Armed robbery at business near NE 42nd St & University Way NE

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "Seattle police" are named as the agency investigating the robbery and as the ones who "have concluded a search for the suspects".

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Seattle police" are named as the agency investigating and concluding the search.
  2. present: It attributes the response to "Seattle police", a named law enforcement agency.
  3. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating and concluding the search.
  4. present: "Seattle police" are named as the investigating and searching agency.
  5. present: Seattle police are named as investigating and concluding the search.
  6. present: "Seattle police" are named as the agency investigating and concluding the search.
  7. present: "Seattle police" are named as the agency investigating and clearing the scene.
  8. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating and concluding the search.
  9. present: "Seattle police" are identified as investigating and conducting the search.
  10. present: It attributes the response to "Seattle police", a named law enforcement agency.
  11. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating and concluding the search.
  12. present: It attributes the response to "Seattle police" investigating and concluding the search.
  13. present: It attributes the response to "Seattle police" investigating the robbery.
  14. present: "Seattle police" are named as the investigating and searching authority.
  15. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating and concluding the search.
  16. present: Seattle police are named as the investigating agency in both segments.
  17. present: "Seattle police" are named as the investigating and searching authority.
  18. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating and as concluding the search.
  19. present: Seattle police are named as investigating and concluding the search.
  20. present: It attributes the response to "Seattle police", a named law enforcement agency.
  21. present: Attributes the response to "Seattle police", a named law enforcement agency.
  22. present: "Seattle police" are named as the agency investigating and concluding the search.
  23. present: "Seattle police" are named as the agency investigating and searching.
  24. present: Seattle police are named as investigating and concluding the search.
  25. present: It attributes the investigation and search to "Seattle police", a named agency.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The threat is specific, "an armed robbery at a restaurant" in which "Two men entered the business and displayed weapons before fleeing on foot".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The threat is specific: "an armed robbery at a restaurant" where two men "displayed weapons".
  2. present: The threat is "an armed robbery at a restaurant" where two men "displayed weapons".
  3. present: The hazard is "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with suspects who "displayed weapons".
  4. present: The hazard is "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with suspects who "displayed weapons".
  5. present: The hazard is an "armed robbery at a restaurant" with suspects who "displayed weapons".
  6. present: An "armed robbery at a restaurant" with suspects who "displayed weapons" is the stated threat.
  7. present: The threat is stated as "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with weapons displayed.
  8. present: The hazard is "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with suspects who "displayed weapons".
  9. present: The hazard is "an armed robbery" where two men "displayed weapons".
  10. present: The hazard is "an armed robbery at a restaurant" by two men who displayed weapons.
  11. present: It reports "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with suspects who "displayed weapons".
  12. present: The named crime is "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with weapons displayed.
  13. present: The hazard is stated as "an armed robbery at a restaurant", with weapons displayed.
  14. present: It reports "an armed robbery" in which two men "displayed weapons".
  15. present: It reports "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with men who "displayed weapons".
  16. present: It reports "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with weapons displayed.
  17. present: It reports "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with weapons displayed.
  18. present: It names "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with two men who "displayed weapons".
  19. present: An armed robbery at a restaurant, with weapons displayed, is the specific threat.
  20. present: It reports "an armed robbery at a restaurant", a specific violent crime.
  21. present: Reports "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with two men who "displayed weapons".
  22. present: It reports "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with suspects who "displayed weapons".
  23. present: The hazard is "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with suspects who displayed weapons.
  24. present: It reports "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with two men who "displayed weapons".
  25. present: It reports "an armed robbery at a restaurant" with two men who "displayed weapons".
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The location is given twice as "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE", a named intersection beside campus.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It is located "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  2. present: It is located "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  3. present: It is placed "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  4. present: It is located "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  5. present: It is located "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  6. present: It locates the robbery "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  7. present: It is located "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  8. present: It is located "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  9. present: It is placed at a restaurant "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  10. present: The location is "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE", a specific intersection.
  11. present: The scene is "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  12. present: It places the robbery "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  13. present: It is located "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  14. present: The scene is a restaurant "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  15. present: The robbery is placed "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  16. present: The location is "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE."
  17. present: The scene is "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE."
  18. present: The location is "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  19. present: It locates the robbery near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE.
  20. present: The scene is "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  21. present: Gives the location as "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  22. present: The scene is "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  23. present: It places the robbery "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  24. present: The location is "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
  25. present: The location is "near NE 42nd Street and University Way NE".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The original post tells recipients "Please avoid the area", and the update lifts it with "The scene is considered secure. All clear."

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs readers to "Please avoid the area".
  2. present: The original post instructs readers to "Please avoid the area".
  3. present: Readers are told "Please avoid the area".
  4. present: Readers are told "Please avoid the area".
  5. present: Readers are told "Please avoid the area".
  6. present: It instructs the community to "Please avoid the area".
  7. present: The original post tells readers "Please avoid the area".
  8. present: Recipients are told "Please avoid the area".
  9. present: Recipients are told "Please avoid the area".
  10. present: Recipients are told "Please avoid the area" while the search continues.
  11. present: It tells readers "Please avoid the area" until the update declares the scene secure.
  12. present: It instructs readers to "Please avoid the area" while the search is underway.
  13. present: Readers are told "Please avoid the area", a protective instruction.
  14. present: Readers are instructed to "Please avoid the area".
  15. present: It instructs readers, "Please avoid the area".
  16. present: The original post instructs readers to "Please avoid the area."
  17. present: It instructs readers to "Please avoid the area."
  18. present: The original post tells readers "Please avoid the area".
  19. present: The text tells readers to please avoid the area.
  20. present: The original post instructs readers "Please avoid the area".
  21. present: Instructs recipients "Please avoid the area".
  22. present: Readers are instructed "Please avoid the area".
  23. present: It instructs readers to "Please avoid the area".
  24. present: It instructs readers "Please avoid the area".
  25. present: It tells readers "Please avoid the area" while the suspects are outstanding.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The update carries a clock time, "UPDATE at 12:55am", marking when the search concluded.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The update is stamped "12:55am", giving a clock time.
  2. present: The update carries the clock time "at 12:55am".
  3. present: The update carries a clock stamp, "UPDATE at 12:55am".
  4. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am", giving a clock reference.
  5. present: The update is timestamped "at 12:55am" and the original post precedes it.
  6. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am", establishing recency.
  7. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am", giving a clock time.
  8. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am", giving the timing.
  9. present: The update carries the time stamp "at 12:55am".
  10. present: The update is timestamped "12:55am", giving a clock reference.
  11. present: The update is timed "at 12:55am", giving recency.
  12. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am", giving a clock time.
  13. present: The update is stamped "UPDATE at 12:55am" and says the scene is now secure.
  14. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am", a clock time.
  15. present: The update is stamped "12:55am", giving a clock time.
  16. present: The update is stamped "12:55am" and the search is described as concluded.
  17. present: The update is timestamped "12:55am."
  18. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am", giving a clock time.
  19. present: The update carries a clock stamp of 12:55am.
  20. present: It is stamped "UPDATE at 12:55am" marking the recency of the all clear.
  21. present: Includes an "UPDATE at 12:55am" timestamp for the conclusion of the search.
  22. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am", giving a clock time.
  23. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am" and the scene declared secure then.
  24. present: The update is stamped "12:55am" and the robbery described as under investigation.
  25. present: The update is stamped "at 12:55am", a clock time.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Unanimous, and correct: the text reports weapons displayed and suspects fleeing but never states any injury, harm, or how dangerous the suspects are to the community.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity is stated; no injuries or danger to the public are described.
  2. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm to the community accompanies the robbery report.
  3. absent: No statement of injury, danger, or severity accompanies the robbery description.
  4. absent: No harm, injury, or severity is described, only that suspects fled.
  5. absent: No injury, danger level, or potential harm to the community is stated.
  6. absent: No sentence describes potential injury or how dangerous the armed suspects might be.
  7. absent: No statement of injury, danger or severity accompanies the report of the robbery.
  8. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm accompanies the robbery report.
  9. absent: No injury, danger, or severity is described, and the scene is called secure.
  10. absent: It notes weapons were displayed but states no injury, danger, or severity for the community.
  11. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm to the community is made.
  12. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm appears; the suspects fled on foot.
  13. absent: Beyond saying weapons were displayed, it states no injury, danger or severity.
  14. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm to the community is given.
  15. absent: It names the crime but states no injury, danger level, or consequence to the community.
  16. absent: It notes weapons were displayed but states no injury, danger level or potential harm.
  17. absent: Beyond weapons being displayed, no injury or danger consequence is stated.
  18. absent: No injury, danger level or potential consequence is stated, and the scene is called secure.
  19. absent: Beyond noting weapons were displayed, no harm or danger to the community is stated.
  20. absent: It notes suspects "displayed weapons" but states no injury, danger or severity outright.
  21. absent: Notes weapons were displayed but never states the harm or danger posed to the community.
  22. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm to the community is offered.
  23. absent: Beyond noting weapons were displayed, it states no injury, danger level, or consequence.
  24. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm to the community accompanies the report.
  25. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm to the community accompanies the robbery report.