  4. present: "Police" names the responding authority in the phrase "police activity".
  5. absent: No sender, brand, or issuing agency is identified, and "police activity" only labels the event.
  6. present: Naming "police" identifies the responding agency even without a branded signature.
  7. absent: No alert brand, college name, or issuing office appears, and "police activity" only describes the event.
  8. absent: "Police activity" describes the scene but does not name the sender or issuing authority.
  9. present: The text names "police" as the authority involved in the activity.
  10. present: The phrase "police activity" names police, a responding authority.
  11. present: It names "police" in "police activity", which identifies the responding agency.
  12. present: The phrase "police activity" names police as the responding authority.
  13. absent: No brand, college name, or issuing agency appears; "police activity" describes the event, not the sender.
  14. present: Naming "police" identifies the agency tied to the activity, a responding authority.
  15. present: The phrase "police activity" names police as the responding authority.
  16. absent: "Police activity" describes the event and does not name a sender, an alert brand, or an issuing authority.
  17. present: The phrase "police activity" names police as the responding authority.
  18. present: Naming "police" identifies the responding agency involved in the activity.
  19. present: The message names "police" as the responding authority on scene.
  20. present: The message names "police" as the responding authority through "police activity".
  21. present: "Police activity" names police as the responding authority.
  22. present: The message names "police" as the agency active at the scene, identifying the responding authority.
  23. absent: Nothing names the sender; "police activity" describes the event rather than an issuing authority.
  24. present: The phrase "police activity" names police as the responding authority.
  25. present: The phrase "police activity" names police as the responding authority.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked Hazard present. Police activity does not name a specific threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: "Police activity" is only a generic label and does not name the specific threat.
  2. absent: "Police activity" is generic and "no immediate threat exists" names no specific hazard.
  3. absent: "Police activity" is generic and "no immediate threat exists" does not name a specific hazard.
  4. absent: "Police activity" does not name a specific threat such as a crime, weapon, or fire.
  5. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat such as a crime or weapon.
  6. absent: "Police activity" does not name a specific threat such as a crime, fire, or weapon.
  7. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat such as a crime, weapon, or fire.
  8. absent: "Police activity" is not a specific threat, and the text names no hazard such as a crime or fire.
  9. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  10. absent: "Police activity" does not name a specific threat, and the text says no threat exists.
  11. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat such as a crime or weapon.
  12. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat such as shots, a weapon, or a crime.
  13. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat such as a crime or weapon.
  14. absent: "Police activity" is not a specific threat, and the text adds that "no immediate threat exists".
  15. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat, and the text says no threat exists.
  16. absent: "Police activity" is generic like an incident, and no specific threat such as a crime or weapon is named.
  17. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat such as a crime or weapon.
  18. absent: "Police activity" is generic, and no specific crime, weapon, or other threat is named.
  19. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat such as shots, a weapon, or a crime.
  20. absent: "Police activity" does not name a specific threat, and the text says no threat exists.
  21. absent: "Police activity" does not name a specific threat, and "no immediate threat exists" denies one.
  22. absent: "Police activity" does not name a specific threat, and the text says "no immediate threat exists".
  23. absent: "Police activity" is generic and names no specific crime, weapon, or other threat.
  24. absent: "Police activity" is not a specific threat, and no crime or other hazard is named.
  25. absent: "Police activity" is generic and does not name a specific threat such as a crime or weapon.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present. The text gives 28th St. and University Ave., at UPC.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives the place as "28th St. and University Ave., at UPC" and also says "the area".
  2. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC".
  3. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and the place "UPC".
  4. present: The activity is placed at "28th St. and University Ave." and at "UPC".
  5. present: It locates the activity "at 28th St. and University Ave., at UPC."
  6. present: The location is the intersection of "28th St. and University Ave." at "UPC".
  7. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and the campus label "UPC".
  8. present: It gives the streets "28th St. and University Ave." and the campus place "UPC".
  9. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC".
  10. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC".
  11. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and the place "UPC".
  12. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC".
  13. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave., at UPC".
  14. present: It gives the place as "28th St. and University Ave." and "at UPC".
  15. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC".
  16. present: It locates the activity at "28th St. and University Ave." and at "UPC".
  17. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC".
  18. present: It locates the activity at "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC."
  19. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC".
  20. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC".
  21. present: It locates the activity at "28th St. and University Ave., at UPC".
  22. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and the place "UPC".
  23. present: The place is "28th St. and University Ave., at UPC," plus "the area."
  24. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and names "UPC".
  25. present: It gives the intersection "28th St. and University Ave." and "UPC."
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance present. It says please stay away from the area.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Please stay away from the area" is a direct protective instruction.
  2. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area", a protective instruction.
  3. present: It instructs recipients to "stay away from the area".
  4. present: "Please stay away from the area" is a protective instruction to recipients.
  5. present: "Please stay away from the area" is a direct protective instruction.
  6. present: "Please stay away from the area" is a direct protective instruction.
  7. present: It instructs recipients to "stay away from the area", which is a protective action.
  8. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area", a protective instruction.
  9. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area", a protective instruction.
  10. present: It instructs recipients to "stay away from the area".
  11. present: It instructs people to "stay away from the area".
  12. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area".
  13. present: It instructs recipients to "stay away from the area".
  14. present: It instructs people to "stay away from the area".
  15. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area".
  16. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area", a clear protective instruction.
  17. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area".
  18. present: It instructs recipients to "stay away from the area."
  19. present: It instructs recipients to "stay away from the area".
  20. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area".
  21. present: "Please stay away from the area" is a protective instruction.
  22. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area", which is a protective instruction.
  23. present: "Please stay away from the area" is an instruction to recipients.
  24. present: It instructs recipients to "stay away from the area".
  25. present: It tells recipients to "stay away from the area."
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked Time present. There is no clock, date, or recency cue such as now or until further notice.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The phrase "no immediate threat" describes threat level, not when the activity occurred, and no clock time or date appears.
  2. absent: The word "immediate" only modifies "threat" and no clock time, date, "now", or "until further notice" is given.
  3. absent: "Immediate" in "no immediate threat" describes threat imminence, not a clock time, date, or recency cue.
  4. absent: "Immediate" describes threat imminence, not a clock time, date, or cue such as now or ongoing.
  5. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue appears, and "immediate" only qualifies the threat.
  6. absent: The message has no date, clock time, or recency word such as "now" or "today".
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears, and "immediate" only modifies the absent threat.
  8. absent: "Immediate" only describes the threat level, and no clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "until further notice" appears.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "until further notice" appears.
  11. absent: "No immediate threat" describes threat level, not a clock time, date, or cue such as "now" or "ongoing".
  12. absent: The word "immediate" only describes threat level, and no date, clock time, or cue such as "now" appears.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "until further notice" appears.
  14. absent: "No immediate threat" speaks to severity, not a date, clock time, or cue such as "now" or "ongoing".
  15. absent: "No immediate threat" describes severity, not a clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now".
  16. absent: No date or clock time appears, and "immediate" only modifies threat rather than marking when the activity is happening.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "ongoing" appears.
  18. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as "now" or "until further notice" appears.
  19. absent: "Immediate" describes the threat level, not a clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "today".
  20. absent: "Immediate" in "no immediate threat" describes threat level, not a clock time, date, or recency cue.
  21. absent: The word "immediate" only qualifies the threat, and no clock time, date, or recency cue is given.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "until further notice" appears.
  23. absent: "Immediate" in "no immediate threat" rates seriousness, not when the activity happened.
  24. absent: "Immediate" in "no immediate threat" describes the threat, not a clock time, date, or recency cue.
  25. absent: "Immediate" only modifies threat level, and no clock time, date, or recency cue is given.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Impact present. The clause no immediate threat exists states the severity.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "No immediate threat exists" explicitly states the consequence level, which is that there is no threat.
  2. present: Saying "no immediate threat exists" states how serious the situation is.
  3. present: The clause "no immediate threat exists" states the severity, that people are not in immediate danger.
  4. present: "No immediate threat exists" states the severity by saying people are not in danger.
  5. present: "No immediate threat exists" states the severity by saying people are not in danger.
  6. present: "No immediate threat exists" states the severity: people are not facing an immediate danger.
  7. present: The words "no immediate threat exists" state the severity by saying people face no immediate danger.
  8. present: Saying "no immediate threat exists" states how serious the situation is.
  9. present: The phrase "no immediate threat exists" states the severity of the situation.
  10. present: "No immediate threat exists" states the severity: there is no threat to people.
  11. present: The clause "no immediate threat exists" states the severity, namely that there is no immediate danger.
  12. present: It states the severity directly: "no immediate threat exists".
  13. present: The clause "no immediate threat exists" states how serious the situation is.
  14. present: It conveys severity by stating that "no immediate threat exists".
  15. present: "No immediate threat exists" states the severity: people are not in immediate danger.
  16. present: The words "no immediate threat exists" state the severity: people are not in danger.
  17. present: It states the severity directly with "no immediate threat exists".
  18. present: "No immediate threat exists" states the severity of the situation for recipients.
  19. present: The phrase "no immediate threat exists" states how serious the situation is.
  20. present: The clause "no immediate threat exists" states the severity as none.
  21. present: "No immediate threat exists" states the current severity for people.
  22. present: The clause "no immediate threat exists" states the severity, namely that there is no immediate danger.
  23. present: "No immediate threat exists" states the severity by saying people are not in danger.
  24. present: "No immediate threat exists" states the severity, specifically that no threat is present.
  25. present: It states severity by saying "no immediate threat exists."